asg said: THE BILLBOARD NUMBERS HAVENT BEEN RELEASED YET SOMEONE IS PLAYING A TRICK i CHECKED ALL THE FORUMS WHICH POST THE NUMBERS . THE EARLY NUMBERS COME IN AT AROUND MID DAY EASTERN AND THE DETAILED NUMBERS POSTED HERE APPEAR 1-3 DAYS LATER
MOST LIKELY THESE NUMBERS ARE JUST FAKE Which ones are you talking about being fake? I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
asg said: THE BILLBOARD NUMBERS HAVENT BEEN RELEASED YET SOMEONE IS PLAYING A TRICK i CHECKED ALL THE FORUMS WHICH POST THE NUMBERS . THE EARLY NUMBERS COME IN AT AROUND MID DAY EASTERN AND THE DETAILED NUMBERS POSTED HERE APPEAR 1-3 DAYS LATER
MOST LIKELY THESE NUMBERS ARE JUST FAKE The Soundscan numbers come out every week on Wednesday like clockwork. I'm on the site NOW. Where did YOUR numbers come from? http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
ButterscotchPimp said: asg said: THE BILLBOARD NUMBERS HAVENT BEEN RELEASED YET SOMEONE IS PLAYING A TRICK i CHECKED ALL THE FORUMS WHICH POST THE NUMBERS . THE EARLY NUMBERS COME IN AT AROUND MID DAY EASTERN AND THE DETAILED NUMBERS POSTED HERE APPEAR 1-3 DAYS LATER
MOST LIKELY THESE NUMBERS ARE JUST FAKE The Soundscan numbers come out every week on Wednesday like clockwork. I'm on the site NOW. Where did YOUR numbers come from? THESE SO CALLED SOUNDSCAN NUMBERS ARE ALL FAKE I HAVE CHECKED ALL THE FORUMS TO VERIFY THESE NUMBERS. i AM THE PPERSON WHO MOSTLY POSTS ALL THE SOUNDSCAN NUMBERS ON THE ORG AND I KNOW WHERE TO FIND THESE [Edited 4/8/09 7:23am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
asg said: ButterscotchPimp said: The Soundscan numbers come out every week on Wednesday like clockwork. I'm on the site NOW. Where did YOUR numbers come from? THESE SO CALLED SOUNDSCAN NUMBERS ARE ALL FAKE I HAVE CHECKED ALL THE FORUMS TO VERIFY THESE NUMBERS Dude. What FORUMS? Soundscan has a WEBSITE. Which you have to have ACCESS to. (which i do, working for a music company) Care to wager who's going to have to issue an apology on here about the inaccurate chart numbers? Name your bet. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
ButterscotchPimp said: asg said: THE BILLBOARD NUMBERS HAVENT BEEN RELEASED YET SOMEONE IS PLAYING A TRICK i CHECKED ALL THE FORUMS WHICH POST THE NUMBERS . THE EARLY NUMBERS COME IN AT AROUND MID DAY EASTERN AND THE DETAILED NUMBERS POSTED HERE APPEAR 1-3 DAYS LATER
MOST LIKELY THESE NUMBERS ARE JUST FAKE The Soundscan numbers come out every week on Wednesday like clockwork. I'm on the site NOW. Where did YOUR numbers come from? MY NUMBERS WHICH ARE FROM YESTERDAY CAME FROM HITS DAILY DOUBLE WHICH IS A COMPETITOR TO SOUNDSCAN AND USUALLY COMES OUT WITH NUMBERS THE NITE B4 AND MOST TIMES THE NUMBERS DONT VARY BY MORE THEN 1-2K | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
asg said: ButterscotchPimp said: The Soundscan numbers come out every week on Wednesday like clockwork. I'm on the site NOW. Where did YOUR numbers come from? MY NUMBERS WHICH ARE FROM YESTERDAY CAME FROM HITS DAILY DOUBLE WHICH IS A COMPETITOR TO SOUNDSCAN AND USUALLY COMES OUT WITH NUMBERS THE NITE B4 AND MOST TIMES THE NUMBERS DONT VARY BY MORE THEN 1-2K caps lock my brother it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
maybe hitsdailydouble.com counted online sales at his web site and Soundscan didnt ? the difference is about 20k .
