independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Come Together - The Beatles, Aerosmith or Michael Jackson?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/08/14 12:06pm

Shawy89

avatar

Come Together - The Beatles, Aerosmith or Michael Jackson?

A better version in your opinion?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/08/14 12:51pm

jillybean

avatar

I'm partial to The Beatles' version. I also really dig the Joe Cocker version from "Across the Universe."
"She made me glad to be a man"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/08/14 12:58pm

Marrk

avatar

Might as well get it out of the way!... Michael's. I just love the production and the vocal performance. I've no idea why that short version turned up years later on HIStory though. That was just odd. Like the continuity in that video. Its always bugged me. Shirt buttoned/unbuttoned. I've never noticed MJ's guitarist getting so close to his crotch before either. See 1:45ish. lol

.

Can i give a big shout out to Prince's version from Coachella too?. Thank goodness i have the soundboard of that, that's pretty damn killer too.

[Edited 5/8/14 17:04pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/08/14 4:15pm

BobGeorge909

avatar

I've never heard a better version than the Beatles. I prefer aerosmiths after that. They have this sloppyness I feel the lyrics require of it. Prince's is a little sloppy, but worse, he tried to make it pretty and grand like a sunrise or something. The song seems very dusk or predawn to me.

Michel's....Bleh. Its dark, which is cool. The gritty vocals r nice...
But its amateurishly funky...and yet entirely antiseptic musically. Everything exactly where it should be and exactly the same at the measure before it. Nothing slinks around in it. Everything is square and straight...the lapels are pressed and the pant creases sharp and clear. Soooo not the image set forth by the lyrics or then songs attitude. Wrong on so many levels. A colonel might as well have covered it.
[Edited 5/8/14 16:18pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/08/14 5:15pm

MotownSubdivis
ion

The Beatles all the way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/08/14 6:57pm

controversy99

avatar

The Beatles. It's not even close. Although it's almost a John solo piece isn't it.
"Love & honesty, peace & harmony"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/08/14 7:09pm

Poplife88

avatar

The Beatles' all the way.

Aerosmith's is pretty good.

MJ's is awful imo.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/08/14 7:47pm

BobGeorge909

avatar

controversy99 said:

The Beatles. It's not even close. Although it's almost a John solo piece isn't it.

Paul's on bass and Ringo's drumming
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/08/14 7:58pm

controversy99

avatar

BobGeorge909 said:

controversy99 said:

The Beatles. It's not even close. Although it's almost a John solo piece isn't it.

Paul's on bass and Ringo's drumming

Yes, and George is playing guitar flourishes. I get it.
"Love & honesty, peace & harmony"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/09/14 6:26am

NaughtyKitty

avatar

Marrk said:

Might as well get it out of the way!... Michael's. I just love the production and the vocal performance. I've no idea why that short version turned up years later on HIStory though. That was just odd. Like the continuity in that video. Its always bugged me. Shirt buttoned/unbuttoned. I've never noticed MJ's guitarist getting so close to his crotch before either. See 1:45ish. lol

.

Can i give a big shout out to Prince's version from Coachella too?. Thank goodness i have the soundboard of that, that's pretty damn killer too.

[Edited 5/8/14 17:04pm]

lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/09/14 7:07am

Militant

avatar

moderator

Michael's. It's dark, heavy and slick. Brilliantly put together, and vocally his performance craps all over everyone else.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/09/14 10:20am

bigd74

avatar

fDeluxe smile
She Believed in Fairytales and Princes, He Believed the voices coming from his stereo

If I Said You Had A Beautiful Body Would You Hold It Against Me?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/09/14 10:21am

bigd74

avatar

Oops
[Edited 5/9/14 12:27pm]
She Believed in Fairytales and Princes, He Believed the voices coming from his stereo

If I Said You Had A Beautiful Body Would You Hold It Against Me?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 05/09/14 11:46am

Doalwa

The Beatles all the way...but I also dig MJ's version alot. Just what the fuck drove him to put it on the History album? Was he that strapped for new songs at the time?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 05/09/14 1:15pm

novabrkr

The Beatles.

It's interesting though how MJ managed to transform the song into a BAD-era sounding thing. I think it was a great choice to cover that song from the catalog he purchased.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 05/09/14 3:14pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

Shame on everyone in this freaking thread for sleeping AND sheeping on The Brother Johnson's version:



Just saying. mr.green

[Edited 5/9/14 16:11pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 05/09/14 3:20pm

Cinny

avatar

NaughtyKitty said:

Marrk said:

Might as well get it out of the way!... Michael's. I just love the production and the vocal performance. I've no idea why that short version turned up years later on HIStory though. That was just odd. Like the continuity in that video. Its always bugged me. Shirt buttoned/unbuttoned. I've never noticed MJ's guitarist getting so close to his crotch before either. See 1:45ish. lol

lol

lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 05/09/14 3:35pm

Marrk

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

Shame on everyone in this freaking thread for sheeping on The Brother Johnson's version:



Just saying. mr.green

'Sheeping'? sheep

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 05/09/14 4:13pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

Marrk said:

TonyVanDam said:

Shame on everyone in this freaking thread for sheeping on The Brother Johnson's version:



Just saying. mr.green

'Sheeping'? sheep

I meant "sleeping". disbelief But f*** it, "sleeping AND sheeping" it is. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 05/09/14 4:20pm

Marrk

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

Marrk said:

'Sheeping'? sheep

I meant "sleeping". disbelief But f*** it, "sleeping AND sheeping" it is. lol

I've just been waiting for the day when i could post sheep and 12,000+ posts later, it's finally arrived! biggrin

.

That version was pretty boss! I only have a Brothers Johnson greatest hits though. So thanks for that. I didn't know they recorded it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 05/09/14 7:47pm

lazycrockett

avatar

The Most Important Thing In Life Is Sincerity....Once You Can Fake That, You Can Fake Anything.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 05/09/14 8:13pm

EddieC

Let's see--adding in the Brothers Johnson, Eurythmics, and Prince versions to the ones in the original thread title...

still gotta go with the Beatles. I liked that Brothers Johnson, though. I'm not up to tracking down all the versions listed in the Wikipedia entry right now--but if anyone else knows of any worth listening to, point 'em out.

I did look at a video of Umphrey's McGee performing Come Together in a version combining it with Nine Inch Nail's Closer. It was every bit as misguided as you might suspect.

Oh, I went back and played the video above of the Beatles version. What a horrid mess that video is--I have no idea why they decided to "create" a performance video for a song they never performed. It looks ridiculous.

[Edited 5/9/14 20:25pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 05/09/14 8:42pm

phunkdaddy

avatar

TonyVanDam said:

Shame on everyone in this freaking thread for sleeping AND sheeping on The Brother Johnson's version:



Just saying. mr.green

[Edited 5/9/14 16:11pm]

This trumps them all. headbang

Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 05/09/14 8:54pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

EddieC said:

I have no idea why they decided to "create" a performance video for a song they never performed.

There's no video for Come Together, that's fan created. John performed it in concert, though, and there's a video for that. That footage of Paul is from Rockshow by Wings, which is around 1976. Youtube is full of homemade videos for many acts. Some have other videos or footage from movies, others have a slide show. There's the "Brown Prider" style videos, which are generally old soul & doo wop songs with pictures of lowriders or Latino art. Some videos have things that has nothing to do with the song or act.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 05/09/14 10:09pm

kewlschool

avatar

The Beatles, then Areosmith, MJ, and then Prince. I'm not a huge fan of Prince's cover of this song, it seems karoke to me and doesn't make me want to come together. I also don't like his cover of Rollercoaster, which oddly thought would be a great song for him to cover. Again it suffers from that karaoke feel (Seems to lack passion in his appropach.).

99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 05/09/14 10:34pm

nd33

1) Beatles - nothing can beat their vibe on this tune. Such a moody production.

2) MJ - this was the first version I became familiar with, since I owned the VHS of Moonwalker when I was an 80's child. Loved it since first hearing it on that. Total Bad vibe, should have been on the extended version of that album rather than History. Killer vocals.

.

Brothers Johnson is pretty cool.

Eurythmics sounds like them. Too happy sounding for me on this tune. Anyone noticed the bassline in the verses is really close to Billie Jean?

Don't care for the Aerosmith version, adds nothing over the OG.

Music, sweet music, I wish I could caress and...kiss, kiss...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 05/10/14 9:13am

ReddishBrownOn
e

Beat this version:

It's been too long since you've had your ass kicked properly:


http://www.facebook.com/p...9196044697

My band - listen and 'like' us, if you please
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 05/10/14 4:05pm

EddieC

MickyDolenz said:

EddieC said:

I have no idea why they decided to "create" a performance video for a song they never performed.

There's no video for Come Together, that's fan created. John performed it in concert, though, and there's a video for that. That footage of Paul is from Rockshow by Wings, which is around 1976. Youtube is full of homemade videos for many acts. Some have other videos or footage from movies, others have a slide show. There's the "Brown Prider" style videos, which are generally old soul & doo wop songs with pictures of lowriders or Latino art. Some videos have things that has nothing to do with the song or act.

I know it's fan-created; I guess I shouldn't have used "they" for both the fan and the band. I'm fine with fan-created videos--this one just seemed like a mess. I would have preferred some other sort of approach. Heck, even a stupid animation of stick figure Beatles playing, if they had to imagine a performance. Or the old standby of a series of still images, either of the band or random nouns from the lyrics. And what if some poor soul thinks they're actually seeing a Beatles performance? There's a lot of people out there who might not know, and might not realize how chronologically chaotic this thing is.

I mean, on a cosmic level, yeah, this doesn't matter. But I still didn't like it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 05/10/14 4:33pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

EddieC said:

I know it's fan-created; I guess I shouldn't have used "they" for both the fan and the band. I'm fine with fan-created videos--this one just seemed like a mess. I would have preferred some other sort of approach. Heck, even a stupid animation of stick figure Beatles playing, if they had to imagine a performance. Or the old standby of a series of still images, either of the band or random nouns from the lyrics. And what if some poor soul thinks they're actually seeing a Beatles performance? There's a lot of people out there who might not know, and might not realize how chronologically chaotic this thing is.

I mean, on a cosmic level, yeah, this doesn't matter. But I still didn't like it.

I've seen fan made videos for Jackson 5/Jacksons songs that has 1990's Michael footage & pictures and none of the other brothers at all. The people who upload these often title them as Michael Jackson only or maybe Michael Jackson & The Jackson 5. It's the same with songs Mike sang on (Kenny Loggins, Rockwell, Donna Summer, Diana Ross, Joe King Carrasco, etc.), they credit him only and put his pictures/videos on them, no matter how insignificant his contribution is. There's one guy who has entire Jackson 5 albums posted, but leave off the songs that don't have a Michael lead. lol Here's a couple that are for a Donna Summer song, but her name is nowhere on the title.


You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 05/15/14 7:36pm

Skylightt

avatar

Marrk said:

Might as well get it out of the way!... Michael's. I just love the production and the vocal performance. I've no idea why that short version turned up years later on HIStory though. That was just odd. Like the continuity in that video. Its always bugged me. Shirt buttoned/unbuttoned. I've never noticed MJ's guitarist getting so close to his crotch before either. See 1:45ish. lol

.

Can i give a big shout out to Prince's version from Coachella too?. Thank goodness i have the soundboard of that, that's pretty damn killer too.

[Edited 5/8/14 17:04pm]

^ The first time I watched it, I never noticed that Michael's shirt goes from being normal, to ripped just a little, to ripped all the way down to his stomach and then back again in the shots. I was way too distracted by...other things. drool3 lol I only noticed it when another fan commented on it and I get a laugh everytime I watch the video.

Michael's version was the first version I heard. His vocals are brilliant on it, the energy of his performance in the video is amazing. I love it. Michael's version makes it hard to sit still, you want to get up and move. Out of respect I'm gonna say The Beatles first, then Michael. I've never heard Aerosmith's version though.

~ You're a desire, I get higher every time I speak your name ~
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Come Together - The Beatles, Aerosmith or Michael Jackson?