independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Hey guys, what time signature is this song in?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 09/16/15 3:43pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Hey guys, what time signature is this song in?

I can hear two different times in this song. Obviously one is not right, lol.

PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 09/16/15 3:46pm

MoBettaBliss

LittleBLUECorvette said:

I can hear two different times in this song. Obviously one is not right, lol.



video won't play for me... but many songs have more than one time signature

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 09/16/15 3:48pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

MoBettaBliss said:

LittleBLUECorvette said:

I can hear two different times in this song. Obviously one is not right, lol.



video won't play for me... but many songs have more than one time signature

But it's the same beat throughout the song, it's no switch up.

Maybe this one will work.

PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 09/16/15 4:48pm

duccichucka

2/2 or 2/4?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 09/18/15 8:39am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

duccichucka said:

2/2 or 2/4?


3/4 or 6/8?
PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 09/18/15 9:30am

Musicslave

LittleBLUECorvette said:

duccichucka said:

2/2 or 2/4?

3/4 or 6/8?

-

Unfortunately I've forgotten just about all of my music theory. But I will say that was my favorite sleeper from that album. I don't think it was ever released as a single but a wonderul album cut. I've found myself revisiting that song more than other bigger hits. -

-

Oh yeah....and "Ceramic Girl".

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 09/18/15 1:20pm

duccichucka

LittleBLUECorvette said:

duccichucka said:

2/2 or 2/4?

3/4 or 6/8?


Yeah, there is a part of the song where I did count 3/4 (which coulda been 6/8). It's definitely
changing time signatures throughout various sections.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 09/19/15 2:17am

deebee

avatar

It's just 4/4 throughout; there's no change. I think the confusion is because it's heavily syncopated, and because it's one of those tracks where you can hear the pulse in the wrong place during the opening section and then get thrown when the main section of the song starts. (It's like when I listen to Fela Kuti tracks sometimes, and, halfway through, realise that I've been hearing it all wrong. lol)

[Edited 9/19/15 10:43am]

"Not everything that is faced can be changed; but nothing can be changed until it is faced." - James Baldwin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 09/19/15 8:37am

Cinny

avatar

4/4 and heavily syncopated. I could program this!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 09/19/15 12:20pm

duccichucka

deebee said:

It's just 4/4 throughout; there's no change.


You see, initially, I thought it was closer to a march time, which is usually 2/2 or 2/4. Because
it sounds alla breve, I didn't think 4/4 was too accurate.

But I thought for certain that the tempo changes ever so slightly during some parts. Ugh; I'll have
to listen to it again but you and Cinny may be right about it not changing.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 09/21/15 12:55am

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

Yeah, it might be the syncopation causing all if the confussion.

PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 09/21/15 3:03am

nd33

I concur its 4/4
I've never heard this before. It's a very strange groove.

Every second bar there is no kick or percussion on the one, and that contributes to a kind of on edge, disconcerting, push-pull feel.
Music, sweet music, I wish I could caress and...kiss, kiss...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 09/21/15 7:53am

Cinny

avatar

nd33 said:

I concur its 4/4 I've never heard this before. It's a very strange groove. Every second bar there is no kick or percussion on the one, and that contributes to a kind of on edge, disconcerting, push-pull feel.

That's exactly right. And especially in funk when it's all about the one, it feels like you've just ran off a cliff. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 09/22/15 5:59am

deebee

avatar

^ I think people may be hearing the pulse in the wrong place. There's a kick on the 1 in every bar. (The bass hits the root note on the first 1 of every four bar sequence, too.) That said, the kick drum pattern's kind of irregular in how it 'frames' hitting the 1. The tension seems to come from a combination of the play between kick and snare, with the latter being displaced and missing the 2, then attacking the upbeat in the middle of the sequence; and the syncopation in the bass, with the popping and slapping off the beat and hitting the root note behind the 1 at various points.

"Not everything that is faced can be changed; but nothing can be changed until it is faced." - James Baldwin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 09/22/15 6:36am

nd33

deebee said:

^ I think people may be hearing the pulse in the wrong place. There's a kick on the 1 in every bar. (The bass hits the root note on the first 1 of every four bar sequence, too.) That said, the kick drum pattern's kind of irregular in how it 'frames' hitting the 1. The tension seems to come from a combination of the play between kick and snare, with the latter being displaced and missing the 2, then attacking the upbeat in the middle of the sequence; and the syncopation in the bass, with the popping and slapping off the beat and hitting the root note behind the 1 at various points.


Well I hear it with the first snare on the two. That's what makes sense in my mind. So at the very start of the song there is two kicks and a snare...to me the 2nd kick is the one and then the snare is the two. It makes sense when the changes come in because then the changes come on the 1.

Counting like that, there is definitely no kick on most even numbered bars.

How the heck are you coumting it?

Music, sweet music, I wish I could caress and...kiss, kiss...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 09/22/15 10:26am

deebee

avatar

nd33 said:

deebee said:

^ I think people may be hearing the pulse in the wrong place. There's a kick on the 1 in every bar. (The bass hits the root note on the first 1 of every four bar sequence, too.) That said, the kick drum pattern's kind of irregular in how it 'frames' hitting the 1. The tension seems to come from a combination of the play between kick and snare, with the latter being displaced and missing the 2, then attacking the upbeat in the middle of the sequence; and the syncopation in the bass, with the popping and slapping off the beat and hitting the root note behind the 1 at various points.


Well I hear it with the first snare on the two. That's what makes sense in my mind. So at the very start of the song there is two kicks and a snare...to me the 2nd kick is the one and then the snare is the two. It makes sense when the changes come in because then the changes come on the 1.

Counting like that, there is definitely no kick on most even numbered bars.

How the heck are you coumting it?

Yes, I thought that might be where the disparity was. That's where I was hearing the pulse to begin with, too. And I think that's where the sense that there are some shorter 3/4 bars or something comes from, especially when the guitar turnaround thingy comes in. But, as you say, listening to it that way gives you the sense that everything's a bit 'out', which might be taken as a sign that something's up. Even the synth pad comes in a bit ahead of the beat, and it sort of feels like everything's stumbling in haphazardly.

I think it's actually that the first of those two kicks at the very start of the track is the 1. When you listen to it like that the whole groove locks in; there's no sense of anything being 'out'; and no incomplete/irregular bars are needed to make all the sections 'fit'. Where it's particularly clear for me is after the turnaround when we go back to the groove. At that point, the bass and kick come back slap-bang on the 1, and we're right in the pocket. The first word of the vocal is also on the 1.

"Not everything that is faced can be changed; but nothing can be changed until it is faced." - James Baldwin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 09/22/15 11:02am

Cinny

avatar

deebee said:

I think it's actually that the first of those two kicks at the very start of the track is the 1.

The first word of the vocal is also on the 1.

OOH yeah, that groove makes more sense. biggrin I heard it in these terms.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 09/22/15 11:07am

Cinny

avatar

Cinny said:

nd33 said:

I concur its 4/4 I've never heard this before. It's a very strange groove. Every second bar there is no kick or percussion on the one, and that contributes to a kind of on edge, disconcerting, push-pull feel.

That's exactly right. And especially in funk when it's all about the one, it feels like you've just ran off a cliff. lol

I don't even know how I heard it like this, now that deebee set us straight. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 09/22/15 3:27pm

deebee

avatar

Cinny said:

deebee said:

I think it's actually that the first of those two kicks at the very start of the track is the 1.

The first word of the vocal is also on the 1.

OOH yeah, that groove makes more sense. biggrin I heard it in these terms.

biggrin

Next week, we'll figure this one out.... lol

"Not everything that is faced can be changed; but nothing can be changed until it is faced." - James Baldwin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 09/22/15 9:56pm

nd33

deebee said:

nd33 said:


Well I hear it with the first snare on the two. That's what makes sense in my mind. So at the very start of the song there is two kicks and a snare...to me the 2nd kick is the one and then the snare is the two. It makes sense when the changes come in because then the changes come on the 1.

Counting like that, there is definitely no kick on most even numbered bars.

How the heck are you coumting it?

Yes, I thought that might be where the disparity was. That's where I was hearing the pulse to begin with, too. And I think that's where the sense that there are some shorter 3/4 bars or something comes from, especially when the guitar turnaround thingy comes in. But, as you say, listening to it that way gives you the sense that everything's a bit 'out', which might be taken as a sign that something's up. Even the synth pad comes in a bit ahead of the beat, and it sort of feels like everything's stumbling in haphazardly.

I think it's actually that the first of those two kicks at the very start of the track is the 1. When you listen to it like that the whole groove locks in; there's no sense of anything being 'out'; and no incomplete/irregular bars are needed to make all the sections 'fit'. Where it's particularly clear for me is after the turnaround when we go back to the groove. At that point, the bass and kick come back slap-bang on the 1, and we're right in the pocket. The first word of the vocal is also on the 1.


It's all in the eye of the beholder really.

I like to dance so I let my feet guide me. Tapping my foot and bopping my head to the groove in this case feels right to me when the first snare lands on the two but I can hear it how you hear it too.

I know that when I'm producing music, sometimes I'll start the groove part way through a bar for the intro, just to fuck with peoples heads lol

Playing in a band one of our horn players used to hear the two snare hits at the start of Curtis Mayfield "Move On Up" as the one and two of the first bar but I hear them as beats 3&4 of a lead in bar, and then the band comes in on one. It'd drive me crazy because I like to improvise a bit and then bring that horn hook back in on the fly from my count in. confused lol

Music, sweet music, I wish I could caress and...kiss, kiss...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 09/22/15 10:15pm

nd33

deebee said:

Cinny said:

OOH yeah, that groove makes more sense. biggrin I heard it in these terms.

biggrin

Next week, we'll figure this one out.... lol


This is a goodie... I look forward to hearing you guy's thoughts smile

Music, sweet music, I wish I could caress and...kiss, kiss...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 09/23/15 9:01am

Cinny

avatar

Cinny said:

4/4 and heavily syncopated. I could program this!

For the record, I program it either way I heard it!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Hey guys, what time signature is this song in?