Hits is known to be off from time to time but this seems like alot . The unusal nature of the release may cause discrepancies. This is not on asq at all . These numbers are reported on Tuesdays at hitsdailydouble.com . Any one of us who may have seen it would have posted it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
newpower99 said: maybe hitsdailydouble.com counted online sales at his web site and Soundscan didnt ? the difference is about 20k .
Hits is known to be off from time to time but this seems like alot . The unusal nature of the release may cause discrepancies. This is not on asq at all . These numbers are reported on Tuesdays at hitsdailydouble.com . Any one of us who may have seen it would have posted it. but urbans numbers r way off too . It doesnt make sense | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
asg said: ButterscotchPimp said: The Soundscan numbers come out every week on Wednesday like clockwork. I'm on the site NOW. Where did YOUR numbers come from? MY NUMBERS WHICH ARE FROM YESTERDAY CAME FROM HITS DAILY DOUBLE WHICH IS A COMPETITOR TO SOUNDSCAN AND USUALLY COMES OUT WITH NUMBERS THE NITE B4 AND MOST TIMES THE NUMBERS DONT VARY BY MORE THEN 1-2K LOL Hits Daily Double is a trade rag. They're not a "competitor". It's a music industry gossip rag. Soundscan doesn't have a competitor. Every record in the country is counted by Soundscan and Soundscan alone. It's where Billboard, Rolling Stone and every other chart worth it's salt gets it's numbers from. I have access to the numbers now, and i'm telling you that YOURS are WRONG. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
asg said: newpower99 said: maybe hitsdailydouble.com counted online sales at his web site and Soundscan didnt ? the difference is about 20k .
Hits is known to be off from time to time but this seems like alot . The unusal nature of the release may cause discrepancies. This is not on asq at all . These numbers are reported on Tuesdays at hitsdailydouble.com . Any one of us who may have seen it would have posted it. but urbans numbers r way off too . It doesnt make sense Yeah something weird is going down . We should know straight from Billboard with in an hour | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
ButterscotchPimp said: asg said: MY NUMBERS WHICH ARE FROM YESTERDAY CAME FROM HITS DAILY DOUBLE WHICH IS A COMPETITOR TO SOUNDSCAN AND USUALLY COMES OUT WITH NUMBERS THE NITE B4 AND MOST TIMES THE NUMBERS DONT VARY BY MORE THEN 1-2K LOL Hits Daily Double is a trade rag. They're not a "competitor". It's a music industry gossip rag. Soundscan doesn't have a competitor. Every record in the country is counted by Soundscan and Soundscan alone. It's where Billboard, Rolling Stone and every other chart worth it's salt gets it's numbers from. I have access to the numbers now, and i'm telling you that YOURS are WRONG. Keith Urban album tops US charts http://www.news.com.au/co...80,00.html | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
newpower99 said: asg said: but urbans numbers r way off too . It doesnt make sense Yeah something weird is going down . We should know straight from Billboard with in an hour i checked my usual sources i think u also use the same sources pulse ukmix and nothing there | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
I could'nt care less if he got to No.1 or not. What matters to me is the quality of the music not whether he sells more CD's than Keith Urban, Now 3002, Hannah Montana or anybody else for that matter! I have the new music, he has my money. end of transaction. I get no greater enjoyment from it knowing lots of other folk have purchased it as an impulse buy in Target. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
newpower99 said: asg said: but urbans numbers r way off too . It doesnt make sense Yeah something weird is going down . We should know straight from Billboard with in an hour yeah come to think of it the numbers seem way off even if he didn't make it to number#1 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
oh well ..its all good.
We dont all need to get all our panties in a bunch just because Lotusflow3r sold 20k less than we intially thought. Lessoned learn not to trust hitsdailydouble numbers in close races. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
http://www.billboard.biz/.../index.jsp
http://www.billboard.com/.../index.jsp these should be posted here | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
newpower99 said: maybe hitsdailydouble.com counted online sales at his web site and Soundscan didnt ? the difference is about 20k .
Hits is known to be off from time to time but this seems like alot . The unusal nature of the release may cause discrepancies. This is not on asq at all . These numbers are reported on Tuesdays at hitsdailydouble.com . Any one of us who may have seen it would have posted it. Again, Hits is a TRADE RAG. Any numbers they post are GUESSES. There's only ONE way to count album sales and it's SOUNDSCAN. It's where BILLBOARD gets their numbers from. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
newpower99 said: oh well ..its all good.
We dont all need to get all our panties in a bunch just because Lotusflow3r sold 20k less than we intially thought. Lessoned learn not to trust hitsdailydouble numbers in close races. this is really not so close | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
![]() ![]() i always love a good fight man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
on a serious tip
why would you nutjobs be so happy about Prince having a #1 album the man clearly could care less about his fans the way he closes down fansites and doesn't listen to the fans requests for remastering his past albums so why the fuck would you want this prick to having any success at all? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
L4OATheOriginal said: ![]() ![]() i always love a good fight move over and pass some of the ![]() OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!
Queen of Hearts, Alice in Wonderland | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
catparker said: on a serious tip
why would you nutjobs be so happy about Prince having a #1 album the man clearly could care less about his fans the way he closes down fansites and doesn't listen to the fans requests for remastering his past albums so why the fuck would you want this prick to having any success at all? because prince only seems to get generous when he is successful. we want him to have success to he'll get happy and release vault material. this is a guy who refuses to promote a project if it doesn't look like it is selling well. think about that for a second. it's time for a new direction / it's time for jazz to die | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Vysyons said: L4OATheOriginal said: ![]() ![]() i always love a good fight move over and pass some of the ![]() bring some chicken wings over 2!! man, he has such an amazing body of music that it's sad to see him constrict it down to the basics. he's too talented for the lineup he's doing. estelle 81 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
L4OATheOriginal said: Vysyons said: move over and pass some of the ![]() bring some chicken wings over 2!! I've got the ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Move over! ![]() I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
catparker said: on a serious tip
why would you nutjobs be so happy about Prince having a #1 album the man clearly could care less about his fans the way he closes down fansites and doesn't listen to the fans requests for remastering his past albums so why the fuck would you want this prick to having any success at all? Why the fuck would a nutjob like you post on a fansite for someone you don't wanna see succeed, fan or not? That's even more crazy right there. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
purplecam said: catparker said: on a serious tip
why would you nutjobs be so happy about Prince having a #1 album the man clearly could care less about his fans the way he closes down fansites and doesn't listen to the fans requests for remastering his past albums so why the fuck would you want this prick to having any success at all? Why the fuck would a nutjob like you post on a fansite for someone you don't wanna see succeed, fan or not? That's even more crazy right there. ![]() ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
1 * URBAN*KEITH DEFYING GRAVITY 171,525 22 779559% 171,547
soundscan never has those weird % in their chart and its capped off at 999% | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
damn when will billboard update the chart? ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
Even if Prince was 3121 on the charts he would still make me cream ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |
asg said: 1 * URBAN*KEITH DEFYING GRAVITY 171,525 22 779559% 171,547
soundscan never has those weird % in their chart and its capped off at 999% I copied it from an excel version of the chart, and yes it does % out like that. Again, and i don't want to go back and forth but you can't use HITS numbers. They're GUESSES. http://www.facebook.com/p...111?ref=ts
y'all gone keep messin' around wit me and turn me back to the old me...... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - ![]() |