independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Associated artists & people > the greatest romance that's ever been sold.
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #90 posted 09/20/16 12:34pm

terrig

LBrent said:

sonshine said:
Ok, this is confusing to me. So is he saying the song was, or wasn't, about Vanity? He makes it sound like everyone (including Vanity?) would immediately assume it was about her, yet he goes on to ask why would anyone would be so presumptuous. So is his point that nothing is as it appears, or seems? (Or at least 9 out of 10 things?) Reminds me of something I heard years ago and keep in the back of my mind all the time: Believe none of what you see, and half of what you hear. Or is it none of what you hear, and half of what you see? No matter. The point is the same.
What I got out of it is, "My name is Prince and I am funky. My name is Prince, the one and only. I will confuse you with my sexy!" That's all I got. confused


Post of the day! lolololol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #91 posted 09/20/16 12:41pm

LBrent

BillieBalloon said:

sonshine said:

I say leave it alone. If you don't like it, you don't like the idea of it, you dont like her, that's fine. Just leave it alone. No reason to get in the gutter and resort to obscenities and profanities and insults. No reason to assume things because that's all any of us have are assumptions. I'm not really interested in the book. That sort of book is not my thing. Lots of other people have said horrible things about P that have been printed. If you don't like it don't buy it, don't support it. That's how you send a clear message. Not by coming to the org and personally attacking other members or the subject of the thread. In the end prince was his own man. He didn't need us to defend him. He just needed us to buy his music. You can speculate all day, but it's obvious she loved him. Perhaps this is partly his fault? He's the one that invited young, naive girls into his life and got intimate with them. He should have expected some fall out from that. He made his bed, now he must lie in it. Just like the rest of us. I love P like I love my own family, warts and all. This is going to be just fine.
As far as the mods go they deserve nothing but praise for the work involved in maintaining this place. I am grateful for their level heads and their efforts to keep everyone acting like mature adults on here.


The fact that Prince made these women famous, invested money in them and basically put them on the world stage, none of that means anything? He's getting his just desserts?


Unbelievable.


I adore P, but he did make decisions that set the standards in terms of choosing relationship partners and part of that was choosing women to be with who, while attractive had limited talent and sometimes limited intelligence due to limited experience, which caused them to behave in ways that didn't always take into consideration his best interests.

Now that he's not here, it shouldn't be a surprise that some of these same partners are misbehaving without having him to guide them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #92 posted 09/20/16 12:55pm

OldFriends4Sal
e

paintedlady said:

Vashtix said:

IF you love someone and they die you will not do something that goes against their will- if I read correctly he stopped her book when she originally wanted to do it. I know I will be dragged over hot coals but alot of what is going on with many of his associates -especially the ex wives - seems disrespectful at this time. He really just died and the timing is in bad taste and for a woman who he stopped talking to or getting on with it is in a very bad taste. He divorced her years ago and no romance story and retelling will change it. Unrequited love is painful and many of us do not get the love we want to love us back but that is not a greenlight to clutch them forever and rewrite the past or change the view of that person in the future. It is her story but he was finished with any relationship with her, remembering how intensely private he was . . . I think that he would not have wanted a book about them especially now-Prince cannot give his side- he cannot speak for himself. It will not be balanced nor accurate.

It hurts how noone gives a damn about his Prince's wishes in death. People who were in his bands sure play the music and give the concerts but an ex-wife is a different category, especially one that was dismissed forever. If you love someone in life and death you protect them forever- Protect even if it is not the best for you; you respect forever . It appears to me that love for many who say they loved Prince is a self-serving, disrespectful love. You can tell me all you want you love me but actions speak louder than words. Prince was private and the ones who are respecting him in death as he would have wanted in life -Much Respect to them all and I appreciate them. There are some who have stories and have been offered millions to spill and write of their time with Prince but the love and respect for Prince meant more. No jealousy for Mayte and the fact that such a juvenille, mean girl type thing is being spouted is so wrong it gives example of the disrespect for Prince and the man he became.

Prince dismissed Sheila E. when she wrote her 1st book... had NOTHING to do with her, then he died and she came rushing in like his widow. Stating stories of their love and how she was engaged and focusing on that. Now she's marketing her symbol tattoo.


I will not judge Sheila, but Mayte (in comparison) is not doing anything different... she has ONE project she will be making money off Prince's death, most of her work she has earned and has worked steadily on her own taking on roles, modeling, and dancing. Again, not off of Prince's name...

I think people here need to pump their brakes on how other people grieve. If we can celebrate the Revolution doing an amazing tribute, then surely we should make room for a book or memories she has, especially since she has been made to keep silent for so long. The same complaint Wendy had regarding Prince's gag orders... I will look forward to her accounts too.


In the long run, Prince would want his story and name remembered, this is why he worked hard to become famous in the first place. Their stories will continue his story, and that is not an act of disrespect. Disrepecting Prince would be to never speak of him again, just forget his existence IMHO.




Actually Prince put her off the Welcome 2 Europe tour before they went to Italy
And then he originally had her and her family band set to open for him in Oakland or Cali in general. He then put Larry Graham on the set and removed Sheila and her family
So then when the tour went to Chicago or Detroit, somewhere in that area, he summond her for the tour and she said she couldn't go through it again.
She took her band on tour, wrote her book(which really wasn't about Prince much)

Sheila E & Prince reconciled around the Fall of last year 2015.
It was either around the same time or right after Kim Upsher passed away

[Edited 9/20/16 13:03pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #93 posted 09/20/16 1:39pm

BillieBalloon

LBrent said:

BillieBalloon said:



The fact that Prince made these women famous, invested money in them and basically put them on the world stage, none of that means anything? He's getting his just desserts?


Unbelievable.


I adore P, but he did make decisions that set the standards in terms of choosing relationship partners and part of that was choosing women to be with who, while attractive had limited talent and sometimes limited intelligence due to limited experience, which caused them to behave in ways that didn't always take into consideration his best interests.

Now that he's not here, it shouldn't be a surprise that some of these same partners are misbehaving without having him to guide them.



I understand, but I don't think Prince deserves his dirty linen being washed in public by some of these women. Anyway, ok.
Baby, you're a star.

Meet me in another world, space and joy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #94 posted 09/20/16 11:27pm

LBrent

I just finished watching the series finale of Hollywood Exes (Yes, I'm late to the paty) and nearly choked on my coffee when the groom sang a heartfelt but very offkey song to the bride and MG, who was bride's maid goes, "Do NOT ask me about that song. C'mon...Adore, Purple Rain...Don't ask me...Ask Sheree (Will Smith's ex, who said No Comment), Will sang Summertime. Ask Nicole (Eddie Murphy's ex, who shook her head No), Eddie sang Pary All The Time. But don't ask me."

That remark granted MG extra points with me. No comparison to P. Lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #95 posted 09/21/16 4:06am

Nanni

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #96 posted 09/21/16 5:00am

RachB65

LBrent said:



Angelsoncrack said:




LoriJ said:


I agree with much of this, especially after watching Hollywood ex wives. I was very surprised to see the type of person MG really is. She throws things in anger, lies, is very vindictive, and at 40 is still very immature.


On the Oprah interview, she seemed so sweet, and he was so happy and obviously in love. Ultimately losing children ended the marraige. Something like that takes it toll on a relationship, blaming each other etc. I have to say that while he might have been able to control and suppress her true personalty/behaviour in public, what about at home? How happy would anyone be in the long run, living with someone with that type of personality?



Hollywood Exes was a reality TV show. The producers would of cut, edited and done whatever it took to show drama and therefore not just Mayte, but all of them in a bad light some how. Most of the stuff Mayte got angry about I could kinda sympathise with. I'm not defending whatever she did (burning someones fur hat, throwing glasses etc) but those if I remember WERE provoked. They knew she didn't like fur, so what does one of them go and do? Take fur with them to a holiday. You just don't do that shit when someone is your 'friend' and not someone you're on a reality show with. Because reality, most of the time- is boring. So it's not even a reality show in my eyes. It's just a skewered drama'd up view of these womens lives through the lens of a producer.





I get what you're saying, but I disagree with what you're saying. MG was a grown 39 year old woman throwing tantrums. Regardless of her PETA beliefs, the world consists of people who eat meat (like MG admitted she does) and people who wear fur. The way to enlighten those people isn't to destroy their belongings, pout, throw tantrums like the baby you've adopted. The way to enlighten them is to behave in a mature fashion that demonstrates that your beliefs are those of an enlightened mature woman instead of a bratty child.



If you disagree with people eating meat or wearing fur, you can state that instead of whining, then upon not getting your way, pouting, yelling, being rude, destroying property then lying about it. Wow.



I like MG and often defend her and give her a pass, but if I had been in Nicole Murphy's place and wore my fur hat and MG would've simply had to feel like she felt. Nicole was sensitive to MG's feelings and didn't wear the hat, hiding it in the sofa cushion, that's why it was acessible to be destroyed. Then breaking the sugar jar at Nicole's house? Not cool.



I think Nicole was very gracious in not whooping her pretty Puerto Rican azz. I would have. Contrary to what P may have made her feel like, the world does not revolve around her. And she ain't gangsta. She tries folks and they let her get away with it. One good azz whooping would absolve her of her delusions of being gangsta. Trust.




kourtneyreign said:




LBrent said:




confused




okay! Cute. Now can they just release his book already regardless of how many pages they have




I feel the same way. sad




Perhaps they can can fill it up n round it out with chapters by friends n family sharing stories, memories, etc.
"Almost all art is trying to become an anaesthetic and at the same time a healing session drawing up the magical electrics.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #97 posted 09/21/16 5:01am

sonshine

avatar

BillieBalloon said:

LBrent said:



I adore P, but he did make decisions that set the standards in terms of choosing relationship partners and part of that was choosing women to be with who, while attractive had limited talent and sometimes limited intelligence due to limited experience, which caused them to behave in ways that didn't always take into consideration his best interests.

Now that he's not here, it shouldn't be a surprise that some of these same partners are misbehaving without having him to guide them.



I understand, but I don't think Prince deserves his dirty linen being washed in public by some of these women. Anyway, ok.

Whats unbelievable? That sometimes we have to accept the unpleasant outcome that results from our own actions and decisions?
And why assume it's "dirty linen"? I suspect it will be quite complimentary to Prince. Give the poor lady a break. It's not our place to judge her. There will be other books. I don't like it either but it can't be stopped. I'm just not going to read them. I feel like I know too much already about his private life. Maybe I'll feel differently after more time has passed but right now it's too soon.
[Edited 9/21/16 5:02am]
It's a hurtful place, the world, in and of itself. We don't need to add to it. We all need one another. ~ PRN
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #98 posted 09/21/16 5:16am

1Sasha

I find the whole reality show craze to be pretty distasteful. I have never watched MG's show. However, I think she has a right to make money. I am surprised she hasn't been on "Dancing with the Stars," but who knows what will happen around the time she needs to promote her book. I don't have a problem with the book, either. I have already pre-ordered it. Oprah should do the interview with her, and they should discuss the infamous 1996 interview. Let her alone.

[Edited 9/21/16 5:16am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #99 posted 09/21/16 7:40am

Vashtix

sonshine said:

BillieBalloon said:
I understand, but I don't think Prince deserves his dirty linen being washed in public by some of these women. Anyway, ok.
Whats unbelievable? That sometimes we have to accept the unpleasant outcome that results from our own actions and decisions? And why assume it's "dirty linen"? I suspect it will be quite complimentary to Prince. Give the poor lady a break. It's not our place to judge her. There will be other books. I don't like it either but it can't be stopped. I'm just not going to read them. I feel like I know too much already about his private life. Maybe I'll feel differently after more time has passed but right now it's too soon. [Edited 9/21/16 5:02am]

It is not our place or hers to judge Prince either; if she never married him we would not have this discussion.

Prince lived his life and died alone. His death was tragic. I don't get why he needs to be trodded upon in death by an ex wife . It is sad.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #100 posted 09/21/16 10:18am

Purplebflogirl

I'm tired of reading about Mayte..I'm tired of hearing about this book..
IMHO she's made a living off being Prince's ex for 20 yrs..and it's continuing.
She's never had to work at McDonalds..
Why all the attention.. Our beloved Prince isn't here to defend himself..This is not Mayte.org
Until the end of time
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #101 posted 09/21/16 10:24am

Vashtix

Purplebflogirl said:

I'm tired of reading about Mayte..I'm tired of hearing about this book.. IMHO she's made a living off being Prince's ex for 20 yrs..and it's continuing. She's never had to work at McDonalds.. Why all the attention.. Our beloved Prince isn't here to defend himself..This is not Mayte.org

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THIS !

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #102 posted 09/21/16 11:52pm

sonshine

avatar

Vashtix said:



sonshine said:


BillieBalloon said:
I understand, but I don't think Prince deserves his dirty linen being washed in public by some of these women. Anyway, ok.

Whats unbelievable? That sometimes we have to accept the unpleasant outcome that results from our own actions and decisions? And why assume it's "dirty linen"? I suspect it will be quite complimentary to Prince. Give the poor lady a break. It's not our place to judge her. There will be other books. I don't like it either but it can't be stopped. I'm just not going to read them. I feel like I know too much already about his private life. Maybe I'll feel differently after more time has passed but right now it's too soon. [Edited 9/21/16 5:02am]


It is not our place or hers to judge Prince either; if she never married him we would not have this discussion.



Prince lived his life and died alone. His death was tragic. I don't get why he needs to be trodded upon in death by an ex wife . It is sad.


How is she judging him and trodding upon him?? And I agree this is not mayte.org. Both wives have been overly discussed imo. But some members can't seem to stop making threads about them.
It's a hurtful place, the world, in and of itself. We don't need to add to it. We all need one another. ~ PRN
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #103 posted 09/22/16 4:07am

rogifan

Hmm...

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Paisley Park is in your heart
#PrinceForever 💜
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #104 posted 09/22/16 5:10am

BklynDiamond

avatar

And to me that is the issue Rogifan.

It is not about whatever she will say, it is about the fact that 1. as a private person and throughout his life he did all he could to keep this stuff privite, even stopping her previous attempt and 2. He is not here to either defend or cooborate what is written.

Anything can be said and it will be taken as the gospet truth when it could be the devil's own lies....who is to know.

Because of their half-baked mistakes, we get ice cream, no cake; all lies, no truth; is it fair to Kill the YOUTH ~~ Party Up
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #105 posted 09/22/16 5:30am

Vashtix

sonshine said:

Vashtix said:

It is not our place or hers to judge Prince either; if she never married him we would not have this discussion.

Prince lived his life and died alone. His death was tragic. I don't get why he needs to be trodded upon in death by an ex wife . It is sad.

How is she judging him and trodding upon him?? And I agree this is not mayte.org. Both wives have been overly discussed imo. But some members can't seem to stop making threads about them.

He is dead he can no longer speak for himself

that right there is trodding on him and disrespectful imo

Since he is no longer here anything she says is suspect and a last word for the dead and that is not right. Makes me question loads of things about her and motives. That is all I do know if she truly loved him - we would not be having this discussion and that book would not be a reality. That is all

BrklynDiamond said it best

It is not about whatever she will say, it is about the fact that 1. as a private person and throughout his life he did all he could to keep this stuff privite, even stopping her previous attempt and 2. He is not here to either defend or cooborate what is written.

Anything can be said and it will be taken as the gospet truth when it could be the devil's own lies....who is to know.

[Edited 9/22/16 5:32am]

[Edited 9/22/16 5:32am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #106 posted 09/22/16 6:12am

luvgirl

Dupe
[Edited 9/22/16 6:24am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #107 posted 09/22/16 6:15am

Kitten

avatar

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....

From my point of view its simple:

Was Prince a private person? Yes

Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes

Would those expire on his death? Yes

Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:

Prince was writing his memoirs!!!

If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.

So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?

