independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > An Anti-Jacko Thread
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/27/03 6:29pm

SefraNSue

An Anti-Jacko Thread

I don't know about ya'll, but I don't like Jacko. I don't know where he came from, why he's here, or where he'll go in the future. He randomly hangs his children out of windows for kicks. He performs voodoo rituas on poor, defenseless animals. He's a weird, demented, dim-witted,all-around supressed freak who was a one-hit wonder in the 80's. He bleached his skin, sanded down his face, and despite being incredibly stupid has managed to rob Paul MacCartney at gunpoint, and pull off the feat of being the most in-control pedophile in history.He's the one who says "I love to sleep with little boys!" At least, it was purported that he said that. I'm sick of hearing from and about Jacko...But I am interested in hearing from Michael Jackson. He is still around, right? I hear he was arrested...or was it Jacko who was arrested?...No, Michael Jackson was arrested, and Jacko is going on trial. Weird. Well, maybe it's for the best. I for one whould like to see an end to Jacko once and for all. Hopefully, he'll finally be brought to justice. Then maybe Michael Jackson can reimmerge, and we can hear from HIM again:

Heal The Kids - Oxford speech Oxford University, March 2001


by Michael Jackson

Thank you, thank you dear friends, from the bottom of my heart, for such a loving and spirited welcome, and thank you, Mr President, for your kind invitation to me which I am so honoured to accept. I also want to express a special thanks to you Shmuley, who for 11 years served as Rabbi here at Oxford. You and I have been working so hard to form Heal the Kids, as well as writing our book about childlike qualities, and in all of our efforts you have been such a supportive and loving friend. And I would also like to thank Toba Friedman, our director of operations at Heal the Kids, who is returning tonight to the alma mater where she served as a Marshall scholar, as well as Marilyn Piels, another central member of our Heal the Kids team.

I am humbled to be lecturing in a place that has previously been filled by such notable figures as Mother Theresa, Albert Einstein, Ronald Reagan, Robert Kennedy and Malcolm X. I've even heard that Kermit the Frog has made an appearance here, and I've always felt a kinship with Kermit's message that it's not easy being green. I'm sure he didn't find it any easier being up here than I do!

As I looked around Oxford today, I couldn't help but be aware of the majesty and grandeur of this great institution, not to mention the brilliance of the great and gifted minds that have roamed these streets for centuries. The walls of Oxford have not only housed the greatest philosophical and scientific geniuses - they have also ushered forth some of the most cherished creators of children's literature, from J.R.R. Tolkien to CS Lewis. Today I was allowed to hobble into the dining hall in Christ Church to see Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland immortalised in the stained glass windows. And even one of my own fellow Americans, the beloved Dr Seuss graced these halls and then went on to leave his mark on the imaginations of millions of children throughout the world.

I suppose I should start by listing my qualifications to speak before you this evening. Friends, I do not claim to have the academic expertise of other speakers who have addressed this hall, just as they could lay little claim at being adept at the moonwalk - and you know, Einstein in particular was really TERRIBLE at that.

But I do have a claim to having experienced more places and cultures than most people will ever see. Human knowledge consists not only of libraries of parchment and ink - it is also comprised of the volumes of knowledge that are written on the human heart, chiselled on the human soul, and engraved on the human psyche. And friends, I have encountered so much in this relatively short life of mine that I still cannot believe I am only 42. I often tell Shmuley that in soul years I'm sure that I'm at least 80 - and tonight I even walk like I'm 80! So please harken to my message, because what I have to tell you tonight can bring healing to humanity and healing to our planet.

Through the grace of God, I have been fortunate to have achieved many of my artistic and professional aspirations realised early in my lifetime. But these, friends are accomplishments, and accomplishments alone are not synonymous with who I am. Indeed, the cheery five-year-old who belted out Rockin' Robin and Ben to adoring crowds was not indicative of the boy behind the smile.

Tonight, I come before you less as an icon of pop (whatever that means anyway), and more as an icon of a generation, a generation that no longer knows what it means to be children.

All of us are products of our childhood. But I am the product of a lack of a childhood, an absence of that precious and wondrous age when we frolic playfully without a care in the world, basking in the adoration of parents and relatives, where our biggest concern is studying for that big spelling test come Monday morning.

