Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)| Author | Message |
JOHN 15:19 PART II ekalb101 said: 333 said: At one time the Watchtower did not have a problem with military service. Some times after 1903, I can't say exactly but is was sometime before 1915, military service was deemed wrong. Now I have two question: (1) Where the JWs before 1903 who considered military service fine and those who were in the military truly Christians? and (2) Do JWs today, looking back on those who did, believe they were truly Christians?
From book "Jehovah's Witnesses-Proclaimers of God's Kingdom" When the World Went to War Around the globe the events of World War I severely tested the claims of those who professed to be Christians. It was the most ghastly war fought down to that time; nearly the entire world population was involved in one way or another. Pope Benedict XV, in spite of Vatican sympathies for the Central Powers, endeavored to maintain an appearance of neutrality. However, within each nation the clergy, Catholic and Protestant, maintained no such neutral stance. Regarding the situation in the United States, Dr. Ray Abrams, in his book Preachers Present Arms, wrote: “The churches assumed a unity of purpose hitherto unknown in religious annals. . . . The leaders lost no time in getting thoroughly organized on a war-time basis. Within twenty-four hours after the declaration of war, the Federal Council of the Churches of Christ in America laid plans for the fullest cooperation. . . . The Roman Catholic Church, organized for similar service under the National Catholic War Council, directed by fourteen archbishops and with Cardinal Gibbons as president, demonstrated an equal devotion to the cause. . . . Many of the churches went much further than they were asked. They became recruiting stations for the enlistment of troops.” What did the Bible Students do? Although they endeavored to do what they felt was pleasing to God, their position was not always one of strict neutrality. What they did was influenced by the belief, shared in common with other professed Christians, that “the higher powers” were “ordained of God,” according to the wording of the King James Version. (Rom. 13:1) Thus, in accord with a proclamation of the president of the United States, The Watch Tower urged the Bible Students to join in observing May 30, 1918, as a day of prayer and supplication in connection with the outcome of the world war. During the war years, the circumstances into which individual Bible Students were thrust varied. The way they dealt with these situations also varied. Feeling obligated to obey “the powers that be,” as they referred to the secular rulers, some went into the trenches at the front with guns and bayonets. But having in mind the scripture, “Thou shalt not kill,” they would fire their weapons into the air or try simply to knock the weapon from the hands of an opponent. (Ex. 20:13, KJ) A few, such as Remigio Cuminetti, in Italy, refused to put on a military uniform. The Italian government at that time made no allowance for anyone who for reasons of conscience would not take up arms. He stood trial five times and was confined in prisons and a mental institution, but his faith and determination remained unshaken. In England some who applied for exemption were assigned to work of national importance or to a noncombatant corps. Others, such as Pryce Hughes, adopted a position of strict neutrality, regardless of the consequences to them personally. At least at that point, the overall record of the Bible Students was not quite like that of the early Christians described in The Rise of Christianity, by E. W. Barnes, who reported: “A careful review of all the information available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus Aurelius [Roman emperor from 161 to 180 C.E.], no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after becoming a Christian, remained in military service.” Many Christmas' ago, I went to buy a doll for my son. I reached for the last one they had, but so did another man. As I rained blows upon him, I realized there had to be another way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
my lord..you all have posted 240 comments on that other thread....oye!!! Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this was the original question asked.....
JOHN 15:19 one reason true christians are no part of the world If you were part of the world, the world would be fond of what is it's own. Now because you are no part of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, on this account the world hates you. 15:21 But they will do all these things against you on account of my name, because they do not know HIM THAT SENT ME>(JEHOVAH). Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
From KH library for research only - When the World Went to War
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
For research only on topic - When the World Went to War
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In the "Declaration of Facts", Dated June 25, 1933 accompanied letter see above letter to Hitler:
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CeeJay-
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fantasyislander said: CeeJay-
i appreciate your earnestness and eagerness in helping people see the truth, but those were some long stinkin' posts!!! think you could shorten it up a bit next time? thanks! Just 4 U I Will. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
fantasyislander said: CeeJay-
i appreciate your earnestness and eagerness in helping people see the truth, but those were some long stinkin' posts!!! think you could shorten it up a bit next time? thanks! whoaaaa!! OK that was good info, very interesting. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: my lord..you all have posted 240 comments on that other thread....oye!!!
I love the song Dont give up by peter gabriel and kate bush. It is old , but I love it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"We ain't gon' study war no more...ain't gon' study war no mo...ain't gon studieeeee war no more." So...how's everybody doing? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thedoorkeeper said: 1
care to explain? "1"?? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CeeJay said: fantasyislander said: CeeJay-
i appreciate your earnestness and eagerness in helping people see the truth, but those were some long stinkin' posts!!! think you could shorten it up a bit next time? thanks! Just 4 U I Will. aaawwww. just for me? now you're making me feel all squishy inside. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Taken from the original thread: JOHN 15:19 one reason true christians are no part of the world
OdysseyMiles said: 333 said: Let ask your thoughts on a matter. At one time the Watchtower did not have a problem with military service. Some times after 1903, I can't say exactly but is was sometime before 1915, military service was deemed wrong. Now I have two question: (1) Where the JWs before 1903 who considered military service fine and those who were in the military truly Christians? and (2) Do JWs today, looking back on those who did, believe they were truly Christians? Well, as you rightly stated before, only God can judge the heart of an individual. It is not my place to say that they were true Christians or not. Nor is it my place to judge the past JWs who celebrated pagan holidays and smoked cigarettes. Those individuals probably did the best they could to do what they thought was right in God's eyes, just as many JWs today try to do. As I said before, I'm a bible person, not a Watchtower person. I agree 100%. That was my point. But some have ask me to do the same with Christians past and present. And that is why I say I will let God judge the matter. I can't really tell you who is and who is not a Christian, person by person. I can't read the hearts and minds of others. [This message was edited Thu Aug 5 22:57:48 2004 by 333] "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Taken from the original thread: JOHN 15:19 one reason true christians are no part of the world
Ekalb101 said: From book "Jehovah's Witnesses-Proclaimers of God's Kingdom" When the World Went to War Around the globe the events of World War I severely tested the claims of those who professed to be Christians. It was the most ghastly war fought down to that time; nearly the entire world population was involved in one way or another. Pope Benedict XV, in spite of Vatican sympathies for the Central Powers, endeavored to maintain an appearance of neutrality. However, within each nation the clergy, Catholic and Protestant, maintained no such neutral stance. Regarding the situation in the United States, Dr. Ray Abrams, in his book Preachers Present Arms, wrote: “The churches assumed a unity of purpose hitherto unknown in religious annals. . . . The leaders lost no time in getting thoroughly organized on a war-time basis. Within twenty-four hours after the declaration of war, the Federal Council of the Churches of Christ in America laid plans for the fullest cooperation. . . . The Roman Catholic Church, organized for similar service under the National Catholic War Council, directed by fourteen archbishops and with Cardinal Gibbons as president, demonstrated an equal devotion to the cause. . . . Many of the churches went much further than they were asked. They became recruiting stations for the enlistment of troops.” What did the Bible Students do? Although they endeavored to do what they felt was pleasing to God, their position was not always one of strict neutrality. What they did was influenced by the belief, shared in common with other professed Christians, that “the higher powers” were “ordained of God,” according to the wording of the King James Version. (Rom. 13:1) Thus, in accord with a proclamation of the president of the United States, The Watch Tower urged the Bible Students to join in observing May 30, 1918, as a day of prayer and supplication in connection with the outcome of the world war. During the war years, the circumstances into which individual Bible Students were thrust varied. The way they dealt with these situations also varied. Feeling obligated to obey “the powers that be,” as they referred to the secular rulers, some went into the trenches at the front with guns and bayonets. But having in mind the scripture, “Thou shalt not kill,” they would fire their weapons into the air or try simply to knock the weapon from the hands of an opponent. (Ex. 20:13, KJ) A few, such as Remigio Cuminetti, in Italy, refused to put on a military uniform. The Italian government at that time made no allowance for anyone who for reasons of conscience would not take up arms. He stood trial five times and was confined in prisons and a mental institution, but his faith and determination remained unshaken. In England some who applied for exemption were assigned to work of national importance or to a noncombatant corps. Others, such as Pryce Hughes, adopted a position of strict neutrality, regardless of the consequences to them personally. At least at that point, the overall record of the Bible Students was not quite like that of the early Christians described in The Rise of Christianity, by E. W. Barnes, who reported: “A careful review of all the information available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus Aurelius [Roman emperor from 161 to 180 C.E.], no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after becoming a Christian, remained in military service.” All of the above is well and good but it does not really address the reasons why the early Christians did not serve in the Roman military. And none of it addresses my questions from the other thread, for the above was posted as a reply. But the reasons why there were few, if any, Christians in the Roman military are quite simple. First, just in case every one had forgotten, early Christians were persecuted by Rome. Thus it really make no sense that a early Christan would join the Roman army. Second, every year a Roman soldier had to swear an oath to the Emperor. The Emperor was thought to be a god. There is no way a Christian would take such an oath. Also, the names of others gods could be contained in the oath. Once again for this reason alone a Christian would not take the military oath. Thus it was not military service per say that was the problem but the oath one had to take. These types of oaths were also required for other offices in the Roman empire as well. [Edited 9/1/04 1:53am] "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
333 said: every year a Roman soldier have to swear an oath to the Emperor. The Emperor was thought to be a god. There is no way a Christian would take such an oath. Also, the names of others gods could be contained in the oath. Once again for this reason alone a Christian would not take the military oath. Thus it was not military service per say that was the problem but the oath one had to take. These types of oaths were also required for other offices in the Roman empire as well.
The oath of the American Soldier: "I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice" (bold and italics are mine) 'Against all enemies" = including other Christians. 'Allegiance" = Allegiance...to country, not to Christ. Every single decision we make, every breath we draw, opens some doors and closes many others. Most of them we don't notice. Some we do. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ekalb101 said: mzflash said:
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mzflash said: ekalb101 said: mzflash said:
After reading most of this thread, I'm left with the impression that Satan has taken over some righteous minds. For anyone to say that God does not love a soldier who is willing to sacrifice his life for the freedom of his brother, I say that they do not know God. Why would He favor those sitting at home drinking beer and criticizing others more than one who loves his neighbor as himself and is willing to stand up for what they have been taught is right? I'm not saying war is right. I'm saying that some of those who follow what Jesus taught, that we should love our neighbors as ourselves, might have been steered in the wrong direction. Surely God is all of His wisdom sees this and loves the intent in the soldiers heart. God sees and knows all. We do not. Did someone say God did not love soldiers? Hmmm?I don't see that written anywhere. God doesn't love war....and BTW I think it is a tremendously brave and commendable thing that someone believes in something so much that they are willing to lose their life over it, I think God love's even the suicide bombers..as they were lead to do what they did by men, and really believed they would go straight to heaven after they killed all the people and themselves. You are right only God knows what is in someone's heart, we don't. Did I understand you when you said love your neighbor as yourself? Does this only apply when there is no war going on? A neighbor would not kill a neighbor (even if it is all the way in Iraq )if he loved him as himself. Please you must agree (or not) that there are alot of soldiers that have really gone too far to receive glory for themselves...like the female shown in newsweek magazine, laying across a stack of dead bodies with her thumb up as in right on! Look what we killed!! That is absolutely disgusting. I personally don't think God was proud of her, but again back to the heart, we don't know it only God does. Who are you implying that sits home and drinks beer and critisizes people? Ekalb101 I have not defended the soldiers who participated in the activity that you mention above. I'm talking about a youth growing up, being lead in the wrong direction. For example, another of God's Commandments is that We Honor Our Father and Mother. Some are brought up believing that he/she is doing the honorable thing by offering to serve their country. If they've tried to honor and respect their parents understanding and guidance they are doing what they believe is right. Once within the military system it is very hard to earn your freedom other than doing your time. New recruits are seduced to sign up for years of service before they really figure out what they are up against. I doubt if many are signing up to kill anyone. It's my guess, many would walk away if they could once the reality sets in. But trying to be true to their commitments and understanding of what God intended for them they give their life and liberty for others freedom. They need our support and prayers that they will return soon. It's difficult for me to understand those who refuse to even pray for their safety, and that's what I'm talking about. I've received the impression that since JW's do not believe in war they shun the thought of caring for those who are serving our country. in order to secure our freedom. Surely JW's enjoy the freedom that our forefathers shed their blood for. I thought we were here because God has a Plan for us. Things we go thru here on earth are designed to bring us closer to Him. So whatever situation we find ourselves in, we can be sure that God's design includes us ALL. I don't feel that a select group of people can nominate themselves as the only true believers who will be saved. God made and loves us ALL and has a way for each one of us to return to Him. And that includes everyone. Even those who have chosen to go the in the opposite direction of just sitting back and indulging in alcohol or drugs while doing nothing more than criticizing what they don't understand. And yes I do try to love my neighbor as myself. It takes work but if we do not see eye to eye, we can still try to embrace each others lives in the spirit of God's love. If God didn't want us to work to realize we want to live with Him, He would have made it so. We need to respect and love ALL of God's people and the plan He has for them. [This message was edited Fri Aug 6 6:06:18 2004 by mzflash] mzflash what plan are you talking about? Is this plan Bible based? May I ask what religion you are? I don't feel that a select group of people can nominate themselves as the only true believers who will be saved. A select group did not nominate themselves Jehovah God did. The Bible only speaks of one true religion and one true God although there are hundreds of both. Narrow is the gate leading off to everlasting life and few are the ones going through.( matthew 7:13-14) Now don't get me wrong I do believe that there will be a resurection of the good and the bad and all will have a chance to live by God's laws or not. God is so loving that he will give us 1000 years after armageddon to live without satan and his temptations then we can all decide if we want to live forever or not. After living 1000 years that should prove to most that God is capable of giving us life everlasting. Imagine instead of reading the obituaries we will be reading about who is going to be resurected . [This message was edited Fri Aug 6 6:53:55 2004 by zkp2003] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
333 said: First, just in case every one had forgotten, early Christians were persecuted by Rome. Thus it really make no sense that a early Christan would join the Roman army.
Second, every year a Roman soldier have to swear an oath to the Emperor. The Emperor was thought to be a god. There is no way a Christian would take such an oath. Also, the names of others gods could be contained in the oath. Once again for this reason alone a Christian would not take the military oath. Thus it was not military service per say that was the problem but the oath one had to take. These types of oaths were also required for other offices in the Roman empire as well. LIKE SHADRACH MESHACH AND ABEDNEGO P o o |/, P o o |\ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Matt. 26:52: “Jesus said to him: ‘Return your sword to its place, for all those who take the sword will perish by the sword.’”
Many Christmas' ago, I went to buy a doll for my son. I reached for the last one they had, but so did another man. As I rained blows upon him, I realized there had to be another way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Is it not true that Jehovah allowed ancient Israel to engage in warfare?
Many Christmas' ago, I went to buy a doll for my son. I reached for the last one they had, but so did another man. As I rained blows upon him, I realized there had to be another way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NotDeaf said: 333 said: every year a Roman soldier have to swear an oath to the Emperor. The Emperor was thought to be a god. There is no way a Christian would take such an oath. Also, the names of others gods could be contained in the oath. Once again for this reason alone a Christian would not take the military oath. Thus it was not military service per say that was the problem but the oath one had to take. These types of oaths were also required for other offices in the Roman empire as well.
The oath of the American Soldier: "I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice" (bold and italics are mine) 'Against all enemies" = including other Christians. 'Allegiance" = Allegiance...to country, not to Christ. I do believe I have covered all of this. Nevertheless here I go again. There are levels or degrees of allegiances, first Christ, then family, then friends, then myself, and then government (This ranking is for myself only, others could rank them differently, but a Christians must put Christ first). Since Christ is first, if one of the other allegiances comes in conflict with it, then Christ must win out over all the others. Thus one could take part in the democratic process without harming his allegiance to Christ. But if it should come in conflict with a person allegiance to Christ, then Christ must come first. I find no command not participate in government or the military or that matter. And it is really is just that simple. And just in case you don't know it your tax dollars go to support the military and the war. But as to my above post, the point is that there were common sense reasons why Christians were not part of the Roman military which had nothing to do with not getting involved with government. But let me put these two questions to you: At one time the Watchtower did not have a problem with military service. Some times after 1903, I can't say exactly but is was sometime before 1915, military service was deemed wrong. Now I have two question: (1) Where the JWs before 1903 who considered military service fine and those who were in the military truly Christians? and (2) Do JWs today, looking back on those who did, believe they were truly Christians? [This message was edited Wed Aug 11 15:03:07 2004 by 333] "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
333 said: NotDeaf said: The oath of the American Soldier: "I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice" (bold and italics are mine) 'Against all enemies" = including other Christians. 'Allegiance" = Allegiance...to country, not to Christ. I do believe I have covered all of this. Nevertheless were I go again. There are levels or degrees of allegiances, first Christ, then family, then friends, then myself, and then government (This ranking is for myself only, others could rank them differently, but a Christians must put Christ first). Since Christ is first, if one of the other allegiances comes in conflict with it, then Christ must win out over all the others. Thus one could take part in the democratic process without harming his allegiance to Christ. But if should come in conflict with a person allegiance to Christ, then Christ must come first. I find no command not participate in government or the military or that matter. And it is really is just that simple. And just in case you don't know it your tax dollars go to support the military and the war. But as to my above post, the point is that there were common sense reasons why Christians were not part of the Roman military which had nothing to do with not getting involved with government. But let me put these two questions to you: At one time the Watchtower did not have a problem with military service. Some times after 1903, I can't say exactly but is was sometime before 1915, military service was deemed wrong. Now I have two question: (1) Where the JWs before 1903 who considered military service fine and those who were in the military truly Christians? and (2) Do JWs today, looking back on those who did, believe they were truly Christians? whats your point? you keep asking/baiting people with this question..just make your point why you disagree with this specific topic...you dont need a witness to respond to share your views...these threads would be so much shorter, direct and enjoyable that way.. ohh, TGIF y'all!!! Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sosgemini said: 333 said: I do believe I have covered all of this. Nevertheless were I go again. There are levels or degrees of allegiances, first Christ, then family, then friends, then myself, and then government (This ranking is for myself only, others could rank them differently, but a Christians must put Christ first). Since Christ is first, if one of the other allegiances comes in conflict with it, then Christ must win out over all the others. Thus one could take part in the democratic process without harming his allegiance to Christ. But if should come in conflict with a person allegiance to Christ, then Christ must come first. I find no command not participate in government or the military or that matter. And it is really is just that simple. And just in case you don't know it your tax dollars go to support the military and the war. But as to my above post, the point is that there were common sense reasons why Christians were not part of the Roman military which had nothing to do with not getting involved with government. But let me put these two questions to you: At one time the Watchtower did not have a problem with military service. Some times after 1903, I can't say exactly but is was sometime before 1915, military service was deemed wrong. Now I have two question: (1) Where the JWs before 1903 who considered military service fine and those who were in the military truly Christians? and (2) Do JWs today, looking back on those who did, believe they were truly Christians? whats your point? you keep asking/baiting people with this question..just make your point why you disagree with this specific topic...you dont need a witness to respond to share your views...these threads would be so much shorter, direct and enjoyable that way.. ohh, TGIF y'all!!! My point is the same one I made above. OdysseyMiles said: 333 said: Let ask your thoughts on a matter. At one time the Watchtower did not have a problem with military service. Some times after 1903, I can't say exactly but is was sometime before 1915, military service was deemed wrong. Now I have two question: (1) Where the JWs before 1903 who considered military service fine and those who were in the military truly Christians? and (2) Do JWs today, looking back on those who did, believe they were truly Christians? Well, as you rightly stated before, only God can judge the heart of an individual. It is not my place to say that they were true Christians or not. Nor is it my place to judge the past JWs who celebrated pagan holidays and smoked cigarettes. Those individuals probably did the best they could to do what they thought was right in God's eyes, just as many JWs today try to do. As I said before, I'm a bible person, not a Watchtower person. I agree 100%. That was my point. But some have ask me to do the same with Christians past and present. And that is why I say I will let God judge the matter. I can't really tell you who is and who is not a Christian, person by person. I can't read the hearts and minds of others. "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ekelb101: “A careful review of all the information available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus Aurelius [Roman emperor from 161 to 180 C.E.], no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after becoming a Christian, remained in military service.”—The Rise of Christianity (London, 1947), E. W. Barnes, p. 333.
“They refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . it was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of princes.”—History of Christianity (New York, 1891), Edward Gibbon, pp. 162, 163. The question is why? First, all Barnes can't truly say is there is no known record of it. Second, as to Gibbon, there is no time frame around the quote. He says Christians. From what time period? It could be the 1700s. No one can tell from the quote. So how about giving the whole quote please? [This message was edited Fri Aug 6 15:09:56 2004 by 333] "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
333 said: Ekelb101: “A careful review of all the information available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus Aurelius [Roman emperor from 161 to 180 C.E.], no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after becoming a Christian, remained in military service.”—The Rise of Christianity (London, 1947), E. W. Barnes, p. 333.
“They refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . it was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of princes.”—History of Christianity (New York, 1891), Edward Gibbon, pp. 162, 163. The question is why? Because they were followers of teachings of Jesus Christ and endeavored to follow in his footsteps. Can you imagine Christ joining the Roman military, carrying a shield, sword, and spear? Or can you imagine him here in our modern world hurling hand grenades at his enemies, using a machine gun, or a flamethrower, dropping nuclear bombs or launching an ICBM which would kill or cripple thousands of mothers and children?” 333 said: First, all Barnes can truly say is there is no known record of it.
Why no record or it? Because they didnt join the military. They were followers of teachings of Jesus Christ and..... 333 said: Second, as to Gibbon, there is no time frame around the quote. He says Christians. From what time period? It could be the 1700s. No one can tell from the quote. So how about giving the whole quote please?
Sorry, I dont have the whole quote. Gibbons wrote about the Roman Empire so it would have been the early christians. Here's another of his quotes: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Edward Gibbon, states: “[Early Christians] refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . It was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers.” Our World Through the Ages, by N. Platt and M. J. Drummond, says: “The behavior of the Christians was very different from that of the Romans. . . . Since Christ had preached peace, they refused to become soldiers.” The Encyclopedia Canadiana observes: “The work of Jehovah’s Witnesses is the revival and re-establishment of the primitive Christianity practised by Jesus and his disciples . . . All are brothers.” An editorial in California’s Sacramento Union noted: “Suffice it to say that if all the world lived by the creed of the Jehovah Witnesses there would be an end of bloodshed and hatred, and love would reign as king”! A writer in Hungary’s Ring magazine remarked: “I have come to the conclusion that if Jehovah’s Witnesses were the only ones living on the earth, wars would cease to exist, and the only duties of the policemen would be to control traffic and to issue passports.” In the Italian church magazine Andare alle genti, a Roman Catholic nun also wrote admiringly of the Witnesses: “They refuse any form of violence and without rebelling put up with the many trials inflicted on them because of their beliefs . . . How different the world would be if we all woke up one morning and firmly decided not to take up arms again, whatever the cost or the reason, just like Jehovah’s Witnesses!” Many Christmas' ago, I went to buy a doll for my son. I reached for the last one they had, but so did another man. As I rained blows upon him, I realized there had to be another way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ekalb101 said: The Encyclopedia Canadiana observes: “The work of Jehovah’s Witnesses is the revival and re-establishment of the primitive Christianity practised by Jesus and his disciples . . . All are brothers.” An editorial in California’s Sacramento Union noted: “Suffice it to say that if all the world lived by the creed of the Jehovah Witnesses there would be an end of bloodshed and hatred, and love would reign as king”! A writer in Hungary’s Ring magazine remarked: “I have come to the conclusion that if Jehovah’s Witnesses were the only ones living on the earth, wars would cease to exist, and the only duties of the policemen would be to control traffic and to issue passports.” In the Italian church magazine Andare alle genti, a Roman Catholic nun also wrote admiringly of the Witnesses: “They refuse any form of violence and without rebelling put up with the many trials inflicted on them because of their beliefs . . . How different the world would be if we all woke up one morning and firmly decided not to take up arms again, whatever the cost or the reason, just like Jehovah’s Witnesses!” these are babylonian writers and so how can they help your arguments? does that mean you equally weigh the validity of such writers who write critically of JW ideologies and beliefs? and these quotes could also be said (and better said) of christ-centered faiths such as the mennonites and the anabaptists who practice pacifism in imitation of Christ's nonviolence. as i understand it, JWs are not pacifists, but rather support their non-engagement with military service as 'neutrality.' Welcome to the New World Odor and
the Mythmaking Moonbattery of Obamanation. Chains We Can Bereave In LIBERALISM IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ekalb101 said: 333 said: Second, as to Gibbon, there is no time frame around the quote. He says Christians. From what time period? It could be the 1700s. No one can tell from the quote. So how about giving the whole quote please?
Sorry, I dont have the whole quote. Gibbons wrote about the Roman Empire so it would have been the early christians. Here's another of his quotes: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Edward Gibbon, states: “[Early Christians] refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . It was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers.” Our World Through the Ages, by N. Platt and M. J. Drummond, says: “The behavior of the Christians was very different from that of the Romans. . . . Since Christ had preached peace, they refused to become soldiers.” First you quote: "They refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defense of the empire. . . . it was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of princes." —History of Christianity (New York, 1891), Edward Gibbon, pp. 162, 163. Then you quote: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Edward Gibbon, states: "[Early Christians] refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defense of the empire. . . . It was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers." Which is it? Does the quote comes from The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire or History of Christianity? Or is the same quote found in both works. I also noticed that the first quote you gave says "They," without reference to time period. Then in the next quote you have "Early Christians" in brackets, showing that it not part of the text but was added. You have a bit of a mess here. So if the quote does come from History of Christianity, then a time reference is needed. If the quote can be found in both works, a time reference is still needed. Does not Gibbon date the fall of Rome in A.D. 476? So I must question what the term "early Christians" means. Are they 1st century, 2nd century, 3rd century, 4th century, or 5th century Christians? Or all of them? And as for your third quote: Our World Through the Ages, by N. Platt and M. J. Drummond, says: "The behavior of the Christians was very different from that of the Romans. . . . Since Christ had preached peace, they refused to become soldiers." It too suffers from the same problems, no time reference. But all three suffer from a even bigger problem. They give no evidence. They merely state something without any back up. Are we to simply take their word for it without knowing what the evidence is? And lastly, I said: First, all Barnes can't truly say is there is no known record of it.
To which you replied: ekalb101 said: Why no record or it? Because they didnt join the military.
That is question begging. Surely we don't have every Roman record do we? Some are lost, are they not? Barnes can't know what was in a record which is now lost. Unless someone can produce every Roman military record, no one can say beyond all doubt. [This message was edited Wed Aug 11 15:05:36 2004 by 333] "Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
333 said:[quote] ekalb101 said: To which you replied: ekalb101 said: Why no record or it? Because they didnt join the military.
That is question begging. Surely we don't have every Roman record do we? Some are lost are they not? Barnes can't know what was in a record which is now lost. Unless someone can produce every Roman military record, no one can say beyond all doubt. [This message was edited Fri Aug 6 15:10:14 2004 by 333] Just google 'early christians war' and you'll find a ton of information to read. Early christian writers were united in their stand on war and the military. Many Christmas' ago, I went to buy a doll for my son. I reached for the last one they had, but so did another man. As I rained blows upon him, I realized there had to be another way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Create new topic
Printable version (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)