independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What the hell is so great about TTD?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 06/10/03 1:18pm

namepeace

BlaqueKnight said:


[b][color=blue:a745dff097]Seems to me that your focus is more on old rantings from YEARS ago rather than the music at hand. "Vibrator" and "Wild Card" can be put up against anything Prince has done within this same time period and fair out as well on some levels and better on others. Sananda is a good artist. PERIOD.


Because you know TTD's work and I don't, I can't argue there.



The THEORY that good artists sell is BULLSHIT. Many good artists go unoticed because of industry agendas.


Again, no argument.

If the label wants you to buy Ja-Fool, they dump MILLIONS into him and bombard you with images and heavy rotation of his music over and over until you finally accept it. That has NOTHING to do with the material; its called MARKETING.


Sure.


Besides, Sananda GAVE WILD CARD AWAY ONLINE FOR FREE before it was released as a CD. Top that! Who does THAT?


Well, Pearl Jam, Grateful Dead, et al. gave away LPs and allowed bootleggers to tape their concerts. There are even those who insist that P released his outtakes to bootleggers to get it out there. But few artists do that, you're right.

But did TTD have any choice in the matter? He'd been written off by the labels because his records didn't sell. What other option does he have to get his music out there? Don't think for a second that he wouldn't love to have "the machine" behind him. That's human nature.


If that's not the artist saying "judge me by the merits of my material", I don't know what is. No posers would do that, my friend.


A lot of artists with no deal do that in this day and age, Blaque.


Sananda has had ego problems in the past, but at least he has the talent to back it up. Unless you can outsing him, I'd think twice on the "poser" comment; and even then as a good singer, one should recognize and respect those who also possess "the gift"


I recongize and respect his prolific talent. He ain't no Prince, though. Sure, he's got a better voice than Prince, but that's like saying, hey, Jamaal Wilkes had a better J than Magic, so he's just as good a player. Prince is not only a supreme musical talent, but he has a legacy of hits and artistic triumphs that have inspired scores of artists all over the world. TTD is a great talent, but he ain't even close to that level.


All that being said, I will check out this new LP. I'm looking forward to it.
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 06/11/03 1:26am

wasitgood4u

avatar

I enjoyed listening 2 Wildcard, but I got bored after a few trax. Thanx tom 4 the lyric postings. Turn the Page is great poetry (somewhat Dylanesque - that's Bob not Thomas, but take ur pick). Still, the others r pretty pretentious (so is TTP, but he manages 2 pul it off there).

He tries too hard to show that he's clever, and he's not clever enough not to need to try so hard!

He has no concept of irony.

Wildcard is interesting, his singing is beautiful, but his attitude is so intensely self-aggrandizing (even when it's pretending 2 b introspective) that it starts 2 wear u down, and I get tired listening.

Nevertheless, I do like it. I liked Hardline and NFNF too. I just don't LOVE them.
"We've never been able to pull off a funk number"

"That's becuase we're soulless auttomatons"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 06/11/03 6:55am

RhythmMan

avatar

abierman said:


exactly, and he has never lived up to expectations ever since.whose expectations?yours?he doesn't need to live up to your expectations.furthermore,to alot of other people he has. His debut was a lucky shot.Hardly.The music was great and it generated interest based on his talent.Also,a lot of thought went into promotion,and he deliberatly said what he said becuase he knew it would garnish attention.
&amp;quot;a man without enemies is a man without movement.&amp;quot;
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 06/11/03 7:04am

Cloudbuster

avatar

abierman said:

Cloudbuster said:

abierman said:

BlaqueKnight said:

You judge artistry by the number of HITS someone has had? Hhmmm. Interesting.


Actually I do not, it's just that TTD was the one who screamed of all roofs that he was going to be so fucking huge and that was going make the world forget about Prince and even James Brown. Jesus, at the low-point of his career (as if there was a high!)...


His career high was his debut album. It spent 9 weeks at the top of the UK chart (more weeks than all of Prince's UK no.1 albums put together) and sold 10 million worldwide.


exactly, and he has never lived up to expectations ever since. His debut was a lucky shot.


As much as I like the Hardline album it remains my least favourite of his. Go figure.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 06/11/03 7:09am

pimpdoutt

RhythmMan said:

abierman said:


exactly, and he has never lived up to expectations ever since.whose expectations?yours?he doesn't need to live up to your expectations.furthermore,to alot of other people he has. His debut was a lucky shot.Hardly.The music was great and it generated interest based on his talent.Also,a lot of thought went into promotion,and he deliberatly said what he said becuase he knew it would garnish attention.



exactly. people need to get over stupid shit terence said years ago. T said in an interview with HUH? magazine that
"when you're young and impressionable and all of a suddent are faced with huge success YOU START TRIPPIN"

so he was trippin when he was talkin shit

GET OVER IT ALREADY rolleyes


if that's all you can say is " i don't like terence because he talked shit 10 YEARS AGO..."

well what does one say to that really?

pimp
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 06/11/03 7:14am

pimpdoutt

namepeace said:

BlaqueKnight said:


[b][color=blue:a745dff097]Seems to me that your focus is more on old rantings from YEARS ago rather than the music at hand. "Vibrator" and "Wild Card" can be put up against anything Prince has done within this same time period and fair out as well on some levels and better on others. Sananda is a good artist. PERIOD.


Because you know TTD's work and I don't, I can't argue there.



The THEORY that good artists sell is BULLSHIT. Many good artists go unoticed because of industry agendas.


Again, no argument.

If the label wants you to buy Ja-Fool, they dump MILLIONS into him and bombard you with images and heavy rotation of his music over and over until you finally accept it. That has NOTHING to do with the material; its called MARKETING.


Sure.


Besides, Sananda GAVE WILD CARD AWAY ONLINE FOR FREE before it was released as a CD. Top that! Who does THAT?


Well, Pearl Jam, Grateful Dead, et al. gave away LPs and allowed bootleggers to tape their concerts. There are even those who insist that P released his outtakes to bootleggers to get it out there. But few artists do that, you're right.

But did TTD have any choice in the matter? He'd been written off by the labels because his records didn't sell. What other option does he have to get his music out there? Don't think for a second that he wouldn't love to have "the machine" behind him. That's human nature.


If that's not the artist saying "judge me by the merits of my material", I don't know what is. No posers would do that, my friend.


A lot of artists with no deal do that in this day and age, Blaque.


Sananda has had ego problems in the past, but at least he has the talent to back it up. Unless you can outsing him, I'd think twice on the "poser" comment; and even then as a good singer, one should recognize and respect those who also possess "the gift"


I recongize and respect his prolific talent. He ain't no Prince, though. Sure, he's got a better voice than Prince, but that's like saying, hey, Jamaal Wilkes had a better J than Magic, so he's just as good a player. Prince is not only a supreme musical talent, but he has a legacy of hits and artistic triumphs that have inspired scores of artists all over the world. TTD is a great talent, but he ain't even close to that level.

All that being said, I will check out this new LP. I'm looking forward to it.



you're right about that

pimp
[This message was edited Wed Jun 11 7:15:58 PDT 2003 by pimpdoutt]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 06/11/03 8:58am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

pimpdoutt said:

...
But did TTD have any choice in the matter? He'd been written off by the labels because his records didn't sell. What other option does he have to get his music out there? Don't think for a second that he wouldn't love to have "the machine" behind him. That's human nature.


TTD has a strong online & overseas fanbase.The reason most people thought he faded out completely was because he was LIVING overseas. Italy, I think. His focus was THERE and not HERE in the States, so OF COURSE its easy to reason that he was doing "badly" when in fact, he wasn't - WE Americans just didn't know what was going on unless you were a member of a fansite or club or group with the info.



I recongize and respect his prolific talent. He ain't no Prince, though. Sure, he's got a better voice than Prince, but that's like saying, hey, Jamaal Wilkes had a better J than Magic, so he's just as good a player. Prince is not only a supreme musical talent, but he has a legacy of hits and artistic triumphs that have inspired scores of artists all over the world. TTD is a great talent, but he ain't even close to that level.

All that being said, I will check out this new LP. I'm looking forward to it.



