sorry I know some of you have seen this but in case you have not

I hope P did not preach to him too much.

cbarnes3121 said:

Ok what gets me with the prince roger Nelson guy is he goes on YouTube and discover all kinds of artist and shit yet he don't think people should be able to do the same for his music legacy??? And why in the world he so obsessed with young people now is he going through a old people thing?? I know he wanna give em shine but old is good too

Prince goes to YouTube for music, too: Some Prince fans who want to go to YouTube to pull up their favorite track or performance have long complained that Prince is overly aggressive in removing that music on copyright infringement grounds. So they might be surprised that he uses it to look up music and old performances of others. When the point is underscored as he watches an old James Brown clip, he says: "James Brown has an estate — so do I," then adds: "People need to stop tripping."

bashraka said:

cbarnes3121 said:

bashraka said:

Prince goes to YouTube for music, too: Some Prince fans who want to go to YouTube to pull up their favorite track or performance have long complained that Prince is overly aggressive in removing that music on copyright infringement grounds. So they might be surprised that he uses it to look up music and old performances of others. When the point is underscored as he watches an old James Brown clip, he says: "James Brown has an estate — so do I," then adds: "People need to stop tripping."

Everything u just said was dumb and pointless and doesn't support nothing prince does u sound like a fool who just go looking for drama have a seat or stand in traffic

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/memorable-moments-paisley-park-25828395

Read the article for yourself. Prince's point is that each recording artist has a choice on how to enforce protection of their intellectual copyrights, James Brown estate is lax on his material being on YouTube, Prince isn't. Executors of living and deceased musicians have some control on how their music is sold and distributed.

Lovingt the new harts album... I think he deserves a lot more recognition. Thanks for sharing!

bashraka said:

cbarnes3121 said:

bashraka said: Everything u just said was dumb and pointless and doesn't support nothing prince does u sound like a fool who just go looking for drama have a seat or stand in traffic

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/memorable-moments-paisley-park-25828395

Read the article for yourself. Prince's point is that each recording artist has a choice on how to enforce protection of their intellectual copyrights, James Brown estate is lax on his material being on YouTube, Prince isn't. Executors of living and deceased musicians have some control on how their music is sold and distributed.

cloUwds said:

Lovingt the new harts album... I think he deserves a lot more recognition. Thanks for sharing!

I found it interesting that he has so far rejected major label support. But in some ways I wish he had that support because nobody I know has ever heard of this dude. Yet. And even the worst track on his album blows away all of the tracks on AOA.

3rdeyedude said:

cloUwds said:

Lovingt the new harts album... I think he deserves a lot more recognition. Thanks for sharing!

I found it interesting that he has so far rejected major label support. But in some ways I wish he had that support because nobody I know has ever heard of this dude. Yet. And even the worst track on his album blows away all of the tracks on AOA.

Yeah, interesting indeed... I'm wondering if P had some influence there. Or maybe he just could'nt get a fair deal from a major... which is common for brand new artists.

3rdeyedude said:

bump....when is this dude coming to America?? i think he should just go with "Darren Hart" instead of Harts but hey what the fuck do I know?

[Edited 11/18/14 15:29pm]