Very excited for this.

Only slight confusing thing is Glam Slam appears to be the live audio, AND the Blu Ray. You'd assume the live audio would be a main show from the tour... maybe a mistake in the mock-up photos?

Nice that the Special Olympics performance is also remastred on Blu Ray though, and the video collection... Bart!

LILpoundCAKE said:

fredmagnus said:

Well, i think we almost have it.

Only 3 studio tracks are missing from our list.

I guess it will be "only" 34 studio tracks + 13 live songs to make the 47.

[Edited 8/24/23 2:46am]

I think the glam slam gig is 13 tracks, then the Olympics peformance is 2 songs. so total 15.

that would leave room for 32 studiotracks. 30 that we knew of, plus Gett Off DN10M.

leaves us with only 1 track. Could be an intro to the live performance or something.

So my guess right now is no more surprise tracks, just the list we already have. Which is ok
for me. Just really sad about I Wonder and Player not being included.

.

Yes, and all the tracks we have so far have a total duration of 170 minutes. That's 57 minute per vault CD. Quite frustrating.

3x vault discs, 1x Remixes. Excellent. I was worried it would be 2x +2x.

LILpoundCAKE said:

fredmagnus said:

Well, i think we almost have it.

Only 3 studio tracks are missing from our list.

I guess it will be "only" 34 studio tracks + 13 live songs to make the 47.

[Edited 8/24/23 2:46am]

I think the glam slam gig is 13 tracks, then the Olympics peformance is 2 songs. so total 15.

that would leave room for 32 studiotracks. 30 that we knew of, plus Gett Off DN10M.

leaves us with only 1 track. Could be an intro to the live performance or something.

So my guess right now is no more surprise tracks, just the list we already have. Which is ok
for me. Just really sad about I Wonder and Player not being included.

Hopefully those missing vault tracks will appear on the Love Symbol SDE... If the Estate and Warner get that completed.

I heard Vault tracks overlapped between the 2 albums, so that might explain missing tracks from this SDE.

SquirrelMeat said:

3x vault discs, 1x Remixes. Excellent. I was worried it would be 2x +2x.

.

+1 (I mean, it was a personal nightmare too)

[Edited 8/24/23 3:03am]

happyshopper said:

LILpoundCAKE said:

I think the glam slam gig is 13 tracks, then the Olympics peformance is 2 songs. so total 15.

that would leave room for 32 studiotracks. 30 that we knew of, plus Gett Off DN10M.

leaves us with only 1 track. Could be an intro to the live performance or something.

So my guess right now is no more surprise tracks, just the list we already have. Which is ok
for me. Just really sad about I Wonder and Player not being included.

Hopefully those missing vault tracks will appear on the Love Symbol SDE... If the Estate and Warner get that completed.

I heard Vault tracks overlapped between the 2 albums, so that might explain missing tracks from this SDE.

this set certainly contains some songs and mixes of songs that were recorded well after
the Diamonds and Pearls album was completed or even released.

I hope that after this set is announced by the estate, we will also sooner rather than later
get some insight into their release schedule/plans for the future.

i'm wondering what the vault series 1 is a part of, if it is a part of anything.

Still hoping for some sort of website/download of regular stuff coming out. Would be for
example a nice place to now put an actual D&P stadium show, to hype the box set and
to give us even more content.

LILpoundCAKE said:

happyshopper said:

Hopefully those missing vault tracks will appear on the Love Symbol SDE... If the Estate and Warner get that completed.

I heard Vault tracks overlapped between the 2 albums, so that might explain missing tracks from this SDE.

i'm wondering what the vault series 1 is a part of, if it is a part of anything.

I doubt we'll see a Vault series... unless it's agreed with Warner or Sony, and there's tracks that don't fit on future SDEs.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CG2PPJC8

I know my post may start some controversy. But I wish to say that there are people who do not seem to appreciate the confidentiality of information when posting details (text) of a public announcement, which is not yet public. Again, I am talking about violating the confidentiality of communication which is yet to be issued officially. When I logged in amazon.fr, they had removed the text description. There are people who may be affected by this unsollicited spread of information. Amazon may have posted it online in error, but it was reshared publicly and when i checked it had been removed.

