independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Associated artists & people > Wendy is at it again..
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 14 « First<34567891011>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 05/17/17 9:40am

paulludvig

To be fair - in a recent interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hX8ihoV2qE) Wendy states categorically that she didn't have a hand in writing the song SOTT. But...

.

I know I'm not supposed to be critical of Wendy around these parts, but come on! I can't be the only one who thinks that Wendy is at least suggesting she had more to do with SOTT than she really did:

.

Wendy: "The Sign O the Times record was... Lisa and I were given a lot of tracks. He was very busy doing a million things again and we were given tapes of general ideas and..go and finish this, go and finish that, go do that. Sign o the Times the song. Nothing to do with. That's him. But we did a lot of work on that record."

Bobby Z: "Beautiful Night and there was a lot of stuff that..."

Wendy: "Yeah, a lot of stuff. Strange Relationship. I mean there was a lot."

The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 05/17/17 5:54pm

GuyBros

avatar

paulludvig said:

To be fair - in a recent interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hX8ihoV2qE) Wendy states categorically that she didn't have a hand in writing the song SOTT. But...

.

I know I'm not supposed to be critical of Wendy around these parts, but come on! I can't be the only one who thinks that Wendy is at least suggesting she had more to do with SOTT than she really did:

.

Wendy: "The Sign O the Times record was... Lisa and I were given a lot of tracks. He was very busy doing a million things again and we were given tapes of general ideas and..go and finish this, go and finish that, go do that. Sign o the Times the song. Nothing to do with. That's him. But we did a lot of work on that record."

Bobby Z: "Beautiful Night and there was a lot of stuff that..."

Wendy: "Yeah, a lot of stuff. Strange Relationship. I mean there was a lot."

Wait wait, so she claims that Prince gave her and Lisa items to finish (fact), and she also cites specific works they worked on (fact), and she also clearly identifies that the title track she didn't work on (fact).

So what's your issue then?

That's she's suggesting more?

Nope, you tried it.

Because the the very least Bobby is also agreeing with the breadth of the work they worked on ("there was a lot of stuff" ≠ "we worked on only a few tracks"). Unless you're going to start going in on Bobby.

She's not suggesting: she's outright stating that there was a lot they worked on. And Bobby is agreeing with her.

So... if we're into facts, what is factually inacurrate?

water coffee

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 05/17/17 10:52pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

paulludvig said:

In a recent interview Wendy is asked what songs the Revolution will play on their upcoming tour. Her answer: "We will perform the catalog that belongs to our band. Everything from “I Would Die 4 U” to “Sign ‘O’ the Times.”" So now she implies that she had a hand in writing SOTT. [Edited 4/8/17 7:20am]


1. Wendy & Lisa were musically involved in Strange Relationship.

2. The Revolution & Shelia E. were involved in It's Gonna Be A Beautiful Night.

Both of those tracks are on the SOTT album. So yes, Wendy was right for mentioning SOTT.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 05/18/17 1:39am

paulludvig

GuyBros said:



paulludvig said:


To be fair - in a recent interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hX8ihoV2qE) Wendy states categorically that she didn't have a hand in writing the song SOTT. But...


.


I know I'm not supposed to be critical of Wendy around these parts, but come on! I can't be the only one who thinks that Wendy is at least suggesting she had more to do with SOTT than she really did:


.


Wendy: "The Sign O the Times record was... Lisa and I were given a lot of tracks. He was very busy doing a million things again and we were given tapes of general ideas and..go and finish this, go and finish that, go do that. Sign o the Times the song. Nothing to do with. That's him. But we did a lot of work on that record."


Bobby Z: "Beautiful Night and there was a lot of stuff that..."


Wendy: "Yeah, a lot of stuff. Strange Relationship. I mean there was a lot."




Wait wait, so she claims that Prince gave her and Lisa items to finish (fact), and she also cites specific works they worked on (fact), and she also clearly identifies that the title track she didn't work on (fact).



So what's your issue then?



That's she's suggesting more?



Nope, you tried it.



Because the the very least Bobby is also agreeing with the breadth of the work they worked on ("there was a lot of stuff" ≠ "we worked on only a few tracks"). Unless you're going to start going in on Bobby.



She's not suggesting: she's outright stating that there was a lot they worked on. And Bobby is agreeing with her.



So... if we're into facts, what is factually inacurrate?



water coffee



So after hearing her statements, would you think she only plays on three songs? Or would you think she worked on more?
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 05/18/17 1:43am

GuyBros

avatar

paulludvig said:

GuyBros said:

Wait wait, so she claims that Prince gave her and Lisa items to finish (fact), and she also cites specific works they worked on (fact), and she also clearly identifies that the title track she didn't work on (fact).

So what's your issue then?

That's she's suggesting more?

Nope, you tried it.

Because the the very least Bobby is also agreeing with the breadth of the work they worked on ("there was a lot of stuff" ≠ "we worked on only a few tracks"). Unless you're going to start going in on Bobby.

She's not suggesting: she's outright stating that there was a lot they worked on. And Bobby is agreeing with her.

So... if we're into facts, what is factually inacurrate?

water coffee

So after hearing her statements, would you think she only plays on three songs? Or would you think she worked on more?

I think it's that it's probably true considering her corroboration from Bobby Z (especially when Bobby says "a lot of stuff" which is not limited to "three songs") and others that Prince had in fact utilized them and worked on those specific tracks and more with them.

What is factually innacurate again?

[Edited 5/18/17 1:45am]

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 05/18/17 1:45am

paulludvig

TonyVanDam said:



paulludvig said:


In a recent interview Wendy is asked what songs the Revolution will play on their upcoming tour. Her answer: "We will perform the catalog that belongs to our band. Everything from “I Would Die 4 U” to “Sign ‘O’ the Times.”" So now she implies that she had a hand in writing SOTT. [Edited 4/8/17 7:20am]


1. Wendy & Lisa were musically involved in Strange Relationship.



2. The Revolution & Shelia E. were involved in It's Gonna Be A Beautiful Night.

Both of those tracks are on the SOTT album. So yes, Wendy was right for mentioning SOTT.




She's suggesting they did more.
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 05/18/17 1:46am

GuyBros

avatar

paulludvig said:

TonyVanDam said:


1. Wendy & Lisa were musically involved in Strange Relationship.

2. The Revolution & Shelia E. were involved in It's Gonna Be A Beautiful Night.

Both of those tracks are on the SOTT album. So yes, Wendy was right for mentioning SOTT.


She's suggesting they did more.

Nope.

She's not suggesting: she's outright stating that there was a lot they worked on. And Bobby is agreeing with her.

So... if we're into facts, what is factually inacurrate?

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 05/18/17 1:51am

paulludvig

GuyBros said:



paulludvig said:


GuyBros said:



Wait wait, so she claims that Prince gave her and Lisa items to finish (fact), and she also cites specific works they worked on (fact), and she also clearly identifies that the title track she didn't work on (fact).



So what's your issue then?



That's she's suggesting more?



Nope, you tried it.



Because the the very least Bobby is also agreeing with the breadth of the work they worked on ("there was a lot of stuff" ≠ "we worked on only a few tracks"). Unless you're going to start going in on Bobby.



She's not suggesting: she's outright stating that there was a lot they worked on. And Bobby is agreeing with her.



So... if we're into facts, what is factually inacurrate?



water coffee



So after hearing her statements, would you think she only plays on three songs? Or would you think she worked on more?

I think it's that it's probably true considering her corroboration from Bobby Z (especially when Bobby says "a lot of stuff" which is not limited to "three songs") and others that Prince had in fact utilized them and worked on those specific tracks and more with them.



What is factually innacurate again?

[Edited 5/18/17 1:45am]



Technically she's not wrong. They did work on tracks around that time (just not the songs that ended up on the album). And she did work on Strange Relationship and Beautiful Night. But listening to this interview would make you think she did more work that ended up on the album. By the way, she cuts off Bobby when he is about to go into spesifics.
[Edited 5/18/17 1:52am]
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 05/18/17 1:54am

GuyBros

avatar

paulludvig said:

she's not wrong.

Cool!

Goodnight!

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 05/18/17 1:59am

paulludvig

GuyBros said:



paulludvig said:


she's not wrong.

Cool!



Goodnight!



Of course she's wrong if she's outright stating she did more work on SOTT than the three songs we know about. I'm trying to give her the benefit of the doubt here.
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 05/18/17 2:02am

GuyBros

avatar

GuyBros said:

paulludvig said:

she's not wrong.

Cool!

Goodnight!

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 05/18/17 7:18am

paulludvig

GuyBros said:



GuyBros said:




paulludvig said:


she's not wrong.

Cool!



Goodnight!





If she said she did more on SOTT than work on those three songs, and you seem to think that she did, then she's wrong. I would even go as far as saying she's lying to the fans.
Not cool!
Goodnight!
Goodnight
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 05/18/17 11:11am

GuyBros

avatar

paulludvig said:

she's not wrong.

Cool!

Goodnight!

[Edited 5/18/17 11:12am]

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 05/18/17 12:11pm

XxAxX

avatar

I will take Wendy's word over the loudest outcry from fans. Wendy was actually there. Not everyone objecting to her claims was even in the same geographic state at the time but she was actually in the room, so she has the most credibility imo
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 05/18/17 12:27pm

paulludvig

XxAxX said:

I will take Wendy's word over the loudest outcry from fans. Wendy was actually there. Not everyone objecting to her claims was even in the same geographic state at the time but she was actually in the room, so she has the most credibility imo


She is not objective. And not truthful. In the past she has been vague enough to avoid being caught lying. Not this time I'm afraid. Next time she makes outlandish claims like these I hope that the interviewer asks some follow up questions. Like "can you be specific, which songs did you work on?" Then we can check her claims using documents and other evidence.
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 05/18/17 12:28pm

paulludvig

GuyBros said:




paulludvig said:


she's wrong.

Cool!



Goodnight!



[Edited 5/18/17 11:12am]




Cool!
Goodnight!
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 05/18/17 1:48pm

GuyBros

avatar

XxAxX said:

I will take Wendy's word over the loudest outcry from fans. Wendy was actually there. Not everyone objecting to her claims was even in the same geographic state at the time but she was actually in the room, so she has the most credibility imo

And also Bobby Z who is agreeing with her and says ""Beautiful Night and there was a lot of stuff"

So even if you doubt her credibility, as paullvidig has stated:

she's not wrong.

And we have corroboration from another Revolution member who notes that there was a lot of stuff worked on by them.

Some of ya'll is so THIRSTY though!

coffee

water

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 05/18/17 1:57pm

paulludvig

GuyBros said:



XxAxX said:


I will take Wendy's word over the loudest outcry from fans. Wendy was actually there. Not everyone objecting to her claims was even in the same geographic state at the time but she was actually in the room, so she has the most credibility imo

And also Bobby Z who is agreeing with her and says ""Beautiful Night and there was a lot of stuff"



So even if you doubt her credibility, as paullvidig has stated:




she's not wrong.




And we have corroboration from another Revolution member who notes that there was a lot of stuff worked on by them.



Some of ya'll is so THIRSTY though!



coffee


water



Wendy cuts him off when he is about to go into spesifics. So Bobby mentions Beautiful Night and Wendy mentions Strange Relationship. They are both right about that. The rest is inuendo at best. Lies at worst. I guess it depends on your definition of 'a lot of stuff'. Three songs = a lot of stuff? Not to me,but perhaps to Wendy.
The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 05/18/17 2:03pm

Reciprocity

The Revolution are trying to take credit for the genius that was Prince.

I cannot believe people are allowing that.

Prince was a genius-

They had years to have their own genius and need to stop trying to act as if Prince was not who he was- his music is his.

This is why I am glad he got rid of them. I imagine them taking credit for anything that came out while they were a band.

Prince got rid of them for good reason.

He had to know they were trying to own his genius.

It is sickening.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 05/18/17 2:34pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

Reciprocity said:

The Revolution are trying to take credit for the genius that was Prince.

I cannot believe people are allowing that.

Prince was a genius-

They had years to have their own genius and need to stop trying to act as if Prince was not who he was- his music is his.

This is why I am glad he got rid of them. I imagine them taking credit for anything that came out while they were a band.