You're right, he's not Prince, he's Sananda. He doesn't fuck his fans over, play games with his releases, force eliteism on his fans in order to acquire his music, etc. and so on. I think he is a better singer than Prince, although at one point, I liked more of Prince's material than Sananda's. Yeah, Prince may have more skills, but in the grand scheme, Prince is mid-level as well. Prince has influenced more people because he has had WAY more opportunities than most other artists - and WAY WAY WAY more airtime. Its DEFINATELY NOT because he is talented, but rather because WB bankrolled a lot of dough on him and timing allowed for much of his success. Granted, he has great material, but Prince is an ENTITY. What is PRESENTED as Prince is actually a LOT of people working to create the ILLUSION that its ONE PERSON doing everything. Sananda doesn't play mind games with the public. He is a great singer and an even greater lyricist (I think he's also a better lyricist than Prince in some ways. Different, that's for sure). That's how he presents himself. He IS abov average, maybe YOU just don't see it. Its cool though. Everybody can't like everybody. Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean they suck, though. We'll just have to agree to disagree on TTD. Peace.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 06/11/03 11:50am

namepeace

BlaqueKnigh said:

You're right, he's not Prince, he's Sananda. He doesn't fuck his fans over, play games with his releases, force eliteism on his fans in order to acquire his music, etc. and so on.


Okay. That being said, a lot of great musicians had contempt for their fans -- Miles is the first to come to mind -- but that character flaw doesn't deter from their musical legacies.

In any event, since when does being an asshole mean you can't like one's music? Apparently he was a real jerk to pimpdoutt, but you have nevertheless been pumping TTD. Not many musicians could be canonized for sainthood.

I think he is a better singer than Prince, although at one point, I liked more of Prince's material than Sananda's.


Fair enough. There have been tons of singers with better voices than Prince, and I won't dispute that TTD may be one of them.

Yeah, Prince may have more skills, but in the grand scheme, Prince is mid-level as well.


Define "grand scheme" and "mid-level."

If you're talking about the entire history of music, maybe. Even if you're talking 20th/21st century popular music, Prince ain't no Coltrane, Miles, Duke, or Jimi, let's be clear.

But let's talk about the actual era in which Prince has performed and recorded, i.e., the last 25 years. In terms of talent, recorded output, performing ability, and degree of influence, I can make a strong argument that Prince is the best single musical artist of that period.

If you think Sananda is in his class, that's your opinion.

It's certainly not mine.

Prince has influenced more people because he has had WAY more opportunities than most other artists - and WAY WAY WAY more airtime. Its DEFINATELY NOT because he is talented, but rather because WB bankrolled a lot of dough on him and timing allowed for much of his success.


Read the post, Blaque. Prince was, and is, a supreme talent, but unlike Sananda, he was savvy in the way he rose to prominence. Once he gained a following, he used his "bankability" to make challenging music. He's made plenty of mistakes along the way, but he had plenty to do with his own success.

WB bankrolled him because of his talent. He wasn't a creature of a marketing machine. To say otherwise is simply absurd.

Sananda did little to help his own cause despite a promising start. He has not managed his career as shrewdly as Prince did (until the last decade, anyway). He apparently burned a lot of bridges before he made his mark -- whereas Prince made his mark and THEN proceeded to burn every bridge he had.

But I digress. Sananda has therefore not had the type of influence Prince had because he didn't sell many records and the label didn't back him. But, Blaque, let me ask you this question: Whose fault is that? Not yours or mine. It lies with your beloved Sananda.


Granted, he has great material, but Prince is an ENTITY. What is PRESENTED as Prince is actually a LOT of people working to create the ILLUSION that its ONE PERSON doing everything. Sananda doesn't play mind games with the public.


Prince has had a great supporting cast, but name a great artist who hasn't? As for Prince's character flaws, no argument there.

He is a great singer and an even greater lyricist (I think he's also a better lyricist than Prince in some ways. Different, that's for sure).


Your opinion. Fair enough. But I never denied Sananda was an impressive musical talent.

That's how he presents himself. He IS abov average, maybe YOU just don't see it.


Get yourself, Blaque. Now you're just wrong. Read my post. I respect his skills and I am looking forward to getting his album. So slow your roll and get your facts right.


Its cool though. Everybody can't like everybody. Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean they suck, though. We'll just have to agree to disagree on TTD. Peace.


I didn't say I didn't like him. Okay, let me try this one more time:

TTD is undeniably a very TALENTED artist . . .

I WANT to hear his new stuff. . .

But Blaque, he is NOT in the same class as Prince. That dog don't hunt.


twocents
[This message was edited Wed Jun 11 15:40:04 PDT 2003 by namepeace]
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 06/11/03 3:35pm

namepeace

Marrk said:

It has to be said Terence/Sananda's site beats the living crap outta the NPGMC.

Lots of great freebies! smile


No argument there. It's a nice site!
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 06/12/03 10:40am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

namepeace said:[quote]
Okay. That being said, a lot of great musicians had contempt for their fans -- Miles is the first to come to mind -- but that character flaw doesn't deter from their musical legacies.

In any event, since when does being an asshole mean you can't like one's music? Apparently he was a real jerk to pimpdoutt, but you have nevertheless been pumping TTD. Not many musicians could be canonized for sainthood.


Having contempt for their fans isn't a good thing and doesn't excuse the behavior. And you're right - it DOESN'T deter from a musical legacy. I like Sananda even though back in his TTD days when I met him, he was an asshole towards me.



Define "grand scheme" and "mid-level."

If you're talking about the entire history of music, maybe. Even if you're talking 20th/21st century popular music, Prince ain't no Coltrane, Miles, Duke, or Jimi, let's be clear.

But let's talk about the actual era in which Prince has performed and recorded, i.e., the last 25 years. In terms of talent, recorded output, performing ability, and degree of influence, I can make a strong argument that Prince is the best single musical artist of that period.


Your case may wash on Prince.org, but the "grand scheme" means ALL music. Even in the past 25 years, Prince is only mid level. In POP music, he is one of the greats, though. Only by limiting the scope of what you define as "relevant music" to POP can you make that arguement. If you include Jazz & classical, Prince will get SMOKED on all levels.


If you think Sananda is in his class, that's your opinion.

It's certainly not mine.

I think Sananda is in Prince's league as a lyricist and a vocalist EASILY, if not beyond Prince. Prince has him beat as a musician and an arranger in my opinion.



Prince was, and is, a supreme talent, but unlike Sananda, he was savvy in the way he rose to prominence. Once he gained a following, he used his "bankability" to make challenging music. He's made plenty of mistakes along the way, but he had plenty to do with his own success.

Yes, he was savvy in his rise to fame. He played WB and I love him for it! Its nice to see musicians beat the big boys once in a while. All in all, Prince got a whole career off those fools and by the time they were fed up with him, it was too late because he had a strong fanbase.

WB bankrolled him because of his talent.

BULLSHIT. That was only ONE aspect of they pushed Prince. They DEVELOPED him into a total package. Do you think Prince is the ONLY multi-instrumentalist that has ever approached WB? Prince was an experiment by WB with the "one man band" approach. As far as I know, they had never tried to do that with anyone else. Believe this, if Prince had the same talent but didn't have the looks he would have been passed over. WB saw a money making opportunity. Merchandising.

He wasn't a creature of a marketing machine. To say otherwise is simply absurd.

MORE BULLSHIT. EVERY artist on a major label is the creature of a marketing machine. The amount of talent the artist has is not as much a factor as you think it is. One of the reasons I liked Prince was because he actually DID have the talent to back up some of the hype, but ALL artists are hyped when they are signed to major labels.


Sananda did little to help his own cause despite a promising start. He has not managed his career as shrewdly as Prince did (until the last decade, anyway). He apparently burned a lot of bridges before he made his mark -- whereas Prince made his mark and THEN proceeded to burn every bridge he had.

But I digress. Sananda has therefore not had the type of influence Prince had because he didn't sell many records and the label didn't back him. But, Blaque, let me ask you this question: Whose fault is that? Not yours or mine. It lies with your beloved Sananda.

Yep. It does. He screwed things up for himself.


But Blaque, he is NOT in the same class as Prince. That dog don't hunt.


We see artists differently. Its all good. I like both these guys.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 06/12/03 12:38pm

NWF

avatar

Hey, folks, did TTD play on the Craig Kilborn show yet? I hope I didn't miss it.
NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 06/12/03 1:36pm

namepeace

BlaqueKnight said:[quote]namepeace said:[quote]
Okay. That being said, a lot of great musicians had contempt for their fans -- Miles is the first to come to mind -- but that character flaw doesn't deter from their musical legacies.

In any event, since when does being an asshole mean you can't like one's music? Apparently he was a real jerk to pimpdoutt, but you have nevertheless been pumping TTD. Not many musicians could be canonized for sainthood.


Having contempt for their fans isn't a good thing and doesn't excuse the behavior. And you're right - it DOESN'T deter from a musical legacy. I like Sananda even though back in his TTD days when I met him, he was an asshole towards me.


Define "grand scheme" and "mid-level."

If you're talking about the entire history of music, maybe. Even if you're talking 20th/21st century popular music, Prince ain't no Coltrane, Miles, Duke, or Jimi, let's be clear.

But let's talk about the actual era in which Prince has performed and recorded, i.e., the last 25 years. In terms of talent, recorded output, performing ability, and degree of influence, I can make a strong argument that Prince is the best single musical artist of that period.



Your case may wash on Prince.org, but the "grand scheme" means ALL music. Even in the past 25 years, Prince is only mid level. In POP music, he is one of the greats, though. Only by limiting the scope of what you define as "relevant music" to POP can you make that arguement. If you include Jazz & classical, Prince will get SMOKED on all levels.


I made this bed, I will lie in it.

You want the argument? okay, here's the argument:

Recorded Music: Prince is as prolific as they come, with recordings of wildly various styles. Much of his work is pretentious, some derivative, but as a body of work it's hard to match during that time frame. Artists and groups of various genres -- pop, rock, r and b, jazz, and classical -- have covered his work.

Performing ability/skill: Prince plays a wide variety of instruments, and while he may not be deemed a master at any one, he is more than adept at all. He has a good voice with above-average range, and his live performances are always captivating.

Commercial Success: Prince's record, CD, memorabilia, VHS/DVD sales speak for themselves. Suffice it to say he's sold tens of millions of items during his career.

Degree of Influence: Scores of artists have been influenced by his work in a lot of different genres. Several of his albums are held in high esteem by his critics, peers and fans. Many artists speak highly, if not reverently, of him as an artist and an influence. Miles Davis himself said that Prince was "the Ellington of his day."

Those factors, among many, constitute my opinion that an argument can be made that Prince is the single greatest musician of the last 25 years. And I AM talking all music.

So now that you've made your statements, make YOUR case.

If you're so bold to say he'd get "smoked on all levels," name every artist who'd "smoke" him. Specifically, name every artist that has surfaced in the last 25 years that matches or exceeds him in each of those factors during that period. Of any genre. Each and every one.

As a fan of a lot of different kinds of music, I find that check you wrote is gonna be awfully hard for you to cash.


If you think Sananda is in his class, that's your opinion.

It's certainly not mine.


I think Sananda is in Prince's league as a lyricist and a vocalist EASILY, if not beyond Prince. Prince has him beat as a musician and an arranger in my opinion.


That's essentially what I said, right? So that settles that!

Prince was, and is, a supreme talent, but unlike Sananda, he was savvy in the way he rose to prominence. Once he gained a following, he used his "bankability" to make challenging music. He's made plenty of mistakes along the way, but he had plenty to do with his own success.


Yes, he was savvy in his rise to fame. He played WB and I love him for it! Its nice to see musicians beat the big boys once in a while. All in all, Prince got a whole career off those fools and by the time they were fed up with him, it was too late because he had a strong fanbase.


[color=red:7d7312f4ee:80a77c1ddf]WB bankrolled him because of his talent.


BULLSHIT.


Now, now, such language! I am shocked a Prince fan would use such language! smile

That was only ONE aspect of they pushed Prince. They DEVELOPED him into a total package. Do you think Prince is the ONLY multi-instrumentalist that has ever approached WB? Prince was an experiment by WB with the "one man band" approach.


Has it ever occurred to you that Prince may have been the best one to build around? And that says what? They bankrolled him because he was the most talented "one-man-band" they had. He wasn't Stevie or Hendrix out the box, but he showed enough to stand out.

As far as I know, they had never tried to do that with anyone else. Believe this, if Prince had the same talent but didn't have the looks he would have been passed over. WB saw a money making opportunity. Merchandising.


As far as I know, WB wanted Prince to be its Stevie Wonder because he had the chops. Sure he was pretty, but if he were pretty and sucked, he wouldn't have lasted too long.

Merchandising may have been a factor, I'm not blind to that. But to say merchandising/marketing was the sole reason is itself, "B.S."

[color=red:7d7312f4ee:80a77c1ddf]He wasn't a creature of a marketing machine. To say otherwise is simply absurd.


MORE BULLSHIT. EVERY artist on a major label is the creature of a marketing machine. The amount of talent the artist has is not as much a factor as you think it is.


Modern music as a whole bears out your point about talent. But for you to presume that the label didn't see the mileage they could get out of Prince's musical potential long-term is, again, "B.S." You yourself said he played WB. He was probably their most problematic artist. Why? Because in your words, he used the label to do things his way.

There is a difference between being a "creature of marketing" and an "artist with stong marketing support." Prince's success would not have come without his talent.
So I disagree with you there.

[b]One of the reasons I liked Prince was because he actually DID have the talent to back up some of the hype, but ALL artists are hyped when they are signed to major labels.


So he was hyped. But do you think WB would hand him the keys to the store if he couldn't play a lick?

Sananda did little to help his own cause despite a promising start. He has not managed his career as shrewdly as Prince did (until the last decade, anyway). He apparently burned a lot of bridges before he made his mark -- whereas Prince made his mark and THEN proceeded to burn every bridge he had.

But I digress. Sananda has therefore not had the type of influence Prince had because he didn't sell many records and the label didn't back him. But, Blaque, let me ask you this question: Whose fault is that? Not yours or mine. It lies with your beloved Sananda.


Yep. It does. He screwed things up for himself.


Okay. Agreed.

But Blaque, he is NOT in the same class as Prince. That dog don't hunt.

We see artists differently. Its all good. I like both these guys.


I don't dislike Sananda. At least he can sing and play. And I don't think his pretentiousness is unique to him. A lot of these talented cats are that way.
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 06/12/03 1:39pm

namepeace

BlaqueKnight said:

Having contempt for their fans isn't a good thing and doesn't excuse the behavior. And you're right - it DOESN'T deter from a musical legacy. I like Sananda even though back in his TTD days when I met him, he was an asshole towards me.


The behavior is inexcusable, but I guess that comes with the territory of being music lovers.
Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 06/12/03 1:50pm

sermwanderer

avatar

I've just discovered TTD, and so far I have found him to be breathtakingly good- much like when I first got into Prince. He is really very good, the only thing you can do is listen to one of his albums and ignore the Prince comparisons- they are really not that similar
“If I can shoot rabbits/then I can shoot fascists”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 06/12/03 1:55pm

Serious

avatar

sermwanderer said:

I've just discovered TTD, and so far I have found him to be breathtakingly good- much like when I first got into Prince. He is really very good, the only thing you can do is listen to one of his albums and ignore the Prince comparisons- they are really not that similar


It's great to see when new people discover TTD's / Sananda's talent. If you want to find out more about him and his music, watch videos of him or listen to free downloads check out his site http://www.sanandapromotion.com/
With a very special thank you to Tina: Is hammer already absolute, how much some people verändern...ICH hope is never so I will be! And if, then I hope that I would then have wen in my environment who joins me in the A....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 06/14/03 4:32pm

sermwanderer

avatar

Serious said:

sermwanderer said:

I've just discovered TTD, and so far I have found him to be breathtakingly good- much like when I first got into Prince. He is really very good, the only thing you can do is listen to one of his albums and ignore the Prince comparisons- they are really not that similar


It's great to see when new people discover TTD's / Sananda's talent. If you want to find out more about him and his music, watch videos of him or listen to free downloads check out his site http://www.sanandapromotion.com/


I did just that and i'm really digging him. His voice is something else, it really is. I am in love with 'As Yet Untitled'
“If I can shoot rabbits/then I can shoot fascists”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 3 <123
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What the hell is so great about TTD?