Kanissa Williams is a fan. I am not sure how she got involved in the project, but it would have polite and respectful to give a hours rather than being too impatient. She may not like very much that folks could not wait hours before resharing publicly.

The same remark goes for people who keep posting information publicly about what they have uncovered, or what they think they have uncovered, days and weeks before the announcement.

Looking for information and sharing it in private is completely normal, but the point is that sharing publicly is becoming a childish behaviour to the point that it can be seen as a deliberate breach of confidential details (confidentiality which is not being preserved), and the participation in the dissemination of information which should be kept private.

WhenFansCry said:

I know my post may start some controversy. But I wish to say that there are people who do not seem to appreciate the confidentiality of information when posting details (text) of a public announcement, which is not yet public. Again, I am talking about violating the confidentiality of communication which is yet to be issued officially. When I logged in amazon.fr, they had removed the text description. There are people who may be affected by this unsollicited spread of information. Amazon may have posted it online in error, but it was reshared publicly and when i checked it had been removed.

Kanissa Williams is a fan. I am not sure how she got involved in the project, but it would have polite and respectful to give a hours rather than being too impatient. She may not like very much that folks could not wait hours before resharing publicly.

The same remark goes for people who keep posting information publicly about what they have uncovered, or what they think they have uncovered, days and weeks before the announcement.

Looking for information and sharing it in private is completely normal, but the point is that sharing publicly is becoming a childish behaviour to the point that it can be seen as a deliberate breach of confidential details (confidentiality which is not being preserved), and the participation in the dissemination of information which should be kept private.

.

This is a losing game.

.

Even Apple can't keep everyting secret before an announcement. And they're trying hard.

WhenFansCry said:

WhenFansCry said:

I know my post may start some controversy. But I wish to say that there are people who do not seem to appreciate the confidentiality of information when posting details (text) of a public announcement, which is not yet public. Again, I am talking about violating the confidentiality of communication which is yet to be issued officially. When I logged in amazon.fr, they had removed the text description. There are people who may be affected by this unsollicited spread of information. Amazon may have posted it online in error, but it was reshared publicly and when i checked it had been removed.

Kanissa Williams is a fan. I am not sure how she got involved in the project, but it would have polite and respectful to give a hours rather than being too impatient. She may not like very much that folks could not wait hours before resharing publicly.

The same remark goes for people who keep posting information publicly about what they have uncovered, or what they think they have uncovered, days and weeks before the announcement.

Looking for information and sharing it in private is completely normal, but the point is that sharing publicly is becoming a childish behaviour to the point that it can be seen as a deliberate breach of confidential details (confidentiality which is not being preserved), and the participation in the dissemination of information which should be kept private.

.
LOL
Amazon shares something with (potentially) 300 million people, we reshare the same info to a couple of dozens of Prince fans, and you complain about the latter. Okay
.
BTW: even Funkenberry has reshared it since, even though he DID sign an NDA – I did not.

[Edited 8/24/23 4:06am]

Personally, I'm keeping an eye out for the 7" box set... I'm a sucker for colored vinyl, and I love these 7" box sets (I bought the 'Sign O The Times' one as well)..

Over on the KISS forums (yes, I'm a KISS fan also), I found out they (the store) put the 'KISS Alive II' picture disc on their site before it was announced (idiots). Limited to 500 copies, and one single person could buy up to 4. It sold out in under an hour. People were immediately flipping them on eBay for 4x the price. To this date it's the only one I missed. My OCD is *screaming*...

Really hope that doesn't happen here...

[Edited 8/24/23 4:12am]

lottusflower said:

lustmealways said:

I'll take it but there should be a lot more here and they should stop trying to fit it all on LP's

Cry about it.

