XxAxX said: but wait, among the various erroneous assumptions you made about me there's one i challenge: i do NOT support anyone's 'right' to go door to door. in fact, as i've said many times, that is not a 'right'.
i believe this so strongly that when asked i refused to telemarket or knock on doors to support john kerry's campaign, even though i'd give my life to see him win this election. There is no law against it. So what would you call it if it's not a right? Freedom of religion includes the right to discuss it with others. Anyone who chooses to go door to door can do so legally (ask the Girl Scouts, window salesmen, and all those kids in your neighborhood with bagfulls of candy in their rooms ). Plus, I didn't make any assumptions about you. I responded to what YOU stated! You said Prince has a burning hatred for white people. I explained why I feel that is a ridiculous idea. You said that Prince referring to himself as a slave to WB was silly. I pointed out that it's not for us to say because we aren't the ones who went through it. Where's the generalization on my part??? I stand by what I said about Lincoln. He obviously didn't have much experience in dealing with minorities as a youth, so like many others during that time, he didn't see them as equals. So even if his view did not come from a malicious or hateful place, it's still racist to think that another group of folks is inferior. As far as Prince goes, you should know that he doesn't have a burning hatred for white people. If he did, I'd think that you would have boycotted his albums, tours and websites by now. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TheOrgerFormerlyKnownAs said: I am probably the only person who can't stand that song.
you ain't alone. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stunning work. I applaud you...LOUDLY! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
nah its pants..mostly because I get the feeling that Pfrince is grasping at straws for something to be controversial about....but thats just my opinion and no doubt one that will be shouted down.
Its as if he was trying to out do Spike Lee for the day in the most paranoid stakes | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpledoveuk said: nah its pants..mostly because I get the feeling that Pfrince is grasping at straws for something to be controversial about....but thats just my opinion and no doubt one that will be shouted down.
Its as if he was trying to out do Spike Lee for the day in the most paranoid stakes It's not hard to outdo Spike Lee. He's not smart enough to write something like 'Avalanche' . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
His intentions of fighting the South did NOT lie with abolishing slavery, but to save the Union. Even though Lincoln died in April of 1865, the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery was not instituted until eight months later, nearly three years from his "slave freeing" Emancipation Proclamation.
That doesn't change the fact that Lincoln wrote the 13th amendment and was the one responsible for getting it through congress. You say that, just like Prince signs it, to imply that Lincoln did nothing to free the slaves. There would be no 13th amendment without Lincoln yet you give him no credit at all for it because some lunatic shot him for his beliefs. Do you give MLK Jr any credit for civil rights advances that he started but which were not ultimately accomplished until after he was shot? Again, Linclon said [b]"I am naturally anti-slavery," he wrote. "If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel."
The 13th amendment is Lincoln's legacy. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
alandail said: The 13th amendment is Lincoln's legacy.
You're right, and it probably always will be. That doesn't mean that someone like Prince can't point out all the facts regarding the situation, rather than just pointing out the things that make Lincoln look like a hero. If MLK did shady things, they should be pointed out too. They're all imperfect humans just like the rest of us. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theblueangel said: I don't think anyone is arguing that Lincoln was the one who got the 13th Amendment through Congress...I think Prince's point is that he didn't necessarily do it primarily for humanitarian reasons. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that while Lincoln did in fact advocate the freeing of slaves, he didn't exactly regard whites and blacks in the same category. In other words, he was a racist. Seems pretty simple to me, but what do I know?
Pretty simple. Exactly the point of the entire lyrical view of this song. Musically and vocally this is indeed one of Prince's most amazing achievements of the last decade, if not last two decades. But I wish I could turn off the way I listen to songs; the lyrics are to me a huge part of a song's appeal to me. And that's where this song to me misses the mark. Sure, I realise Prince probably wrote the entire song around the word's "Abraham Lincoln was a racist" as much as "we could fuck until the dawn" was created just for shock purposes. My problem is that Prince's view on history is tainted by his lessons in the Jehova Witness cult. The lyrics to a song like Family Name are as racist as he claims Abe Lincoln was. I will not say he was not. In the eyes of modern day knowledge he WAS. But then EVERY white was a racist through ignorance. It is easy to look back on history and see it through the glasses of the freedom we fought for, as a human race. Whenever I hear the album The Rainbow Children and songs like Avalanche, I hear the AGENDA Prince has...and sadly to say it is one of propaganda. [Edited 11/1/04 14:52pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alandail, I understand what you're saying, but I still think that the only point that the song makes in regard to Lincoln is that he was a racist. It's quite simple. OdysseyMiles quoted Lincoln saying the following:
:"I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality; and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I ... am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position."