Those of you who are familiar with the Jackson Five know that I began performing at the tender age of five and that ever since then, I haven't stopped dancing or singing. But while performing and making music undoubtedly remain as some of my greatest joys, when I was young I wanted more than anything else to be a typical little boy. I wanted to build tree houses, have water balloon fights, and play hide and seek with my friends. But fate had it otherwise and all I could do was envy the laughter and playtime that seemed to be going on all around me.

There was no respite from my professional life. But on Sundays I would go Pioneering, the term used for the missionary work that Jehovah's Witnesses do. And it was then that I was able to see the magic of other people's childhood.

Since I was already a celebrity, I would have to don a disguise of fat suit, wig, beard and glasses and we would spend the day in the suburbs of Southern California, going door-to-door or making the rounds of shopping malls, distributing our Watchtower magazine. I loved to set foot in all those regular suburban houses and catch sight of the shag rugs and La-Z-Boy armchairs with kids playing Monopoly and grandmas baby-sitting and all those wonderful, ordinary and starry scenes of everyday life. Many, I know, would argue that these things seem like no big deal. But to me they were mesmerising.

I used to think that I was unique in feeling that I was without a childhood. I believed that indeed there were only a handful with whom I could share those feelings. When I recently met with Shirley Temple Black, the great child star of the 1930s and 40s, we said nothing to each other at first, we simply cried together, for she could share a pain with me that only others like my close friends Elizabeth Taylor and McCauley Culkin know.

I do not tell you this to gain your sympathy but to impress upon you my first important point : It is not just Hollywood child stars that have suffered from a non-existent childhood. Today, it's a universal calamity, a global catastrophe. Childhood has become the great casualty of modern-day living. All around us we are producing scores of kids who have not had the joy, who have not been accorded the right, who have not been allowed the freedom, or knowing what it's like to be a kid.

Today children are constantly encouraged to grow up faster, as if this period known as childhood is a burdensome stage, to be endured and ushered through, as swiftly as possible. And on that subject, I am certainly one of the world's greatest experts.

Ours is a generation that has witnessed the abrogation of the parent-child covenant. Psychologists are publishing libraries of books detailing the destructive effects of denying one's children the unconditional love that is so necessary to the healthy development of their minds and character. And because of all the neglect, too many of our kids have, essentially, to raise themselves. They are growing more distant from their parents, grandparents and other family members, as all around us the indestructible bond that once glued together the generations, unravels.

This violation has bred a new generation, Generation O let us call it, that has now picked up the torch from Generation X. The O stands for a generation that has everything on the outside - wealth, success, fancy clothing and fancy cars, but an aching emptiness on the inside. That cavity in our chests, that barrenness at our core, that void in our centre is the place where the heart once beat and which love once occupied.

And it's not just the kids who are suffering. It's the parents as well. For the more we cultivate little-adults in kids'-bodies, the more removed we ourselves become from our own child-like qualities, and there is so much about being a child that is worth retaining in adult life.


Love, ladies and gentlemen, is the human family's most precious legacy, its richest bequest, its golden inheritance. And it is a treasure that is handed down from one generation to another. Previous ages may not have had the wealth we enjoy. Their houses may have lacked electricity, and they squeezed their many kids into small homes without central heating. But those homes had no darkness, nor were they cold. They were lit bright with the glow of love and they were warmed snugly by the very heat of the human heart. Parents, undistracted by the lust for luxury and status, accorded their children primacy in their lives.

As you all know, our two countries broke from each other over what Thomas Jefferson referred to as "certain inalienable rights". And while we Americans and British might dispute the justice of his claims, what has never been in dispute is that children have certain inalienable rights, and the gradual erosion of those rights has led to scores of children worldwide being denied the joys and security of childhood.

I would therefore like to propose tonight that we install in every home a Children's Universal Bill of Rights, the tenets of which are:

1. The right to be loved without having to earn it

2. The right to be protected, without having to deserve it

3. The right to feel valuable, even if you came into the world with nothing

4. The right to be listened to without having to be interesting

5. The right to be read a bedtime story, without having to compete with the evening news

6. The right to an education without having to dodge bullets at schools

7. The right to be thought of as adorable - (even if you have a face that only a mother could love).

Friends, the foundation of all human knowledge, the beginning of human consciousness, must be that each and every one of us is an object of love. Before you know if you have red hair or brown, before you know if you are black or white, before you know of what religion you are a part, you have to know that you are loved.

About twelve years ago, when I was just about to start my Bad tour, a little boy came with his parents to visit me at home in California. He was dying of cancer and he told me how much he loved my music and me. His parents told me that he wasn't going to live, that any day he could just go, and I said to him: "Look, I am going to be coming to your town in Kansas to open my tour in three months. I want you to come to the show. I am going to give you this jacket that I wore in one of my videos." His eyes lit up and he said: "You are gonna GIVE it to me?" I said "Yeah, but you have to promise that you will wear it to the show." I was trying to make him hold on. I said: "When you come to the show I want to see you in this jacket and in this glove" and I gave him one of my rhinestone gloves - and I never usually give the rhinestone gloves away. And he was just in heaven.

But maybe he was too close to heaven, because when I came to his town, he had already died, and they had buried him in the glove and jacket. He was just 10 years old. God knows, I know, that he tried his best to hold on. But at least when he died, he knew that he was loved, not only by his parents, but even by me, a near stranger, I also loved him. And with all of that love he knew that he didn't come into this world alone, and he certainly didn't leave it alone.

If you enter this world knowing you are loved and you leave this world knowing the same, then everything that happens in between can he dealt with. A professor may degrade you, but you will not feel degraded, a boss may crush you, but you will not be crushed, a corporate gladiator might vanquish you, but you will still triumph. How could any of them truly prevail in pulling you down? For you know that you are an object worthy of love. The rest is just packaging.

But if you don't have that memory of being loved, you are condemned to search the world for something to fill you up. But no matter how much money you make or how famous you become, you will still fell empty. What you are really searching for is unconditional love, unqualified acceptance. And that was the one thing that was denied to you at birth.

Friends, let me paint a picture for you. Here is a typical day in America - six youths under the age of 20 will commit suicide, 12 children under the age of 20 will die from firearms - remember this is a DAY, not a year - 399 kids will be arrested for drug abuse, 1,352 babies will be born to teen mothers. This is happening in one of the richest, most developed countries in the history of the world.

Yes, in my country there is an epidemic of violence that parallels no other industrialised nation. These are the ways young people in America express their hurt and their anger. But don't think that there is not the same pain and anguish among their counterparts in the United Kingdom. Studies in this country show that every single hour, three teenagers in the UK inflict harm upon themselves, often by cutting or burning their bodies or taking an overdose. This is how they have chosen to cope with the pain of neglect and emotional agony.


In Britain, as many as 20% of families will only sit down and have dinner together once a year. Once a year! And what about the time-honoured tradition of reading your kid a bedtime story? Research from the 1980s showed that children who are read to, had far greater literacy and significantly outperformed their peers at school. And yet, less than 33% of British children ages two to eight have a regular bedtime story read to them. You may not think much of that until you take into account that 75% of their parents DID have that bedtime story when they were that age.

Clearly, we do not have to ask ourselves where all of this pain, anger and violent behaviour comes from. It is self-evident that children are thundering against the neglect, quaking against the indifference and crying out just to be noticed. The various child protection agencies in the US say that millions of children are victims of maltreatment in the form of neglect, in the average year. Yes, neglect. In rich homes, privileged homes, wired to the hilt with every electronic gadget. Homes where parents come home, but they're not really home, because their heads are still at the office. And their kids? Well, their kids just make do with whatever emotional crumbs they get. And you don't get much from endless TV, computer games and videos.

These hard, cold numbers which for me, wrench the soul and shake the spirit, should indicate to you why I have devoted so much of my time and resources into making our new Heal the Kids initiative a colossal success.

Our goal is simple - to recreate the parent/child bond, renew its promise and light the way forward for all the beautiful children who are destined one day to walk this earth.

But since this is my first public lecture, and you have so warmly welcomed me into your hearts, I feel that I want to tell you more. We each have our own story, and in that sense statistics can become personal.

They say that parenting is like dancing. You take one step, your child takes another. I have discovered that getting parents to re-dedicate themselves to their children is only half the story. The other half is preparing the children to re-accept their parents.

When I was very young I remember that we had this crazy mutt of a dog named "Black Girl," a mix of wolf and retriever. Not only wasn't she much of a guard dog, she was such a scared and nervous thing that it is a wonder she did not pass out every time a truck rumbled by, or a thunderstorm swept through Indiana. My sister Janet and I gave that dog so much love, but we never really won back the sense of trust that had been stolen from her by her previous owner. We knew he used to beat her. We didn't know with what. But whatever it was, it was enough to suck the spirit right out of that dog.

A lot of kids today are hurt puppies who have weaned themselves off the need for love. They couldn't care less about their parents. Left to their own devices, they cherish their independence. They have moved on and have left their parents behind.

Then there are the far worse cases of children who harbour animosity and resentment toward their parents, so that any overture that their parents might undertake would be thrown forcefully back in their face.

Tonight, I don't want any of us to make this mistake. That's why I'm calling upon all the world's children - beginning with all of us here tonight - to forgive our parents, if we felt neglected. Forgive them and teach them how to love again.

You probably weren't surprised to hear that I did not have an idyllic childhood. The strain and tension that exists in my relationship with my own father is well documented. My father is a tough man and he pushed my brothers and me hard, from the earliest age, to be the best performers we could be.

He had great difficulty showing affection. He never really told me he loved me. And he never really complimented me either. If I did a great show, he would tell me it was a good show. And if I did an OK show, he told me it was a lousy show.

He seemed intent, above all else, on making us a commercial success. And at that he was more than adept. My father was a managerial genius and my brothers and I owe our professional success, in no small measure, to the forceful way that he pushed us. He trained me as a showman and under his guidance I couldn't miss a step.

But what I really wanted was a Dad. I wanted a father who showed me love. And my father never did that. He never said I love you while looking me straight in the eye, he never played a game with me. He never gave me a piggyback ride, he never threw a pillow at me, or a water balloon.

But I remember once when I was about four years old, there was a little carnival and he picked me up and put me on a pony. It was a tiny gesture, probably something he forgot five minutes later. But because of that moment I have this special place in my heart for him. Because that's how kids are, the little things mean so much to them and for me, that one moment meant everything. I only experienced it that one time, but it made me feel really good, about him and the world.

But now I am a father myself, and one day I was thinking about my own children, Prince and Paris and how I wanted them to think of me when they grow up. To be sure, I would like them to remember how I always wanted them with me wherever I went, how I always tried to put them before everything else. But there are also challenges in their lives. Because my kids are stalked by paparazzi, they can't always go to a park or a movie with me.

So what if they grow older and resent me, and how my choices impacted their youth? Why weren't we given an average childhood like all the other kids, they might ask? And at that moment I pray that my children will give me the benefit of the doubt. That they will say to themselves: "Our daddy did the best he could, given the unique circumstances that he faced. He may not have been perfect, but he was a warm and decent man, who tried to give us all the love in the world."

I hope that they will always focus on the positive things, on the sacrifices I willingly made for them, and not criticise the things they had to give up, or the errors I've made, and will certainly continue to make, in raising them. For we have all been someone's child, and we know that despite the very best of plans and efforts, mistakes will always occur. That's just being human.

And when I think about this, of how I hope that my children will not judge me unkindly, and will forgive my shortcomings, I am forced to think of my own father and despite my earlier denials, I am forced to admit that me must have loved me. He did love me, and I know that.


There were little things that showed it. When I was a kid I had a real sweet tooth - we all did. My favourite food was glazed doughnuts and my father knew that. So every few weeks I would come downstairs in the morning and there on the kitchen counter was a bag of glazed doughnuts - no note, no explanation - just the doughnuts. It was like Santa Claus.

Sometimes I would think about staying up late at night, so I could see him leave them there, but just like with Santa Claus, I didn't want to ruin the magic for fear that he would never do it again. My father had to leave them secretly at night, so as no one might catch him with his guard down. He was scared of human emotion, he didn't understand it or know how to deal with it. But he did know doughnuts.

And when I allow the floodgates to open up, there are other memories that come rushing back, memories of other tiny gestures, however imperfect, that showed that he did what he could. So tonight, rather than focusing on what my father didn't do, I want to focus on all the things he did do and on his own personal challenges. I want to stop judging him.

I have started reflecting on the fact that my father grew up in the South, in a very poor family. He came of age during the Depression and his own father, who struggled to feed his children, showed little affection towards his family and raised my father and his siblings with an iron fist. Who could have imagined what it was like to grow up a poor black man in the South, robbed of dignity, bereft of hope, struggling to become a man in a world that saw my father as subordinate. I was the first black artist to be played on MTV and I remember how big a deal it was even then. And that was in the 80s!

My father moved to Indiana and had a large family of his own, working long hours in the steel mills, work that kills the lungs and humbles the spirit, all to support his family. Is it any wonder that he found it difficult to expose his feelings? Is it any mystery that he hardened his heart, that he raised the emotional ramparts? And most of all, is it any wonder why he pushed his sons so hard to succeed as performers, so that they could be saved from what he knew to be a life of indignity and poverty?

I have begun to see that even my father's harshness was a kind of love, an imperfect love, to be sure, but love nonetheless. He pushed me because he loved me. Because he wanted no man ever to look down at his offspring.

And now with time, rather than bitterness, I feel blessing. In the place of anger, I have found absolution. And in the place of revenge I have found reconciliation. And my initial fury has slowly given way to forgiveness.

Almost a decade ago, I founded a charity called Heal the World. The title was something I felt inside me. Little did I know, as Shmuley later pointed out, that those two words form the cornerstone of Old Testament prophecy. Do I really believe that we can heal this world, that is riddled with war and genocide, even today? And do I really think that we can heal our children, the same children who can enter their schools with guns and hatred and shoot down their classmates, like they did at Columbine? Or children who can beat a defenceless toddler to death, like the tragic story of Jamie Bulger? Of course I do, or I wouldn't be here tonight.

But it all begins with forgiveness, because to heal the world, we first have to heal ourselves. And to heal the kids, we first have to heal the child within, each and every one of us. As an adult, and as a parent, I realise that I cannot be a whole human being, nor a parent capable of unconditional love, until I put to rest the ghosts of my own childhood.

And that's what I'm asking all of us to do tonight. Live up to the fifth of the Ten Commandments. Honour your parents by not judging them. Give them the benefit of the doubt.

That is why I want to forgive my father and to stop judging him. I want to forgive my father, because I want a father, and this is the only one that I've got. I want the weight of my past lifted from my shoulders and I want to be free to step into a new relationship with my father, for the rest of my life, unhindered by the goblins of the past.

In a world filled with hate, we must still dare to hope. In a world filled with anger, we must still dare to comfort. In a world filled with despair, we must still dare to dream. And in a world filled with distrust, we must still dare to believe.

To all of you tonight who feel let down by your parents, I ask you to let down your disappointment. To all of you tonight who feel cheated by your fathers or mothers, I ask you not to cheat yourself further. And to all of you who wish to push your parents away, I ask you to extend you hand to them instead. I am asking you, I am asking myself, to give our parents the gift of unconditional love, so that they too may learn how to love from us, their children. So that love will finally be restored to a desolate and lonely world.

Shmuley once mentioned to me an ancient Biblical prophecy which says that a new world and a new time would come, when "the hearts of the parents would be restored through the hearts of their children". My friends, we are that world, we are those children.

Mahatma Gandhi said: "The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong." Tonight, be strong. Beyond being strong, rise to the greatest challenge of all - to restore that broken covenant. We must all overcome whatever crippling effects our childhoods may have had on our lives and in the words of Jesse Jackson, forgive each other, redeem each other and move on.

This call for forgiveness may not result in Oprah moments the world over, with thousands of children making up with their parents, but it will at least be a start, and we'll all be so much happier as a result.

And so ladies and gentlemen, I conclude my remarks tonight with faith, joy and excitement.

From this day forward, may a new song be heard.

Let that new song be the sound of children laughing.

Let that new song be the sound of children playing.

Let that new song be the sound of children singing.

And let that new song be the sound of parents listening.

Together, let us create a symphony of hearts, marvelling at the miracle of our children and basking in the beauty of love.

Let us heal the world and blight its pain.

And may we all make beautiful music together.

God bless you, and I love you.

[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 18:45:10 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]
Michael never stopped!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/27/03 6:58pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

This'll be popular so I'll raise a finger to all you motherfuckers now...finger
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/27/03 7:01pm

AaronAlmighty

avatar

tired rolleyes
"oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/27/03 7:01pm

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

This'll be popular so I'll raise a finger to all you motherfuckers now...finger


Hey, at least the poster had the decency to stamp it as an anti-Jacko thread.
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:02:51 PST 2003 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/27/03 7:23pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

SefraNSue said:

He randomly hangs his children out of windows for kicks.

a one-time event is "random"?

He performs voodoo rituas on poor, defenseless animals.

the national enquirer, star, and any other tabloidal publication is meant for entertainment purposes only, mm'kay?

He's a weird, demented, dim-witted,all-around supressed freak who was a one-hit wonder in the 80's.

that one-size-fits-all description could be used for a helluva lot more other '80s acts/musicians, y'know.

i don't care for michael nowadays either, but certainly not to the extent that you do. it ain't that crucial.®

neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/27/03 7:25pm

AaronAlmighty

avatar

one-hit wonder? confuse that's ridiculous.
"oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/27/03 7:26pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

AaronAlmighty said:

one-hit wonder? confuse that's ridiculous.


Quite!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/27/03 7:32pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

SefraNSue said:

...stuff and things...


I think I see what you're getting at. I just checked your profile. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/27/03 7:33pm

ThreadBare

The oddities that gave rise to the "Jacko" phenomenon were creations of Michael Jackson, not the media that passionately -- even obsessively -- covered his antics.

If anyone's responsible for the Wacko Jacko image, it's Michael Jackson. I believe a biographer in the Bashir documentary also spoke to this effect.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/27/03 7:36pm

SefraNSue

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you? Perhaps I should have been clearer:

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by *whomever* and running out of control today).
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:38:16 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]
Michael never stopped!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 12/27/03 7:38pm

VoicesCarry

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 12/27/03 7:42pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

That's a particularly unflattering shot of him. A lot of folk look grim when they have their mugshots taken. rolleyes

I know his face can look a mess at times but that one is not fairly representative of him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 12/27/03 7:42pm

SefraNSue

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!
Michael never stopped!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 12/27/03 7:43pm

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

That's a particularly unflattering shot of him. A lot of folk look grim when they have their mugshots taken. rolleyes

I know his face can look a mess at times but that one is not fairly representative of him.


He has problems. He needs treatment. Let us not suddenly delude ourselves into believing that there is such a thing as a flattering shot of Michael Jackson anymore, or that the media created a monster. He created the monster himself. I want him to get help.
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:46:39 PST 2003 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 12/27/03 7:43pm

Handclapsfinga
snapz

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 12/27/03 7:44pm

ThreadBare

SefraNSue said:

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!


I think we get the premise of the thread. We just reject it, is all.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 12/27/03 7:49pm

SefraNSue

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!


I think we get the premise of the thread. We just reject it, is all.


No, YOU reject it because like many people, you're choosing to place all the blame somewhere else and draw conclusions based on your own opinions instead of looking at the situation objectively. That's actually the entire point of the speech I posted at the beginning of this thread (not that I expect everyone to pay attention to THAT. Michael Jackson making sense? No way! )
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:50:24 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]
Michael never stopped!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 12/27/03 7:54pm

AaronAlmighty

avatar

SefraNSue said:

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!


I think we get the premise of the thread. We just reject it, is all.


No, YOU reject it because like many people, you're choosing to place all the blame somewhere else and draw conclusions based on your own opinions instead of looking at the situation objectively. That's actually the entire point of the speech I posted at the beginning of this thread (not that I expect everyone to pay attention to THAT. Michael Jackson making sense? No way! )
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:50:24 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]



we are choosing to place the blame where it belongs: on him, based on his own statements and actions and appearance.
"oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 12/27/03 7:58pm

ThreadBare

SefraNSue said:

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!


I think we get the premise of the thread. We just reject it, is all.


No, YOU reject it because like many people, you're choosing to place all the blame somewhere else and draw conclusions based on your own opinions instead of looking at the situation objectively. That's actually the entire point of the speech I posted at the beginning of this thread (not that I expect everyone to pay attention to THAT. Michael Jackson making sense? No way! )
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:50:24 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]



You probably haven't had time to read the Org note I sent you that referenced the figures he quoted in that speech. I said something to the effect that he must have done some research into it, showing that it probably is important to him in some degree.

My objectivity forces me to consider more than a celebrity's stated interest in the rights of children. I also look at how that artist interacts with them on a personal level, claims to be little more than an uncommon manchild (while ignoring the common, sexual nature of many of his songs and dance moves) and how he denies having had a tremendous amount of plastic surgery ("it's all lies," he said, "that's b.s.").

Why does MJ expect people to read the same pool of information two different ways? I hope he addresses that in his 60 Minutes interview. I've been unable to get a straight answer to this question from his strongest fans, for almost a year now...

http://www.prince.org/msg/8/35474
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 12/27/03 8:14pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

ThreadBare said:

http://www.prince.org/msg/8/35474


I'd forgotten how great Lammastide's post was.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/27/03 8:18pm

ThreadBare

Cloudbuster said:

ThreadBare said:

http://www.prince.org/msg/8/35474


I'd forgotten how great Lammastide's post was.

Yessuh! He rocked it. woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 12/27/03 8:18pm

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

ThreadBare said:

http://www.prince.org/msg/8/35474


I'd forgotten how great Lammastide's post was.


I love the "he doesn't have a constant craving for sex with children, so he CAN'T be a pedophile" bullshit excuse.
Many, Many, MANY pedophiles, abusers, rapists, and serial killers have been discovered to only perpetrate one or two acts over a long span of time (5+ years). In self-reports, they describe an increasing drive to commit said acts that they often try to control until they crack. So, no, a pedophile who only does one or two a year is HARDLY unprecedented.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 12/27/03 8:19pm

VoicesCarry

And psychopaths are not very predictable (not saying Mike's a psychopath, but he does exhibit tendencies).
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 12/27/03 8:22pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

Cloudbuster said:

ThreadBare said:

http://www.prince.org/msg/8/35474


I'd forgotten how great Lammastide's post was.


I love the "he doesn't have a constant craving for sex with children, so he CAN'T be a pedophile" bullshit excuse.
Many, Many, MANY pedophiles, abusers, rapists, and serial killers have been discovered to only perpetrate one or two acts over a long span of time (5+ years). In self-reports, they describe an increasing drive to commit said acts that they often try to control until they crack. So, no, a pedophile who only does one or two a year is HARDLY unprecedented.


Okay, but how about one or two in a lifetime?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 12/27/03 8:24pm

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

VoicesCarry said:

Cloudbuster said:

ThreadBare said:

http://www.prince.org/msg/8/35474


I'd forgotten how great Lammastide's post was.


I love the "he doesn't have a constant craving for sex with children, so he CAN'T be a pedophile" bullshit excuse.
Many, Many, MANY pedophiles, abusers, rapists, and serial killers have been discovered to only perpetrate one or two acts over a long span of time (5+ years). In self-reports, they describe an increasing drive to commit said acts that they often try to control until they crack. So, no, a pedophile who only does one or two a year is HARDLY unprecedented.


Okay, but how about one or two in a lifetime?


Um...you really need to read up on your criminal history. You'll learn things.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 12/27/03 8:28pm

VoicesCarry

Often, it's common for these things to progress gradually over a lifetime, in the same way a serial killer maybe starts with intimidation and petty crime, then abuse, then rape, then eventually murder. Then he discovers he likes it, and continues. Perhaps he starts murdering when he's a senior (a good example would be the Albert Fish case), but are we going to say "why did he start so late in life?". I think not. It's a gradual progression.

So yes, I believe Michael could have sublimated his deviant desires for one or more decades. He had the pressure of his career and his public image to think about, as well. This is not uncommon. But I think by the early 90s it's entirely CONCEIVABLE that he had graduated to abusing these children. His endless surgeries, his increasingly eccentric behaviour, the extravagant spending and complete detachment from reality and so on would follow the same pattern of gradual progression over time. He clearly believes he's invincible now. No sane person accused of child molestation does an interview on 60 minutes where he claims it's 100% acceptable to sleep with children. He's sinking deeper and deeper into his psychosis.
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 20:33:52 PST 2003 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 12/27/03 8:36pm

SefraNSue

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!


I think we get the premise of the thread. We just reject it, is all.


No, YOU reject it because like many people, you're choosing to place all the blame somewhere else and draw conclusions based on your own opinions instead of looking at the situation objectively. That's actually the entire point of the speech I posted at the beginning of this thread (not that I expect everyone to pay attention to THAT. Michael Jackson making sense? No way! )
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:50:24 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]



You probably haven't had time to read the Org note I sent you that referenced the figures he quoted in that speech. I said something to the effect that he must have done some research into it, showing that it probably is important to him in some degree.


OK, I read it. Check your org notes.

And lol @ the ammature psychology lessons in this thread. Tell me, have any of you ever met Michael Jackson, or even listened to anything that has come DIRECTLY from his mouth?

This wasn't meant to be a "MJ is guilty/innocent" thread, only a thread to profess my disgust for the thing called "Jacko" and all who contributed to it's perpetuation. (By the way, READ the article at the top of the page.)
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 20:43:54 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]
Michael never stopped!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 12/27/03 8:36pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

But I think by the early 90s it's entirely CONCEIVABLE that he had graduated to abusing these children. His endless surgeries, his increasingly eccentric behaviour, the extravagant spending and complete detachment from reality and so on would follow the same pattern of gradual progression over time.


A possibility, sure. Still, there are exceptions to every rule. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 12/27/03 8:41pm

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

VoicesCarry said:

But I think by the early 90s it's entirely CONCEIVABLE that he had graduated to abusing these children. His endless surgeries, his increasingly eccentric behaviour, the extravagant spending and complete detachment from reality and so on would follow the same pattern of gradual progression over time.


A possibility, sure. Still, there are exceptions to every rule. wink


That's my point. There is no "rule" with mental illness rolleyes. By preconceived notions of how a pedophile should act, you expect him to follow a certain pattern (constant cravings for sex with young boys) but he does not. He breaks the rule. This does NOT mean by default he is innocent and not a pedophile.

And no, the "gradual progression" I described is not a "rule" (nowhere did I state that), it is merely a pattern.
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 20:41:37 PST 2003 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 12/27/03 8:44pm

AaronAlmighty

avatar

SefraNSue said:

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

ThreadBare said:

SefraNSue said:

VoicesCarry said:

SefraNSue said:

LOL! You guys don't get it, do you?

This is an anti-JACKO-pro-Michael-Jackson-thread (Jacko being the fictionalized boogie man created by the media).


Hun, he created the boogie man.


If you believe that, fine. Either way, Jacko is gonna be put away very soon. And I say good riddance!


I think we get the premise of the thread. We just reject it, is all.


No, YOU reject it because like many people, you're choosing to place all the blame somewhere else and draw conclusions based on your own opinions instead of looking at the situation objectively. That's actually the entire point of the speech I posted at the beginning of this thread (not that I expect everyone to pay attention to THAT. Michael Jackson making sense? No way! )
[This message was edited Sat Dec 27 19:50:24 PST 2003 by SefraNSue]



You probably haven't had time to read the Org note I sent you that referenced the figures he quoted in that speech. I said something to the effect that he must have done some research into it, showing that it probably is important to him in some degree.


OK, I read it. Check your org notes.

And lol @ the ammature psychology lessons in this thread. Tell me, have any of you ever met Michael Jackson, or even listened to anything that has come DIRECTLY from his mouth?

This wasn't meant to be a "MJ is guilty/innocent" thread, only a thread to profess my disgust for the thing called "Jacko" and all who contributed to it's perpetuation. (By the way, READ the article at the top of the page.)




how are our your opinions on him any more valid than ours?
"oPS i HITTED THE CAPDLOCK"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 4 1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > An Anti-Jacko Thread