independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > a fight 4 Michael Jackson's kids
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/24/04 9:44pm

4jamiestarr

avatar

a fight 4 Michael Jackson's kids

well, I knew those kids did not have any of Michael's DNA from the beginning. this guy is totally dillusional. or is he an evil-child molester genius??

MEGASTAR Michael Jackson's claim he is the natural father of the two children born to ex-wife Debbie Rowe is a LIE.

Debbie was artificially inseminated with anonymously donated sperm to give birth to son Prince Michael Jnr and daughter Paris.

The bombshell fact—revealed by Debbie in a legal dossier—could be her strongest weapon in her bid to wrest control of the children from 45-year-old Jacko.

She wants to stop him using "rich and influential friends" to send Prince Michael and Paris out of the U.S. before he faces charges of sexually abusing a 12-year-old boy.

The News of the World has learned the secrets of the documents drawn up by Debbie, seen with Jackson top right, as she prepares to seek "temporary exclusive custody" of the children. The papers reveal:

Jackson hid the truth about the PATERNITY of the children, aged six and five, when he was grilled about their light-complexioned features by Martin Bashir for his ITV documentary. The star insisted he WAS their true biological father.

Jacko and Debbie DID enter into a SURROGACY agreement on January 23 1996. The deal made their marriage ceremony nine months later a total sham—aimed only at securing his parental rights.

Michael was so obsessed with controlling the creation of each child he imposed a six-month SEX BAN on Debbie before insemination.

In return for bearing Michael two children, Debbie received a staggering £6million PAY-OFF. She also got a £1.6million Beverly Hills home, a car, clothes, furs and jewels. Michael continues to pay her monthly expenses. Last month she claimed £35,000.

In the surrogacy agreement Debbie, 41, agreed to "knowingly and voluntarily waive my right to contest Michael's paternity of either child" and "consent to Michael being declared the father".

But in the legal documents she also described the astonishing secrets of how she became pregnant.

Debbie states: "I have no information whatsoever about the identity of the semen donor for either child, as such semen was obtained anonymously from a semen bank under an agreement of confidentiality.

"I consented to the artificial insemination with the specific intent of bearing a child to which Michael would be the father and treated in all respects as the father..."

Blonde and blue-eyed Debbie also details how Jacko insisted that for six months she "refrained from sexual relations and avoided any possibility of semen being introduced into my body other than by way of surgical artificial insemination."

On May 28 and 29, 1996, following the stipulated sex ban, Debbie was artifically inseminated by Beverly Hills fertility specialist, Dr Hal C. Danzer.

He confirms: "I was requested by Petitioner, Deborah Rowe Jackson and Respondent, Michael J. Jackson to perform an artificial insemination of semen, donated to and for the use of Respondent, into the uterus of Petitioner for the principal purpose of assisting Respondent in having a child of his own."

The pair married in Australia on November 15 1996, three months before Prince Michael Jr was born.

After another four months Debbie was inseminated again, and Paris was born in April 1998.

By October the following year the couple were divorced. Jacko went on to have son Prince Michael II — nicknamed Blanket — with a second surrogate mum.

His divorce agreement with Debbie shows she agreed to give him "sole legal and physical custody".

She was allowed to visit the children only once every 45 days, between 10am and 7pm, with their nanny Gracie Rwarmba present.

Jacko gave Debbie a first-class plane ticket for each visit. But the following year she agreed to give up her visiting rights altogether.

In her declaration to regain custody, she explains: "In or about November 2000, I believed that Michael was the most wonderful father in the worldbased upon observations with him and our children."

But then her fears grew that he would send Prince Michael and Paris out of the US.

She states: "Michael has close, influential and rich friends all over the world...

"He has the ability to have the children taken out of the United States and never returned. He has the financial ability to rent a private jet at a moment's notice."

She also claims that Jackson is "easily influenced" and she fears he is being led by extremist Muslims in the Nation of Islam movement.

Worries

She states: "Michael's involvement with a cult, Nation Of Islam, is horrifying to me. I am Jewish and I converted to Judaism in 1982 before marrying my first husband. Therefore, our children are Jewish."

Debbie says she knows the Nation of Islam "do not like Jews" which "causes me endless worries".

She also claims she told Jacko last month she would never agree to his "secret plans" for his mother Katherine to adopt her children.

Jackson continues to show "poor judgment," she says, in stating it is acceptable for him to sleep in the same bed with children.

And she suggests that she move into the Neverland ranch with the children now Michael has vowed never to return there.

Jacko has vowed to fight to keep the children. He will stand trial on the abuse charges later this year.


jacko is not there father



PEACE N B WiLD!!!
4jamiestarr
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/24/04 9:47pm

NWF

avatar

I already knew that. You see how white them kids are. Even though MJ appears white now, the fact remains he's still black. And any children he has will not enter this world in any other color or form.
NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/24/04 9:48pm

4jamiestarr

avatar

NWF said:

I already knew that. You see how white them kids are. Even though MJ appears white now, the fact remains he's still black. And any children he has will not enter this world in any other color or form.



ya, that is Xactly what i've been saying.



PEACE N B WiLD!!!
4jamiestarr
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/24/04 10:01pm

Janfriend

confuse I don't get why he didn't wamt his own biological children

Is he asexual or something, because I don't see a reason why he couldn't ejaculate in a cup
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/24/04 11:57pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

omfg Wow, never crossed my mind those kids are not his. So now will they be able to show there faces.
canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/25/04 1:49am

rainman1985

I'd like to know where you got this from because Fox news has just confirmed that a similar story (if not the exact same) printed in a tabloid magazine, of which the name I cannot remember, is false. Debbie "reportedly" (if you beleive anything Fox news says) laughed off suggestions she is contesting custody or that she has a problem with the Nation of Islam.

Please reference the story.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/25/04 1:55am

Phantasy

avatar

Geez, those poor kids. I feel sorry for the children of today. So many screwed up, incompetent people having kids right and left. I wish more people would exercise birth control and not bring these innocent beings into such bad, unhealthy situations. It's also a shame that children that come from so called "healthy backgrounds" have to live and deal with this crazy world. nuts
__________________________________________________

+++SOME THINGS ARE BETTER LEFT UNSAID+++
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/25/04 2:00am

langebleu

avatar

moderator

rainman1985 said:

I'd like to know where you got this from because Fox news has just confirmed that a similar story (if not the exact same) printed in a tabloid magazine, of which the name I cannot remember, is false. Debbie "reportedly" (if you beleive anything Fox news says) laughed off suggestions she is contesting custody or that she has a problem with the Nation of Islam.

Please reference the story.

If you re ad the story you will see it says:

"The News of the World has learned the secrets of the documents drawn up by Debbie ..."

Here's the online version of this tabloid rag:

http://www.newsoftheworld...biz2.shtml
ALT+PLS+RTN: Pure as a pane of ice. It's a gift.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/25/04 3:32am

dazzjped

Custody Case "Not Happening"

"Don't believe a word of the stories coming out of the United Kingdom about Debbie Rowe suing Michael Jackson for custody of their kids."

Those are the words of Roger Friedman, FOX News, after reports of a custody battle by several UK outlets.

"Rowe is said to have laughed heartily when she heard the British tabloid The Sun made up their latest fiction", Friedman states.

This comes after earlier in the week reports came out of the UK saying that Debbie Rowe was concerned for her children being "made to wear masks when out in public." This was reported despite her appearance in a documentary less than a year ago stating that the "masks" were in fact her idea.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/25/04 3:38am

VoicesCarry

The Sun is now reporting this as well.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/25/04 6:38am

1p1p1i3

avatar

She should have the kids, or at least he shouldn't.

What court could let a man repeatedly accused of child molestation - and who is CLEARLY MENTALLY UNWELL - keep custody of the kids?

In the UK, they'd be with Social Services by now, at least until after the trial.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/25/04 10:12am

VoicesCarry

1p1p1i3 said:

She should have the kids, or at least he shouldn't.

What court could let a man repeatedly accused of child molestation - and who is CLEARLY MENTALLY UNWELL - keep custody of the kids?

In the UK, they'd be with Social Services by now, at least until after the trial.


It's called the "if you're rich, you're golden, baby" American justice system. "The kids aren't rich? FUCK THEM!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/25/04 12:43pm

1p1p1i3

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

1p1p1i3 said:

She should have the kids, or at least he shouldn't.

What court could let a man repeatedly accused of child molestation - and who is CLEARLY MENTALLY UNWELL - keep custody of the kids?

In the UK, they'd be with Social Services by now, at least until after the trial.


It's called the "if you're rich, you're golden, baby" American justice system. "The kids aren't rich? FUCK THEM!"


Oh yeah. I keep forgetting that!!
God Bless America!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/25/04 12:46pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

maury povich, hell-ooo? eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/25/04 5:09pm

SquirrelMeat

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

The Sun is now reporting this as well.



But the Sun is the News of the world...
.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/25/04 5:15pm

VoicesCarry

SquirrelMeat said:

VoicesCarry said:

The Sun is now reporting this as well.



But the Sun is the News of the world...


Lol, forgive me if I'm not up on my cheap tabloids.

Debbie is definitely not suing, that's for sure.

But he still should NOT have those kids with him when he's facing child molestation charges.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 01/25/04 5:15pm

VoicesCarry

SquirrelMeat said:

VoicesCarry said:

The Sun is now reporting this as well.



But the Sun is the News of the world...


Lol, forgive me if I'm not up on my cheap tabloids.

Debbie is definitely not suing, that's for sure.

But he still should NOT have those kids with him when he's facing child molestation charges.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 01/25/04 6:50pm

thetimefan

avatar

I read this in the News Of The World. Most of whats in that paper is alot of crap so who knows if this story is true. I watched the interview with MJ's parents and they said they were gonna adopt the kids, so who knows whats gonna happen.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 01/26/04 1:13pm

1p1p1i3

avatar

thetimefan said:

I read this in the News Of The World. Most of whats in that paper is alot of crap so who knows if this story is true.


WHAT!
So it's NOT true that Prince can have telepathic sex with women?

That's another illusion shattered right there.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > a fight 4 Michael Jackson's kids