independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Discuss Everything and Anything MJ
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 11 of 41 « First<789101112131415>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #300 posted 03/29/11 5:03pm

Marrk

avatar

bboy87 said:

SherryJackson said:

They're tryna portray us as a bunch of moonwalking idiots who have nothing better to do than make these useless videos for them. neutral Do your own goddamn fan tributes, people!

Or, they're pretty much doing a dick measuring contest between Michael and other artists. Like "check out how many people Mike inspires...how many fans love him...etc". Sorta reminds me of the TII mosaic (I donated 2 pics of me to that boxed)

Actually...excuse the last one...if I'm associating things with dick it's cuz I just walked out of pyschology class. disbelief

Timmy....I shoulda said this earlier...great sig thumbs up!

A huge portion of fans on MJJC are excited about it so the mission was accomplished lol

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #301 posted 03/29/11 5:04pm

GettOffMyLand

avatar

bboy87 said:

Swa said:

And another opportunity to do something cool and innovative goes out the window.

Are all the Michael videos gonna be fan tributes? neutral

I mean, come up with a actual concept/storyline, hire some actors.....hell, make an animated video?

Doing videos like this just makes it completely corny

Completely agree. From the outset they should have hired some interesting directors. This is just completely pointless.

‘You don’t understand — if I’m not there to receive these ideas, God might give them to Prince.’ 
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #302 posted 03/29/11 5:06pm

SherryJackson

Marrk said:

bboy87 said:

A huge portion of fans on MJJC are excited about it so the mission was accomplished lol

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

It happens....

But we gotta deal with the crazy ass Prince fans. Which is a minor problem compared to crazy ass MJ fans. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #303 posted 03/29/11 8:25pm

bboy87

avatar

Marrk said:

bboy87 said:

A huge portion of fans on MJJC are excited about it so the mission was accomplished lol

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

I see myself probably frequenting The Michael Jackson Vault more often (which I'm probably going to start moderating) if there was more people posting there lol

If that were the case, ya'll would rarely see me here on the Org lol

"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #304 posted 03/29/11 8:57pm

LittleBLUECorv
ette

avatar

bboy87 said:

Marrk said:

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

I see myself probably frequenting The Michael Jackson Vault more often (which I'm probably going to start moderating) if there was more people posting there lol

If that were the case, ya'll would rarely see me here on the Org lol

They'll come back, it's been gone for almost a year.

PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever
-----
Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #305 posted 03/30/11 6:05am

Derek1984

avatar

I think the fact that Monster, the most radio friendly song on the album, hasn't been released as a single is telling.

I also think that the only hope for the Estate to actually make signifcant money and for something to actually be done right are the Cirque Du Soleil shows.

Are they releasing the original mix of Behind The Mask from 1982 on the single? Like I've always thought, they probably aren't. It's something the fans would love to hear and McClain wouldn't be able to handle the fact that the original mix would sound better than his.

The Estate has no clue how to handle anything to do regarding music and video's.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #306 posted 03/30/11 6:13am

Unholyalliance

Marrk said:

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

I don't understand why MJ's fandom thinks theirs is the only fandom out there with lunatics. I also don't understand why a good portion of them try so hard to seperate themselves into what I call the 'anti-Michael Jackson fan.' Like they try so hard to be seperate themselves from everyone else by trying to be the opposite of actual MJ fans. There are all different levels of fandoms, but, as I said some time ago, already proclaiming yourself to be a fan of MJ already puts you in a different category. Hell, being a fan of anything puts you in a special category in people's minds.

I guess I just don't understand...

Though...I have been thinking: Does being a fan of something in particular already reflect something in your personality? How can I word this better... Example, does it take a 'certain' kind of person to be a MJ fan or a Britney Spears fan? Would someone who is a fan of Claude DeBussy would outright call themselves a fan of Lil' Wayne too? I'm not saying that it's not possible to be a fan of both, but I mean the type that would go out there and join message boards, buy stuff related to the artist, and etc.

