independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > IS ULTIMATE PRINCE REALLY A REMASTER??
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 03/26/06 5:00pm

kevin1

IS ULTIMATE PRINCE REALLY A REMASTER??

I looked on the packaging for the ultimate prince cd but it did not say the songs were remastered. I would think this would be a real selling point to tell buyers the cd set was with remastered songs. To those of you calling this a remastered cd set....where did you see this that this set was remastered?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 03/26/06 5:03pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

A remasterbator.
All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 03/26/06 8:24pm

8up

avatar

I listened to it and it didn't really sound remastered. Maybe a little louder, but that's it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 03/26/06 8:32pm

ufoclub

avatar

I have listened to some bootleg files of it, and it sounded exactly the same in tone, depth, and clarity. Maybe just louder, like someone hit "normalize". But I have not done a wave display comparison in a sound editing program. That would tell you immediately.

I fear it might not have been remastered.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 03/26/06 9:18pm

Bfunkthe1

avatar

What I've heard doesn't sound that much different. Just louder and a little cleaner.
Fantasy is reality in the world today. But I'll keep hangin in there, that is the only way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 03/26/06 9:19pm

Bfunkthe1

avatar

But still great nontheless. cool
Fantasy is reality in the world today. But I'll keep hangin in there, that is the only way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 03/26/06 9:26pm

Sdldawn

nah, from what i've heard its not remastered.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 03/26/06 10:53pm

metalorange

avatar

The only chance I've had to hear it is some downloaded mp3s, in good quality though.

Personally, there's nothing I can't hear in these that I couldn't hear in the originals. Except occasionally the voice sounds a bit echoey - is that what remastering is, making the voice echoey?!

You have to ask yourself, what were you expecting? Personally, I was thinking the vocals might be a bit sharper on some of the older tracks, but they don't sound much different.

At least vinyl only releases like Raspberry and She's Always are now available in a completely non-staticky version.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 03/26/06 11:32pm

sarkozy2007

avatar

IT HAS BEEN REMASTERED. Full stop.
" Je serai toujours de retour bande de mods à la con de mes deux " Moi - 2007
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 03/26/06 11:34pm

sarkozy2007

avatar

...For christ's sake, Tangerine who has been working on it for ages has explained to us all how it had been remastered and all !!!
" Je serai toujours de retour bande de mods à la con de mes deux " Moi - 2007
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 03/27/06 12:06am

Rogue588

avatar

2freaky4church1 said:

A remasterbator.

lol

sarkozy2007 said:

...For christ's sake, Tangerine who has been working on it for ages has explained to us all how it had been remastered and all !!!

Yeah, huh. It's funny how these "rumors" get started..
• Did you first think Prince was gay? •

Wendy: He’s a girl, for sure, but he’s not gay. He looked at me like a gay woman would look at another woman. Lisa: Totally. He’s like a fancy lesbian.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 03/27/06 3:29am

sarkozy2007

avatar

Rogue588 said:

2freaky4church1 said:

A remasterbator.

lol

sarkozy2007 said:

...For christ's sake, Tangerine who has been working on it for ages has explained to us all how it had been remastered and all !!!

Yeah, huh. It's funny how these "rumors" get started..


Tangerine has given the evidence he has worked on this stuff. With the attitude of some poeple here real insiders who are constantly laughed at here will not bother anymore to give their info on the org.
Tangerine has been far too kind to share his info with us. Next time he should keep'em for himself.
" Je serai toujours de retour bande de mods à la con de mes deux " Moi - 2007
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 03/27/06 3:36am

metalorange

avatar

Tangerine also said that once the tracklisting was finalised, it would only take a half-day to do the remastering.

To me, that sounded like nothing more than putting the original tracks through come computer filters, rather than getting the dozens of original tapes out and re-digitising and working to get the sound clearer and balance better. But what do I know, I just thought the process would take longer and require more care.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 03/27/06 3:50am

NouveauDance

avatar

metalorange said:

Tangerine also said that once the tracklisting was finalised, it would only take a half-day to do the remastering.

To me, that sounded like nothing more than putting the original tracks through come computer filters, rather than getting the dozens of original tapes out and re-digitising and working to get the sound clearer and balance better. But what do I know, I just thought the process would take longer and require more care.


nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 03/27/06 5:27am

Sdldawn

NouveauDance said:

metalorange said:

Tangerine also said that once the tracklisting was finalised, it would only take a half-day to do the remastering.

To me, that sounded like nothing more than putting the original tracks through come computer filters, rather than getting the dozens of original tapes out and re-digitising and working to get the sound clearer and balance better. But what do I know, I just thought the process would take longer and require more care.


nod


It usually does...

They are remastering the Genesis first albums right now, and its taken forever, due to Peter Gabriel wants some of the sounds to be uplifted... I know it takes more than a half day to do.. lol

true remastering at least
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 03/27/06 5:46am

TheAStarr

avatar

All the songs on Ultimate certainly sound better than they used to (for the most part), but I do think it was a quick "no frills" job.

Some have hinted at legal issues that limit how much they can tweak the sound.
But that may or may not be true.

There are two types of remastering efforts... The simple kind takes a day and boost volume, possibly reduces some noise, perhaps widens the stereo some, etc.

Then there is the type that takes sometimes months... theres always the crazy "we had to bake the tapes and then only had one shot to transfer them before they disintigrated!!" Artists are sometimes more involved with these efforts. There can be EQ changes all around, and it can turn into something much better than it ever could have been 20 years ago. (Or it could be complete crap that fans dissaprove of).

Its obvious that Ultimate Prince is closer to the former. I think some of the better sound quality is due to better studio technology. I think Tangerine confirmed that the masters (and some saftey masters) were used. Transfering songs off of a master tape for a CD release will obviously sound signifigantly better than it did in 1989. I suspect it's the better transfer + volume + little tweaks for Ultimate Prince.

If T17 happens to stop by this thread I would love to know exactly what went into the process, the filter types (if any), why some things were/were not done, etc.

I suspect there are quite a few audiophiles on the org who would enjoy a breakdown of the whole thing.

Yeah, I'm a nerd, and I love it. geek
[Edited 3/27/06 5:48am]
Starrfighter
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 03/27/06 6:18am

Rebeljuice

To be a proper remaster it would require Prince’s input and his permission.

Somehow I don’t think Prince would just hand over the 8 separate trax (or however many it may be) which make up Purple Rain or Raspberry Beret to some WB producer/engineer. That would be asking said producer/engineer to bring his own artistic taste to the final remastered mix! And its highly unlikely Prince would entertain WB with his time and effort to do it himself.

WB have probably taken the songs in their entirety and had them normalised and tweaked. But it would have been done on the whole song and not individual elements of the songs.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 03/27/06 8:26am

ufoclub

avatar

is there a link to Tangerine's posts?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 03/27/06 8:41am

SquirrelMeat

avatar

sarkozy2007 said:

Rogue588 said:


Yeah, huh. It's funny how these "rumors" get started..


Tangerine has given the evidence he has worked on this stuff. With the attitude of some poeple here real insiders who are constantly laughed at here will not bother anymore to give their info on the org.
Tangerine has been far too kind to share his info with us. Next time he should keep'em for himself.


You are assuming everyone agrees with the information that is given out. Do you believe in Santa too? wink

Tangerine gave some good info on the artwork. But much of the rest was hearsay and guesswork.

It is very strange that the cover or sticker make no reference to remastering. I don't think there has ever been a remastered cut which doesn't advertise so.

Besides, do you really believe Prince decided to let WB remaster some tracks, but not others, then block the project anyway?

I'm not saying it is or it isn't. Some stores were certainly advertising it as remastered. Whichever way we look at it, its either badly remastered, or not remastered at all.

We should be careful with rumour as people end up believing it.
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 03/27/06 12:14pm

sarkozy2007

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

sarkozy2007 said:



Tangerine has given the evidence he has worked on this stuff. With the attitude of some poeple here real insiders who are constantly laughed at here will not bother anymore to give their info on the org.
Tangerine has been far too kind to share his info with us. Next time he should keep'em for himself.


You are assuming everyone agrees with the information that is given out. Do you believe in Santa too? wink

Tangerine gave some good info on the artwork. But much of the rest was hearsay and guesswork.

It is very strange that the cover or sticker make no reference to remastering. I don't think there has ever been a remastered cut which doesn't advertise so.

Besides, do you really believe Prince decided to let WB remaster some tracks, but not others, then block the project anyway?

I'm not saying it is or it isn't. Some stores were certainly advertising it as remastered. Whichever way we look at it, its either badly remastered, or not remastered at all.

We should be careful with rumour as people end up believing it.



For fuck's sake there are not rumours. he was aware of every fucking detail day after day. he has explained who he has worked with throughout the years with amazing details.
But no, there are still people like you to put the descredit on people like him who are too kind to share their info with us.
Next time i advise tangerine to keep his mouth shut as orgers like you are so ungraceful.
It has been remastered but there are several ways of doing it. You can spend 10 months in the studio to work every fucking single sound like on some Bowie's stuff or Gabriel's stuff or you can remaster by cleaning and clearing the sound (that's what has been done for Ultimate) and it takes half a day per tune.
" Je serai toujours de retour bande de mods à la con de mes deux " Moi - 2007
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 03/27/06 12:18pm

Justin1972UK

It's just louder.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 03/27/06 1:07pm

metalorange

avatar

sarkozy2007 said:


It has been remastered but there are several ways of doing it. You can spend 10 months in the studio to work every fucking single sound like on some Bowie's stuff or Gabriel's stuff or you can remaster by cleaning and clearing the sound (that's what has been done for Ultimate) and it takes half a day per tune.


