independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Tue 20th Feb 2018 5:12pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > James Mattis now admits there is no evidence Assad did gas attack
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/11/18 3:20am

midnightmover

James Mattis now admits there is no evidence Assad did gas attack

Last year the public was led to believe that President Assad gassed his own people. I said at the time that the public was being deceived and misled. There was no evidence and it defied basic logic that Assad would do something so foolish. Well now, a year later, it's been confirmed that I was right and most of the org was wrong. James Mattis has admitted that there is "no evidence" that Assad launched that attack. Even Newsweek is now writing an article using the same arguments I used here on the org last year. There's a lesson in this. The media and the establishment politicians are professional deceivers who promote war and last year they deceived all of you with fake news. Here is the Newsweek article.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOW MATTIS ADMITS THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE ASSAD USED POISON GAS ON HIS PEOPLE

BY IAN WILKIE ON 2/8/18 AT 11:44 AM

Lost in the hyper-politicized hullabaloo surrounding the Nunes Memorandum and the Steele Dossier was the striking statement by the US Secretary of Defence James Mattis that the US has "no evidence" that the Syrian government used the banned nerve agent Sarin against its own people.

This assertion flies in the face of the White House (NSC) Memorandum which was rapidly produced and declassified to justify an American Tomahawk missile strike against the Shayrat airbase in Syria.

Mattis offered no temporal qualifications, which means that both the 2017 event in Khan Sheikhoun and the 2013 tragedy in Ghouta are unsolved cases in the eyes of the Defense Department and Defense Intelligence Agency.

Mattis went on to acknowledge that “aid groups and others” had provided evidence and reports but stopped short of naming President Assad as the culprit.

There were casualties from organophosphate poisoning in both cases; that much is certain. But America has accused Assad of direct responsibility for Sarin attacks and even blamed Russia for culpability in the Khan Sheikhoun tragedy.

Now its own military boss has said on the record that we have no evidence to support this conclusion. In so doing, Mattis tacitly impugned the interventionists who were responsible for pushing the “Assad is guilty” narrative twice without sufficient supporting evidence, at least in the eyes of the Pentagon.

This dissonance between the White House and the Department of Defense is especially troubling when viewed against the chorus of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) experts who have been questioning the (Obama and Trump) White House narratives concerning chemical weapons in Syria since practically the moment these “Assad-ordered events” occurred.

Serious, experienced chemical weapons experts and investigators such as Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, Gareth Porter and Theodore Postol have all cast doubt on “official” American narratives regarding President Assad employing Sarin.

These analysts have all focused on the technical aspects of the two attacks and found them not to be consistent with the use of nation-state quality Sarin munitions.

The 2013 Ghouta event, for example, employed home-made rockets of the type favored by insurgents. The White House Memorandum on Khan Sheikhoun seemed to rely heavily on testimony from the Syrian White Helmets who were filmed at the scene having contact with supposed Sarin-tainted casualties and not suffering any ill effects.

Likewise, these same actors were filmed wearing chemical weapons training suits around the supposed “point of impact” in Khan Sheikhoun, something which makes their testimony (and samples) highly suspect. A training suit offers no protection at all, and these people would all be dead if they had come into contact with real military-grade Sarin.

Chemical weapons are abhorrent and illegal, and no one knows this more than Carla Del Ponte. She, however, was unable to fulfill her U.N. Joint Investigative Mechanism mandate in Syria and withdrew in protest over the United States refusing to fully investigate allegations of chemical weapons use by “rebels” (jihadis) allied with the American effort to oust President Assad (including the use of Sarin by anti-Assad rebels).

The fact that U.N. investigators were in Syria when the chemical weapon event in Khan Sheikhoun occurred in April 2017 makes it highly dubious that Assad would have given the order to use Sarin at that time. Common sense suggests that Assad would have chosen any other time than that to use a banned weapon that he had agreed to destroy and never employ.

Furthermore, he would be placing at risk his patronage from Russia if they turned on him as a war criminal and withdrew their support for him.

Tactically, as a former soldier, it makes no sense to me that anyone would intentionally target civilians and children as the White Helmet reports suggest he did.

There is compelling analysis from Gareth Porter suggesting that phosphine could have been released by an airborne munition striking a chemical depot, since the clouds and casualties (while organophosphate-appearing in some respects) do not appear to be similar to MilSpec Sarin, particularly the high-test Russian bomb-carried Sarin which independent groups like “bellingcat” insist was deployed.

America’s credibility was damaged by Colin Powell at the United Nations in 2003 falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of having mobile anthrax laboratories. Fast forward to 2017 and we encounter Nikki Haley in an uncomfortably similar situation at the U.N. Security Council calling for action against yet another non-Western head-of-state based on weak, unsubstantiated evidence.

Now Secretary Mattis has added fuel to the WMD propaganda doubters’ fire by retroactively calling into question the rationale for an American cruise missile strike.

While in no way detracting from the horror of what took place against innocent civilians in Syria, it is time for America to stop shooting first and asking questions later.

[Edited 2/11/18 4:13am]

“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/11/18 3:41am

midnightmover

It's worth bearing in mind that Tulsi Gabbard was one of the only US politicians who kept a cool head at that time and got it completely right. All the other politicians (including almost all Democrats) supported Trump's illegal response to this fake news, which was to bomb Syria. Her fellow Democrats began feverishly attacking her because she refused to join in their false narrative. Now she looks smart and brave while they look stupid and cowardly (not to mention evil for supporting pointless murder). Here is an interview she gave at the time.

[Edited 2/11/18 5:58am]

“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/11/18 5:00am

SuperFurryAnim
al

avatar

2 minutes in news..The Truth is Messy! Right? wink

*CNN disclaimer, sorry we misled the American people again.

You better Watch Out! I'm a WAR MACHINE!
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/11/18 5:54am

midnightmover

Many of the points made in the Newsweek article about the White Helmets' fake evidence in 2017 were pointed out on the Jimmy Dore show last year. Another example of independent media being light years ahead of corporate media. That's why independent media is currently under sustained attack by Google. They keep pointing out the things that mainstream media is covering up.

[Edited 2/11/18 6:35am]

“The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them, inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”
- Thomas Jefferson
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/11/18 10:21am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Means RT was right after all. So was Putin.

DJ is da man
"2freaky is very down." 2Elijah.
"2freaky convinced me to join Antifa: OnlyNDA
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/11/18 10:28am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

People need to apologize to Jimmy. Now.

DJ is da man
"2freaky is very down." 2Elijah.
"2freaky convinced me to join Antifa: OnlyNDA
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/12/18 4:24pm

214

As usual with USA fire first ask later.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > James Mattis now admits there is no evidence Assad did gas attack