independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince Did Blow It By Being So Difficult With Fans
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 05/06/16 9:47pm

RiotPaisley

purplesweat said:

Yep. I became a fan back in 2006 and it was so difficult to locate his material. He should've been more understanding that younger fans can't really access songs unless they're on the net. What with wrecka stows closing and CD players becoming relics, it really limited people from discovering his work. I only really got introduced to him through his award show performances between 04 and 06. In the end, I had to get other fans to send me burned copies of his CDs, there was just no other way to access anything. Which sucks because his b-sides are incredible and worth hearing!



Bull crap! So you stole from him anyway with burned copies! Before he died you could buy just about any cd of his on Amazon for a reasonable price. If you wanted to find him, you could.
Surprise, surprise.
Another treat. Another trick.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 05/06/16 9:51pm

CynicKill

pyramidseye said:

My 15-year old son does not know who Prince is. He says he has no idea of his music. The first place he goes when he wants to listen to some song is YouTube, and Prince wasn't there. Prince's quarrel with WB was a sign that more trouble was to come and it did. You can't get rich all by yourself. You need partners. He had great talent but he couldn't make the most out of it financially. $150-300 mio is nothing for a world star with decades of musical career. That's only a fraction of what Madonna owns. He was an emotional artist but not a rational businessman. When he appeared on Larry King on CNN, he had no idea that CNN belonged to WB. Can you believe that? Most artists don't give their music away with newspapers, simply because it is not the best way to make money. He fought the corporations by losing his own money opportunities and the corporations did not care a bit. Business is as usual and Prince had no impact on it.

>

I'm out of sync in a world that regards $150-300 mil as a failure.

I agree he was a piss poor businessman but it is what it is.

The music and the spectacular performances speak for themselves.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 05/06/16 9:51pm

RiotPaisley

pyramidseye said:

My 15-year old son does not know who Prince is. He says he has no idea of his music. The first place he goes when he wants to listen to some song is YouTube, and Prince wasn't there.

Prince's quarrel with WB was a sign that more trouble was to come and it did. You can't get rich all by yourself. You need partners. He had great talent but he couldn't make the most out of it financially. $150-300 mio is nothing for a world star with decades of musical career. That's only a fraction of what Madonna owns.

He was an emotional artist but not a rational businessman. When he appeared on Larry King on CNN, he had no idea that CNN belonged to WB. Can you believe that? Most artists don't give their music away with newspapers, simply because it is not the best way to make money. He fought the corporations by losing his own money opportunities and the corporations did not care a bit. Business is as usual and Prince had no impact on it.


Why do you care how much he made? And more importantly, if you are a Prince fan- how on Earth does your 15 year old son not know who he is? My 6 year old daughter was singing Raspberry Beret when she was 3 and requests AOA in the car, track 2, every single day. That's yo' fault if your son don't know who he is, not Prince's.
Surprise, surprise.
Another treat. Another trick.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 05/06/16 9:52pm

RiotPaisley

CynicKill said:



pyramidseye said:


My 15-year old son does not know who Prince is. He says he has no idea of his music. The first place he goes when he wants to listen to some song is YouTube, and Prince wasn't there. Prince's quarrel with WB was a sign that more trouble was to come and it did. You can't get rich all by yourself. You need partners. He had great talent but he couldn't make the most out of it financially. $150-300 mio is nothing for a world star with decades of musical career. That's only a fraction of what Madonna owns. He was an emotional artist but not a rational businessman. When he appeared on Larry King on CNN, he had no idea that CNN belonged to WB. Can you believe that? Most artists don't give their music away with newspapers, simply because it is not the best way to make money. He fought the corporations by losing his own money opportunities and the corporations did not care a bit. Business is as usual and Prince had no impact on it.

>


I'm out of sync in a world that regards $150-300 mil as a failure.


I agree he was a piss poor businessman but it is what it is.


The music and the spectacular performances speak for themselves.








Maybe he wasn't such a bad business man after all: http://www.billboard.com/...-his-super
Surprise, surprise.
Another treat. Another trick.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 05/06/16 10:01pm

CynicKill

RiotPaisley said:

CynicKill said:

>

I'm out of sync in a world that regards $150-300 mil as a failure.

I agree he was a piss poor businessman but it is what it is.

The music and the spectacular performances speak for themselves.

Maybe he wasn't such a bad business man after all: http://www.billboard.com/...-his-super

>

True but he was inconsistant, and seemed relatively surprised by the success of the tour.

A rational artist never would've released ATWIAD after Purple Rain, and not so soon. He could've gotten another year out of Purple Rain.

Parade would've been a no-go.

If he cared about the business he would've progressed on the strides he made with Purple Rain and left everyone in the dust. But he gets bored with new music he creates, so he was averse to extended tours, hence jettisoning the second leg of the PR tour in 84.

He released albums in the 90's a manager probably would've nixed. A rational artist would listen. Prince was not one of them.

But I loved him and always will. He just wasn't one of those artist with an eye for business details.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 05/06/16 10:05pm

gatorgirl

avatar

This is how I see it.

I think his fans are lucky. We have enjoyed the majority of his music over the years and have literally years of it that have yet to make it to our ears. His death is still a shock to me, and it hurts like hell, but knowing there are still parts of him here, parts we have yet to hear or see, helps to get through it just a little bit easier. I wish there was a Stevie Ray Vaughan vault, too, but there isn’t (probably because he was more of a live performer than a studio guy and passed in his 30s). Are there any other artists out there that have a literal vault of material? Or have so many boots? I hope the vault material is slowly released. Even MJ's unheard music has mostly been demos or uncompleted songs it seems, with some of them not actually sounding like him (I do not want to go there).

Prince was generous. How much were the Celebrations? Wasn't one of them like, $77 for the week? To get to go into a state-of-the art complex and "hang out" in what was basically his home? I would rather have had that than to have any videos on YouTube.

The problem I see with YouTube is they make money off those videos, and it isn’t the artists getting the biggest checks from them. Another thing Prince hated was his tickets being scalped. His concerts were pricey but that's because he pretty much had to back them up himself, at least for many of them. And it was worth EVERY penny to see him perform live. Is there anyone even close to his caliber now?

I don't think it was because he was greedy and wanted the money himself. I think he didn't like seeing others get ripped off, though yes, it made him appear very controlling and I would probably think much differently if I had been one of the fans that had been threatened with a lawsuit. It's just like when other artists were remaking his music, they went to WB to ask permission, not him, when the music came from his mind, not WB execs. That would piss me off, too. I know he was okay when they asked him, but not when they asked WB. I can see his point.

I know when he put out TRC, he said feel free to burn it and give it to family and friends. G-I-V-E it, don’t charge them or sell it. He didn’t make much off albums. His money was made from performing. But I think he hated seeing others make money off him and his work.

His catalogue, etc. is worth maybe $150 million? Is that just including published material? Some sources put MiJac (just MJ's songs) at about $75 to $150 million. I think Prince did well.

I can’t comment on Tidal but have heard crappy things about it.

What I do wish is that he had been more vocal about official news, statements, etc. I know he liked technology and seemed to want to be the leader in the field for artists with it, but then for a while there was nothing really “official”. I thought Dr. Funkenberry was the only “official source”. It wasn’t until after he passed I realized he had a real Twitter and Instagram that were verified. Makes me sick now…:,-(

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 05/06/16 10:23pm

RiotPaisley

gatorgirl said:

This is how I see it.



I think his fans are lucky. We have enjoyed the majority of his music over the years and have literally years of it that have yet to make it to our ears. His death is still a shock to me, and it hurts like hell, but knowing there are still parts of him here, parts we have yet to hear or see, helps to get through it just a little bit easier. I wish there was a Stevie Ray Vaughan vault, too, but there isn’t (probably because he was more of a live performer than a studio guy and passed in his 30s). Are there any other artists out there that have a literal vault of material? Or have so many boots? I hope the vault material is slowly released. Even MJ's unheard music has mostly been demos or uncompleted songs it seems, with some of them not actually sounding like him (I do not want to go there).