Sorry, but the half day thing sounds half-arsed. When you hear the phrase 'remaster' you expect the 10 month thing, and that's what is really needed on Prince's 70s/80s albums. Anything else is just a cop-out for Warners to earn some easy money.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 03/27/06 1:14pm

rainbowchild

avatar

I wouldn't know as I haven't heard it yet..
"Just like the sun, the Rainbow Children rise."



"We had fun, didn't we?"
-Prince (1958-2016) 4ever in my life
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 03/27/06 2:00pm

Sdldawn

lol This thing has NOT been remastered.. I dont care what tangerine or even prince said it...


Its just louder.. thats it folks.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 03/27/06 2:25pm

BorisFishpaw

avatar

Actually it HAS been remastered.

I think a lot of people misunderstand the term 'remastered' and confuse it with
'remixing'. Mastering is the final stage where the final stereo mix is
transfered to CD/Vinyl/cassette/whatever. This is where the already mixed 2 track
master is tweaked to give the optimum balance and quality. The source material
for 'mastering' and 'remastering' is the final 2 track stereo mix.

If you go back to the original 24 track masters and 'reamaster' it from there,
this is actually technically a 'remixing' not a 'remastering'.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 03/27/06 2:35pm

Universaluv

So after all this time it's just an unimpressive remaster. nice confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 03/27/06 3:18pm

metalorange

avatar

BorisFishpaw said:

Actually it HAS been remastered.

I think a lot of people misunderstand the term 'remastered' and confuse it with
'remixing'. Mastering is the final stage where the final stereo mix is
transfered to CD/Vinyl/cassette/whatever. This is where the already mixed 2 track
master is tweaked to give the optimum balance and quality. The source material
for 'mastering' and 'remastering' is the final 2 track stereo mix.

If you go back to the original 24 track masters and 'reamaster' it from there,
this is actually technically a 'remixing' not a 'remastering'.


So did Led Zeppelin and all those other 'remasters' get the full job or just a volume tweak like this? I think in the average joe's mind a 'remaster' is when the music has been rebuilt from scratch, otherwise it's practically just a re-release.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 03/27/06 3:44pm

ufoclub

avatar

metalorange said:

BorisFishpaw said:

Actually it HAS been remastered.

I think a lot of people misunderstand the term 'remastered' and confuse it with
'remixing'. Mastering is the final stage where the final stereo mix is
transfered to CD/Vinyl/cassette/whatever. This is where the already mixed 2 track
master is tweaked to give the optimum balance and quality. The source material
for 'mastering' and 'remastering' is the final 2 track stereo mix.

If you go back to the original 24 track masters and 'reamaster' it from there,
this is actually technically a 'remixing' not a 'remastering'.


So did Led Zeppelin and all those other 'remasters' get the full job or just a volume tweak like this? I think in the average joe's mind a 'remaster' is when the music has been rebuilt from scratch, otherwise it's practically just a re-release.


There is a dramatic difference in the Led Zepplin stuff, that is what I would have hoped for with the Prince stuff. Micheal Jackson's also sounds good (Thriller, Off The Wall...)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 03/27/06 4:19pm

jpav

avatar

SquirrelMeat said:

sarkozy2007 said:



Tangerine has given the evidence he has worked on this stuff. With the attitude of some poeple here real insiders who are constantly laughed at here will not bother anymore to give their info on the org.
Tangerine has been far too kind to share his info with us. Next time he should keep'em for himself.


You are assuming everyone agrees with the information that is given out. Do you believe in Santa too? wink

Tangerine gave some good info on the artwork. But much of the rest was hearsay and guesswork.

It is very strange that the cover or sticker make no reference to remastering. I don't think there has ever been a remastered cut which doesn't advertise so.

Besides, do you really believe Prince decided to let WB remaster some tracks, but not others, then block the project anyway?

I'm not saying it is or it isn't. Some stores were certainly advertising it as remastered. Whichever way we look at it, its either badly remastered, or not remastered at all.

We should be careful with rumour as people end up believing it.


You have no idea what you are talking about... Tangerine has given us the full scoop on this every step of the way.

Puh-leeze!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 03/27/06 4:36pm

starr

It's advertised as being remastered:
Ultimate Prince [Remaster] [TBA]-CD-Prince SKU: 7696451
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 3 123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > IS ULTIMATE PRINCE REALLY A REMASTER??