independent and unofficial
Prince fan community site
Mon 1st Dec 2008 11:42pm
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Politics & Religion > And In The While You Were Distracted News...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
AuthorMessage
Thread started 09/05/08 7:34pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

And In The While You Were Distracted News...

http://www.huffingtonpost...24405.html

Government Nears Deal To Back Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

ALAN ZIBEL | September 5, 2008 10:06 PM EST | AP

WASHINGTON — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are expected to be taken over by the government as soon as this weekend in a bold move designed to protect the mortgage market from the risk the companies could fail, a person briefed on the matter said Friday night.

Some of the details of the intervention, which could cost taxpayers billions, were not yet available, but are expected to include the departure of Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron, according to the source, who asked not to be named because the plan was yet to be announced.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and James Lockhart, the companies' chief regulator, met Friday afternoon with the top executives from the mortgage companies and informed them of the government's plan to take over the troubled companies in a process known as conservatorship.

The news, first reported on The Wall Street Journal's Web site, came after stock markets closed. In after-hours trading Fannie Mae's shares plunged $1.70, or 24 percent, to $5.34. Freddie Mac's shares fell 95 cents, or almost 19 percent, to $4.15.

The news also followed a report by the Mortgage Bankers Association that more than 4 million American homeowners with a mortgage, a record 9 percent, were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure at the end of June.

That confirmed what investors saw in Fannie and Freddie's recent financial results: trouble in the mortgage market has shifted to homeowners who had solid credit but took out exotic loans with little or no proof of their income and assets.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation's largest buyers and backers of mortgages, lost a combined $3.1 billion between April and June. Half of their credit losses came from these types of risky loans with ballooning monthly payments.

While both companies say they have enough resources to withstand the losses, many investors believe their financial cushions could wither away as defaults and foreclosures mount.
Story continues below
advertisement

Still, many in Washington and on Wall Street hadn't expected Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to intervene unless the companies had trouble issuing debt to fund their operations.

This summer, Congress passed a plan to provide unlimited government loans to Fannie and Freddie and to purchase stock in the two companies if needed.

Critics say the open-ended nature of the rescue package could expose taxpayers to billions of dollars of potential losses.

Supporters, however, argue the Bush administration had little choice but to support Fannie and Freddie, which together hold or guarantee $5 trillion in mortgages _ almost half the nation's total.

Representatives of Fannie and Freddie declined to comment on the government assistance plan.

Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said officials "have been in regular communications" with Fannie and Freddie, but refused to comment on the story saying, "We are not going to comment on rumors."

Treasury recently signed a contract with Morgan Stanley to investigate the financial position of Fannie and Freddie, with help from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the new regulatory body created by Congress to oversee the mortgage giants.

Asked if an announcement could come soon, McLaughlin said, "We are making progress in the work with Morgan Stanley and FHFA." A spokeswoman for the FHFA also declined to comment.

Concern has been growing that a government rescue of Fannie and Freddie could not only wipe out common stockholders, but also be costly for scores of investment, banking and insurance companies that hold billions of dollars in their preferred shares

The two companies had nearly $36 billion in preferred shares outstanding as of June 30, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mudd, the son of TV anchor Roger Mudd, was elevated to Fannie Mae's top post in December 2004 when chief executive Franklin Raines and chief financial officer Timothy Howard were swept out of office in an accounting scandal. Syron was named Freddie Mac's CEO in 2003, replacing former chief Gregory Parseghian, who was ousted in after being implicated in accounting irregularities.

He formerly was executive chairman of Thermo Electron Corp., a Waltham, Mass.-based maker of scientific equipment, served head of the American Stock Exchange was president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston in the early 1990s.

Fannie Mae was created by the government in 1938, and was turned into a shareholder-owned company 30 years later. Freddie Mac was established in 1970 to provide competition for Fannie.

___

AP Business Writers Martin Crutsinger and Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.

YES WE DID!!! President Barack Obama!!!

It's time to Speak On It, America!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 09/05/08 7:35pm

Astasheiks

McCain and Palin have a solution... smile

Astasheiks also know as the Son of Prince

http://www.myspace.com/xhaltation
www.youtube.com/princeben7
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 09/05/08 8:27pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

That's not a surprise. It's been known for a month. The problem was wipe out stockholders or the government take the bath. Haven't read the article but I'm not optimistic that shareholders take a well deserved bath. God forbid any American's actions should have negative consequences.

Meanwhile, civic knowledge is enhanced by discussing public affairs, taking part in civic activities and reading about current events and history, the group said.


Which is why we have P & R!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 09/05/08 8:31pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Just read the article. So we are going to spend billion so shareholders who assume the risk, won't actually face that risk.
That's business.
All it does is tell businesses to get big enough so you can always get public funds for bailing out a private enterprise.

Meanwhile, civic knowledge is enhanced by discussing public affairs, taking part in civic activities and reading about current events and history, the group said.


Which is why we have P & R!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 09/05/08 9:41pm

Stymie

What about their personal responsibility and accountability? neutral

And some people trip when a citizen wants 50 dollars in food stamps.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 09/05/08 9:45pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

Stymie said:

What about their personal responsibility and accountability? neutral

And some people trip when a citizen wants 50 dollars in food stamps.


Yeah, whatever happened to "pulling yourself up out your troubles, by your own bootstraps?" hmm

YES WE DID!!! President Barack Obama!!!

It's time to Speak On It, America!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 09/05/08 9:47pm

Stymie

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Stymie said:

What about their personal responsibility and accountability? neutral

And some people trip when a citizen wants 50 dollars in food stamps.


Yeah, whatever happened to "pulling yourself up out your troubles, by your own bootstraps?" hmm
this is truly fucked up.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 09/05/08 9:49pm

foal30

because certain form of Welfareism are never identified as such.
the biggest complainers of government meddling are always the first with the cap out.

still, you will all be able to educate your children on the inherent sickness of Capitalism with this example of the rich feeding the rich.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 09/05/08 9:56pm

Stymie

foal30 said:

because certain form of Welfareism are never identified as such.
the biggest complainers of government meddling are always the first with the cap out.

still, you will all be able to educate your children on the inherent sickness of Capitalism with this example of the rich feeding the rich.
yep that's all this is.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 09/05/08 11:47pm

lazycrockett

avatar

The problem is that banking institutions want to be free and easy with the rules and regulations an want the government to stay out of their business, but as soon as shit goes down, they expect the government to come to their aid.

Its not a gop or dnc issue, cause both do it. The real solution stop bailing them out.

You Can Not Go Against Nature
Cause When You Do
To Go Against Nature
Is Part Of Nature Too.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 09/06/08 4:29am

XxAxX

avatar

fuck. i haven't contributed to this mess, nor profited from it and *i* get to foot the bill for the cleanup???? neutral

This summer, Congress passed a plan to provide unlimited government loans to Fannie and Freddie and to purchase stock in the two companies if needed.

Critics say the open-ended nature of the rescue package could expose taxpayers to billions of dollars of potential losses.

Supporters, however, argue the Bush administration had little choice but to support Fannie and Freddie, which together hold or guarantee $5 trillion in mortgages _ almost half the nation's total.

ufo
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 09/06/08 3:45pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

lazycrockett said:

The problem is that banking institutions want to be free and easy with the rules and regulations an want the government to stay out of their business, but as soon as shit goes down, they expect the government to come to their aid.

Its not a gop or dnc issue, cause both do it. The real solution stop bailing them out.

Then comes the usual cry of jobs, jobs, jobs. . . . .You can't let a business go under . . . Yes, it hurts, but no one was thinking about that during the good times . . .

Meanwhile, civic knowledge is enhanced by discussing public affairs, taking part in civic activities and reading about current events and history, the group said.


Which is why we have P & R!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 09/06/08 7:29pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

lazycrockett said:

The problem is that banking institutions want to be free and easy with the rules and regulations an want the government to stay out of their business, but as soon as shit goes down, they expect the government to come to their aid.

Its not a gop or dnc issue, cause both do it. The real solution stop bailing them out.


I agree! But of course, the bulk of MY money isn't in a bank! So tell that to the folks who's money is and get back to me with their reply!! wink

YES WE DID!!! President Barack Obama!!!

It's time to Speak On It, America!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  Create new topic   Printable version   (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Politics & Religion > And In The While You Were Distracted News...