wonder505 said:

Yes we do. Metaphors are great at highlighting points. Its obviously way over your head. The FACTS are in Alan's entire statement and we responded to his statement. Just because it was negative, you getting your feelings hurt. The FACT is that Alan has not spoken to or dealt with Prince in 20 years, and because we called him out on it, you crying like a baby.

Again... when we're talking facts you don't need metaphors. It's just a way to divert the conversation away from the facts, because you made shit up and then got called in it.

and yes, I'm used to Prince getting criticism, he got mercilessly criticized here alive and in death. YOU need to get used to Alan getting called out cuz he aint getting spared.

Yeah, because Prince was all about vengeance wasn't he.

As I've already said, you're a keyboard warrior attempting to discredit someone because they made a comment you didn't like. Biographers and film makers will continue to reach out to Alan before they do you. Literally nothing you can do will change that.

[Edited 11/2/16 11:26am]

Noodled24 said:

wonder505 said:

Yeah, because Prince was all about vengeance wasn't he.

As I've already said, you're a keyboard warrior attempting to discredit someone because they made a comment you didn't like. Biographers and film makers will continue to reach out to Alan before they do you. Literally nothing you can do will change that.

[Edited 11/2/16 11:26am]

You sound so pathetic. A grown ass man like you?

Keyboard warrior? Attempting to discredit? vengeance?

All I did was post my opinion of Alan Leeds And you are SO HURT over it. Why are you so hurt?

Why would I think any biographer would come to me. You sound stupid. Like a little 10 yeargoing nay nay na nay na!

You poor thing. I will CONTINUE to call him out whether you like it or not so get ready to shed more tears since you're so hurt.

[Edited 11/2/16 11:51am]

wonder505 said:

Noodled24 said:

Yeah, because Prince was all about vengeance wasn't he.

As I've already said, you're a keyboard warrior attempting to discredit someone because they made a comment you didn't like. Biographers and film makers will continue to reach out to Alan before they do you. Literally nothing you can do will change that.

[Edited 11/2/16 11:26am]

You sound so pathetic. A grown ass man like you?

Keyboard warrior? Attempting to discredit? vengeance?

All I did was post my opinion of Alan Leeds And you are SO HURT over it. Why are you so hurt?

Why would I think any biographer would come to me. You sound stupid. Like a little 10 yeargoing nay nay na nay na!

You poor thing. I will CONTINUE to call him out whether you like it or not so get ready to shed more tears HURT ONE.

wow... and you had the nerve to call me childish.

Noodled24 said:

wonder505 said:

You sound so pathetic. A grown ass man like you?

Keyboard warrior? Attempting to discredit? vengeance?

All I did was post my opinion of Alan Leeds And you are SO HURT over it. Why are you so hurt?

Why would I think any biographer would come to me. You sound stupid. Like a little 10 yeargoing nay nay na nay na!

You poor thing. I will CONTINUE to call him out whether you like it or not so get ready to shed more tears HURT ONE.

wow... and you had the nerve to call me childish.

Well, Go back and read your post and ask yourself is it really that serious.

jaawwnn said:

Sure, if we can do more than discuss the semantics of who is responding to who.

We call it telling the truth where I come from....

Semantics has nothing to do with who is responding to whom. The definition of semantics is as follows.....

wonder505 said:

Noodled24 said:

wow... and you had the nerve to call me childish.

Well, Go back and read your post and ask yourself is it really that serious.

Just saw you making up quotes and called you on it.

Noodled24 said:

wonder505 said:

Well, Go back and read your post and ask yourself is it really that serious.

Just saw you making up quotes and called you on it.

For which I clarified, for which you keep bringing up cuz you cant debate key points. Only run away from them, with hurt feelings over Alan Leeds.

Any way, I'm done here. You can have the last word. Just be sure next time Alan opens his mouth on some unfair BS you gonna hear about it.

[Edited 11/2/16 12:59pm]

babynoz said:

jaawwnn said:

Sure, if we can do more than discuss the semantics of who is responding to who.

We call it telling the truth where I come from....

Semantics has nothing to do with who is responding to whom. The definition of semantics is as follows.....

se·man·tics

səˈman(t)iks/

noun

1. the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning.

   • the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text.

Can't believe they didn't include prince.org threads in their formal definition. I'll have to have a word with the lads over at dictionary dot com.

[Edited 11/2/16 13:11pm]

jaawwnn said:

babynoz said:

We call it telling the truth where I come from....

Semantics has nothing to do with who is responding to whom. The definition of semantics is as follows.....

se·man·tics

səˈman(t)iks/

noun

1. the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning.

   • the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text.

Can't believe they didn't include prince.org threads in their formal definition. I'll have to have a word with the lads over at dictionary dot com.

[Edited 11/2/16 13:11pm]

Keep dancing,

Search the org and you will find old topics of Alan Leeds the man himself.. on his account trashing Prince.. acting extremely unprofessional. I guess he couldn't get in contact with him sooo he went online to trash him. Keep that off the net.

Ok, there was a thread on the org titled "Alan Leeds explanation of being redacted from Prince's appreciation list"..one poster suggested Alan was redacted from the list and the list was made around 1999. There is a pic of the official appreciation list which includes (but is purposefully scratched off) Alan Leeds, but kept Eric Leeds on the list. There are aproximately 80 people in all on the list. I thought it was on the Julian auction being shown, but I can not seem to find the pic at the moment. If this tidbit has been posted already, my apologies.