Ugh, what a waste of space she is.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/y...rostitutes

GOP Sen. Scott Brown is blastingcomedian Kathy Griffin after she jokingly referred to his daughters as “prostitutes” on her new Bravo reality show.

The segment, which aired Tuesday, featured CNN’s Dana Bash and John King quizzing Griffin on her political knowledge during a recent visit to Washington. When King held up a photo of Brown, Griffin identified him as “Scott Brown, who is a senator from Massachusetts and has two daughters that are prostitutes.” Within seconds, a "brief message from Bravo's legal team" scrolls up the screen: "Scott Brown's daughters ARE NOT prostitutes!!!"

RodeoSchro said:

Within seconds, a "brief message from Bravo's legal team" scrolls up the screen: "Scott Brown's daughters ARE NOT prostitutes!!!"

anyway. i think she is quickly becoming a victim of her own hype.

kids should be off limits.

She is just painfully unfunny.

Was she asleep for the whole Letterman/Palin fiasco?

She's not funny.

But THIS is funny.

RodeoSchro said:

Within seconds, a "brief message from Bravo's legal team" scrolls up the screen: "Scott Brown's daughters ARE NOT prostitutes!!!"

Their dad is a whore so maybe she thought the apples don't fall far from the tree

I find Kathy really funny BUT KIDS SHOULD BE OFF LIMITS.

So not only is she insulting people who aren't even rightful targets (they're the kids of someone famous) but the only way she can think to insult them is by degrading them sexually. Cuz everyone knows the only way to properly insult women/girls/anyone female is by making the "joke" sexual.

Classless, irrelevant and talentless.

It's one thing to criticize Sen. Scott Brown for being a former "prostitute" since he once did nude photos for straight women AND gay/bi men for extra cash. But calling the man's daughters "prostitutes" WITHOUT any evidences to prove it was totally out of order.

purplesweat said:

So not only is she insulting people who aren't even rightful targets (they're the kids of someone famous) but the only way she can think to insult them is by degrading them sexually. Cuz everyone knows the only way to properly insult women/girls/anyone female is by making the "joke" sexual.

Classless, irrelevant and talentless.

......in which the idea in itself is sexist.

And she wonders why she's in the Z-list.

Harlepolis said:

And she wonders why she's in the Z-list.

while i generally find her very unfunny, but i cant deny she has her moments with me, like the whole Levi Johnston romance mess & scaring off Liz on the view recently

PricelessHo said:

Harlepolis said:

And she wonders why she's in the Z-list.

while i generally find her very unfunny, but i cant deny she has her moments with me, like the whole Levi Johnston romance mess & scaring off Liz on the view recently

Yeah, that was my "Yay! Kathy" moment too. I was PISSED she didn't let prissy ass Liz resort to her water works though

But Kathy is like uninvited obnoxious loud mouth trollop who crashes everybody's party and wonder why she ends up seeing her ass print on the sidewalk later. Its a wonder why nobody made her pick her teeth from the floor yet.

Hell, I don't mind crass humor that much(I'm a huge fan of Lisa Lampanelli after all) but when your diarrhea of the mouth starts spewing on kids,,,,,somebody oughta hang it up.

I hope their father goes to war on this dizzy bitch.

Harlepolis said:

I hope their father goes to war on this dizzy bitch.

I am not surprised she is like that. But minor children should be off limits. But then again their parents should limit their exposure. It was pretty bad to see the Obamas and the Palins using their kids as props.

But I also think that a family should be able to be a family even when cameras are rolling. Remember the Obama deal with one of the girls asking for ice cream or something? I found that delightful. But it was seen by some (even the Obamas) as over the line. And maybe should have not been broadcast.

Now once the kid is over 18 and they start making public appearances or making public statements then they are fair game for their public appearances and statements. But not any further. But criticism should be limited to their public appearances and not their private issues.

TonyVanDam said:

It's one thing to criticize Sen. Scott Brown for being a former "prostitute" since he once did nude photos for straight women AND gay/bi men for extra cash. But calling the man's daughters "prostitutes" WITHOUT any evidences to prove it was totally out of order.

He was a model and he posed discreetly nude for Cosmopolitan. That hardly qualifies as being a prostitute.

He did make some weird joke fairly recently about putting his daughters up for a date or something, which he quickly apologized for. Perhaps Kathy was trying to make a joke about that?

I find her funny. I like her (although I found her funnier a few years ago). Meh.

Efan said:

TonyVanDam said:

It's one thing to criticize Sen. Scott Brown for being a former "prostitute" since he once did nude photos for straight women AND gay/bi men for extra cash. But calling the man's daughters "prostitutes" WITHOUT any evidences to prove it was totally out of order.

He was a model and he posed discreetly nude for Cosmopolitan. That hardly qualifies as being a prostitute.

He did make some weird joke fairly recently about putting his daughters up for a date or something, which he quickly apologized for. Perhaps Kathy was trying to make a joke about that?

I find her funny. I like her (although I found her funnier a few years ago). Meh.

I think that is what Kathy was referring to.

He made a few weird comments about his daughters being hot and available. Gross.

Any chick who wears shells on her tits is definitely a prostitute.

[img:$uid]http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2010-01-20-scottbrown1.jpg[/img:$uid]

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Now once the kid is over 18

According to wikipedia, they are both in college, which means they're probably both at least 18.

I find her funny. I really don't think this is that bad.

CarrieMpls said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Now once the kid is over 18

According to wikipedia, they are both in college, which means they're probably both at least 18.

I find her funny. I really don't think this is that bad.

they are still NOT public figures. making what Kathy said potentially actionable.

OnlyNDaUsa said:

CarrieMpls said:

According to wikipedia, they are both in college, which means they're probably both at least 18.

I find her funny. I really don't think this is that bad.

they are still NOT public figures. making what Kathy said potentially actionable.

But they are clearly NOT prostitutes and no one would think they are. That's what makes it a joke. Especially given the context of their father attempting to whore them out himself.

PunkMistress said:

Efan said:

He was a model and he posed discreetly nude for Cosmopolitan. That hardly qualifies as being a prostitute.

He did make some weird joke fairly recently about putting his daughters up for a date or something, which he quickly apologized for. Perhaps Kathy was trying to make a joke about that?

I find her funny. I like her (although I found her funnier a few years ago). Meh.

I think that is what Kathy was referring to.

He made a few weird comments about his daughters being hot and available. Gross.

Yep, definitely deserves a joke in reply.

CarrieMpls said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

Now once the kid is over 18

According to wikipedia, they are both in college, which means they're probably both at least 18.

I find her funny. I really don't think this is that bad.

How about when she called 15-year-old Miley Cyrus a slut, over and over, in act after act?

Kathy Griffin

Efan said:

TonyVanDam said:

It's one thing to criticize Sen. Scott Brown for being a former "prostitute" since he once did nude photos for straight women AND gay/bi men for extra cash. But calling the man's daughters "prostitutes" WITHOUT any evidences to prove it was totally out of order.

He was a model and he posed discreetly nude for Cosmopolitan. That hardly qualifies as being a prostitute.

He did make some weird joke fairly recently about putting his daughters up for a date or something, which he quickly apologized for. Perhaps Kathy was trying to make a joke about that?

I find her funny. I like her (although I found her funnier a few years ago). Meh.

Why do think I used quotation marks ("")?

PunkMistress said:

Any chick who wears shells on her tits is definitely a prostitute.

[img:$uid]http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2010-01-20-scottbrown1.jpg[/img:$uid]

Some Samoan women & Hawaiian women wear shells as bras. And no one faulty accused them for being prostitiutes.

CarrieMpls said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

they are still NOT public figures. making what Kathy said potentially actionable.

But they are clearly NOT prostitutes and no one would think they are. That's what makes it a joke. Especially given the context of their father attempting to whore them out himself.

With that understanding, ALL politicians (especially presidents & prime ministers) are guilty for whoring their children out in the spotlight.

TonyVanDam said:

PunkMistress said:

Any chick who wears shells on her tits is definitely a prostitute.

[img:$uid]http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2010-01-20-scottbrown1.jpg[/img:$uid]

Some Samoan women & Hawaiian women wear shells as bras. And no one faulty accused them for being prostitiutes.

It is well known that every woman in Samoa and Hawaii will have sex for money.

Thanks for proving my point.