Author | Message |
Most influential pop music icon: Michael Jackson or Madonna? #TeamMichaelJackson
#TeamMadonna
Join the conversation and vote below
Michael Jackson and Madonna are the crowned King and Queen of Pop. Both legends shaped pop music and influenced generations of artists. MJ's magical dance moves, visually-compelling music videos and showmanship inspired today's top entertainers. Madonna's reinvention, sexual freedom and female empowerment not only pushed boundaries, but helped future pop divas to continue that legacy. While MJ and Madonna proudly earned their honorific titles, who ultimately influenced pop music more? 🎤 👑 Michael and Madonna are among the best-selling artists of all time. It wasn't that uncommon for their paths to cross. In fact, they tried working together. Obviously that didn't happen, but they hung out—as Madonna explained at the 2009 VMAs. She later revealed they also had a brief romance. Though it was understood they were king and queen of pop, they were also fierce competitors.
Both have inspired today's artists, but there can only be one greatest pop music icon of all time.
To be honest, many believe no other music artist will ever accomplish what MJ did—not even Madonna. Back in 2010, The Atlantic writer Hampton Stevens wrote:
If Jackson had only been a great musician who also invented music video, he still wouldn't have mattered as much. Madonna, his only worthy heir, was almost as gifted at communicating an aesthetic on-screen. The aesthetic Jackson communicated, however, was much more powerful, liberating and globally resonant than hers. It was more powerful than what Elvis and Sinatra communicated, too. Hence, that whole "Most Influential Artist" thing.
Madonna cemented her influence on pop music by always controlling the narrative. She always knew what she was doing by pushing the envelope and remaining a controversial figure through her art. And through all that public heat and reinvention, Madonna was able to break down barriers for future artists. Cleveland's Laure DeMarco wrote: Madonna's ability to turn controversy into publicity was never more apparent than with the 1984 release of her second album, "Like a Virgin." It was this release, with the white-lace-clad singer on the cover in a virgin/whore pose and Boy Toy belt, that established Madonna as a superstar. It sold more than 10 million copies worldwide and spawned five Top 10 singles. But more than that, it was the visual and lyrical content that set a successful pattern Madonna has followed through her career: intentionally provoking with a mix of overtly sexual content, religious symbolism and devil-may-care girl-power rebellion. [Edited 3/15/17 16:44pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No doubt Madonna is highly influential (Just like Cher is in some of the things listed) but one thing I do not like is when they list Britney Spears as one of the first/primary examples of Madonnas influence because of how much she ripped off Janet Jackson. You can now look back at all of her tours from when she was the biggest female pop star and maybe only about 10% would be influenced by Madonna. (And that includes stage presence too.) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's not up for debate.Michael is the most popular figure in the history of music (Pop and classical alike). The only one who matches his popularity is either Bob Marley, Mozart, Elvis or The Beatles.And his overall popularity is matched by Jesus's, Mohammed's, Einstein's, Che Guevara's, Hitler's and other globally known figures.He is influential in every aspect. I say this because I actually traveled to a lot of third world countries and the man is just a major thing. He's like sushi. Even the penguins in Antarctica know about MJ and tried at least once in their lives to moonwalk.I'd estimate that 60% of current world population knows about MJ. He's known mostly for being the greatest dancer / entertainer ever lived, then comes Billie Jean's popularity, then his vitiligo and image... plus so many things.Madonna is widely influential but her influence is only big in North America, Europe, Australia, Canada, parts of Asia and that's it really, you don't go to Brazil and see singers impersonating her. You don't go to Sierra Leone and ask someone about her and expect a reaction. Still though, she is a MAJOR FIGURE in pop culture.[Edited 3/15/17 20:39pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is so easy.......Team Prince Is The Most Influential Pop Music Icon
Ok I got that out of my system .......I will say Team MJ because of his longevity and his music/fashion etc influence since his days in the Jackson 5, and as a solo artist. Even Madonna was inspired by him growing up, and did a little tribute to him during the Virgin Tour 1985 (and who by the way sought out his manager Freddy De Mann, the Victory Tour band, and sets to launch her first major tour). So in my eyes MJ is more influential than Madonna (who I also love).
[Edited 3/15/17 20:48pm] [Edited 3/15/17 20:49pm] Keep Calm & Listen To Prince | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This whole thread, concept, question is blasphemous. May the lord strike sense into the lost and delusional. Mj > madonna in all circumstances in all universes in all scenarios. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Musically, neither were very influential.
Madonna influenced and empowered a whole lot more girls/women though, so it's got to be Madonna. She's the one that will be remembered out of the 2 of them. Hamburger, Hot Dog, Root Beer, Pussy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hamburger, Hot Dog, Root Beer, Pussy | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Michael! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
How can you compare the influence of one person who is dead and thus won't be creating any more art, and another person who is still alive and a creative artist?
Also, when people die, we tend to put them on a pedestal and only remember the wonderful things they did and not the albums they released that weren't so good or flopped. Where as with living artists you tend to focus more equally on the things you love and the things you don't like as much that they have done. So I don't think it's fair to compare a dead person to a living person in terms of influence.
And the person who said they aren't Madonna impersonators in Brazil has no clue what they are talking about. Brazil is one of Madonna's biggest markets! When she has toured there she has played in huge stadiums. Her sexuality which is seen as a problem in the US is very much embraced in Brazil. Brazil has many Madonna impersonators! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOST INFLUENTIAL POP MUSIC ICON: . Mr. Dynamite... . Soul Brother Number One... . Mr. Please, Please, Please... . The HARDEST Working Man In Show Business... . The Man With The Crown... . JAAAAAAAAAAAAMES BROWN!!! . . But if the only two choices are MJ or Madge... . No question: Michael | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MJ was bigger at the time, but Madge did it for longer, still going strong long after MJ's star faded. www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaveT said: MJ was bigger at the time, but Madge did it for longer, Interestingly, from which year do you count the chronology? Michael had hit # 1 in 1969, and his last album Invincible was released in 2001. Yes, it was not a huge hit, but Madonna's albums after 2005 are hardly more successful. As far as I know, Michael has many records just for the long time of his popularity. Hits # 1 in 4 decades. Hits top 10 in 5 decades (in 6, if you count his posthumous records too). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Madonna. And I love me some MJ. Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lol.....I can't even take this as a serious question. FOOLS multiply when WISE Men & Women are silent. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaveT said:
Well, for me Madonna's music was interesting from 1986 to 1998, Michael's from 1978 to 1995. ard candy and Mdna are no better than Invincible. So include them in Madonna's run, but not Michael's - biased. And Michael also had "returns". In the mid-70s he was actually written off for retirement, most believed that he was cute boy who ceased to be interesting to the public when he grew up. His albums and singles were not in the top 40 even. But he returned not only his popularity, but also multiplied it many times. But I agree that such topics are full of subjective judgments, so the correct answer to this question does not exist in principle. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree not up for debate. Michael hands down. Without Michael..would have been no Madonna realistically. Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ALthough I am a bigger Prince fan, I respect the work of both. They both are icons, but MJ had a 10-15 year head start (before Madonna's debut).
Had his career ended in the mid 70's, he would have been an icon just for his J5 work alone. He entered another stratosphere with his solo career. If his career ended at ANY point in his classic solo era (78-91/92), he STILL would be the icon. Classic albums, great dancer/vocalist and globally recognized, he was the best all around entertainer/showman I have seen in my lifetime (IMO).
Madonna is iconic as well. Her material during the 80's is classic pop and as mentioned before, she always controlled the narrative of her career, a pop provacateur who was shameless and unapologetic in her work. For me, her icon status is due to her attitude/style above the music more so. Don't get me wrong, LOVE her music, but her personality was much more assertive over a longer period of time and when combined with her ability to stay current musically, she has had a solid run as an icon.
Much respect to both, just wishing MJ (and Prince )were still with us creating art.
"Old man's gotta be the old man. Fish has got to be the fish." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Of course he was, he is still after almost a century. I love both of them, but it's going to be Michael Jackson always. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Unfortunately i have to say you're right about this. After Bad his live performances became the same, over and over again. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
[Edited 3/17/17 2:33am] www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Glindathegood said: How can you compare the influence of one person who is dead and thus won't be creating any more art, and another person who is still alive and a creative artist?
Also, when people die, we tend to put them on a pedestal and only remember the wonderful things they did and not the albums they released that weren't so good or flopped. Where as with living artists you tend to focus more equally on the things you love and the things you don't like as much that they have done. So I don't think it's fair to compare a dead person to a living person in terms of influence.
And the person who said they aren't Madonna impersonators in Brazil has no clue what they are talking about. Brazil is one of Madonna's biggest markets! When she has toured there she has played in huge stadiums. Her sexuality which is seen as a problem in the US is very much embraced in Brazil. Brazil has many Madonna impersonators! That said, both are hugely influential. Not necessarily on a musical level but still in many relations to music, specifically how music is packaged. Just about every major female performer after Madonna has cited her as an inspiration and even those that don't still subconsciously display her influence in some way within their own work. It would be foolish to say Mike wasn't a massive influence himself as there are many male and female singers who cite him as an influence or show shades of him in what they do. Madonna, even if she took more from Prince still took a page or so from MJ's book and that certainly counts for something. Michael wasn't the first megastar, Elvis was but he surpassed the mostly American-based Elvis by quite a wide margin as he had a global outreach no solo star before or after him has attained. Even compared to the more similarly popular Beatles, Michael had a wider variety of fans. Also, his solo success greatly trumps that of each individual Beatle member. I want to give it to MJ but at the same time, I can't just sign off on that without some reluctance reading the points some are presenting here. Part of me goes with Madonna for being the most recognizable female artist in history (as well as what was stated above) and MJ for the reasons stated above. However, MJ's live performances while great, we basically rehashes with little variation and as (one of) the grratest live act(s) of all time, it is disappointing that he wasn't more spontaneous. However, one could argue that him bringing his music videos to the live stage was a spectacle at the time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I really can't see how Madonna is the answer here. I'll leave this here. How many females have been influenced by Michael? Now ask yourself how mane males have been influenced by Madonna? PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever ----- Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Females influenced by MJ - None that I know of. I knew a couple of guys growing up who tried to imitate his style but no ladies. www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaveT said:
Females influenced by MJ - None that I know of. I knew a couple of guys growing up who tried to imitate his style but no ladies. There are acts out there who Prince influenced but they don't dress like he did or make the same music. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Agreed. DaveT doesn't make an unreasonable argument, just an overly broad one. Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DaveT said:
Elvis is the first ever megastar and he owns his place in history but he's since been surpassed by Michael. MJ was influenced by Elvis who himself, was influenced by black artists so you can say it worked itself back around. MJ's appeal was also far broader than Elvis' was. [Edited 3/17/17 8:25am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That's not being influenced, that is being a fan. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |