independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > General Discussion > the JOKER
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 8 <12345678>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 10/16/19 5:34pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

rdhull said:

Yeah. They are buying GTA and rap music for 7 year olds rolleyes

You must live in Leave It To Beaver land. In certain areas in the city where I live there's kids under 10 in street gangs or selling drugs or their parents belong to gangs. I bet you can find videos of kids on Youtube doing rap songs. So you're saying they just happen to know the words to songs they don't have access to. They don't even have to buy the CDs, the songs are on the radio and anybody can see the videos on Youtube where they're not bleeped out like the radio versions.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 10/16/19 5:36pm

rdhull

avatar

lol @ people rationalizing taking a 7 year old to Joker

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 10/16/19 5:54pm

ufoclub

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

rdhull said:

I’m guessing most of those people who took a six or seven-year-old thought it was gonna be a regular comic book movie

It's R rated though and many parents have taken children to R movies for decades now. I haven't seen Joker but it can't be any more violent than the video games kids play like Grand Theft Auto & Mortal Kombat. In GTA you run over people and pick up prostitutes. Parents or other adults are likely the ones buying the game discs, since they're kinda costly. With games the player is actively participating in them unlike a movie. Not everybody censors what their kids watch or listen to. I hear kids singing lyrics from rap hits, some doing the cursing.

Joker is done in a more convincing way and has all the psychological underpinnings that take the violence in it to another level where the death feels more dimensional and distrubing when it hits some of the more major characters. I think it's a complete mistake to take a kid to see it.



What is the point of that?



If violence is stylized like what slasher movies / Evil Dead, etc where it is made into an abstract sort of fun gore fest, that's one thing. But Joker makes it a point to be realistic in the same way the violence in an old movie like Taxi Driver is realistically weaved.


But hey, a society is directly reaping what happens in it by sowing it's own paths and practices. Time is telling us, right? Times is telling us.


It's alway been mystifying overseas (in much of Europe) that in America, violence in entertainment is okay, but kids are shielded from normal nudity and sex as if it were something horrible.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 10/16/19 6:13pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

rdhull said:

lol @ people rationalizing taking a 7 year old to Joker

I don't care what someone takes their kids to see at the multiplex. You think Joker made almost $600 million worldwide already from adults only? The really huge box office numbers like that generally happens when a lot of families go to a movie. Anyway I was replying to what you said about children listening to rap, which many do since hip hop is the majority of what is played on Top 40 radio today. The hit songs by singers and bands often have a guest rapper on them too. Even some of the curent mainstream popular country music has trap beats. Old Town Road by Lil Nas X & Billy Ray Cyrus was recently #1 for 19 weeks. So it's pretty hard to avoid hip hop.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 10/16/19 6:25pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

ufoclub said:

But hey, a society is directly reaping what happens in it by sowing it's own paths and practices. Time is telling us, right? Times is telling us.

Well what's your excuse for peoples behavior over 200 years ago when there was no movies, comic books, video games, or recorded music of any kind? I guess people only became violent when movie theaters were invented. lol

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 10/16/19 6:31pm

rdhull

avatar

lol @ people rationalizing taking a 7 year old to Joker

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 10/16/19 6:36pm

LoveGalore

MickyDolenz said:

ufoclub said:

But hey, a society is directly reaping what happens in it by sowing it's own paths and practices. Time is telling us, right? Times is telling us.

Well what's your excuse for peoples behavior over 200 years ago when there was no movies, comic books, video games, or recorded music of any kind? I guess people only became violent when movie theaters were invented. lol

lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 10/17/19 2:05am

JorisE73

MickyDolenz said:

ufoclub said:

But hey, a society is directly reaping what happens in it by sowing it's own paths and practices. Time is telling us, right? Times is telling us.

Well what's your excuse for peoples behavior over 200 years ago when there was no movies, comic books, video games, or recorded music of any kind? I guess people only became violent when movie theaters were invented. lol


Books? Stage plays?

Just playing wink

I won;t be taking my 6 year old to Joker simply becuase she's not yet interested in those kind of movies, I did show her Terminator 1 and 2 tho recently and she's not traumatized, actually she had fun with those movies. I can't speak for every European but as far as I know most Dutch kids dont live some sheltered lives or are taught how to react to certain movies and just react as they feel.
As for nudity in movies, I'm Dutch and 46 years old and 40 years ago any Dutch movie in the 70's and 80's had a lot of nudity, don;t see any problem with that.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 10/17/19 6:01am

LoveGalore

JorisE73 said:



MickyDolenz said:




ufoclub said:


But hey, a society is directly reaping what happens in it by sowing it's own paths and practices. Time is telling us, right? Times is telling us.