Prince was generous. How much were the Celebrations? Wasn't one of them like, $77 for the week? To get to go into a state-of-the art complex and "hang out" in what was basically his home? I would rather have had that than to have any videos on YouTube.



The problem I see with YouTube is they make money off those videos, and it isn’t the artists getting the biggest checks from them. Another thing Prince hated was his tickets being scalped. His concerts were pricey but that's because he pretty much had to back them up himself, at least for many of them. And it was worth EVERY penny to see him perform live. Is there anyone even close to his caliber now?



I don't think it was because he was greedy and wanted the money himself. I think he didn't like seeing others get ripped off, though yes, it made him appear very controlling and I would probably think much differently if I had been one of the fans that had been threatened with a lawsuit. It's just like when other artists were remaking his music, they went to WB to ask permission, not him, when the music came from his mind, not WB execs. That would piss me off, too. I know he was okay when they asked him, but not when they asked WB. I can see his point.



I know when he put out TRC, he said feel free to burn it and give it to family and friends. G-I-V-E it, don’t charge them or sell it. He didn’t make much off albums. His money was made from performing. But I think he hated seeing others make money off him and his work.



His catalogue, etc. is worth maybe $150 million? Is that just including published material? Some sources put MiJac (just MJ's songs) at about $75 to $150 million. I think Prince did well.



I can’t comment on Tidal but have heard crappy things about it.



What I do wish is that he had been more vocal about official news, statements, etc. I know he liked technology and seemed to want to be the leader in the field for artists with it, but then for a while there was nothing really “official”. I thought Dr. Funkenberry was the only “official source”. It wasn’t until after he passed I realized he had a real Twitter and Instagram that were verified. Makes me sick now…:,-(




Well said. I think if he could have found someone he trusted to run a website that would have made all the difference. I don't know what happened with his other ones, maybe he did just get bored with them and maybe that his problem- he got bored with himself before we ever did. He just wanted to keep creating and going forward with his vision, I respect that and wish I could be more like him in that regard.

He had something he needed to say, so he kept cranking out records, and I think his body of work spells out his message quite clearly. No one else could say what he wanted to get out and that's why he couldn't let anyone mess with it. I love everything he produced but sure, I can only listen to certain tracks when it's the right time for that track, if that makes any sense.

I agree on the Twitter thing and say that sadly, I didn't follow him that closely because I figured it wasn't really him and I could seriously kick myself for that. Duh! I really am sad about that too. I just pray his estate does him well and I have faith they will because people who knew him REALLY loved him and I think it will all be ok. It's just scary right now.
Surprise, surprise.
Another treat. Another trick.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 05/06/16 10:28pm

dougfrm

CynicKill said:

RiotPaisley said:

CynicKill said: Maybe he wasn't such a bad business man after all: http://www.billboard.com/...-his-super

>

True but he was inconsistant, and seemed relatively surprised by the success of the tour.

A rational artist never would've released ATWIAD after Purple Rain, and not so soon. He could've gotten another year out of Purple Rain.

Parade would've been a no-go.

If he cared about the business he would've progressed on the strides he made with Purple Rain and left everyone in the dust. But he gets bored with new music he creates, so he was averse to extended tours, hence jettisoning the second leg of the PR tour in 84.

He released albums in the 90's a manager probably would've nixed. A rational artist would listen. Prince was not one of them.

But I loved him and always will. He just wasn't one of those artist with an eye for business details.

