independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Thu 13th Dec 2018 4:58pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > Roy Moore accused of sexual harassment and underage dating
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 5 of 19 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #120 posted 11/29/17 3:49pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

jjhunsecker said:

RodeoSchro said:



Why not?

You're saying that it would be better to have a pedophile as Senator than not.

A perfect example of someone to whom partisanship matters more than morals and values

so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #121 posted 11/29/17 4:00pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



jjhunsecker said:


RodeoSchro said:




Why not?

You're saying that it would be better to have a pedophile as Senator than not.



A perfect example of someone to whom partisanship matters more than morals and values



so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?



If it was a SANE Republican, than the answer is yes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #122 posted 11/29/17 4:11pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

jjhunsecker said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?

If it was a SANE Republican, than the answer is yes

i do not believe you

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #123 posted 11/29/17 4:53pm

poppys

jjhunsecker said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?

If it was a SANE Republican, than the answer is yes

This is where we are now. A pedophile is preferable to a Democrat.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #124 posted 11/29/17 5:04pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



jjhunsecker said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:




so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?



If it was a SANE Republican, than the answer is yes


i do not believe you


That's your problem. You asked me a question and I gave you an honest answer
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #125 posted 11/29/17 5:04pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

poppys said:



jjhunsecker said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:




so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?



If it was a SANE Republican, than the answer is yes

This is where we are now. A pedophile is preferable to a Democrat.


Says a lot about some people
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #126 posted 11/29/17 5:42pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

jjhunsecker said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

i do not believe you

That's your problem. You asked me a question and I gave you an honest answer

so you would have H W Bush in 1992? at that time we knew clinton had been accused of rape

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #127 posted 11/29/17 5:45pm

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

jjhunsecker said:

OnlyNDaUsa said: If it was a SANE Republican, than the answer is yes

This is where we are now. A pedophile is preferable to a Democrat.

that is simply not a rational standard. saying I will not vote for someone is not enough you have to actually vote for their opponent or you must prefer bad person.

there is no doubt you would not hold yourself to that standard.... NONE.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #128 posted 11/29/17 6:04pm

poppys

OnlyNDaUsa said:

poppys said:

This is where we are now. A pedophile is preferable to a Democrat.

that is simply not a rational standard. saying I will not vote for someone is not enough you have to actually vote for their opponent or you must prefer bad person.

there is no doubt you would not hold yourself to that standard.... NONE.

By your standards I am an "extreme lefty". Yeah, got that Antifa gear in the closet for when I rumble. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #129 posted 11/29/17 7:21pm

jjhunsecker

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



jjhunsecker said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:



i do not believe you



That's your problem. You asked me a question and I gave you an honest answer




so you would have H W Bush in 1992? at that time we knew clinton had been accused of rape



Did you vote for Trump even though he had a dozen accusers of sexual harassment and a history of bigotry?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #130 posted 11/30/17 3:30am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

jjhunsecker said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

so you would have H W Bush in 1992? at that time we knew clinton had been accused of rape

Did you vote for Trump even though he had a dozen accusers of sexual harassment and a history of bigotry?

did you vote for hillary despite her history of criminal allegations and her defence of her rapist husband?

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #131 posted 11/30/17 6:48am

RodeoSchro

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

jjhunsecker said:

RodeoSchro said: A perfect example of someone to whom partisanship matters more than morals and values

so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?



I certainly would, and have many times.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #132 posted 11/30/17 6:49am

RodeoSchro

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

jjhunsecker said:

OnlyNDaUsa said: Did you vote for Trump even though he had a dozen accusers of sexual harassment and a history of bigotry?

did you vote for hillary despite her history of being vidicated in many baseless criminal allegations and her alleged defence of her alleged rapist husband?



FIFY.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #133 posted 11/30/17 6:53am

poppys

If Bama wanted to do someting about that ticket, they could have. Heard they have a Repub write-in, too late, just the way they wanted it. Now they have to support poor Roy after all what he's been through...

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #134 posted 11/30/17 8:21am

poppys

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

did you vote for hillary despite her history of being vidicated in many baseless criminal allegations and her alleged defence of her alleged rapist husband?



FIFY.

Thank you.

Plus the allegeds that should be in his signature. The word rape alone is inflammatory, not fit for Prince.org, imo. disbelief

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #135 posted 11/30/17 8:30am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

RodeoSchro said:



FIFY.