Well what's your excuse for peoples behavior over 200 years ago when there was no movies, comic books, video games, or recorded music of any kind? I guess people only became violent when movie theaters were invented. lol




Books? Stage plays?


Just playing wink

I won;t be taking my 6 year old to Joker simply becuase she's not yet interested in those kind of movies, I did show her Terminator 1 and 2 tho recently and she's not traumatized, actually she had fun with those movies. I can't speak for every European but as far as I know most Dutch kids dont live some sheltered lives or are taught how to react to certain movies and just react as they feel.
As for nudity in movies, I'm Dutch and 46 years old and 40 years ago any Dutch movie in the 70's and 80's had a lot of nudity, don;t see any problem with that.



It seems that few of us in this thread have actually seen the movie. Trust me when I tell you there is no fantasy element like in Terminator which distinguishes the brutal scenes from reality. When you see someone get murdered in gritty fashion, it is quite realistic. His smeared makeup doesn't really deter from that.

IMO, it's not even remotely suitable for a child barely in elementary school.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 10/17/19 11:22am

EmmaMcG

rdhull said:

EmmaMcG said:



I didn't subject her to anything. She wanted to see it. I seen it first to make sure it was OK and I don't see anything in the movie that is inappropriate. Certainly nothing she hasn't seen before. The stabbing in the eye scene is not that violent. You don't actually see much. It's kind of like the chainsaw scene in Scarface or the shower scene in Psycho. Most of the actual violence happens off screen. It's nowhere near as violent as the guy in Total Recall having his arms chopped off or that scene in Kill Bill where The Bride kills the Crazy 88s. Two movies my daughter loves. Especially Kill Bill. Violence in movies doesn't bother her. She knows how it works. And I know her limits. She doesn't like scary movies. So I don't bring her to see scary movies. It's not a case of being precocious or anything else. It's just that most instances of violence in movies have no impact on her. Like I said, she loved the movie. If she had any issues with it then she would tell me.


I have issues with you as a mother. And it’s ironic that you made a tirade (justified) about the Gary Glitter song in the movie due to him being a pedophile yet you took your 7 year old daughter to this movie. And use you being an actress saying she understands it’s all dress up and make believe to still subject her to this movie. You’re basically saying your raising a female Sheldon. Something is fishy about this whole thing now that I think about it.


Go fuck yourself.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 10/17/19 11:35am

ufoclub

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

ufoclub said:

But hey, a society is directly reaping what happens in it by sowing it's own paths and practices. Time is telling us, right? Times is telling us.

Well what's your excuse for peoples behavior over 200 years ago when there was no movies, comic books, video games, or recorded music of any kind? I guess people only became violent when movie theaters were invented. lol

Same reason 200 years ago, people were violent because they were raised to be inclined to behave that way, with the culture and the parents.

There's your explanation.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 10/17/19 11:44am

EmmaMcG

The movie is nowhere near as violent as its been made out to be. There's a scene where 3 people are shot on a train. Some blood splatters on the wall behind one of the characters as they are shot but the camera doesn't linger on it. Later on, the Joker smothers his mother with a pillow. No more violent than similar scenes shown in soap operas like Eastenders. The one scene in the movie which gave me pause as to whether to allow my daughter to see it was the one where the Joker stabs a guy in the eye with a scissors and bashes his head against a wall. But even that is not as violent as it sounds. Most of the violence is off screen so you don't actually see it. So I decided to let my daughter see it but when that particular scene came up I checked to make sure she was OK. And she was. The only reaction from her was to laugh at the little guy trying to reach the door handle to escape. In other words, the "violence" didn't even register with her. She doesn't care about movie violence. She's seen much worse in Die Hard, Kill Bill, The Terminator etc. She enjoys action movies. Just like I did at her age. In fact, I seen much worse than she has when I was small. Things I wouldn't allow her to see. And I've never killed anyone or tried to imitate what I've seen in a movie.

I've raised a great little girl. She's top of her class in school, speaks 2 languages fluently and never gives me a moment of trouble. She takes care of her little cousin who lives with us and is always very well behaved. She never swears despite hearing all sorts from movies. Given that I raised her by myself for the first 5 years I think I've done a damn good job and I don't take kindly to little pricks on the Internet trying to make out like I'm a bad mother. I allow my daughter a certain amount of freedom because I trust her. She knows exactly what she is and is not allowed to do and because I treat her with respect she gives me that same respect. I am a good mother.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 10/17/19 1:06pm

rdhull

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

The movie is nowhere near as violent as its been made out to be.

The more you talk, the more your make the case for having poor judgment (and insight possibly).

"Climb in my fur."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 10/17/19 1:36pm

KoolEaze

avatar

I watched tons of horror and action movies as a kid and don´t think that they had a negative influence on me. I think I was eight or nine when I watched The Exorcist with my parents and after that I watched The Omen, Rosemary´s Baby and Dawn of the Dead. And I loved Mad Max II (the uncut version) at the age of 10....watched it in a movie theater.

I understand why some people think those kind of movies are not appropriate for a child , I really do, but I think it always depends on the individual child in question and of course the parents.

I think it´s rude to question her qualities as a mother just because she allowed her daughter to watch the Joker movie. You don´t know her or her daughter.

" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 10/17/19 1:39pm

LoveGalore

....Aaaaaanywho, those of you who have not seen it yet should definitely check it out. With or without children, YMMV.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 10/17/19 3:07pm

EmmaMcG

KoolEaze said:

I watched tons of horror and action movies as a kid and don´t think that they had a negative influence on me. I think I was eight or nine when I watched The Exorcist with my parents and after that I watched The Omen, Rosemary´s Baby and Dawn of the Dead. And I loved Mad Max II (the uncut version) at the age of 10....watched it in a movie theater.


I understand why some people think those kind of movies are not appropriate for a child , I really do, but I think it always depends on the individual child in question and of course the parents.


I think it´s rude to question her qualities as a mother just because she allowed her daughter to watch the Joker movie. You don´t know her or her daughter.



Some kids are different to others. That's my point. My daughter is well able for violent movies. She loves the action. But she wouldn't watch certain horror movies. And to be honest, neither would I. On the other hand, my nephew (my cousin's son) is 5 and I definitely would not recommend him to see a movie like The Joker because I know it would frighten him. We watched Teenwolf (Michael J Fox) a few months ago and he turned into my daughter during the first transformation scene because he was kind of scared of it. My daughter was fine and she put her arm around him and let him know once the scene was over. He loved the rest of the movie though. The basketball scenes especially. But he's not as comfortable with those kinds of things as my daughter is. And that's fine. We don't show him that stuff. Like I said, all kids are different. Some are affected by things others are not. I know my daughter. I know what scares her and makes her uncomfortable and I make sure she isn't exposed to that. But there's nothing in the Joker that made her feel in any way uncomfortable. She hated the character of the Joker because he does bad things. But she loved the movie because she got to see how one of her favourite characters came to be. Even though I think she prefers Mark Hamill's version.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 10/17/19 9:48pm

LoveGalore

Should we retitle this thread "Emma's a mom!" or something.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 10/17/19 10:55pm

EmmaMcG

LoveGalore said:

Should we retitle this thread "Emma's a mom!" or something.


Or we could just get back to discussing the actual movie
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 10/18/19 4:40am

LoveGalore

EmmaMcG said:

LoveGalore said:

Should we retitle this thread "Emma's a mom!" or something.


Or we could just get back to discussing the actual movie

Absolutely!

One thing I dig about the Joker character is that every actor so far has put their own spin on him. I think that makes sense given it is much harder to reinterpret the hero - villains have a bit more freedom in that respect.

So far, I find this interpretation to be very very good. It's akin to the Dark Knight version, but set apart enough to be totally original.

One thing I appreciate is the effort the director put into building atmosphere and using Gotham to fill in spots where a lot of other movies would just have endless dialogue. People have bitched about the script here, but I think it is rather minimalist and the scenery is very well utilized.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 10/18/19 11:10am

EmmaMcG

LoveGalore said:

EmmaMcG said:



Or we could just get back to discussing the actual movie

Absolutely!

One thing I dig about the Joker character is that every actor so far has put their own spin on him. I think that makes sense given it is much harder to reinterpret the hero - villains have a bit more freedom in that respect.

So far, I find this interpretation to be very very good. It's akin to the Dark Knight version, but set apart enough to be totally original.

One thing I appreciate is the effort the director put into building atmosphere and using Gotham to fill in spots where a lot of other movies would just have endless dialogue. People have bitched about the script here, but I think it is rather minimalist and the scenery is very well utilized.


I really liked the movie and I think Juaquin Phoenix is fantastic in it. But I think it's too early to be comparing him to previous jokers because he doesn't really become The Joker until near the end. I'd love to see him reprise the role in a future Batman movie to see how his version of a fully realised Joker would be.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 10/18/19 2:46pm

LoveGalore

EmmaMcG said:

LoveGalore said:


Absolutely!

One thing I dig about the Joker character is that every actor so far has put their own spin on him. I think that makes sense given it is much harder to reinterpret the hero - villains have a bit more freedom in that respect.

So far, I find this interpretation to be very very good. It's akin to the Dark Knight version, but set apart enough to be totally original.

One thing I appreciate is the effort the director put into building atmosphere and using Gotham to fill in spots where a lot of other movies would just have endless dialogue. People have bitched about the script here, but I think it is rather minimalist and the scenery is very well utilized.


I really liked the movie and I think Juaquin Phoenix is fantastic in it. But I think it's too early to be comparing him to previous jokers because he doesn't really become The Joker until near the end. I'd love to see him reprise the role in a future Batman movie to see how his version of a fully realised Joker would be.


Fair point, I think I'm just excited over the prospects.

That being said, I am kinda dreading Pattinson as Batman so I am not sure how that will go down. I don't think they've yet confirmed there will be crossover here or even if there is a sequel in the works (but it's a smash hit so why not), but it'd be weird if they cast another Batman when they have a new one already. Yuck
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 10/18/19 3:41pm

EmmaMcG

LoveGalore said:

EmmaMcG said:



I really liked the movie and I think Juaquin Phoenix is fantastic in it. But I think it's too early to be comparing him to previous jokers because he doesn't really become The Joker until near the end. I'd love to see him reprise the role in a future Batman movie to see how his version of a fully realised Joker would be.


Fair point, I think I'm just excited over the prospects.

That being said, I am kinda dreading Pattinson as Batman so I am not sure how that will go down. I don't think they've yet confirmed there will be crossover here or even if there is a sequel in the works (but it's a smash hit so why not), but it'd be weird if they cast another Batman when they have a new one already. Yuck


I don't like the casting of Robert Pattinson either. In fact, I don't like anything about the direction of the new Batman movie.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 10/19/19 5:52am

KoolEaze

avatar

LoveGalore said:

EmmaMcG said:
I really liked the movie and I think Juaquin Phoenix is fantastic in it. But I think it's too early to be comparing him to previous jokers because he doesn't really become The Joker until near the end. I'd love to see him reprise the role in a future Batman movie to see how his version of a fully realised Joker would be.
Fair point, I think I'm just excited over the prospects. That being said, I am kinda dreading Pattinson as Batman so I am not sure how that will go down. I don't think they've yet confirmed there will be crossover here or even if there is a sequel in the works (but it's a smash hit so why not), but it'd be weird if they cast another Batman when they have a new one already. Yuck

According to the director this Joker will NOT be part of any future Batman movies and is intended as a stand-alone movie. A sequel...maybe. But not with the Rober Pattinson Batman. At least that´s what Philips said. But I think if the money is too tempting they might change their plans.

" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 10/19/19 8:17am

EmmaMcG

KoolEaze said:



LoveGalore said:


EmmaMcG said:
I really liked the movie and I think Juaquin Phoenix is fantastic in it. But I think it's too early to be comparing him to previous jokers because he doesn't really become The Joker until near the end. I'd love to see him reprise the role in a future Batman movie to see how his version of a fully realised Joker would be.

Fair point, I think I'm just excited over the prospects. That being said, I am kinda dreading Pattinson as Batman so I am not sure how that will go down. I don't think they've yet confirmed there will be crossover here or even if there is a sequel in the works (but it's a smash hit so why not), but it'd be weird if they cast another Batman when they have a new one already. Yuck

According to the director this Joker will NOT be part of any future Batman movies and is intended as a stand-alone movie. A sequel...maybe. But not with the Rober Pattinson Batman. At least that´s what Philips said. But I think if the money is too tempting they might change their plans.



To be honest, I'd rather they be kept seperate. I mean, they can go ahead with their DCEU or whatever they're calling it now. But then they can also have a seperate shared universe of lower budget, more serious movies. So they could keep their Robert Pattinson Batman but then they could also have a seperate series of Batman movies with a different actor that focuses less on the big action set pieces and more on character development and his detective skills.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 10/19/19 7:08pm

LoveGalore

I would be surprised if they casted two Batman's at the same time though. While they could certainly continue with sequels that don't run up to the time where Bruce is an adult, the dynamic between Batman and Joker is so intrinsically tied that anything they do has to be really really good. Joker is not morally grey like Catwoman or Harley Quinn so to have a series of movies centered around a villain may be a fresh perspective, but something they would need to execute with great care in today's atmosphere.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 10/20/19 8:09pm

ufoclub

avatar

KoolEaze said:

I watched tons of horror and action movies as a kid and don´t think that they had a negative influence on me. I think I was eight or nine when I watched The Exorcist with my parents and after that I watched The Omen, Rosemary´s Baby and Dawn of the Dead. And I loved Mad Max II (the uncut version) at the age of 10....watched it in a movie theater.

I understand why some people think those kind of movies are not appropriate for a child , I really do, but I think it always depends on the individual child in question and of course the parents.

I think it´s rude to question her qualities as a mother just because she allowed her daughter to watch the Joker movie. You don´t know her or her daughter.

I watched tons of horror through elementary school, even reading the novel The Exorcist in middle school (6th Grade), and I can honestly track how it effected me at the time... and I can now recognize some negative impact there within me, but nothing that caused any criminal behviour. But certainly it helped me reach an edge in my imagination, that I would not have reached otherwise. That goes for the way in which I would imagine revenge, righting grade school wrongs to me. I am now embarressed recalling the friends and family I distanced away from me with my horror inclinations. I got quite popular for my horror drawings in middle school, but also, I'm sure a lot of teachers might have been concerned behind my back. I mean, I thought of possessed Reagan in The Exorcist as a sort of superhero. I remember one guy in high school telling me he was going to kill me if he ever saw me outside of shcool because I seemed "satanic". I just laughed at him. In ways it was like walking an edge of performance.

I can see how a certain more "triggered" mindset in a child could easily be influenced by a well made horror/violent crime movie that rides on psychological truth and casts a passionate spell on viewers. It's not unlike a child witnessing a crime, or growing up in a warzone. Some can be affected as if there is scabbed trauma wound in the mind that they can conquer by "owning" it. By weilding it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #206 posted 10/20/19 11:39pm

EmmaMcG

LoveGalore said:

I would be surprised if they casted two Batman's at the same time though. While they could certainly continue with sequels that don't run up to the time where Bruce is an adult, the dynamic between Batman and Joker is so intrinsically tied that anything they do has to be really really good. Joker is not morally grey like Catwoman or Harley Quinn so to have a series of movies centered around a villain may be a fresh perspective, but something they would need to execute with great care in today's atmosphere.


It's interesting that you mention Harley Quinn as being "morally grey". From what I know about the character, she's just as bad as the Joker himself.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #207 posted 10/21/19 12:50am

LoveGalore

EmmaMcG said:

LoveGalore said:

I would be surprised if they casted two Batman's at the same time though. While they could certainly continue with sequels that don't run up to the time where Bruce is an adult, the dynamic between Batman and Joker is so intrinsically tied that anything they do has to be really really good. Joker is not morally grey like Catwoman or Harley Quinn so to have a series of movies centered around a villain may be a fresh perspective, but something they would need to execute with great care in today's atmosphere.


It's interesting that you mention Harley Quinn as being "morally grey". From what I know about the character, she's just as bad as the Joker himself.

She certainly has been at times, but ever since the New 52 event in 2011, DC has been writing her as an antihero type character.

She's even one of the few LGBT characters in the DC comics universe now (with her girlfriend Poison Ivy).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #208 posted 10/21/19 7:04am

EmmaMcG

LoveGalore said:

EmmaMcG said:



It's interesting that you mention Harley Quinn as being "morally grey". From what I know about the character, she's just as bad as the Joker himself.

She certainly has been at times, but ever since the New 52 event in 2011, DC has been writing her as an antihero type character.

She's even one of the few LGBT characters in the DC comics universe now (with her girlfriend Poison Ivy).


I only really know her from the animated series and the Arkham games. Never read any of the comics. I prefer to think of her as a villain though. There's too many bad guys being turned into "anti-heroes" now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #209 posted 10/21/19 7:20am

LoveGalore

EmmaMcG said:

LoveGalore said:
She certainly has been at times, but ever since the New 52 event in 2011, DC has been writing her as an antihero type character. She's even one of the few LGBT characters in the DC comics universe now (with her girlfriend Poison Ivy).
I only really know her from the animated series and the Arkham games. Never read any of the comics. I prefer to think of her as a villain though. There's too many bad guys being turned into "anti-heroes" now.

Yep, agreed. I think her story was always quite intriguing. That's the problem with comics. They run so long that characters get run through the absolute meat grinder of possible iterations.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 8 <12345678>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > General Discussion > the JOKER