superspaceboy said:

no, but at the very least, i HOPE it's a hoax. i've seen fake covers that look better than that mess.

Anxiety said:

It's a lot better than the Terence Trent D'Arby cover!

andyman91 said:

for which album? wildcard? that wasn't a great cover, but just because it was generic. it was a nice photograph, and it did the job for a self-released/internet/whateveryacallit kind of release. i haven't seen the cover of that vampyre album thinger yet.

Now this is scary (i wish it was a fake)!!

arron said:

1.

2.

3.

he looks HORRIBLE!!! and he's not a bad looking man! that's just a bad photograph with shitty lighting!

and the design....sheesh.

maybe he took the pic and designed it himself.

still:

omg...how low-budget can ya get????

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

SANANDA...buddy...I've bought every one of your albums, I've downloaded stuff from your site, I love you madly - GIVE ME A CALL AND I'LL DESIGN YOUR NEXT ALBUM FOR FREE.

i don't have a damn bit of experience under my belt, but the compilation CDs i make for my friends look better than that, seriously. come on. let me hook you up with my mad nero 5.0 template design skillz.

BTW I could be wrong but it seems to me that nobody has reported this hoax at HQ. Like if only org members had been contacted via email. Would be a joke coming from someone at HQ ?

I love conspiracy theories !

It's like they only had one picture left on the roll of film and had to use it for the album cover, good or bad.

BeautifulFrance said:

i'm doubting it.

Anxiety said:

FOR FREE, i said!

Anxiety said:

it's like he just took a picture of himself, saved it on the computer, opened up microsoft paint and put text on it.

Anxiety said:

I also love Sananda's stuff - a great musician!

But that cover - is it comedy???

If that is what independence looks like, I will never say a bad word about record labels again!!!

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

i kinda like my stoney jackson artwork better.

a trusty contact has confirmed that prince has indeed recorded with the revolution and have finished their new album, "OMFG!!!", due later this year.

as a top secret org exclusive, we have obtained the cover art:





again anxy gets the inside scoop! thank me later!

Anxiety said:

mspaint is teh sexxxxx!!!!

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

it's not mspaint! shut your mouth! it's prince's new custom highly-exclusive design software, PURPLEAXXXE PRO 69.0!!!11!!

Anxiety said:

oh yeah, yeah, i forgot...uh, i meant omgz this r00000lz!!!!1111one!

Handclapsfingasnapz said:

this is his most puzzling cover since ATWIAD!!! i wonder what the "hi" symbolizes??? that probably means mani is pregnant!!!

Anxiety said:

or maybe...maybe he really was jamie starr all along!

Anxiety said:

And the fact that his head is on its side - like he's sleeping... OMG, THIS MUST BE HIS LAST ALBUM EVER!!!

booyah said:

NOOOOO!!!!

That is so a fake..
the REAL cover looks like THIS....

BorisFishpaw said:

this one's always gotta make with the oneupsmanship.

Anxiety said:

Is that Dook?


M

BorisFishpaw said:

go, boris!!!!

So,has this indeed been confirmed as a hoax?
I don't understand why some of you seem so threatened by this cover?
I have seen worse.much worse than this one.
Suppose we wait for some confirmation before we start tearing this down.
If this turns out to be for real,a few of you are going to have to eat alot of crow.
just saying.

Tibet said:

may as well. since when has the npgmc sent out e-mails with an sbcglobal e-mail address?

at any rate:

From - Fri Oct 07 17:48:11 2005
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: GmailId106ccef1fc5e301d
X-Mozilla-Status: 0400
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000
X-Gmail-Received: 5b70c53e7a92a5eb14adf3daff6f25d95f4ee450
Delivered-To: [e-mail addy was here]
Received: by 10.65.51.10 with SMTP id d10cs169qbk;
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr657493nzd;
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received: from web80706.mail.yahoo.com (web80706.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.170.63])
by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id 34si1857260nza.2005.10.07.14.14.14;
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 66.163.170.63 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of npgonline@sbcglobal.net)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: (qmail 95091 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Oct 2005 21:14:13 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=6srl0/Y2SzKnkJQ1xiX5RRVnmHvBDd6ni3DV1Pv5Km+PflsRIckZyG2KImA9ZKFxcDs4ujiY2cQFU/iXbAqmEtTp06wtLbYekrxh2nla+g3FyUjaXj7IrBFHcP/EJ8ZgcpiEpiLF/AWgZiTTnqa9QrbxK7XNAZV2SwBRnELUjRU= ;
Message-ID:
Received: from [68.72.174.226] by web80706.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:14:13 PDT
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: npg operator
To: [e-mail addy was here]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1931232965-1128719653=:94717"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

--0-1931232965-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-43813702-1128719653=:94717"

--0-43813702-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


--0-43813702-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



--0-43813702-1128719653=:94717--
--0-1931232965-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: image/pjpeg; name="3121 promo.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: 2980262162-3121 promo.jpg
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="3121 promo.jpg"

...yeah. genuine shit, yo.






cuz j00 a1n't 133t 3d1t
[Edited 10/7/05 15:55pm]

I'm really surprised that folks still want a reunion of The Revolution. I don't see P drifting back into the 80's. I think he would see that as a failure, to some degree. P knows his "glory years" was from that movie. Simply by reforming "The Revolution" could off the vibe that he's attempting to regain past glories. I don't think P wants to be perceived that way. He wants his current output to survive on it's own merrit.

Handclapsfingasnapz said:[quote]

Tibet said:

may as well. since when has the npgmc sent out e-mails with an sbcglobal e-mail address?

at any rate:

From - Fri Oct 07 17:48:11 2005
X-Account-Key: account2
X-UIDL: GmailId106ccef1fc5e301d
X-Mozilla-Status: 0400
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000
X-Gmail-Received: 5b70c53e7a92a5eb14adf3daff6f25d95f4ee450
Delivered-To: [e-mail addy was here]
Received: by 10.65.51.10 with SMTP id d10cs169qbk;
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.139.17 with SMTP id m17mr657493nzd;
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received: from web80706.mail.yahoo.com (web80706.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.170.63])
by mx.gmail.com with SMTP id 34si1857260nza.2005.10.07.14.14.14;
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 66.163.170.63 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of npgonline@sbcglobal.net)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: (qmail 95091 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Oct 2005 21:14:13 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net;
h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
b=6srl0/Y2SzKnkJQ1xiX5RRVnmHvBDd6ni3DV1Pv5Km+PflsRIckZyG2KImA9ZKFxcDs4ujiY2cQFU/iXbAqmEtTp06wtLbYekrxh2nla+g3FyUjaXj7IrBFHcP/EJ8ZgcpiEpiLF/AWgZiTTnqa9QrbxK7XNAZV2SwBRnELUjRU= ;
Message-ID:
Received: from [68.72.174.226] by web80706.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 14:14:13 PDT
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: npg operator
To: [e-mail addy was here]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1931232965-1128719653=:94717"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

--0-1931232965-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-43813702-1128719653=:94717"

--0-43813702-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


--0-43813702-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



--0-43813702-1128719653=:94717--
--0-1931232965-1128719653=:94717
Content-Type: image/pjpeg; name="3121 promo.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: 2980262162-3121 promo.jpg
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="3121 promo.jpg"

...yeah. genuine shit, yo.






cuz j00 a1n't 133t 3d1t
[Edited 10/7/05 15:55pm]
[/quote


have no clue as to what all of those numbers mean.
still not sure this is a hoax!
I will wait for either npgmc or sony to confirm or deny before I just write
this off as a hoax.
sometimes we are a bit too jaded here,i'm afraid