Author | Message |
(F**k It) I Don't Want You Back http://entertainment.news...255E10431%
255E%255Enbv,00.html 26 expletives and it's No. 1 By Daniel Brettig April 24, 2004 IT seems a lot of swearing can still go a long way. Bitter hip-hop track F... It (I Don't Want You Back) has been the biggest pop single in Australia, possibly the world, this year. It has topped the Australian charts for three consecutive weeks. It also sat at number one for seven weeks in the United States. Last week, it debuted at number one in Britain. With expletives, including the F-word uttered a blush-inducing 20 times during the course of the song, it blends its invective with the feel of a radio-friendly urban ballad. Triple M Adelaide's Music Director Jaime Chaux said the single's bulging sales were mainly due to the novelty of its vengeful lyrics. "I don't think there's ever been anything that's ever been that blunt," he said. "Over the years songs about love gone wrong, like REM's The One I Love, have always left a little room for interpretation but there's none of that here. "When we got the single at the station and heard it for the first time we all said 'my God, this is going to be huge', because of that novelty value." F... It's New York-based creator Eamon Doyle said the blunt bitterness of the track, a rebuke to a two-timing lover, had also been a factor. "It's a truthful song," the 20-year-old told The Advertiser. "It's something that everyone wants to say but no one has had the balls to say it, certainly not vocally in music." The impact of the song has not been affected by the heavy edits applied to radio versions, with cursing either cut completely (the ultra-clean version) or partly (the clean version). "People know what the song says but, on radio you've got to keep it clean for the kids," said Doyle. "Apparently in Sweden they're playing the version with the cursing in it, which is great." While F... It's novelty is unquestioned, few pundits have given Doyle much chance of being anymore than a flash in the commercial pan. "He has to be very careful about his next single, otherwise he'll be another Young MC, another Vanilla Ice, or more recently The Androids," Chaux said. "There's only so much novelty people can take." Naturally, Doyle disagreed. "I want to last like Frank Sinatra did," he said. "A long time." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's a really, really, REALLY shit song.
Just sensationalist crap. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Worst song ever! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ack this song was crap lol | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
BTW, it only peaked at No. 16 in the US (which is too high as it is, but where they got this "no. 1 for seven weeks" shit I do not know). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: BTW, it only peaked at No. 16 in the US (which is too high as it is, but where they got this "no. 1 for seven weeks" shit I do not know).
Maybe the R&B chart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OdysseyMiles said: VoicesCarry said: BTW, it only peaked at No. 16 in the US (which is too high as it is, but where they got this "no. 1 for seven weeks" shit I do not know).
Maybe the R&B chart. No, it only made No. 37 R&B. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i'm mad that rem's 'the one i love' was even mentioned in relation to this horrible "song". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Crazy song that I couldn't believe something like that could be played on the radio. There's a late nite DJ on my favorite R&B station who LOVES this song. He always seems to be playing it on my drive time home at nite | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cloudbuster said: you listen to this song everyday! :T2h: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Christopher said: Cloudbuster said: you listen to this song everyday! :T2h: And then butters his toast with it. [This message was edited Tue Apr 27 19:01:45 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: Christopher said: you listen to this song everyday! :T2h: And then butters his toast with it. [This message was edited Tue Apr 27 19:01:45 2004 by VoicesCarry] yeah,.... hes a whore! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Complete piece of shit...I really can't believe this song is a hit...
There was a "touching" story about his little cousin singing the song everytime he sees him. Saying "it's only okay if I sing the song with you..not with mommy" awwww | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: BTW, it only peaked at No. 16 in the US (which is too high as it is, but where they got this "no. 1 for seven weeks" shit I do not know).
I always find that strange when record comapnies clam a song is or has been a number one when it hasn't been number one on any chart what so ever! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VinnyM27 said: VoicesCarry said: BTW, it only peaked at No. 16 in the US (which is too high as it is, but where they got this "no. 1 for seven weeks" shit I do not know).
I always find that strange when record comapnies clam a song is or has been a number one when it hasn't been number one on any chart what so ever! I don't think it's the record company claiming it - it's the dumbass author of the article, who can't be bothered to check facts. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: VinnyM27 said: I always find that strange when record comapnies clam a song is or has been a number one when it hasn't been number one on any chart what so ever! I don't think it's the record company claiming it - it's the dumbass author of the article, who can't be bothered to check facts. They are pretty bad too. Reporters should not write stories about artists and their albums if they can never get the facts straight. It's either over or under embleshing or mixing up years and names and titles. They suck! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Although he sounds like the Y2K version of Keith Sweat, I'm kinda glad he made the record. I wonder how many "diss reply" records are going to come out from this song? I think he addressed an issue that DOES exist and feelings that are valid. Women write songs to no end about how men do them wrong, but as soon as a man does a heartbreak song with lyrics on how he really feels, then its treated like a crime. Pop culture dehumanizes men almost as much as it objectifies women. Dude wrote a song about how he felt and his anger at the moment and didn't sugarcoat it. It needed to be done, especially in the context that it was done in. It would have been almost completely ineffective if it had been a rap song. Fact is - women cheat, too despite pop culture's reluctance to acknowledge it. The lyrics are a little immature (except the last verse), but convey the idea effectively. Men are used to male-bashing songs. Its about time there was a dose dished out here and there. I think the reason so many women are offended by it is because they may harbor some guilt from when they have screwed a guy or two over and the song addresses it - sugar free. As for the singing - I HATE Keith Sweat and nasal vocals coming from male singers. It sucks. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mrdespues said: It's a really, really, REALLY shit song.
Just sensationalist crap. I have 2 agree!. That song has 2 b 1 of the worst UK Number 1 ever, and remember in the UK we have some really bad number 1's but that is amongst the top 5 worst ever. Eminem and Bubba Sparxx r million times better than this guy. [This message was edited Wed Apr 28 19:23:55 2004 by thetimefan] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |