independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Mon 23rd Nov 2009 7:51am
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > The Holy Spirit is Feminine
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 09/10/09 3:07pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

The Holy Spirit is Feminine

I have always thought this was obvious but I am met with blank stares when I say this to Christians. The explanations to explain womanhood never ever make sense when I question the notion that God created man in his image. The argument seems to be that God created Adam in his image and woman was created from Adam's likeness.

I know the story of the rib and all that but I believe it should state that god created Mankind in its image. We assign masculinity to God "He", "Father", "Son" but woman is the bearer of the human race, it only stand to reason that Woman too is a reflection of God and that reflection is of the Holy Spirit. What is the Holy spirit if not feminine?

Spirituality, obviously, is not owned by the female race but expression of emotion, which I believe comes from the spirit, tends to be viewed as belonging to the feminine.

Is this a concept that is ever discussed in Christian churches? I've never heard it brought up. Are any Christians in agreement? If not, why?

2009: Mermaids and Dolphins...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 09/10/09 5:17pm

peter430044

avatar

I'm not christian or religious since several years, but I used to be up until my early 20s.

I think many christians believe that God created both genders in "his" image and that God has both male and female characteristics, that would include the holy spirit.

Genesis 1:27
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them."

The word "man" stands for "mankind" in this sentence. In the swedish translation of the same sentence it reads:

"And God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created her, man and woman he created them."

However God is mostly described as a man in the bible which shows that God's male characteristics are given much more importance. This of course is explained by the ancient times in which the texts were written. But if the texts had really been inspired by a benevolent deity I think they would've been ahead of their times and would not have emphasized the male as much as they do.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 09/10/09 5:23pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

The Catholic and Orthodox Churches endorse this idea.

it is necessary to help others, not only in our prayers, but in our daily lives. If we find we cannot help others, the least we can do is to desist from harming them.
Dalai Lama
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 09/11/09 1:06pm

markpeg

avatar

I'm a Christian and I've often thought of the Holy Spirit as feminine. I kind of think of God and the Holy Spirit as "parents" of Jesus. Don't know if there is any official doctrine about this though, it's just my own personal idea, and I don't bring it up at Church.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 09/11/09 2:27pm

kenlacam

This is ludicris!!!!!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 09/11/09 2:32pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

kenlacam said:

This is ludicris!!!!!

You quoted me! touched Not your post but your signature lol

2009: Mermaids and Dolphins...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 09/11/09 2:35pm

meow85

avatar

It certainly makes more sense to say the Almighty is a feminine presence than a masculine one, given that no life on Earth could exist without females but it doesn't necessarily require males.

That said, I believe that if there really is a Holy Spirit or deity, It has no gender. It's above and beyond such distinctions.

smile

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 09/11/09 2:37pm

meow85

avatar

The church I grew up going to recited The Lord's Prayer as beginning with "Our Mother and Father who art in heaven..."

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 09/11/09 3:13pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

So, does this mean life is just.... one big chick flick?

lol

"I think one of the things that we're probably proudest of -- I certainly am -- is that the message was always love, in any form we portrayed it." - Paul McCartney
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 09/11/09 4:16pm

Lammastide

avatar

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.

BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of God's spirit is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we are cautious in making hard and fast ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.
[Edited 9/12/09 0:06am]

________________
Sundiata J., Prince fan extraordinaire.
R.I.P., brother.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 09/11/09 4:18pm

meow85

avatar

Lammastide said:

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.

BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of "spirit" is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we never make any ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.


clapping for that whole post, but especially the last paragraph. Well said.

We have too limited of an understanding on so many areas that it's unwise to make claims about the Creator one way or another.

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 09/11/09 4:26pm

Lammastide

avatar

meow85 said:

Lammastide said:

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.

BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of "spirit" is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we never make any ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.


clapping for that whole post, but especially the last paragraph. Well said.

We have too limited of an understanding on so many areas that it's unwise to make claims about the Creator one way or another.

Thanks.

Based on my beliefs about scriptural inspiration and authority (which I'm aware not everyone shares smile), I do think we're safe to make some claims about God... or at least how we've experienced God through history. But I think we make a grand mistake in assuming our very limited experiences corral the whole of God. twocents

________________
Sundiata J., Prince fan extraordinaire.
R.I.P., brother.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 09/11/09 4:28pm

meow85

avatar

Lammastide said:

meow85 said:



clapping for that whole post, but especially the last paragraph. Well said.

We have too limited of an understanding on so many areas that it's unwise to make claims about the Creator one way or another.

Thanks.

Based on my beliefs about scriptural inspiration and authority (which I'm aware not everyone shares smile), I do think we're safe to make some claims about God... or at least how we've experienced God through history. But I think we make a grand mistake in assuming our very limited experiences corral the whole of God. twocents

nod

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 09/11/09 4:47pm

babynoz

avatar

Lammastide said:

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.


BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of God's spirit is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we never make any ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.
[Edited 9/11/09 16:18pm]



yeahthat

"After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill...the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill...you stay in wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 09/11/09 4:53pm

XxAxX

avatar

meow85 said:

It certainly makes more sense to say the Almighty is a feminine presence than a masculine one, given that no life on Earth could exist without females but it doesn't necessarily require males.

That said, I believe that if there really is a Holy Spirit or deity, It has no gender. It's above and beyond such distinctions.

smile



god just might be hermaphroditic nod shhh

ufo
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 09/11/09 5:10pm

meow85

avatar

XxAxX said:

meow85 said:

It certainly makes more sense to say the Almighty is a feminine presence than a masculine one, given that no life on Earth could exist without females but it doesn't necessarily require males.

That said, I believe that if there really is a Holy Spirit or deity, It has no gender. It's above and beyond such distinctions.

smile



god just might be hermaphroditic nod shhh

hmm

You been listening Corporate Avenger lately?

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 09/11/09 8:04pm

rodman2

avatar

Lammastide said:

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.

BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of God's spirit is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we are cautious to make hard and fast ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.
[Edited 9/11/09 18:51pm]


In regards to God's gender.

I read Job 38 to be in a figurative use. “Womb” is employed at times with reference to the source of something. In speaking about creative works involving the earth, Jehovah speaks of the sea as bursting forth “from the womb.” (Job 38:8) Jehovah says to David’s Lord that in the day of his military force this one will have willing volunteers “like dewdrops” from “the womb of the dawn” (from where comes the morning dew).—Ps 110:1-3.

Also in respect to Isaiah, Jehovah expects his male worshipers to respect women, for he respects them. Indications of this are found in scriptures in which Jehovah uses the experiences of women illustratively and likens his own feelings to those of women. (Isaiah 42:14; 49:15; 66:13) This helps readers to understand how Jehovah feels. Interestingly, the Hebrew term for “mercy,” or “pity,” which Jehovah applies to himself, is closely related to the word for “womb” and can be described as “motherly feeling.”—Exodus 33:19; Isaiah 54:7.

Two gay guys can have motherly affection towards their adopted children right. Doesn't make them females.

Paul likened himself to both a father and a mother in his relation to the Thessalonian Christians. (1Th 2:7, 11)

Jesus gave us the model prayer it starts Our father, I'm thinking he would have instructed us to say Our Father and Mother, to make it clear for us if we were to think of god in Feminine way.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 09/11/09 9:04pm

JayJai

avatar

XxAxX said:

meow85 said:

It certainly makes more sense to say the Almighty is a feminine presence than a masculine one, given that no life on Earth could exist without females but it doesn't necessarily require males.

That said, I believe that if there really is a Holy Spirit or deity, It has no gender. It's above and beyond such distinctions.

smile



god just might be hermaphroditic nod shhh

eek Could this mean that hermaphrodites are 'closer' to God than those who are identified as male and female? hmmm
Maybe they even get an automatic ticket to Heaven...u know...Heaven-bound by default lol

People Call me Rude
I Wish We All Were Nude
I Wish There Was No Black and White
I Wish There Were No Rules!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 09/11/09 11:21pm

Lammastide

avatar

rodman2 said:

Lammastide said:

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.

BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of God's spirit is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we are cautious to make hard and fast ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.
[Edited 9/11/09 18:51pm]


In regards to God's gender.

I read Job 38 to be in a figurative use. “Womb” is employed at times with reference to the source of something. In speaking about creative works involving the earth, Jehovah speaks of the sea as bursting forth “from the womb.” (Job 38:8) Jehovah says to David’s Lord that in the day of his military force this one will have willing volunteers “like dewdrops” from “the womb of the dawn” (from where comes the morning dew).—Ps 110:1-3.

Also in respect to Isaiah, Jehovah expects his male worshipers to respect women, for he respects them. Indications of this are found in scriptures in which Jehovah uses the experiences of women illustratively and likens his own feelings to those of women. (Isaiah 42:14; 49:15; 66:13) This helps readers to understand how Jehovah feels. Interestingly, the Hebrew term for “mercy,” or “pity,” which Jehovah applies to himself, is closely related to the word for “womb” and can be described as “motherly feeling.”—Exodus 33:19; Isaiah 54:7.

Two gay guys can have motherly affection towards their adopted children right. Doesn't make them females.

Paul likened himself to both a father and a mother in his relation to the Thessalonian Christians. (1Th 2:7, 11)

Jesus gave us the model prayer it starts Our father, I'm thinking he would have instructed us to say Our Father and Mother, to make it clear for us if we were to think of god in Feminine way.

And I'm thinking if we weren't to think of God -- ever -- in feminine metaphor, then God's inspired Word, and Jesus himself, would not have done so on multiple occasions in counsel to the faithful.

________________
Sundiata J., Prince fan extraordinaire.
R.I.P., brother.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 09/12/09 12:06am

rodman2

avatar

Lammastide said:

rodman2 said:



In regards to God's gender.

I read Job 38 to be in a figurative use. “Womb” is employed at times with reference to the source of something. In speaking about creative works involving the earth, Jehovah speaks of the sea as bursting forth “from the womb.” (Job 38:8) Jehovah says to David’s Lord that in the day of his military force this one will have willing volunteers “like dewdrops” from “the womb of the dawn” (from where comes the morning dew).—Ps 110:1-3.

Also in respect to Isaiah, Jehovah expects his male worshipers to respect women, for he respects them. Indications of this are found in scriptures in which Jehovah uses the experiences of women illustratively and likens his own feelings to those of women. (Isaiah 42:14; 49:15; 66:13) This helps readers to understand how Jehovah feels. Interestingly, the Hebrew term for “mercy,” or “pity,” which Jehovah applies to himself, is closely related to the word for “womb” and can be described as “motherly feeling.”—Exodus 33:19; Isaiah 54:7.

Two gay guys can have motherly affection towards their adopted children right. Doesn't make them females.

Paul likened himself to both a father and a mother in his relation to the Thessalonian Christians. (1Th 2:7, 11)

Jesus gave us the model prayer it starts Our father, I'm thinking he would have instructed us to say Our Father and Mother, to make it clear for us if we were to think of god in Feminine way.

And I'm thinking if we weren't to think of God -- ever -- in feminine metaphor, then God's inspired Word, and Jesus himself, would not have done so on multiple occasions in counsel to the faithful.


So does that mean we agree. biggrin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 09/12/09 4:41am

XxAxX

avatar

meow85 said:

XxAxX said:




god just might be hermaphroditic nod shhh

hmm

You been listening Corporate Avenger lately?



confuse who?

ufo
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 09/12/09 4:44am

XxAxX

avatar

JayJai said:

XxAxX said:




god just might be hermaphroditic nod shhh

eek Could this mean that hermaphrodites are 'closer' to God than those who are identified as male and female? hmmm
Maybe they even get an automatic ticket to Heaven...u know...Heaven-bound by default lol


well, god made them in his/her image too, right?

ufo
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 09/12/09 8:41am

rodman2

avatar

XxAxX said:

JayJai said:


eek Could this mean that hermaphrodites are 'closer' to God than those who are identified as male and female? hmmm
Maybe they even get an automatic ticket to Heaven...u know...Heaven-bound by default lol


well, god made them in his/her image too, right?

That did not mean that Adam resembled God in appearance. Jehovah is an invisible spirit. (John 4:24) So Jehovah does not have a body of flesh and blood. Being made in God’s image meant that Adam was created with qualities like those of God, including love, wisdom, justice, and power. Adam was like his Father in another important way in that he possessed free will.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 09/12/09 9:08pm

meow85

avatar

rodman2 said:

Lammastide said:

This is absolutely discussed in many Christian churches, though the importance of gendered language with respect to the Divine isn't altogether uniform from church to church.

It should be said first and foremost that God -- and assuming we're using an orthodox trinitarian model, also the Holy Spirit and even Christ's divine nature (as opposed to his clearly male human nature) -- transcends humanness, let alone sex and gender. That said, the gendered language with which God is revealed in scripture is meant to serve good purpose. None of us can grasp the infinity of God, but we can likely grasp notions of a disciplinarian, a fierce protector and a material provider, for example, as traditionally "masculine" in most cultures. And, indeed, the vast majority of biblical language referring to God is masculine... which I don't think is unimportant.

BUT it's not all masculine: God is recalled as being motherly in Isaiah 66, and as having a womb and giving birth to creation in Job 38. God trying to reach sinners is likened to a woman searching for a lost coin in Luke 15. And God creates both male and female in the Divine image in Genesis 1:26-27 and 5:2. Elsewhere, Jesus likens himself to a "mother hen" in Matthew 23:37, and the Wisdom of God, which some (but not all) consider a pre-Christian identification of the Holy Spirit, is personified as "Lady Wisdom" throughout the book of Proverbs.

Also, by way of linguistics, the succession of words from which we inherit our notion of God's spirit is interesting: The Hebrew ruach is feminine; the Greek pnuema is neuter; the Latin spiritus is masculine... and, anecdotally at least, it was a Latin-speaking culture from which our contemporary Christian language (and the thinking that imbues it) is most recently derived. Make of that what you will.

At the end of the day, I think it's important to understand that this gendered language is poetic, metaphorical at best. But, then, metaphor is no less an inspired form of communication than any other, eh? And many people I know find utmost comfort in the more traditionally "feminine" traits attached to God -- life giving, quietude, gentle consolation, nurturing, mercy, unfailing love. I see nothing wrong with that so long as we are cautious to make hard and fast ontological claims on God based on our limited reality.
[Edited 9/11/09 18:51pm]


In regards to God's gender.

I read Job 38 to be in a figurative use. “Womb” is employed at times with reference to the source of something. In speaking about creative works involving the earth, Jehovah speaks of the sea as bursting forth “from the womb.” (Job 38:8) Jehovah says to David’s Lord that in the day of his military force this one will have willing volunteers “like dewdrops” from “the womb of the dawn” (from where comes the morning dew).—Ps 110:1-3.

Also in respect to Isaiah, Jehovah expects his male worshipers to respect women, for he respects them. Indications of this are found in scriptures in which Jehovah uses the experiences of women illustratively and likens his own feelings to those of women. (Isaiah 42:14; 49:15; 66:13) This helps readers to understand how Jehovah feels. Interestingly, the Hebrew term for “mercy,” or “pity,” which Jehovah applies to himself, is closely related to the word for “womb” and can be described as “motherly feeling.”—Exodus 33:19; Isaiah 54:7.

Two gay guys can have motherly affection towards their adopted children right. Doesn't make them females.

Paul likened himself to both a father and a mother in his relation to the Thessalonian Christians. (1Th 2:7, 11)

Jesus gave us the model prayer it starts Our father, I'm thinking he would have instructed us to say Our Father and Mother, to make it clear for us if we were to think of god in Feminine way.

Because obviously, God has testicles.

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 09/12/09 9:09pm

meow85

avatar

XxAxX said:

meow85 said:


hmm

You been listening Corporate Avenger lately?



confuse who?

Nevermind. lol

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 09/12/09 9:11pm

meow85

avatar

rodman2 said:

XxAxX said:



well, god made them in his/her image too, right?

That did not mean that Adam resembled God in appearance. Jehovah is an invisible spirit. (John 4:24) So Jehovah does not have a body of flesh and blood. Being made in God’s image meant that Adam was created with qualities like those of God, including love, wisdom, justice, and power. Adam was like his Father in another important way in that he possessed free will.

Which is why it's completely insane to insist that God has either a masculine or a feminine presence. You can't assert in one breath that God and Jesus did not intend the Almighty to be considered feminine, then in the next breath say God has no body.

We are stardust. We are golden.

Feb. 12th -28th: Two weeks of corporate and nationalistic dick-stroking in the guise of a sporting event. I can not wait.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 09/13/09 1:10am

morningsong

avatar

Yes I've heard that before a few times and I tend to agree.

Never again, not I.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 09/13/09 7:16am

SCNDLS

avatar

God IS a woman . . . and she is pissed! pissed

You don't need directions and you don't need cash. From your Jimmy Choos to your Ultralash. ~ Prince batting eyes
And when the groove is dead and gone, you know that Love survives so we can rock FOREVER. ~ RIP MJ rose pray
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 09/13/09 8:42am

rodman2

avatar

meow85 said:

rodman2 said:


That did not mean that Adam resembled God in appearance. Jehovah is an invisible spirit. (John 4:24) So Jehovah does not have a body of flesh and blood. Being made in God’s image meant that Adam was created with qualities like those of God, including love, wisdom, justice, and power. Adam was like his Father in another important way in that he possessed free will.

Which is why it's completely insane to insist that God has either a masculine or a feminine presence. You can't assert in one breath that God and Jesus did not intend the Almighty to be considered feminine, then in the next breath say God has no body.


That makes sense, but why did Jesus call Jehovah his father. And why do the scriptures use terms like Lord, King,which ascribe masculinity to God.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 09/13/09 9:19am

XxAxX

avatar

rodman2 said:

XxAxX said:



well, god made them in his/her image too, right?

That did not mean that Adam resembled God in appearance. Jehovah is an invisible spirit. (John 4:24) So Jehovah does not have a body of flesh and blood. Being made in God’s image meant that Adam was created with qualities like those of God, including love, wisdom, justice, and power. Adam was like his Father in another important way in that he possessed free will.



it is nice that you feel you have the answers. but, i do not believe that the doctrine you are reciting is the only correct doctrine.
[Edited 9/13/09 9:19am]

ufo
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > The Holy Spirit is Feminine