I think that if he milked Purple Rain for another year or two, he may get typecast into being the Purple Rain guy. He already is mostly the Purple Rain guy for casual observers. I remember when Rick James hit it big with Street Songs, then put out a great album afterwards, Throw Down. Problem was that the songs sounded too similar to Street Songs. I think that he labored hard to make his follow up album soon and very different to keep things popping for the long run. Pop Life; Raspberry Beret - great songs.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 05/06/16 10:55pm

MyLord

I don't think he "blew it", but he sure did try my patience as a huge fan back from 1984! Yes, he was absolutely a musical genius, but he needed some help from a business genius. If he didn't want all those bootlegs running rampant and all types of things all over youtube, then play the game smart: get a vevo channel, a youtube channel, release dvds and blurays with the official PaisleyPark and/or NPG seal, license the music, etc.

He could have then used all that extra $revenue$ to do all the good things he wanted to do for communites and people as he saw fit.

Think about it: if we'd had access to all those things in the first place we wouldn't be scrounging around for bootlegs in the first damn place.

God bless him, he was the best musician ever, though smile

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 05/06/16 11:07pm

setyrmindphree

Why in the hell would someone say Prince wasn't a good businessman?
Based on what?
Money - he had more than enough. He could put food on his and many others plates.
Control - wrangled back all that he created and decided what was done with it.
Success - could still sell out some concerts 40 years in.
Solutions to problems - broke a lot of ground in the music biz.
Self-direction - Created an environment that allowed him to produce success and failure like every successful person (I think he had many failures but what an achievement to not have to call it that if you don't want to)
Motivation - the vault
Mentor - to many in his field.
Philanthropy - Turns out he was more of a philanthropist than most people realized.
Legacy - many people care and I saw a lot of purple everywhere.

Please, God, let me be a bad businessman like Prince.

He wasn't difficult with his fans. He made it fun being a fan. Did he create an emotional relationship with his fans? Sure.
But what was so difficult? Because we couldn't see "Little Red Corvette" on you tube when we wanted. Come on. He put out music for close to 40 years! Think about that 40 YEARS! F'ing hell man!

I enjoyed having all this secret Prince boots and videos from all the back door sources. Him making it hard to find his art was most of the fun for me the last 20 years.
Finding a 20 year old gem that was new to his fans is what kept it interesting.

I'm going to miss the cat and mouse game so much!!!

May your body RIP and your spirit be free
Thanks for the fun
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 05/06/16 11:14pm

bookwomen

avatar

I was always of two minds on how accessible the music and videos were. The fan in me enjoyed the hunt. I also wished he could separate the fan bootlegs from the corporate greed. In hind sight of course I feel like it was all so unnecessary since he made no after plans.

I was always glad he never rested on his Purple Rain laurels.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 05/06/16 11:19pm

kewlschool

avatar

Metallica has come out and denounced youtube for the amount they pay artists. As in barely paying them at all.

99.9% of everything I say is strictly for my own entertainment
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 05/06/16 11:55pm

RiotPaisley

setyrmindphree said:

Why in the hell would someone say Prince wasn't a good businessman?
Based on what?
Money - he had more than enough. He could put food on his and many others plates.
Control - wrangled back all that he created and decided what was done with it.
Success - could still sell out some concerts 40 years in.
Solutions to problems - broke a lot of ground in the music biz.
Self-direction - Created an environment that allowed him to produce success and failure like every successful person (I think he had many failures but what an achievement to not have to call it that if you don't want to)
Motivation - the vault
Mentor - to many in his field.
Philanthropy - Turns out he was more of a philanthropist than most people realized.
Legacy - many people care and I saw a lot of purple everywhere.

Please, God, let me be a bad businessman like Prince.

He wasn't difficult with his fans. He made it fun being a fan. Did he create an emotional relationship with his fans? Sure.
But what was so difficult? Because we couldn't see "Little Red Corvette" on you tube when we wanted. Come on. He put out music for close to 40 years! Think about that 40 YEARS! F'ing hell man!

I enjoyed having all this secret Prince boots and videos from all the back door sources. Him making it hard to find his art was most of the fun for me the last 20 years.
Finding a 20 year old gem that was new to his fans is what kept it interesting.

I'm going to miss the cat and mouse game so much!!!