WhenFansCry said:

I know my post may start some controversy. But I wish to say that there are people who do not seem to appreciate the confidentiality of information when posting details (text) of a public announcement, which is not yet public. Again, I am talking about violating the confidentiality of communication which is yet to be issued officially. When I logged in amazon.fr, they had removed the text description. There are people who may be affected by this unsollicited spread of information. Amazon may have posted it online in error, but it was reshared publicly and when i checked it had been removed.

Kanissa Williams is a fan. I am not sure how she got involved in the project, but it would have polite and respectful to give a hours rather than being too impatient. She may not like very much that folks could not wait hours before resharing publicly.

Despite your protestation regarding someone supplying a link to a public site, no-one in this thread to date has quoted the description that was published on the French Amazon site (and which, as I type, is still published on at least one other Amazon site). I too am not sure how a person whose name was included in the description would feel about its premature disclosure, but you chose to (mis)publish her name here.

mb71 said:

Cry about it.

Well played

langebleu said:

WhenFansCry said:

I know my post may start some controversy. But I wish to say that there are people who do not seem to appreciate the confidentiality of information when posting details (text) of a public announcement, which is not yet public. Again, I am talking about violating the confidentiality of communication which is yet to be issued officially. When I logged in amazon.fr, they had removed the text description. There are people who may be affected by this unsollicited spread of information. Amazon may have posted it online in error, but it was reshared publicly and when i checked it had been removed.

Kanissa Williams is a fan. I am not sure how she got involved in the project, but it would have polite and respectful to give a hours rather than being too impatient. She may not like very much that folks could not wait hours before resharing publicly.

Despite your protestation regarding someone supplying a link to a public site, no-one in this thread to date has quoted the description that was published on the French Amazon site (and which, as I type, is still published on at least one other Amazon site). I too am not sure how a person whose name was included in the description would feel about its premature disclosure, but you chose to (mis)publish her name here.

.
I did copy the French Amazon's product description here but let's get something clear: once something is published on Amazon (or any other huge site with a reach of hundreds of millions), it IS published and stops being confidential, period.
Crying about this is childish.

lottusflower said:

DISC: 1 1.

.

Thank you. Not bad at all. My only missing thing is I Hear Your Voice. I was still hoping for it.

olb99 said:

LILpoundCAKE said:

I think the glam slam gig is 13 tracks, then the Olympics peformance is 2 songs. so total 15.

that would leave room for 32 studiotracks. 30 that we knew of, plus Gett Off DN10M.

leaves us with only 1 track. Could be an intro to the live performance or something.

So my guess right now is no more surprise tracks, just the list we already have. Which is ok
for me. Just really sad about I Wonder and Player not being included.

.

Yes, and all the tracks we have so far have a total duration of 170 minutes. That's 57 minute per vault CD. Quite frustrating.

So 10 minutes shy of 2 discs?? Hmm. Like they added 1 or maybe 2 tracks to give the illusion that the mighty Londell Spicer administration delivered with a whole full disc more than their predecessors when it's a literal extra breadcrumb from their seat cushions?

WhisperingDandelions said:

olb99 said:

.

Yes, and all the tracks we have so far have a total duration of 170 minutes. That's 57 minute per vault CD. Quite frustrating.

So 10 minutes shy of 2 discs?? Hmm. Like they added 1 or maybe 2 tracks to give the illusion that the mighty Londell Spicer administration delivered with a whole full disc more than their predecessors when it's a literal extra breadcrumb from their seat cushions?

.
It's about 12 minutes more than what could've fitted 2 CDs. A rather questionable editing decision indeed. At least they could've added the audio of the special olympics show onto one of the vault CDs, if they really didn't want to give us any other vault tracks.

Kares said:

Landonfunkmonkey said:

as long as fitting every track on the CD on the LP is a concern, the discs will continue to be undercooked and understuffed.

lustmealways said:

Landonfunkmonkey said: