This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
THE OFFICIAL 3121 CD COVER!!!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
U been bamboozled, hoodwinked, took. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ugly, if you ask me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it's ok.
i was born with the wrong sign, in the wrong house, with the wrong ascendancy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Really? Where has this been confirmed? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
As one door closes, another opens... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
onenitealone said: Really? Where has this been confirmed?
PP6 at NPGMC. U been bamboozled, hoodwinked, took. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I like it! I can imagine this looking really fine as a digipak. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
onenitealone said: Really? Where has this been confirmed?
Well, there is a full page ad in today's USA TODAY (page 5e) with this very picture | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cheers guys!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The best in years!!! I do like it!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MUCH better than mucousology. way to go, sam!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm glad there's a bit of mystery to it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
wow... it's very very good!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thank you! I love it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: MUCH better than mucousology. way to go, sam!
if the orange background were kind of a brushed foil, it would be HOTT. as is, it's really not bad at all. Right. I don't get why some say it's looks "cheap". Don't think so at all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eugnj420 said: onenitealone said: Really? Where has this been confirmed?
Well, there is a full page ad in today's USA TODAY (page 5e) with this very picture Scan? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It seems some people are confusing "Simple" with "Cheap." It's not my favorite cover, but it's a far cry better then Musicology, at least the foreground and background match... -->> This Space 4 Rent <<--
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry.
You know that those vines were from the wall @ Paisley right? Ahhhh the stupid shit I notice! I kinna like the new cover | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry.
ditto. and there's no wordart text there too, like on musicology. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
that's what i would call GOOD.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
javed said: WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!.
----- We are in the era of digital downloads and you guys are worrying about the cover of the CD. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I dig it! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think it's striking. I love it.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yeah it's really growing on me now. i might even go so far as to say it looks kinda "phat"... for some reason that kinda dated word pops into my head even though this look is very NOW. it's PHAT circa 2006. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: javed said: WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!.
----- We are in the era of digital downloads and you guys are worrying about the cover of the CD. yes, because it still matters. and when 'solid' media becomes completely obsolete, cover art will still be relevant. something visual has ALWAYS been attached to albums and it always will be, even if it's a computer graphic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Handclapsfingasnapz said: Anx said: i swear, if they photoshop in some ugly-ass bricks or vines in the background, i'm going to be very angry.
ditto. and there's no wordart text there too, like on musicology. if only! musicology would have benefitted from some wordart text. i could have helped out with that, but noooo. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
laurarichardson said: javed said: WOW that is awful. What statement does this make?. This makes the Musicology cover look like Sgt Pepper!!!!. It's cheap looking, unimaginative and whatever else you choose!.
----- We are in the era of digital downloads and you guys are worrying about the cover of the CD. plenty of people, including myself aren't into downloading tracks compared to buying the whole shebang. artwork still matters. . [Edited 2/17/06 5:47am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
This is a "featured" topic! — From here you can jump to the « previous or next » featured topic.