What if you're straight and have infrequent STRAIGHT sex??...

Byron said:

Byron said:

Then you're an orger with the sreen-name "Illustrator".

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I agree

i'm perplexed as to why Vainandy hasn't chimed in yet. he usually has these type threads plugged into his "keyword alert me" engine

Fury said:

Isn't that what the term "bisexual" is for???

PurpleJedi said:

no no no--that's for men who sleep with prostitutes.






jk

Fury said:

Stymie said:

exactly.

Byron said:

You smell!

althom said:

Or married!

Byron said:

Or a nerd!

althom said:

Or dress funny!

Byron said:

Or dribble when you talk!

althom said:

...so basically you're saying that Screech is having Gay sex?

PurpleJedi said:

Exactly. Those bastards want to call themselves straight so they live the best of both worlds and still continue bashing gay men. It makes them bisexual, even if they've only done it once....unless they were raped.

Nope. That would make him bisexual, just like those so-called "straight" men that have sex with other men but prefer women. The difference is, most gay or bisexual men have no problem calling themselves what they really are. These closeted "trade" or "down low" men are the biggest gay bashers out there and they want that "straight" title to feel superior and continue to bash. I say, bust the fuckers out for what they really are and let them suffer like they make other people suffer.

I can't stand them and don't listen to their bullshit about they are straight. They think as long as they get sucked and don't suck that they are straight. When they tell me that, I get them to the point of orgasm, stop, and tell them to suck me off if they want me to finish. Nine times out of ten they will do it. Yeah, that's real straight behavior alright.

I don't fool with them at all anymore except very rarely. On the rare occassion that I do, I tell them to keep their fucking mouth shut and don't spoil it by talking.

Here I am. When it comes to trade, I hate them son of a bitches.

It seems to me -- "fluidity of orientation" be darned -- that if you're having homosexual relations, you're not heterosexual.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

obviously
That's what i mean

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

This rings true to me, bro.

you people label everything.
sexuality should just be seen as that!
its not a name game or reason for seperatism.
i refuse to use a title of gay-straight-bisexual-lesbian-etc.
its just a form for people to disconnect from each other.

That's very true but when a person labels someone in order to bash and then it turns out that they are doing a variation of the same thing, they deserve a label themselves to knock them off their high horse.

It would be nice for everyone to be "without labels" if this was a perfect world but it's not.

weepingwall said:

I agree with you about not using words or labels to advance hatred or ignorance.

But, the broader context is about people who label themselves as being one thing, when their (usually covert) behavior is contrary to that label.

Even worse, that behavior often endangers significant others (i.e. girlfriends and wives) who are under the impression that their men are being faithful to them.

ThreadBare said:

i see what you mean.

6sixx6 said:

Bullshit. There's a great big middle ground many of us occupy comfortably.

You need to get out more.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

The motivation is the deciding factor, not the action. In other words, it's not what you do, it's what you really want that decides who you are.