Now regardless of what your other thoughts are on Lincoln or his legacy, how can you deny that the above statement is a racist one? I think that's the point Prince is making...that even this so-called freer of the slaves was in fact a racist by definition. No confusion, no tears. No enemies, no fear. No sorrow, no pain. No ball, no chain.
Sex is not love. Love is not sex. Putting words in other people's mouths will only get you elected. Need more sleep than coke or methamphetamine. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: alandail said: The 13th amendment is Lincoln's legacy.
You're right, and it probably always will be. That doesn't mean that someone like Prince can't point out all the facts regarding the situation, rather than just pointing out the things that make Lincoln look like a hero. If MLK did shady things, they should be pointed out too. They're all imperfect humans just like the rest of us. point out all of the facts? They lyrics say He was not or never had been in favor
of setting r people free if it wasn't 4 the 13th Amendment we woulda been born in slavery which clearly implies Lincoln had nothing to do with the 13th amendment when he in fact wrote it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theblueangel said: Now regardless of what your other thoughts are on Lincoln or his legacy, how can you deny that the above statement is a racist one? I think that's the point Prince is making...that even this so-called freer of the slaves was in fact a racist by definition.
He wasn't a "so-called" freer of the slaves. As author of the 13th amendment he was in fact the freer of the slaves. While he clearly wasn't perfect, you can't deny that he was instrumental in ending slavery. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Not only that, Prince then says:
Abraham Lincoln was a racist who said
"U cannot escape from history" And here is the context where Lincoln said that: Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and this administration, will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass, will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation. We say we are for the Union. The world will not forget that we say this. We know how to save the Union. The world knows we do know how to save it. We -- even we here -- hold the power, and bear the responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free -- honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth. Other means may succeed; this could not fail. The way is plain, peaceful, generous, just -- a way which, if followed, the world will forever applaud, and God must forever bless.
Lincoln is saying that while making his case for the end of slavery in front of congress. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: XxAxX said: but wait, among the various erroneous assumptions you made about me there's one i challenge: i do NOT support anyone's 'right' to go door to door. in fact, as i've said many times, that is not a 'right'.
i believe this so strongly that when asked i refused to telemarket or knock on doors to support john kerry's campaign, even though i'd give my life to see him win this election. There is no law against it. So what would you call it if it's not a right? Freedom of religion includes the right to discuss it with others. Anyone who chooses to go door to door can do so legally (ask the Girl Scouts, window salesmen, and all those kids in your neighborhood with bagfulls of candy in their rooms ). Plus, I didn't make any assumptions about you. I responded to what YOU stated! You said Prince has a burning hatred for white people. I explained why I feel that is a ridiculous idea. You said that Prince referring to himself as a slave to WB was silly. I pointed out that it's not for us to say because we aren't the ones who went through it. Where's the generalization on my part??? I stand by what I said about Lincoln. He obviously didn't have much experience in dealing with minorities as a youth, so like many others during that time, he didn't see them as equals. So even if his view did not come from a malicious or hateful place, it's still racist to think that another group of folks is inferior. As far as Prince goes, you should know that he doesn't have a burning hatred for white people. If he did, I'd think that you would have boycotted his albums, tours and websites by now. ok. you're right i overstated that. i think he has a burning anger toward white people and accompanying 'system' of oppression that's been coloring his work lately. this is the impression, feeling, taste i get. and it turns me off because i don't think anger will change the world. it has its place, but anger begets more anger. hate begets more hate. only love can engender more love. obviously i'm not a perfect human being and i never claimed to be. i'm speaking from the perspective of someone who's listened to his music over the years (since the beginning) and learned a lot from hearing his point of view. but i don't dig the recent stuff so much. i just feel he does an equal amount of harm as good when he attacks someone like lincoln. [Edited 11/1/04 16:14pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |