Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
|
U.S. Republican ad uses bin Laden image WASHINGTON - Republicans unveiled an advertisement on Friday featuring the image and words of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and a warning to voters that "these are the stakes" in the November 7 election.
|
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it is also very reminiscent of the anti Regan ads | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IrresistibleB1tch said: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02 "I am truly not that concerned about him." - G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts, 3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02) given that Bush had nothing to do with that Ad i do not see how Bush's thoughts are relevant at all. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: IrresistibleB1tch said: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02 "I am truly not that concerned about him." - G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts, 3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02) given that Bush had nothing to do with that Ad i do not see how Bush's thoughts are relevant at all. really now? Bush has nothing to do with the Republican National Committee?? and even if you believe that, do you think Bush's comments are of any interest outside of the ad? [Edited 10/21/06 14:56pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IrresistibleB1tch said:
[b] really now? Bush has nothing to do with the Republican National Committee?? that is not what i said. i said Bush has nothing to do with the RNC's generic ads. and even if you believe that, do you think Bush's comments are of any interest outside of the ad?
i think that Bush has been consistent with the fact that getting Bin Ladan has little to do with the over all war on terror. sure he wants him...but he is NOT the END goal and i do not think he was EVER said to be. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: IrresistibleB1tch said:
really now? Bush has nothing to do with the Republican National Committee?? that is not what i said. i said Bush has nothing to do with the RNC's generic ads. and even if you believe that, do you think Bush's comments are of any interest outside of the ad?
i think that Bush has been consistent with the fact that getting Bin Ladan has little to do with the over all war on terror. sure he wants him...but he is NOT the END goal and i do not think he was EVER said to be. [b] so when he said "wanted - dead or alive", he was just giving generic options? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IrresistibleB1tch said: so when he said "wanted - dead or alive", he was just giving generic options? when did he say that? *i am sure he did but when? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: IrresistibleB1tch said: so when he said "wanted - dead or alive", he was just giving generic options? when did he say that? *i am sure he did but when? you know, why don't you google it? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IrresistibleB1tch said: SlamGlam said: when did he say that? *i am sure he did but when? you know, why don't you google it? well i would assume sept of 2001... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: IrresistibleB1tch said: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02 "I am truly not that concerned about him." - G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts, 3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02) given that Bush had nothing to do with that Ad i do not see how Bush's thoughts are relevant at all. So who is responsible? And why doesn't that Republican't listen to the words of the preznit? © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SlamGlam said: i think that Bush has been consistent with the fact that getting Bin Ladan has little to do with the over all war on terror.
"getting Bin Ladan has little to do with the over all war on terror"??? Does your lot even believe the nonsense that comes out of your mouths? And if you believe this BS, why don't you say that in your ads, instead of using an image of Osama? SlamGlam said: sure he wants him...but he is NOT the END goal
What is the end goal? You seem to know. And please back up your statements with actual quotes, no "I think" bullshit. © Bart Van Hemelen
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties, and confers no rights. It is not authorized by Prince or the NPG Music Club. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If Prince.Org shuts down, I'm writing SLAVE on my left buttcheek! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)