There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #108 posted 09/22/16 6:17am

luvgirl

[quote]

sonshine said:


Ok, this is confusing to me. So is he saying the song was, or wasn't, about Vanity? He makes it sound like everyone (including Vanity?) would immediately assume it was about her, yet he goes on to ask why would anyone would be so presumptuous. So is his point that nothing is as it appears, or seems? (Or at least 9 out of 10 things?) Reminds me of something I heard years ago and keep in the back of my mind all the time: Believe none of what you see, and half of what you hear. Or is it none of what you hear, and half of what you see? No matter. The point is the same.


(Don't mean to stare this off topic. Just wanted to answer your question.)

His statement stems from the fact that there was a rumor going around that 'The Beautiful Ones' was written for Susannah Melovin. Prince was trying to clear up that rumor, saying that the song wasn't inspired by Susannah Melvoin at all, but had lyrics specifically written for the Purple Rain scene between Apples and Morris sitting around the table with him performing on stage and singing 'Do you want him or do you want me.' Other parts he said was inspired by Vanity leaving his camp.
Some believe that he might have been miffed at SM at the time and that is why he said it, but I don't believe that to be the case, I think he really wanted to set the record straight. I guess as fans we still have the option to choose which ever ex girlfriend's rumor we want to believe the song was written for. So whoever your favorite associate is, knock yourself out. I'm team Vanity, lol lol
[Edited 9/22/16 6:50am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #109 posted 09/22/16 10:36am

sonshine

avatar

Kitten said:

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....



From my point of view its simple:



Was Prince a private person? Yes



Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes



Would those expire on his death? Yes



Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:



Prince was writing his memoirs!!!



If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.



So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?



There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.


Very good points.
It's a hurtful place, the world, in and of itself. We don't need to add to it. We all need one another. ~ PRN
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #110 posted 09/22/16 10:39am

sonshine

avatar

luvgirl said:[quote]

sonshine said:


Ok, this is confusing to me. So is he saying the song was, or wasn't, about Vanity? He makes it sound like everyone (including Vanity?) would immediately assume it was about her, yet he goes on to ask why would anyone would be so presumptuous. So is his point that nothing is as it appears, or seems? (Or at least 9 out of 10 things?) Reminds me of something I heard years ago and keep in the back of my mind all the time: Believe none of what you see, and half of what you hear. Or is it none of what you hear, and half of what you see? No matter. The point is the same.


(Don't mean to stare this off topic. Just wanted to answer your question.)

His statement stems from the fact that there was a rumor going around that 'The Beautiful Ones' was written for Susannah Melovin. Prince was trying to clear up that rumor, saying that the song wasn't inspired by Susannah Melvoin at all, but had lyrics specifically written for the Purple Rain scene between Apples and Morris sitting around the table with him performing on stage and singing 'Do you want him or do you want me.' Other parts he said was inspired by Vanity leaving his camp.
Some believe that he might have been miffed at SM at the time and that is why he said it, but I don't believe that to be the case, I think he really wanted to set the record straight. I guess as fans we still have the option to choose which ever ex girlfriend's rumor we want to believe the song was written for. So whoever your favorite associate is, knock yourself out. I'm team Vanity, lol lol
[Edited 9/22/16 6:50am]

Thank you for that insight smile Makes total sense now. I wasn't aware of that particular behind the scenes "drama", and I imagine given the number of girlfriends and fiancee's he had this was a constant factor in his offstage life lol lol lol
It's a hurtful place, the world, in and of itself. We don't need to add to it. We all need one another. ~ PRN
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #111 posted 09/22/16 11:30am

morningsong

Kitten said:

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....

From my point of view its simple:

Was Prince a private person? Yes

Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes

Would those expire on his death? Yes

Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:

Prince was writing his memoirs!!!

If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.

So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?

There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.



Valid arguement.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #112 posted 09/22/16 2:06pm

strawberrylova
123

Kitten said:

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....



From my point of view its simple:



Was Prince a private person? Yes



Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes



Would those expire on his death? Yes



Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:



Prince was writing his memoirs!!!



If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.



So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?



There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.


I dont think it's her place to tell mayte not to speak on HER marriage or the tragedy of loosing Two children.she wasnt around.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #113 posted 09/22/16 2:24pm

strawberrylova
123

And lets be honest I'd rather hear this story from the true source than an unauthorized author.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #114 posted 09/22/16 2:53pm

endiadj

Mayte fired back at Wendy Williams about the book. Mayte said it is a love story not a tell all. I really don't believe she will paint him in a bad light. I believe she loved (still does) him too much to do so.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #115 posted 09/22/16 3:20pm

Lovejunky

Kitten said:

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....

From my point of view its simple:

Was Prince a private person? Yes

Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes

Would those expire on his death? Yes

Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:

Prince was writing his memoirs!!!

If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.

So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?

There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.

Well thought out and insightfull Kitten...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #116 posted 09/22/16 3:43pm

fanoftheman

strawberrylova123 said:

Kitten said:

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....

From my point of view its simple:

Was Prince a private person? Yes

Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes

Would those expire on his death? Yes

Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:

Prince was writing his memoirs!!!

If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.

So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?

There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.

I dont think it's her place to tell mayte not to speak on HER marriage or the tragedy of loosing Two children.she wasnt around.

Yes to both of these Comments. Prince was writting he memoirs and I wonder how he was going to approch that time in his life losing babies, marriage etc.. I think Mayte has a right to tell he story and now is the best time while the Iron is hot.. also I dont think it will be a tell all.. she still loved him..

[Edited 9/22/16 15:43pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #117 posted 09/22/16 3:57pm

BillieBalloon

Kitten said:

Hmmm, I see Delilah weighed in on this subject on Twitter overnight and she's not happy because of the apparent money making off the death of someone so private.....



From my point of view its simple:



Was Prince a private person? Yes



Did he make people sign confidentiality agreements? Yes



Would those expire on his death? Yes



Now, whilst from a moral point of view some may argue that knowing the above and then speaking out as soon as he has passed is questionable (and I would entirely agree ordinarily) there is another point to note, one which someone has mentioned already on here and one which changes everything IMO:



Prince was writing his memoirs!!!



If it was to be a really truthful account of his life then it would have included his loves, and his losses and lets face it Mayte was a part of his life for around a decade if you go from first meeting through to divorce. In fact for her not to feature in his book, given the length of their relationship and the heavy psychological burden as a result of the lost children would be nothing short of lying on his part.



So if we assume it at least would have touched on their relationship, is it OK for him to write about it and not her? People are saying its unfair that she's doing this now because he was private and he's not here to defend himself, (but then she couldn't do it when he was here could she) Firstly, Prince was sweeping privacy aside if he was writing his memoirs, secondly who says there will be anything in Mayte's book that would require him to defend himself, and thirdly...very key.....had Prince lived and written his memoirs, if there was anything contentious in there relating to Mayte, Mayte would have been alive and unable to defend herself due to the confidentiality agreement. Is that fair?



There is a double standard here, she may be famous because of him, but their history is a shared one and neither has more or less right to speak about it than the other, and both would have made money from their books.




Prince's memoir was a document of his life and career. Mayte's book is about her relationship with Prince, her "love story" as she puts it. The two books are coming from different places. If Prince had published anything contentious about Mayte of course she could have defended herself , agreement or no agreement. Prince's book would not have been marketed as a tell all about his relationships but a biography of his life
Mayte has one and only one reason for writing her book and that's to reveal the intimate details of her relationship with Prince. You can't even compare the 2 books because they're both different entities.
Baby, you're a star.

Meet me in another world, space and joy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #118 posted 09/22/16 5:36pm

Mumio

avatar

sonshine said:

So is his point that nothing is as it appears, or seems?

I'm gonna say that I think this is something that applies to almost everything. I do think this is very in line with the man and how he thought.

Welcome to "the org", Mumio…they can have you, but I'll have your love in the end nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #119 posted 09/22/16 9:35pm

strawberrylova
123

OMG WENDY WILLIAMS IS A HORRENDOUS HUMAN BEING mad

I'm beyond saddened by your comments on your show about Prince & my son. How dare you say something - of our baby!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 4 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Associated artists & people > the greatest romance that's ever been sold.