Thank you.

Plus the allegeds that should be in his signature. The word rape alone is inflammatory, not fit for Prince.org, imo. disbelief


yes, I bet you have accused others of crimes here and thought it was just fine.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #136 posted 11/30/17 8:31am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

Musicslave said:

This is sort of off topic but I've been amazed at how effective the GOP has been through decades of making the republican brand synonymous with God or Christianity. There are people right now in Alabama ACTUALLY STRUGGLING whether or not to vote for this guy vs. the democrat, Doug Jones I think his name is. It's as if they think they'll go to hell for voting for someone who's not republican. lol lol

-

Of course they can write-in someone else but unless it's an organized effort, Roy Moore could still very well win. Thankfully, the leaders in the GOP have tools they can legally use to ensure he doesn't serve in the Senate.

Haha, they're goin to hell if they don't vote for the child molester. What a quandry.

You're right about the Democrat being Doug Jones but I had to look. See? He has no name recognition, unlike Judge Roy. There should be a full on door-knocking Dem campaign going on in Alabama right now. There are a lot of blue voters there. For one thing, it is 26% African American. This is where voting laws, access to polling places, gerrymandering and good ole voter suppression come in to play.

Some tricks - very few polling places so you have to wait a long time, make the polling place hard to get to if you don't have a car, make the hours very short so you can't go before/after work. The kicker is to make it in a real small space so everybody has to stand in a long line outside for hours. They do this in Louisiana too, more in the smaller towns.

The term child molester alone is inflammatory, not fit for Prince.org, imo.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #137 posted 11/30/17 8:35am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

did you vote for hillary despite her history of being vidicated in many baseless criminal allegations and her alleged defence of her alleged rapist husband?



FIFY.

I will excuse your altering my post. He was not vidicated and some of the cases they denied were proven true so you would have to believe that the only times they lied were the times they were proven to be lying.

and she damn sure did defend it...that is on video. but yes he was alleged to have raped someone... ALLEGED. Just like More is Alleged to have molested a child.

So all I can you admit to a double standard?

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #138 posted 11/30/17 8:39am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

so are you saying if it was the other way around you would vote for the republican?



I certainly would, and have many times.

which elections were the Democrats accused of a crime so you voted for the republican with whom you had vast poltical diffrences of opnion with?

I suspect you are saying you have voted for a Republican before. that is you agreed more with some Republicans than their Democrat rivals... but I want a case when you disagreed with a Republican but voted for him anyway due to a criminal allegation.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #139 posted 11/30/17 8:46am

poppys

OnlyNDaUsa said:

poppys said:

Thank you.

Plus the allegeds that should be in his signature. The word rape alone is inflammatory, not fit for Prince.org, imo. disbelief


yes, I bet you have accused others of crimes here and thought it was just fine.


You accuse a POTUS of rape in your signature visible on every post you write. On Prince.org. Just let that sink in. Your last sig was a Prince quote about how you really have love for us all.

I'm done with you on this. If you're not just trolling you've hit a new low defending Moore by attacking others politically. Wash the slime off your hands, ugh.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #140 posted 11/30/17 8:52am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:


yes, I bet you have accused others of crimes here and thought it was just fine.


You accuse a POTUS of rape in your signature visible on every post you write. On Prince.org. Just let that sink in. Your last sig was a Prince quote about how you really have love for us all.

I'm done with you on this. If you're not just trolling you've hit a new low defending Moore by attacking others politically. Wash the slime off your hands, ugh.

I know how sigs work. I know sigs work retroactively! I want it to be seen... Juanita Broaddrick has every right to be heard as Moore's victim have.


And I do have love and respect for all... but Bill Clinton should have gone to prison.

I have never once defended Moore. Not once!

I said I would not vote for him (If I was in that state) that I would just not vote and YOU and others used that to accuse me of preferring a child rapist over the democrat running against him. (I also said I do not think he will win and if he wins he will not serve.)




You talk about the rules yet you've had posts deleted... and that says what?


[Edited 11/30/17 9:26am]

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #141 posted 11/30/17 9:10am

poppys

You don't read, and you can't write. ^^ See above and call your editor, couple of big mistakes.


