independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Fri 14th Dec 2018 5:46pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > What's going on in Michigan and Wisconsin now?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/06/18 4:59pm

onlyforaminute

What's going on in Michigan and Wisconsin now?

Republicans in Wisconsin and Michigan Aim to Hobble Incoming Democrats


https://www.theatlantic.c...ts/577420/




...both states are embroiled in bitter postelection struggles over a flurry of proposals from the GOP-controlled legislatures to limit the power of the incoming statewide Democratic officials—and to dilute the voting power of the urban-based coalitions that elected them. Wisconsin Republicans passed a sweeping package of such bills early Wednesday morning.






Sounds like anything goes. Pretty soon it'll just be a game of, anything you can do, I can do better...


"You want to know your biggest fault? You don’t keep true accounts: you put a high value on what you’ve given, a low value on what you’ve received."

- Seneca, On Anger 3.31.3
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/06/18 5:01pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

haha.... but yeah this is jacked up and can only come back to bite them later. I know where I live the governor has pretty limited power. But that is long established...

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/07/18 6:01am

Dauphin

avatar

It's a situation where the few major cities control the votes for the vast majority of the physical layout of the states. In my mind, anytime the govt can tie it's own hands and slow it's toll is a good thing.

That said, I personally voted for the Democratic party gov Whitimer for two reasons. One, she promised to fix the roads. I'll be pissed if she ttys to raise taxes to do so, because we already pay to have good roads. Two, she's not a Rick Snyder republican who has done fuck all for the state from my point of view.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/07/18 7:09am

jjhunsecker

avatar

Dauphin said:

It's a situation where the few major cities control the votes for the vast majority of the physical layout of the states. In my mind, anytime the govt can tie it's own hands and slow it's toll is a good thing. That said, I personally voted for the Democratic party gov Whitimer for two reasons. One, she promised to fix the roads. I'll be pissed if she ttys to raise taxes to do so, because we already pay to have good roads. Two, she's not a Rick Snyder republican who has done fuck all for the state from my point of view.

Shouldn't the will of the majority of voters prevail ? Isn't that the point of elections ?

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/07/18 7:49am

poppys

jjhunsecker said:

Dauphin said:

It's a situation where the few major cities control the votes for the vast majority of the physical layout of the states. In my mind, anytime the govt can tie it's own hands and slow it's toll is a good thing. That said, I personally voted for the Democratic party gov Whitimer for two reasons. One, she promised to fix the roads. I'll be pissed if she ttys to raise taxes to do so, because we already pay to have good roads. Two, she's not a Rick Snyder republican who has done fuck all for the state from my point of view.

Shouldn't the will of the majority of voters prevail ? Isn't that the point of elections ?


Yes. That's not even true either. If it were, my state would be blue instead of red. Laid waste with gerrymandering, our biggest city's voice is purposely weakened. One person, one vote is the only fair way.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/07/18 8:19am

13cjk13

What's going on in Michigan and Wisconsin? Simple answer, right wing corruption and voter fraud, that's what. Just another normal day.

"Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost".
-Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/07/18 1:50pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

poppys said:

jjhunsecker said:

Shouldn't the will of the majority of voters prevail ? Isn't that the point of elections ?


Yes. That's not even true either. If it were, my state would be blue instead of red. Laid waste with gerrymandering, our biggest city's voice is purposely weakened. One person, one vote is the only fair way.


Bigger picture: Both Dakotas have 4 senators between them (populations 869,000 and 755,000) and California only has 2 (population 36.5 million)

Makes perfect sense, right?

"'Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.'' - Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/07/18 1:56pm

onlyforaminute

DiminutiveRocker said:

poppys said:


Yes. That's not even true either. If it were, my state would be blue instead of red. Laid waste with gerrymandering, our biggest city's voice is purposely weakened. One person, one vote is the only fair way.


Bigger picture: Both Dakotas have 4 senators between them (populations 869,000 and 755,000) and California only has 2 (population 36.5 million)

Makes perfect sense, right?

The Senate is composed of senators, each of whom represents a single state in its entirety, with each state being equally represented by two senators, regardless of its population, serving staggered terms of six years; with 50 states currently in the Union, there are 100 U.S. Senators.



This is what is being used against the general population, the average person does not know that "majority rule" isn't 100% the way this system was setup.

I'm still perplexed with all the "flag waving" was about a tiny population being flipped in Cali, when there are whole states that need to be addressed.

[Edited 12/7/18 14:01pm]

"You want to know your biggest fault? You don’t keep true accounts: you put a high value on what you’ve given, a low value on what you’ve received."

- Seneca, On Anger 3.31.3
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/07/18 7:06pm

Dauphin

avatar

poppys said:



jjhunsecker said:




Dauphin said:


It's a situation where the few major cities control the votes for the vast majority of the physical layout of the states. In my mind, anytime the govt can tie it's own hands and slow it's toll is a good thing. That said, I personally voted for the Democratic party gov Whitimer for two reasons. One, she promised to fix the roads. I'll be pissed if she ttys to raise taxes to do so, because we already pay to have good roads. Two, she's not a Rick Snyder republican who has done fuck all for the state from my point of view.


Shouldn't the will of the majority of voters prevail ? Isn't that the point of elections ?




Yes. That's not even true either. If it were, my state would be blue instead of red. Laid waste with gerrymandering, our biggest city's voice is purposely weakened. One person, one vote is the only fair way.



Yes and no. The system is setup so that there are checks and balances. A simple majority is a poor way to govern. That said, we have a less than simple majority process in MI where an Amendment Proposal can be voted yes and made law. I say less than simple majority, because not everyone voter votes.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Still it's nice to know, when our bodies wear out, we can get another

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/08/18 6:17am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Why did you go haha first? You would think Christmas would make us nicer

"My motherfucker's so cool sheep count him."
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 12/08/18 10:30am

poppys

Dauphin said:

poppys said:


Yes. That's not even true either. If it were, my state would be blue instead of red. Laid waste with gerrymandering, our biggest city's voice is purposely weakened. One person, one vote is the only fair way.


Yes and no. The system is setup so that there are checks and balances.
A simple majority is a poor way to govern. That said, we have a less than simple majority process in MI where an Amendment Proposal can be voted yes and made law. I say less than simple majority, because not everyone voter votes.


Checks and balances setup for what was the 1% of yesteryear. Still evident today. Just because it's in place does not mean it works well.

You said that major cities control the vast majority of the state's vote. The opposite is the case in my state. Now arguing checks and balances. Why exactly do you think a simple majority is a poor way to govern? Voter apathy should not be a reason to circumvent what should be a fair process either. If our votes actually counted, maybe more would vote, especially young people.

The person with the majority vote of the country lost the last election. I think majority should rule. It would cut down on sour grapes in party politics too.

It's happened 5 times - 2 most recent:

In 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

In 2016, Donald Trump won the electoral vote by 304 to 227 over Hillary Clinton, but Trump lost the popular vote. Clinton received nearly 2.9 million more votes than Trump, according to an analysis by the Associated Press of the certified results in all 50 states and Washington, D.C.

[Edited 12/9/18 9:33am]

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 12/14/18 2:54pm

poppys

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 12/14/18 3:01pm

13cjk13

"Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost".
-Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 12/14/18 3:26pm

RodeoSchro

avatar

A study was released today that said Wisconsinites are the most likely Americans to drink to excess.

That explains a lot, doesn't it?

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > What's going on in Michigan and Wisconsin now?