Prince got rid of them for good reason.

He had to know they were trying to own his genius.

It is sickening.

sensless post backed up by no facts

barf and u know it

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 05/18/17 3:03pm

GuyBros

avatar

paulludvig said:

Not to me,but perhaps to Wendy.

It's only lies if it's lies. And right now, you've already stated she's not wrong.

At the very least Bobby Z also agrees that the amount of input they had was on "a lot of stuff."

But as it stands right now

paulludvig said:

she's not wrong

I think we agree!

water water

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 05/18/17 3:20pm

purplerabbitho
le

As if you are not going to biased yourself. Look at your moniker.

What matters is what Wendy means by 'lots of stuff". She could be full of shit or she could be talking about songs from their Dream Factory recordings that were done prior to the Revolution breaking up and that he supposedly scrapped. My understanding was always that they were given responsibilities to add color and arrangement and instrumental parts (from loose ideas of his) to songs he had come up with but that once the Revolution disbanded, he removed their contributions and redid the songs.

She needs to be more specific however. If she and Lisa basically were the arrangers and co-writers on all these dinky little songs he loosely came up with that were eventually and officially on the Sign of the Times album except the Sign of The Times song itself, I would think that that degree of collaboration would have been brought up much earlier. In fact, I would think that they would have sued him a long time ago.

The fact of the matter is that someone who is capable of doing the brilliant song SOTT is certainly capable of writing and arranging "She's Got the Look" all by himself as well.

What about Susan Rogers, his engineer? She basically states how autocratic Prince was with his music all the time. She was there up to that point and has nothing to gain from lying or alluding to more credit.

GuyBros said:

paulludvig said:

Not to me,but perhaps to Wendy.

It's only lies if it's lies. And right now, you've already stated she's not wrong.

At the very least Bobby Z also agrees that the amount of input they had was on "a lot of stuff."

But as it stands right now

paulludvig said:

she's not wrong

I think we agree!

water water

[Edited 5/18/17 15:23pm]

[Edited 5/18/17 15:31pm]

[Edited 5/18/17 15:35pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 05/18/17 3:49pm

paulludvig

GuyBros said:

But as it stands right now

paulludvig said:

she's wrong

I think we agree!

Cool!

Goodnight!

The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 05/18/17 3:54pm

paulludvig

purplerabbithole said:

As if you are not going to biased yourself. Look at your moniker.

What matters is what Wendy means by 'lots of stuff". She could be full of shit or she could be talking about songs from their Dream Factory recordings that were done prior to the Revolution breaking up and that he supposedly scrapped. My understanding was always that they were given responsibilities to add color and arrangement and instrumental parts (from loose ideas of his) to songs he had come up with but that once the Revolution disbanded, he removed their contributions and redid the songs.

She needs to be more specific however. If she and Lisa basically were the arrangers and co-writers on all these dinky little songs he loosely came up with that were eventually and officially on the Sign of the Times album except the Sign of The Times song itself, I would think that that degree of collaboration would have been brought up much earlier. In fact, I would think that they would have sued him a long time ago.

The fact of the matter is that someone who is capable of doing the brilliant song SOTT is certainly capable of writing and arranging "She's Got the Look" all by himself as well.

What about Susan Rogers, his engineer? She basically states how autocratic Prince was with his music all the time. She was there up to that point and has nothing to gain from lying or alluding to more credit.

As to the second option - this has been the excuse made for her in the past, that she's talking about music recorded around the same time, but not necessarily music that ended up on SOTT. But this time it's difficult to interpret her statement as anything but an attempt to take credit for the music that was actually released on SOTT.

The wooh is on the one!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 05/18/17 3:59pm

GuyBros

avatar

purplerabbithole said:

As if you are not going to biased yourself. Look at your moniker.

Girl, you're late. Go back to page 5 where I tell ya'll to check out the screenname AND avatar. Yeah, I love me some Prince. And that doesn't stop me from appreciating other artists too.

The difference here is: I don't pretend to be unbiased.

Some people claim to be. And you can see them changing their responses to fit their narrative.

coffee

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 05/18/17 4:05pm

purplerabbitho
le

In her defense, she could be talking about instrumentation originally added to strange Relationship by her and Lisa that was removed once he recorded it for the SOTT album.

Her vagueness is kind of a crappy move. Bobby Z might have been alluding to Dream Factory etc and she cut him either to avoid getting off track too much or to reclaim their contributions to those songs that Prince later removed. Like saying "I did all that work based on his arrangement ideas and he removed him anyhow. But I still have a right to be given credit for the work that directly or indirectly led to this album."

paulludvig said:

purplerabbithole said:

As if you are not going to biased yourself. Look at your moniker.

What matters is what Wendy means by 'lots of stuff". She could be full of shit or she could be talking about songs from their Dream Factory recordings that were done prior to the Revolution breaking up and that he supposedly scrapped. My understanding was always that they were given responsibilities to add color and arrangement and instrumental parts (from loose ideas of his) to songs he had come up with but that once the Revolution disbanded, he removed their contributions and redid the songs.

She needs to be more specific however. If she and Lisa basically were the arrangers and co-writers on all these dinky little songs he loosely came up with that were eventually and officially on the Sign of the Times album except the Sign of The Times song itself, I would think that that degree of collaboration would have been brought up much earlier. In fact, I would think that they would have sued him a long time ago.

The fact of the matter is that someone who is capable of doing the brilliant song SOTT is certainly capable of writing and arranging "She's Got the Look" all by himself as well.

What about Susan Rogers, his engineer? She basically states how autocratic Prince was with his music all the time. She was there up to that point and has nothing to gain from lying or alluding to more credit.

As to the second option - this has been the excuse made for her in the past, that she's talking about music recorded around the same time, but not necessarily music that ended up on SOTT. But this time it's difficult to interpret her statement as anything but an attempt to take credit for the music that was actually released on SOTT.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #206 posted 05/18/17 4:07pm

purplerabbitho
le

I don't pretend to be unbiased either. But I would not go on a Wendy and Lisa site and strictly focus on how Prince wrote SOTT (the song), When Doves Cry, Darling Nikki, Beautiful ones, nearly the entirety of 1999, his first two albums, most of Controversy/Dirty Mind (Lisa was there and must have contributed some) and 20 years of underrated (albeit inconsistent) post WB music, without them... Even Lisa admitted that Prince composed, performed and recorded that song(Strange Way) for her in 2-3 hours all by himself.

GuyBros said:

purplerabbithole said:

As if you are not going to biased yourself. Look at your moniker.

Girl, you're late. Go back to page 5 where I tell ya'll to check out the screenname AND avatar. Yeah, I love me some Prince. And that doesn't stop me from appreciating other artists too.

The difference here is: I don't pretend to be unbiased.

Some people claim to be. And you can see them changing their responses to fit their narrative.

coffee

[Edited 5/18/17 16:12pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #207 posted 05/18/17 4:09pm

GuyBros

avatar

purplerabbithole said:

she cut him either to avoid getting off track too much or to reclaim their contributions to those songs that Prince later removed.

water water water

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #208 posted 05/18/17 4:19pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

Image result for run away emoticon

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #209 posted 05/18/17 4:20pm

GuyBros

avatar

purplerabbithole said:

I don't pretend to be unbiased either. But I would not go on a Wendy and Lisa site and strictly focus on how Prince wrote SOTT (the song), When Doves Cry, Darling Nikki, nearly the entirety of 1999 without them...

GuyBros said:

Girl, you're late. Go back to page 5 where I tell ya'll to check out the screenname AND avatar. Yeah, I love me some Prince. And that doesn't stop me from appreciating other artists too.

The difference here is: I don't pretend to be unbiased.

Some people claim to be. And you can see them changing their responses to fit their narrative.

coffee

First of all: huh?

Second of all: That's a bad analogy. What I am NOT doing is claiming the ladies wrote nearly all of SOTT without Prince. And neither is Wendy or Bobby Z.

If you think that in this thread my fact checking those who have shown to have a history of attempting to twist a narrative is at all analagous to that, that's on you.

"I mean I always figured you were a trip at times, but now I'm beginning to believe you're a freaking vacation." -2elijah
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 14 « First<34567891011>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Associated artists & people > Wendy is at it again..