I guess one good example, would be from Rupaul's drag race last season where Raven was at constant odds with this one other contestant because she was a Britney Spears fan. Raven said she hated Britney Spears fans because they were all superficial and shallow. While a big generalization, does that hold some weight you think when it comes to fandoms for other artists (and other things) as well?

I could very well be wrong, but I was just wondering.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #307 posted 03/30/11 10:45am

dag

avatar

Unholyalliance said:

Marrk said:

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

I don't understand why MJ's fandom thinks theirs is the only fandom out there with lunatics. I also don't understand why a good portion of them try so hard to seperate themselves into what I call the 'anti-Michael Jackson fan.' Like they try so hard to be seperate themselves from everyone else by trying to be the opposite of actual MJ fans. There are all different levels of fandoms, but, as I said some time ago, already proclaiming yourself to be a fan of MJ already puts you in a different category. Hell, being a fan of anything puts you in a special category in people's minds.

I guess I just don't understand...

Though...I have been thinking: Does being a fan of something in particular already reflect something in your personality? How can I word this better... Example, does it take a 'certain' kind of person to be a MJ fan or a Britney Spears fan? Would someone who is a fan of Claude DeBussy would outright call themselves a fan of Lil' Wayne too? I'm not saying that it's not possible to be a fan of both, but I mean the type that would go out there and join message boards, buy stuff related to the artist, and etc.

I guess one good example, would be from Rupaul's drag race last season where Raven was at constant odds with this one other contestant because she was a Britney Spears fan. Raven said she hated Britney Spears fans because they were all superficial and shallow. While a big generalization, does that hold some weight you think when it comes to fandoms for other artists (and other things) as well?

I could very well be wrong, but I was just wondering.

Interesting questions for which, however, I don't have answers.

"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #308 posted 03/30/11 11:35am

armpit

avatar

Unholyalliance said:

Marrk said:

Turns out MJ only has about enough sane fans on the internet to count on one hand. luckily, I know i'm one of them.

Kinda ironic we live on a Prince site.lol

I don't understand why MJ's fandom thinks theirs is the only fandom out there with lunatics. I also don't understand why a good portion of them try so hard to seperate themselves into what I call the 'anti-Michael Jackson fan.' Like they try so hard to be seperate themselves from everyone else by trying to be the opposite of actual MJ fans. There are all different levels of fandoms, but, as I said some time ago, already proclaiming yourself to be a fan of MJ already puts you in a different category. Hell, being a fan of anything puts you in a special category in people's minds.

I guess I just don't understand...

Though...I have been thinking: Does being a fan of something in particular already reflect something in your personality? How can I word this better... Example, does it take a 'certain' kind of person to be a MJ fan or a Britney Spears fan? Would someone who is a fan of Claude DeBussy would outright call themselves a fan of Lil' Wayne too? I'm not saying that it's not possible to be a fan of both, but I mean the type that would go out there and join message boards, buy stuff related to the artist, and etc.

I guess one good example, would be from Rupaul's drag race last season where Raven was at constant odds with this one other contestant because she was a Britney Spears fan. Raven said she hated Britney Spears fans because they were all superficial and shallow. While a big generalization, does that hold some weight you think when it comes to fandoms for other artists (and other things) as well?

I could very well be wrong, but I was just wondering.

No no, it's not that.

I've been online for at least ten years now, and I've been around to a lot of different fan communities for different artists. A lot. In every single one, I've seen some crazies.

But the ratio of crazy to sane fans in the MJ fan community, is a real anomaly. Seriously. I think that as many as forty percent of all MJ fans are really and truly mentally ill, and that's a really high incidence compared to most fan communities where it's like 10 percent, tops. And a lot of the sickest MJ fans are the most vocal so yes, the MJ fan community does have a rep as being the most mentally unstable so I completely understand why the sane fans, jump hoops and offer disclaimers to people like, "I'm an MJ fan, but....I'm not like THAT."

The sick ones have basically fucked up the image of the entire fanbase.

"I don't think you'd do well in captivity." - random person's comment to me the other day
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #309 posted 03/30/11 1:57pm

Emancipation89

WildStyle said:

I think it's pointless making videos without Michael here. What made Michael's videos so great? His talent and charisma. He's not here, they just need to leave it alone. Does anyone even watch music videos anymore?

I liked Hold My Hand video...it was kinda corny but in a way, it was a nice tribute to Michael and his diehard fans...

I kinda like Hollywood Tonight video as well. If the record company keeps making videos like this, I'll be ok with that. They're just making tribute videos...So that teenagers can keep watching the new MJ videos and keep loving him...I don't know if MJ would've wanted that after he died or not but it's part of keeping his legacy alive I think...^_^

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #310 posted 03/30/11 2:10pm

Timmy84

Rebbie doing "Rock With You" at some show, probably for her charity for autism (I think).

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #311 posted 03/30/11 2:33pm

babybugz

avatar

armpit said:

Unholyalliance said:

I don't understand why MJ's fandom thinks theirs is the only fandom out there with lunatics. I also don't understand why a good portion of them try so hard to seperate themselves into what I call the 'anti-Michael Jackson fan.' Like they try so hard to be seperate themselves from everyone else by trying to be the opposite of actual MJ fans. There are all different levels of fandoms, but, as I said some time ago, already proclaiming yourself to be a fan of MJ already puts you in a different category. Hell, being a fan of anything puts you in a special category in people's minds.

I guess I just don't understand...

Though...I have been thinking: Does being a fan of something in particular already reflect something in your personality? How can I word this better... Example, does it take a 'certain' kind of person to be a MJ fan or a Britney Spears fan? Would someone who is a fan of Claude DeBussy would outright call themselves a fan of Lil' Wayne too? I'm not saying that it's not possible to be a fan of both, but I mean the type that would go out there and join message boards, buy stuff related to the artist, and etc.

I guess one good example, would be from Rupaul's drag race last season where Raven was at constant odds with this one other contestant because she was a Britney Spears fan. Raven said she hated Britney Spears fans because they were all superficial and shallow. While a big generalization, does that hold some weight you think when it comes to fandoms for other artists (and other things) as well?

I could very well be wrong, but I was just wondering.

No no, it's not that.

I've been online for at least ten years now, and I've been around to a lot of different fan communities for different artists. A lot. In every single one, I've seen some crazies.

But the ratio of crazy to sane fans in the MJ fan community, is a real anomaly. Seriously. I think that as many as forty percent of all MJ fans are really and truly mentally ill, and that's a really high incidence compared to most fan communities where it's like 10 percent, tops. And a lot of the sickest MJ fans are the most vocal so yes, the MJ fan community does have a rep as being the most mentally unstable so I completely understand why the sane fans, jump hoops and offer disclaimers to people like, "I'm an MJ fan, but....I'm not like THAT."

The sick ones have basically fucked up the image of the entire fanbase.

Sound like Lady Gaga fans I’m a big fan but I can not deal with her little monsters I don’t like Michael fans either but timmy and Bboy are cool.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #312 posted 03/30/11 2:46pm

Unholyalliance

armpit said:

I've been online for at least ten years now, and I've been around to a lot of different fan communities for different artists. A lot. In every single one, I've seen some crazies.

But the ratio of crazy to sane fans in the MJ fan community, is a real anomaly. Seriously. I think that as many as forty percent of all MJ fans are really and truly mentally ill, and that's a really high incidence compared to most fan communities where it's like 10 percent, tops. And a lot of the sickest MJ fans are the most vocal so yes, the MJ fan community does have a rep as being the most mentally unstable so I completely understand why the sane fans, jump hoops and offer disclaimers to people like, "I'm an MJ fan, but....I'm not like THAT."

The sick ones have basically fucked up the image of the entire fanbase.

I always thought that MJ fans were seen as being 'mentally ill' for the mere fact that they were willing to defend, listen to, and support a 'sick pervert.' When people view something as 'weird or different' they label it and they label the people who support it. I do admit that some are more passionate about it than others, but couldn't that be a case of how varied MJ's fanbase is rather than a big portion of them being nuts.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #313 posted 03/30/11 3:29pm

HAPPYPERSON

Michael Jackson Memorial High for new high school in Cramerton?

Gaston County Schools received more than 2,000 entries suggesting names for the high school in the process of being built in Cramerton.

The most popular choices included names like Lakewood and Cramerton.

Others had more unique suggestions, such as Tri City, Two Rivers and Weaver’s Mill. Some submissions paid homage to individuals with Ron Harper High, Reeves McGlohon High, Stuart Cramer High, Chuck Norris High and Michael Jackson Memorial High School.

A committee of parents, teachers and residents of Belmont, Mount Holly and Cramerton sorted through name suggestions Tuesday, weeding out the wacky and those too similar to existing schools.

The remaining names will be narrowed down even further at a committee meeting in April. That’s when they’ll cull the possibilities down to four or five names. Those names then go to the Gaston County Board of Education’s operations committee, who will make its recommendation to the full school board. School officials hope to have the name, mascot and colors of the new school decided by the end of June.

“We had so many names to choose from,” said parent and South Point High teacher Leigh Nance.

Her son could be among the first graduating class at the high school since they live in Cramerton.

Committee member Chuc Clubb said he wouldn’t choose Cramerton or Lakewood as the new high school’s name. Naming the school Cramerton could alienate kids coming from Mount Holly or Belmont. Lakewood isn’t a good choice because there’s already a Lakewood High in the state.

He hopes the students will have more of an input on the name.

“It’s the name that’s going to be on their class ring and their diploma,” Clubb said. “I think people need to let the kids have a voice in it.”

Construction of the three-story, 268,000-square-foot building is scheduled to be complete in time for the school to open in the fall of 2013. The school can hold 1,200 students and will be able to expand to 1,500 students.

The new high school will open with ninth and 10th grade students the first year and add grades 11 and 12 over the next two years.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #314 posted 03/30/11 3:38pm

SherryJackson

Timmy84 said:

Rebbie doing "Rock With You" at some show, probably for her charity for autism (I think).

*ahem*

No comment. I'm sorry that did nothing for me...and i actually like her... lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #315 posted 03/30/11 3:43pm

Swa

avatar

Unholyalliance said:

armpit said:

I've been online for at least ten years now, and I've been around to a lot of different fan communities for different artists. A lot. In every single one, I've seen some crazies.

But the ratio of crazy to sane fans in the MJ fan community, is a real anomaly. Seriously. I think that as many as forty percent of all MJ fans are really and truly mentally ill, and that's a really high incidence compared to most fan communities where it's like 10 percent, tops. And a lot of the sickest MJ fans are the most vocal so yes, the MJ fan community does have a rep as being the most mentally unstable so I completely understand why the sane fans, jump hoops and offer disclaimers to people like, "I'm an MJ fan, but....I'm not like THAT."

The sick ones have basically fucked up the image of the entire fanbase.

I always thought that MJ fans were seen as being 'mentally ill' for the mere fact that they were willing to defend, listen to, and support a 'sick pervert.' When people view something as 'weird or different' they label it and they label the people who support it. I do admit that some are more passionate about it than others, but couldn't that be a case of how varied MJ's fanbase is rather than a big portion of them being nuts.

I think any fanbase has fan's that take it to the extreme of their fandom. I've seen some pretty crazy Bon Jovi fans, Prince fans, even Radiohead and Bjork fans.

I think when you stop being analytical and open to the fact that your artist of choice will make mistakes and start viewing them as "can do no wrong" then that's when all hell breaks loose and all sense of reality starts to drift away.

Maybe some MJ fans take it extremes because for a good 10 years you were ridiculed and seen as being "weird" yourself for being a fan. Now with his passing many in the general public are reassessing their bias towards him and I think those fans are now overly protective of Michael.

I don't think being a massive fan of someone characterises your personality if you are not just one dimensional in your musical taste. If all you listen to is Britney, then you will be limited in your outlook and thus might get stereotyped as this or that.

I call myself a fan of many artists, and they aren't all in the same genre - Prince, MJ, Nine Inch Nails, Depeche Mode, Radiohead, Arcade Fire, Foo Fighters, Beck, Bjork, Janet and on and on.

In my opinion, when you shut yourself down to other's points of view (don't have to agree with them, just hear them out) then you drift off to being irrational. Of course, for a long time it was fashionable to be an MJ hater and to deliberately rile up fans - maybe an easy target so I think many people's first reaction is to defend. Some just take it too far.

"I'm not human I'm a dove, I'm ur conscience. I am love"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #316 posted 03/30/11 5:17pm

bboy87

avatar

Derek1984 said:

I think the fact that Monster, the most radio friendly song on the album, hasn't been released as a single is telling.

I also think that the only hope for the Estate to actually make signifcant money and for something to actually be done right are the Cirque Du Soleil shows.

Are they releasing the original mix of Behind The Mask from 1982 on the single? Like I've always thought, they probably aren't. It's something the fans would love to hear and McClain wouldn't be able to handle the fact that the original mix would sound better than his.

The Estate has no clue how to handle anything to do regarding music and video's.

With the promotion, it's not just the estate making the decisions, it's Sony and in the climate, they're in, they're going with the "let's have the fans promote it" route

I wouldn't say that they have no clue on how to handle it, they're just not handling it in the way that we'd expect and hoped for. One executor is the guy who helped Michael secure Sly Stone's publishing catalog and the ATV deal. The other guy helped found Interscope Records and helped Dr. Dre and Suge Knight get their deal for Death Row Records. They definitely know the music industry lol

If what I'm hearing is true, the re-release of Bad next year is gonna be good and hopefully, they'll learn from their mistakes that they made with Michael

"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #317 posted 03/30/11 6:20pm

Unholyalliance

Swa said:

I think when you stop being analytical and open to the fact that your artist of choice will make mistakes and start viewing them as "can do no wrong" then that's when all hell breaks loose and all sense of reality starts to drift away.

Funny you state that because this is the thing: In a lot of people's eyes they still see him a great possibly in him being guilty so when you start to defend him others take it as you not being able to accept the truth and glossing over the facts to defend your 'idol'. Even, right now, if someone were to come in here and start talking about the allegations would most of us here not try and to defend him as being a victim of extortion rather than a predator? In many other eyes they see it as you are so far into your fandom you can not see the man for what he was.

That being said though, I do agree with you on many other points, but that also applies to so many other fandoms, including many of those on the Prince and More subforum, which is why I tend to shy away from it in general. How many Prince fans I have seen claim that James Brown is far inferior to him, Beatles fanboys claim outright that modern music would not exist without them, or that no one was bigger than Elvis? Even though I don't agree with any of those people, in the least, it is just their opinions. Every fandom has them. I don't think that this particular fandom has more of them, because I can think of another couple of significant ones that have its share of uber passionate fans. =/

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #318 posted 03/30/11 7:24pm

armpit

avatar

Unholyalliance said:

armpit said:

I've been online for at least ten years now, and I've been around to a lot of different fan communities for different artists. A lot. In every single one, I've seen some crazies.

But the ratio of crazy to sane fans in the MJ fan community, is a real anomaly. Seriously. I think that as many as forty percent of all MJ fans are really and truly mentally ill, and that's a really high incidence compared to most fan communities where it's like 10 percent, tops. And a lot of the sickest MJ fans are the most vocal so yes, the MJ fan community does have a rep as being the most mentally unstable so I completely understand why the sane fans, jump hoops and offer disclaimers to people like, "I'm an MJ fan, but....I'm not like THAT."

The sick ones have basically fucked up the image of the entire fanbase.

I always thought that MJ fans were seen as being 'mentally ill' for the mere fact that they were willing to defend, listen to, and support a 'sick pervert.' When people view something as 'weird or different' they label it and they label the people who support it. I do admit that some are more passionate about it than others, but couldn't that be a case of how varied MJ's fanbase is rather than a big portion of them being nuts.

...Nice try, but save it for someone who isn't a MJ fan lol . I've probably been a fan of the man longer than you've even been alive. Before I could even multiply or write in cursive, I knew the lyrics to his songs by heart. Hell, before I could even tie my own shoes - and I'm not exaggerating - my mother used to tell me stories about how I knew all the words to his songs when I was only four years old. I don't even remember that. And like everyone else, I was pissed as hell when he was accused of pedophilia and slandered on a regular basis in the press. So don't hand me that bullshit.

This isn't about disliking the fan community because of the man. I loved, still love, the man. But a sizable portion of his fan community, is fucking psycho. And I'm not blaming him for that - that wasn't his fault, he had no control over that. Any sane person who goes in MJ fan chats or MJ fan forums and hangs around will see real quick that something is very wrong with a lot of his fanbase. And MJ kept a shitload of security around himself. Says alot.

And I'm not the first person to make these observations. I've seen lots of people on several music-related websites, over the years complain about how they're a big MJ fan, and thought highly of the man and his work, but how they just cannot take his batshit crazy fans. I've also seen several people who were really big fans and knew a lot about his discography and had a lot they could've contributed to those forums, run off of them by the mentally ill members; and I've seen people come in threads on sites, asking for links to MJ fan forums, only to have people flock to them and warn them NOT to go anywhere near those places.

Again - that says ALOT.

"I don't think you'd do well in captivity." - random person's comment to me the other day
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #319 posted 03/30/11 8:10pm

Timmy84

I just stay away from most sites unless I feel the urge to talk there and it's only been in KOP lately. I did go briefly to MJJC but that was to comment on something unrelated to Michael. It was about Gaga I think, I forgot. I'm gonna make more attempts to go to the MJJ Vault site though. I forgot I'm a member there.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #320 posted 03/30/11 10:57pm

mookie

Timmy84 said:

I just stay away from most sites unless I feel the urge to talk there and it's only been in KOP lately. I did go briefly to MJJC but that was to comment on something unrelated to Michael. It was about Gaga I think, I forgot. I'm gonna make more attempts to go to the MJJ Vault site though. I forgot I'm a member there.

I still visit the KOP, MJJC and MJJUK. IMO, as annoying as some of these fans are on these sites, they overall are pretty harmless. I'll take these posters anyday over these racists, hateful, arrogant pricks on some of these other fansites.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #321 posted 03/30/11 11:01pm

Timmy84

mookie said:

Timmy84 said:

I just stay away from most sites unless I feel the urge to talk there and it's only been in KOP lately. I did go briefly to MJJC but that was to comment on something unrelated to Michael. It was about Gaga I think, I forgot. I'm gonna make more attempts to go to the MJJ Vault site though. I forgot I'm a member there.

I still visit the KOP, MJJC and MJJUK. IMO, as annoying as some of these fans are on these sites, they overall are pretty harmless. I'll take these posters anyday over these racists, hateful, arrogant pricks on some of these other fansites.

It's like a lesser evil lol but I see what you're saying.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #322 posted 03/30/11 11:22pm

Swa

avatar

^^

I figure there is nothing on another MJ site (KOP etc) that I couldn't discuss here - and here the discussion is intelligent and propels insights and views (well, for the most part).

"I'm not human I'm a dove, I'm ur conscience. I am love"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #323 posted 03/30/11 11:24pm

Timmy84

Swa said:

^^

I figure there is nothing on another MJ site (KOP etc) that I couldn't discuss here - and here the discussion is intelligent and propels insights and views (well, for the most part).

Once you get away from all the crazy talk, yeah lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #324 posted 03/31/11 2:04am

dag

avatar

Swa said:

Unholyalliance said:

I always thought that MJ fans were seen as being 'mentally ill' for the mere fact that they were willing to defend, listen to, and support a 'sick pervert.' When people view something as 'weird or different' they label it and they label the people who support it. I do admit that some are more passionate about it than others, but couldn't that be a case of how varied MJ's fanbase is rather than a big portion of them being nuts.

I think any fanbase has fan's that take it to the extreme of their fandom. I've seen some pretty crazy Bon Jovi fans, Prince fans, even Radiohead and Bjork fans.

I think when you stop being analytical and open to the fact that your artist of choice will make mistakes and start viewing them as "can do no wrong" then that's when all hell breaks loose and all sense of reality starts to drift away.

Maybe some MJ fans take it extremes because for a good 10 years you were ridiculed and seen as being "weird" yourself for being a fan. Now with his passing many in the general public are reassessing their bias towards him and I think those fans are now overly protective of Michael.

I don't think being a massive fan of someone characterises your personality if you are not just one dimensional in your musical taste. If all you listen to is Britney, then you will be limited in your outlook and thus might get stereotyped as this or that.

I call myself a fan of many artists, and they aren't all in the same genre - Prince, MJ, Nine Inch Nails, Depeche Mode, Radiohead, Arcade Fire, Foo Fighters, Beck, Bjork, Janet and on and on.

In my opinion, when you shut yourself down to other's points of view (don't have to agree with them, just hear them out) then you drift off to being irrational. Of course, for a long time it was fashionable to be an MJ hater and to deliberately rile up fans - maybe an easy target so I think many people's first reaction is to defend. Some just take it too far.

I think I can only agree.

"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #325 posted 03/31/11 2:38am

bboy87

avatar

Excerpt of an interview with Matt Forger

G-Man: What's the weirdest thing you've done in the studio? In terms of sonics, I mean.

Forger: Before the advent of digital technology, you needed to be creative acoustically and electronically. In the song "Billie Jean," when Michael sings the line "Do think twice" at end of the third verse, he's singing through a cardboard mailing tube. We often would record elements in the bathroom (tiled) because it would give it a short early reflection quality. The main percussion sound on the song "Beat It" was Michael beating on fiberboard drum cases with 1x3 inch pieces of wood in the mirrored room of Westlake Studio A. This was all normal. Now if you want to talk weird, on one song (not MJ) we ran a tape loop around the room supported by microphone stands on a two track machine. It was a loop of burps and was keyed by the kick and snare to give the effect of drums that were alive and breathing.

"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #326 posted 03/31/11 8:15am

Marrk

avatar

bboy87 said:

Excerpt of an interview with Matt Forger

G-Man: What's the weirdest thing you've done in the studio? In terms of sonics, I mean.

Forger: Before the advent of digital technology, you needed to be creative acoustically and electronically. In the song "Billie Jean," when Michael sings the line "Do think twice" at end of the third verse, he's singing through a cardboard mailing tube. We often would record elements in the bathroom (tiled) because it would give it a short early reflection quality. The main percussion sound on the song "Beat It" was Michael beating on fiberboard drum cases with 1x3 inch pieces of wood in the mirrored room of Westlake Studio A. This was all normal. Now if you want to talk weird, on one song (not MJ) we ran a tape loop around the room supported by microphone stands on a two track machine. It was a loop of burps and was keyed by the kick and snare to give the effect of drums that were alive and breathing.

Another example of Mike being a percussionist.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #327 posted 03/31/11 9:22am

dag

avatar

[img:$uid]http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/tt349/esmeralda84_2009/gif-10.gif[/img:$uid] [img:$uid]http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/tt349/esmeralda84_2009/gif2-7.gif[/img:$uid]


[Edited 3/31/11 9:27am]

"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #328 posted 03/31/11 9:51am

SherryJackson

bboy87 said:

Excerpt of an interview with Matt Forger

G-Man: What's the weirdest thing you've done in the studio? In terms of sonics, I mean.

Forger: Before the advent of digital technology, you needed to be creative acoustically and electronically. In the song "Billie Jean," when Michael sings the line "Do think twice" at end of the third verse, he's singing through a cardboard mailing tube. We often would record elements in the bathroom (tiled) because it would give it a short early reflection quality. The main percussion sound on the song "Beat It" was Michael beating on fiberboard drum cases with 1x3 inch pieces of wood in the mirrored room of Westlake Studio A. This was all normal. Now if you want to talk weird, on one song (not MJ) we ran a tape loop around the room supported by microphone stands on a two track machine. It was a loop of burps and was keyed by the kick and snare to give the effect of drums that were alive and breathing.

worship

I still get amazed by Mike....

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #329 posted 03/31/11 9:54am

dag

avatar

Miss you, sweetheart.

[Edited 3/31/11 9:57am]

"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 11 of 41 « First<789101112131415>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Discuss Everything and Anything MJ