Ann Coulter...good, bad or who?

http://www.anncoulter.com...402mic.jpg

This is not a pretty woman! She is part of the new wave of conservative pundits that gained immediate fame because of 9/11 and scaring everyone into voting Republican and becoming, say it with me, patriotic. This patriotism extends to wishing a plane had hit the New York Times (bitter anyone), making sure to screen only “swarthy” young men in airports and she peppers other hateful liberal bashings, anti-feminist remarks (so it is Ok for her 40+ year old ass to have a job and no family, but all other women can get screwed) and just a general discontent for anyone in any minority. I read her columns and she just twists and manipulates the language in order to make a screwy point. A horrible writer. Just can't stand the woman. And now she has anew book out and I've only heard about it through her damn website. If you know who she is (along with her kind) post your thoughts. If not, critique the photo!
[This message was edited Wed Jun 25 23:48:05 PDT 2003 by VinnyM27]

hm...ok.never head of her. and those pictures do not even open.
If it isn't too hard on you, please post some articles of hers.

careydevi said:

hehehe... gotta love how democrats keep bitching and moaning now that there is finally a source to hear the other side of the story huh? (bitter anyone)

Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Matt Drudge, Neal Boortz, Rush Limbaugh, G. Gordon Liddy, Bill O'Reilly and others are finally becoming popular. The other side is finally coming out. The leftist media is falling thanks to the unprecedented popularity of Fox News and talk radio. And the democrats just keep whining and whining.

I suggest you read Ann Coulter's new book 'Treason'. As well as her old book 'Slander' and Neal Boortz's book 'The Truth About Liberals'. You will change your views quickly about the democratic party you love so much.

Her new book raises some great questions about what the Clinton presidency would have been like if it wasnt for the internet, talk radio and up and coming Fox News? Would we have ever learned about his corruption, greed and adultery? Most likely not, just like we didnt learn about democrats who were known Soviet spys until just recently.

Also, after all that has come out with the New York Times recently and their twisting of facts and blatent plagerism and making stories up... dont you wish a plane would have hit it to? Or you do like it when leftist news sources are deemed totally uncredible?

by the way...

Ann Coulter's new book is second only to Harry Potter on Amazon.com's Bestsellers.


Hillary Clinton's fiction novel is number 8.

Scare you?

I find her very attractive, and its refreshing to see a woman slice and dice liberals for a change. However, her punditry seems intentionally inflammatory at times...at little over the top. But still cool.

Ann Coulter is just another annoying yenta with no class and nothing to say. Unlike other guests from that end of the spectrum (such as Dinesh D'Souza), she added nothing to "Politically Incorrect" whenever she was on.

If she didn't have give those country club mofo's a boner no one would even listen to her. (Actually, IMHO, she's kind of skanky looking.)

Though I don't care for a lot of his points, G. Gordon Liddy is the most intellegent, gracious and entertaining one of the conservative commentators.

Bad. Really, really bad. I firmly believe that she is the anti-Christ. Like Teller said, she is overly inflammatory that, imho, takes away from any sort of legitimate argument she may be trying to present. (which I would be more than willing to hear, if she wasn't so abrasive.)

Here are some quotes, solely from her first paragraph of her last article on her website:

"Liberals are fanatical liars,then as now"

"Liberals denounced McCarthy because they were afraid of getting caught, so they fought back like animals to hide their own collaboration with a regime as evil as the Nazis."

I consider myself a liberal, but not a democrat. Why should even TRY to see what her underlying message is in her article when she starts out with these accusations of being a liar, and comparing my beliefs with the Nazis, simply because I don't have the same ideologies as her??? No thank you.

She seems like a bully, who doesn't know of any other way of communicating other than through insults and accusations. (like when she was interviewing with Diane Sawyer and made the "3-1 pound ratio" comment about Hillary Clinton--really, what's the point of insults like that? Nothing. It just makes her look juvenile.)

jackflash said:

purplek said:

Or the "Liberal Media". HA!

I love Ann Coulter - for the most part, she is very "pro-woman" and she is extremly intelligent. To comment on her looks is a very sexist thing to do. Men are usually judged on their intellectual ability, and here some of you go referring to her ass skanky looking...? c'mon!

I love the fact that she tells it like it is. Oh yeah, like Hillary is to be admired...allowing herself to be publicly humiliated by her cheating husband over and over, yeah that sends a great message to young women.

This is one of Ann's best articles



I Like Black People Too, Julia!

March 28, 2002

I TUNED IN LATE and consequently can speak only to the last three hours of Halle Berry's acceptance speech at the Academy Awards last Sunday. But inasmuch as she engaged in wild race-baiting to get her Oscar, her expressions of shock were not very believable. She had spent weeks complaining about one time she did not get a role because of her color. It was the part of a forest ranger. Arnold Schwarzenegger probably has trouble getting cast as a ballet dancer, too.

And yet still, somehow, white guilt worked on Hollywood liberals! Berry had successfully mau-maued her way to a best actress award and then acted surprised.

It's interesting that Berry makes such a big deal about being black. She was raised by her white mother who was beaten and abandoned by her black father. Clearly, Berry has calculated that it is more advantageous for her acting career to identify with the man who abandoned her rather than the woman who raised her.


Demanding that everyone marvel at her accomplishment, Berry gushed: "This moment is so much bigger than me." Whenever people say something is not about them it's always just about them. This is a turn of phrase meant to remind the audience of the importance and beauty of them. Berry said her triumph was a victory "for every nameless, faceless woman of color who now has a chance because this door tonight has been opened."

Yes, at long last, the "glass ceiling" had been broken. Large-breasted, slightly cocoa women with idealized Caucasian features finally have a chance in Hollywood! They will, however, still be required to display their large breasts for the camera and to discuss their large breasts at some length with reporters.

Thus, Berry has explained her philosophy on nude scenes, saying: "[I]f it's what the character would do, then I'd use my body in any way that would best serve that character." This, she said, is her "strong belief." But what does it mean, exactly? Don't all people undress sometimes? All people pick their noses, but vapid Hollywood actresses don't insist on showing us that in every movie on the grounds that it is "what the character would do."

In fact, Berry's unseemly enthusiasm for displaying "these babies," as she genteelly refers to her breasts, reduces roles for any women who lack Berry's beauty-queen features. If movies must include soft-porn scenes, the audience is entitled to demand performers with sexual characteristics they would like to see in a soft porn movie. Somehow, characters played by Whoopi Goldberg are never the sorts of characters who would do things in real life like undress or have sex. And by the way, Billy Bob Thornton isn't cutting it for the female audience.

When they are young, nubile Hollywood actresses all utter the same idiotic cliches about the artistic value of nudity in movies. Then they expect us to feel sorry for them when parts dry up after they become old and start to sag. Live by the breast, die by the breast.

But Berry's self-aggrandizing pap was merely a footnote to the main theme of the awards ceremony, which was: Julia Roberts loves all the black brothers! It was a point she felt could not be made too often or with too much condescension. Her presentation of the best actor award began with the exciting revelation that she had just kissed Sidney Poitier!

Having once famously proclaimed she did not want to live in a world in which Denzel Washington had not won an Oscar for best actor, she preceded her announcement of his award saying, "I love my life!" This was about her, not him. It was her personal triumph over racism. The only patronizing remark Roberts skipped was to note that Washington and Poitier were "articulate."

After Washington accepted his award, Roberts leapt on him and would not let go. It was as if he had grown some sort of exotic Julia Roberts wart. Not only Washington, but, more urgently, his wife deserve great credit for their forbearance. Whatever indignities Hollywood has visited on blacks in the past, it would be hard to top this.

Whenever white liberals are in trouble, they always run to the blacks. Immediately after the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, Monica went to a Washington Wizards game where she hoisted some poor unsuspecting black girl onto her lap in full view of the cameras. Bill Clinton dropped the subtlety and dashed off to Africa. After his abomination of a presidency, Jimmy Carter built housing in Harlem.

Apparently, Oscar night was Hollywood's shot at patronizing blacks to generate goodwill – perhaps as wartime penance for its long-standing hatred of America.

It's too bad Denzel Washington's Oscar was tainted by Hollywood's self-serving night of condescension. He deserved that award. And he deserves a special award for not punching Julia Roberts in the mouth.
[This message was edited Thu Jun 26 7:13:03 PDT 2003 by gabeez]

purplek said:

She's actually not bad looking, and becoming more and more popular, just like Sean Hannity. I think the reason these people (coulter hannity) are doing so well, is simple-many people agree with their point of view. In a capatilist society, such as ours, dollars are like votes, they are selling their product (conservitism) very well. It isn't because people are stupid, I think people truly are tired of liberal/democrat depressing, manipulative, and hypocritical points of view.

She's very pretty for a blonde.
What are you on about?

gabeez said:

She's actually not bad looking, and becoming more and more popular, just like Sean Hannity. I think the reason these people (coulter hannity) are doing so well, is simple-many people agree with their point of view. In a capatilist society, such as ours, dollars are like votes, they are selling their product (conservitism) very well. It isn't because people are stupid, I think people truly are tired of liberal/democrat depressing, manipulative, and hypocritical points of view.

<---Fed up and bored with liberals' gloom-and-doom.

Guilty as charged--I haven't read any of her books, only select articles online and I've seen her various talk shows on TV. I think I'll read more of her stuff before I form a final opinion on her, but when I see text like this, (taken from excerpts from the Drudge Report:)

"Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America’s self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant."

I get offended. I wasn't 'bleating' for Hussein when I decided that I felt that this wasn't the right time to gage a war. I'm glad he's out of there, but I'd be happier if he were dead or in our capitivity, and I would just like for the soldiers to come home safe and sound and return to their families. Does that make me a traitor? To call someone a traitor is a very heavy accusation.

I guess why I don't like her is because she's like a 'Shock Jock' for the right wing. Stuff like that never impresses me much, whether it's from the left or right.

Apparently I have been living in a box, but what sort of examples does she cite for this? (I honestly would like to know.)

purplek said:

Ann Coulter is shit. Hannity is shit. Michael Moore is shit.

If I wanted sensationalism, I'd read The Weekly World News.

I'll take Christopher Hitchens ANY DAY.

I really don't care for Miss Coulter, but I actually like Sean Hannity if that is possible. Her appearance on Bill Maher's show a couple of months ago cemented my feelings for her. It seems to me she says a lot of things for shock value.

gabeez said:

Excellent post, namepeace.

gabeez said:

I still say she's hot.

teller said:

KingSausage said:

teller said:

I still say she's hot.

teller said:

KingSausage said:

teller said:

I still say she's hot.

Yeah, when I said she was inflammatory, I wasn't actually referring to anybody's ideological sensibilities...