[Edited 11/30/17 9:15am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #142 posted 11/30/17 9:18am

jjhunsecker

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:



jjhunsecker said:


OnlyNDaUsa said:





so you would have H W Bush in 1992? at that time we knew clinton had been accused of rape



Did you vote for Trump even though he had a dozen accusers of sexual harassment and a history of bigotry?



did you vote for hillary despite her history of criminal allegations and her defence of her rapist husband?



Expected deflection from my question...

And yes, I voted for Hillary because I didn't buy the narrative you're pushing
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #143 posted 11/30/17 9:22am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

You don't read, and you can't write. ^^ See above and call your editor, couple of big mistakes.


[Edited 11/30/17 9:15am]

when you can not debate go personal

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #144 posted 11/30/17 9:25am

jjhunsecker

avatar

poppys said:



OnlyNDaUsa said:




poppys said:



Thank you.

Plus the allegeds that should be in his signature. The word rape alone is inflammatory, not fit for Prince.org, imo. disbelief




yes, I bet you have accused others of crimes here and thought it was just fine.




You accuse a POTUS of rape in your signature visible on every post you write. On Prince.org. Just let that sink in. Your last sig was a Prince quote about how you really have love for us all.

I'm done with you on this. If you're not just trolling you've hit a new low defending Moore by attacking others politically. Wash the slime off your hands, ugh.



Has he ever truly criticized a Conservative Republican for their behavior or statements? I don't recall ever seeing it. And any mealy mouthed "condemnation" is ALWAYS followed by an attack on a Liberal. It's all about politics with that guy
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #145 posted 11/30/17 9:31am

RodeoSchro

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

RodeoSchro said:



I certainly would, and have many times.

which elections were the Democrats accused of a crime so you voted for the republican with whom you had vast poltical diffrences of opnion with?

I suspect you are saying you have voted for a Republican before. that is you agreed more with some Republicans than their Democrat rivals... but I want a case when you disagreed with a Republican but voted for him anyway due to a criminal allegation.




I disagreed with our current president but voted for him in the Texas GOP primary because I thought alleged senator Rafael Cruz was an even worse choice for the GOP. I'm not sure anyone has accused alleged senator Rafael Cruz of being a crook, although it wouldn't surprise me if he was. But I surely voted for a man with whom I have/had major political differences.

But that was before I knew he had tried to screw another man's wife. Had I known that our current president bragged about trying to screw another man's wife, there is no way I would have voted for him, either.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #146 posted 11/30/17 9:36am

poppys

OnlyNDaUsa said:

poppys said:

You don't read, and you can't write. ^^ See above and call your editor, couple of big mistakes.

when you can not debate go personal

When you can't come up with an HRC video/audio, ever, just keep yanking that chain. At least I back up what I say here.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #147 posted 11/30/17 9:38am

RodeoSchro

avatar

OnlyNDaUsa said:

RodeoSchro said:



FIFY.

I will excuse your altering my post. He was not vidicated and some of the cases they denied were proven true so you would have to believe that the only times they lied were the times they were proven to be lying.

and she damn sure did defend it...that is on video. but yes he was alleged to have raped someone... ALLEGED. Just like More is Alleged to have molested a child.

So all I can you admit to a double standard?



In other words, everything that I "altered" on your post - which was clearly identified by me - is correct, other than the hair-splitting charge of a wife defending her hsuband against an unproven allegation.

Second Funkiest White Man in America

P&R's paladin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #148 posted 11/30/17 9:44am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

RodeoSchro said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

I will excuse your altering my post. He was not vidicated and some of the cases they denied were proven true so you would have to believe that the only times they lied were the times they were proven to be lying.

and she damn sure did defend it...that is on video. but yes he was alleged to have raped someone... ALLEGED. Just like More is Alleged to have molested a child.

So all I can you admit to a double standard?



In other words, everything that I "altered" on your post - which was clearly identified by me - is correct, other than the hair-splitting charge of a wife defending her hsuband against an unproven allegation.

and the allegations against Moore are also unproven as are the ones agaqinst Trump. Some of the ones clinton denied have been proven.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #149 posted 11/30/17 9:45am

OnlyNDaUsa

avatar

poppys said:

OnlyNDaUsa said:

when you can not debate go personal

When you can't come up with an HRC video/audio, ever, just keep yanking that chain. At least I back up what I say here.

it is not that I can't it is that I will not.

Anyone for banning the AR15 must be on the side of the criminal as once banned only criminals will have them.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 5 of 19 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > Roy Moore accused of sexual harassment and underage dating