May your body RIP and your spirit be free
Thanks for the fun


You're right. I guess I would rephrase and say if he wanted MORE money he could've been a better businessman- but I figure he knew damn well how to easily whore himself out for the masses, he was no fool. I never assumed he really cared about the business though. So I take it back. I remember him in an interview, one of those picture disc ones, that people told him he needed to start buying stuff. So he bought a house. I mostly said that business stuff for the sake of argument wink I swear!

He just wanted to make music. I wish however that he had maybe gone the Ani DiFranco route and released his own bootlegs (though I agree that takes the fun out of it) I will admit I have a few (never sold them or gave them away- find your own! Lol) but the sound quality was never great.

But he kept the vault. And I have faith we will be gifted by him for years to come with his own bootlegs. They were worried he'd "saturate" the market while he was alive. Haha... I hope things get super wet now.

Interesting when you think that all that dancing in those boots did a number on his legs.
[Edited 5/6/16 23:58pm]
Surprise, surprise.
Another treat. Another trick.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 05/07/16 12:13am

TheW00denLeg

avatar

I completely agree with the OP. I don´t know how the situation was in the US, but in Europe there were records you literally could not buy. I don´t see that as a "business plan" or genius strike. If your name is Prince you don´t have to have a huge record label to get a good distribution deal for every part of the world. He tried to figure out different ways of getting his stuff out. That´s cool. But it didn´t work out big time and for some of his (possible) fans that was a real let down. Maybe he wanted some kind of "elite" status. If that was the case he was pretty successful. To me it´s a strange strategy to keep new fans away by hiding your music.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 05/07/16 12:16am

Funkmeimfamous

avatar

RiotPaisley said:

purplesweat said:

Yep. I became a fan back in 2006 and it was so difficult to locate his material. He should've been more understanding that younger fans can't really access songs unless they're on the net. What with wrecka stows closing and CD players becoming relics, it really limited people from discovering his work. I only really got introduced to him through his award show performances between 04 and 06. In the end, I had to get other fans to send me burned copies of his CDs, there was just no other way to access anything. Which sucks because his b-sides are incredible and worth hearing!



Bull crap! So you stole from him anyway with burned copies! Before he died you could buy just about any cd of his on Amazon for a reasonable price. If you wanted to find him, you could.


I agree! I'm 28 and started buying his music in 04. I own all his official albums on CD and I own a few dozen vinyl records as well. Most of my purchases were done online.
Baby, that was much too fast... 1958-2016
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 05/07/16 12:19am

thetimefan

avatar

Personally I think P had every right to control the marketing and distribution of his own music. He pays for the studio time, the musicians etc and he has final quality control of his recording output. I also think a big issue was selling bootlegs as the companies who produce them are profiting from a source which isn't licensed or official so he had every right to be forceful in his stance against them. I do think he could have monetised the bootleg market if he put them up at the NPG music club or released a Crystal Ball series of outtakes. The YouTube thing I also understand but he could have agreed to put his official releases on there but again the whole point for a recording artist is it profit from their work as at the end of the day it was his job and he rightly deserved to be paid for his work. The fact that some musicians are multi millionaires are a moot point because it's really making a stand and changing today's ethos that music should be free. Well if we apply that ideology so should food, water, electricity etc. So all P was doing was protecting his work from unauthorised use and I'm sure if there was tons of poor quality releases in the wreckastow we'd all be the first to complain. Plus Princes stance is nothing new, Metallica and others are the same. In an ideal world everyone would be free to listen to music and unreleased songs boots like the Grateful Dead or have free releases like the Nine Inch Nails etc.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 05/07/16 12:20am

Funkmeimfamous

avatar

CynicKill said:



pyramidseye said:


My 15-year old son does not know who Prince is. He says he has no idea of his music. The first place he goes when he wants to listen to some song is YouTube, and Prince wasn't there. Prince's quarrel with WB was a sign that more trouble was to come and it did. You can't get rich all by yourself. You need partners. He had great talent but he couldn't make the most out of it financially. $150-300 mio is nothing for a world star with decades of musical career. That's only a fraction of what Madonna owns. He was an emotional artist but not a rational businessman. When he appeared on Larry King on CNN, he had no idea that CNN belonged to WB. Can you believe that? Most artists don't give their music away with newspapers, simply because it is not the best way to make money. He fought the corporations by losing his own money opportunities and the corporations did not care a bit. Business is as usual and Prince had no impact on it.

>


I'm out of sync in a world that regards $150-300 mil as a failure.


I agree he was a piss poor businessman but it is what it is.


The music and the spectacular performances speak for themselves.








Can I add that Madonna toured Australia earlier this year for the first time in 25 years and tickets prices started from $300 for an arena show! Not hard to see how she builds her fortune!
Baby, that was much too fast... 1958-2016
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 05/07/16 12:23am

anudha

Have to admit that my toes tingle each time I make a see a new Prince video on youtube. Some are old friends and others are variations on a theme, while other discoveries are brand new....

I think my friend K said it best: "He might have had slave written on his face, but his fans were the real slaves (regarding the tight control he had). lol.

Quintessentially Prince....

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 05/07/16 12:29am

bookwomen

avatar

My toes tingle too. I had to take a cold shower after watching some concert footage. IMHO Prince was at his best live.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 05/07/16 12:31am

MissMarySharon

I respect that he was a passionate advocate for the rights of artists, I'm not sure it was always necessarily about the money with him, I think a big part of it was wanting to feel like he owned all his work and had complete control over it.

As a long time, devoted but passive fan, who has had no involvement in bootlegs, file sharing or whatever, I don't mind admitting I did get frustrated with certain aspects. I was particularly annoyed when he took his stuff off Spotify - I have discovered so many new artists on there, and have bought a lot of albums as a result. If his work was available there, I think would have increased his fanbase and opened up his world to others. I don't always buy the "if they can get it for free they won't buy it" argument, perhaps I'm old school, but if I discover a song I like I will definitely investigate and probably end up buying the album.

I never got around to joining Tidal - by that time I was a bit weary of his faffing around with various methods of putting out his music. I'm on a limited income nowadays and I just don't have the money to be paying out every month. But maybe that's just me, I have to recognise that the industry has changed, and the days of being able to go into a store, buy albums and then enjoy the music forever, end of story, will probably soon be history.

Seeing so much stuff on youtube after all these years has been a joy. It was always frustrating to me that incredible shows - Lovesexy, Parade and some of the extraordinary aftershows, were never put out on official DVDs. They are a part of musical history and deserve to be seen. So many fans never got to see him live, which I think is so sad.

[Edited 5/7/16 0:34am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 05/07/16 12:37am

paisleyperk

I agree with everything you wrote in your post, Cloreen. I LOVED Prince, but he alienated his die hard fans. Remember the shenanigans with ticket prices to the 3121 club (Vegas) shows? Not long after, he did a show in SF that you could only get tickets to if you had a certain credit card. The card company thought it was the gift of a "unique experience" to its customers for having or signing up for their card (and promising to consume and spend more in exchange for that unique experience). The latter, I found morally repugnant. I understand where he was coming from about music on the Internet, but he was not savvy about it at all. He never got it right. Ever. His distribution schemes alienated many hard core fans. He was a total and complete flake! He did shows with crazy ticket prices (200$ at DNA in SF!).

And, finally, I will say this: I'm kind of glad he was this way because my anger at him cut through my sadness at his passing. Only now am I starting to grieve. Prince was just impossible from a fan perspective: damned if you do, damned if you don't. Many of us just gave up on him.

He didn't have to handle things that way. He could have been a bit more thoughtful, a bit more kind. I'm sure he felt trapped in his fame. Maybe he did it to get back at us? Whatever the reason, it hurt. But I have to say the wall is cracking now and I find myself tearing up and crying at his loss. I suppose it was nice to have that buffer while it lasted.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 05/07/16 1:20am

gerardv

I completely agree. The youtube ban hurt his career to an extent because it so limited his exposure.

It's not like there is a lot of live stuff out on dvd either, so there were few alternatives.

And fans should be able to not feel bad for expressing that opinion.

You can be a loyal fan and still disagree/be disappointed with decisions the artist makes.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 05/07/16 1:28am

gerardv

RiotPaisley said:

Maybe if people weren't ripping copies of his music and selling it or using it in ways he didn't want it to be things would be different. He was an artist and wanted due compensation for his stuff. There were a few things he did that got me frustrated- I think fairly recently he issued a cease and desist to a DJ who was having Prince nights or something and someone posted a video of people dancing. I thought that went too far but I understood why he wouldn't want people putting his albums on YouTube. Maybe he should have done it himself and found a way to be compensated but he was valid for wanting credit. I didn't mind having to dig for his work. That was kind of fun actually. A treasure hunt. Having the sites go down or tracks I legit paid for disappear from my iTunes account, not cool ... But otherwise, no. He did not "blow it" with fans. He had every right to be a mystery. It kept him out of the tabloids. Look what they did to Michael all the time. Hell, look at the what they are doing to Prince now that he's not here to defend himself. If anything I wish he would have put out more DVDs with live stuff, videos, controlled behind the scenes/interviews kind of stuff. But people would bootleg and profit from that too so... If anything maybe he wasn't the best business man. He didn't trust people and I don't really blame him for that.

What people did 'to' Michael was not because he made is products available, it had to do with his eccentricity and sometimes bizarre behaviour, part of which was engineered in order to get media exposure, certainly in the early post Thriller days. MJ was a very contradictory individual.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 05/07/16 1:59am

theartistirl

setyrmindphree said:

Why in the hell would someone say Prince wasn't a good businessman?
Based on what?
Money - he had more than enough. He could put food on his and many others plates.
Control - wrangled back all that he created and decided what was done with it.
Success - could still sell out some concerts 40 years in.
Solutions to problems - broke a lot of ground in the music biz.
Self-direction - Created an environment that allowed him to produce success and failure like every successful person (I think he had many failures but what an achievement to not have to call it that if you don't want to)
Motivation - the vault
Mentor - to many in his field.
Philanthropy - Turns out he was more of a philanthropist than most people realized.
Legacy - many people care and I saw a lot of purple everywhere.

Please, God, let me be a bad businessman like Prince.

He wasn't difficult with his fans. He made it fun being a fan. Did he create an emotional relationship with his fans? Sure.
But what was so difficult? Because we couldn't see "Little Red Corvette" on you tube when we wanted. Come on. He put out music for close to 40 years! Think about that 40 YEARS! F'ing hell man!

I enjoyed having all this secret Prince boots and videos from all the back door sources. Him making it hard to find his art was most of the fun for me the last 20 years.
Finding a 20 year old gem that was new to his fans is what kept it interesting.

I'm going to miss the cat and mouse game so much!!!

May your body RIP and your spirit be free
Thanks for the fun


Agree 100%, I wish I was as bad at my job as he was at his smile I love it that he did it his own Purple way.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 05/07/16 2:21am

saviour7

It just made it more special to me..I mean we all knew where Prince stood on a lot of things and how strongly he felt. I'm not one bit upset that videos weren't readily available to watch, when I seen a clip I loved it and cherished it and then listened to the music I had payed for. Being a longtime Prince fan it just was how it was and it just shows that he was a true artist who cared where his work was and how and when it would be seen.It was all part of the mystique the Prince factor..Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 05/07/16 5:16am

SENNISS

If I'd have been in Prince's shoes this is what I would have done..


Created an online video vault, something along the lines of Princetube but with a different name. I'd have had all of the singles videos, films and stuff like Live in Syracuse up permanently for people to view for free. I'd have added unseen videos once a month to keep people returning (old and current to tie in with shows/tours etc)

To keep it free of advertising I'd have added a membership option for a small fee, giving people access to a plethora of other videos to see if they so desire.



  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 05/07/16 5:22am

Pokeno4Money

avatar

To say he "blew it" is to assume he wanted twice as much money, twice as many fans, twice as much fame, etc.

I think the fact he preferred playing in smaller venues such as clubs the past few years, instead of large arenas and stadiums, tells me he wasn't all that concerned about increasing his fanbase. In the grand scheme of things, did it really matter if he was worth $500M more or not?

And I think that's a big reason why he didn't care about putting anything free on YouTube etc. Because let's face it, most people aren't gonna BUY a musician's music without hearing it first. So all those teens and 20-somethings who don't have Prince fans for parents, how are they gonna get exposed to his music? It's not played very often over the airwaves (always bugged me that classic rock stations never played his music, but that's another discussion), not played much in clubs and bars, and it can't be watched/listened on the net ... so HOW do they get a chance to experience it and become fans?

Putting SOME music and performances on YouTube for free would have gone a long way in exposing more people to Prince and turning more of them into fans. It's no different than new movies always releasing a trailer, often multiple trailers, so that everyone can watch part of the movie for free. If they like what they see, they'll most likely want to pay to see the entire film.

"Never let nasty stalkers disrespect you. They start shit, you finish it. Go down to their level, that's the only way they'll understand. You have to handle things yourself."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 05/07/16 6:39am

laurarichardso
n

pyramidseye said:

My 15-year old son does not know who Prince is. He says he has no idea of his music. The first place he goes when he wants to listen to some song is YouTube, and Prince wasn't there.

Prince's quarrel with WB was a sign that more trouble was to come and it did. You can't get rich all by yourself. You need partners. He had great talent but he couldn't make the most out of it financially. $150-300 mio is nothing for a world star with decades of musical career. That's only a fraction of what Madonna owns.

He was an emotional artist but not a rational businessman. When he appeared on Larry King on CNN, he had no idea that CNN belonged to WB. Can you believe that? Most artists don't give their music away with newspapers, simply because it is not the best way to make money. He fought the corporations by losing his own money opportunities and the corporations did not care a bit. Business is as usual and Prince had no impact on it.

// Your son needs to go Amazon.com and buy some music and while you are at read the Billboard article about the Musicology tour dude was by no means stupid as a business man. He had his ups and downs which is the nature of business.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 05/07/16 6:46am

destinyc1

I guess most of you answered as either fans or business types.As a fan (fanatic) i was with him all the way fight the power fight the man.Keep in mind many singers at the time were going through it with the music industry.TLC,MJ,MARIAH and a ton of others that weren't as outspoken.I had all his music anyway as many of his original fans do....Now on the business end its like wtf.Big celebs are usually generational meaning us,our kids and our grandkids and beyond.They use youtube its a proven fact.And they're the ones buying the music 30 and under.They know him from the dave c show.The superbowl which usually after doing the SB sales of your music goes through the roof.He wasn't that 80's,90's guy anymore.People moved on he stayed the same.WB was willing to put up with the crazy while the green was pouring in but,dont be crazy,rude,out of touch and the green isn't coming in.It wasn't just about his masters.He himself said 'why isn't my music being played on the radio?Thats why his butt went straight back to WB.Mj did the same thing called on jessie jackson and rev al to call tommy M a very,very bad man and said he was devilish and the crazy fans started calling sony.Then had the nerve to bring tommys ex wife out Mariah.Truth is they promoted mj as much as ever they just wasn't paying all that loot for every song on the record.He payed brando out of his own money.And again as a fan i couldn't stand tommy how dare he.But,as a biz person i knew the box,mtv and trl were just about over.I honestly dont know how much it hurt his pocket but,many are saying his estate right now is no where near 300mill.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 05/07/16 6:48am

destinyc1

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Prince: Music and More > Prince Did Blow It By Being So Difficult With Fans