XxAxX said:

SETI is real scientists using real science to search for life in outer space. They sceptically analyze any odd signals and don't go yelling alien at any anomoly. What they do is exactly what I said in my last post. I have always been a supporter. They are not chasing military flares with pitch forks and torches. So I'm glad you are now starting to see things more clearly.

If you are a fan of SETI, I assume you have read Sagan?

lust said:

XxAxX said:

^ i don't have time to read any of all that but i'm glad you're both coming around to seeing things more clearly.

here, this link is where you can donate money to fund the search. thanks again!

http://www.seti.org/

[Edited 1/30/12 16:55pm]

SETI is real scientists using real science to search for life in outer space. They sceptically analyze any odd signals and don't go yelling alien at any anomoly. What they do is exactly what I said in my last post. I have always been a supporter. They are not chasing military flares with pitch forks and torches. So I'm glad you are now starting to see things more clearly. If you are a fan of SETI, I assume you have read Sagan?

It’s certainly not a roswell/phoenix light tin-foil hat area, but I actually think the case for seti is quite fuzzy, given how many assumptions we have to make with the drake equation, only having a sample size of one for proven existence of life, assumed technologies and windows of use in a technological world, etc... It’s almost in an area like cold fusion where there’s almost no realistic chance of a payoff – yet I still support doing it because the relative cost is pretty minor and the payoff would be enormous if realized. It's like playing the lottery - you certainly wouldn't put all of your research money into such a field, but we could set a little aside to put into low probability/high yield areas.

Do you listen to podcasts? Rationally Speaking (hosted by Massimo Pigliucci, philosopher of science at City Univercity in NY) did a great summary of the issues and assumptions with seti back in November. A good listen if you’re interested. http://rationallyspeaking...-seti.html

[Edited 1/31/12 3:59am]

damosuzuki said:

XxAxX said:

^ i don't have time to read any of all that but i'm glad you're both coming around to seeing things more clearly.

here, this link is where you can donate money to fund the search. thanks again!

http://www.seti.org/

[Edited 1/30/12 16:55pm]

[img:$uid]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v460/flipwilson1/wacked-1.jpg[/img:$uid]

so words finally failed you? well thank god for that~!

KingBAD said:

the exsistence of ufos should be a greater proof

of the exsistence of god, shouldn't it???

Shiiiiiit! The "little green men" in UFO's might be the God you pray to.

dseann said:

KingBAD said:

the exsistence of ufos should be a greater proof

of the exsistence of god, shouldn't it???

Shiiiiiit! The "little green men" in UFO's might be the God you pray to.

i don't pray but, YES, EXACTLY!!! no...

as i said GOD would have no need of a vehicle.

dseann said:

KingBAD said:

the exsistence of ufos should be a greater proof

of the exsistence of god, shouldn't it???

Shiiiiiit! The "little green men" in UFO's might be the God you pray to.

I'd suggest u watch the Green Lantern again but this time, supplement the movie with the Holy Tablets.

KingBAD said:

dseann said:

Shiiiiiit! The "little green men" in UFO's might be the God you pray to.

i don't pray but, YES, EXACTLY!!! no...

as i said GOD would have no need of a vehicle.

I'm simply suggesting that back in the days of antiquity people mislabled these ET's as God/The Devil/Angels.

damosuzuki said:

Great. Thanks. I'll check it out. I listen to podcasts and always looking for new stuff. I'll recommend you the Alex jones podcast.....,joke.

dseann said:

KingBAD said:

i don't pray but, YES, EXACTLY!!! no...

as i said GOD would have no need of a vehicle.

I'm simply suggesting that back in the days of antiquity people mislabled these ET's as God/The Devil/Angels.

yeah... THAT!!!