independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Gustav Mahler No. 3...
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 06/13/16 1:49pm

Genesia

avatar

Gustav Mahler No. 3...

...is a 98-minute hot mess. It does not "jam" - on the box or otherwise.

We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 06/13/16 2:07pm

SPYZFAN1

Question...Are you listening to the symphonic version? If so, yes it's a bit outside the box. I was never crazy about his symphonic covers. His music covered by piano quartets is pretty amazing..I enjoy his music more that way..very dynamic and almost "heavy metal" in a weird sense.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 06/13/16 2:24pm

Genesia

avatar

SPYZFAN1 said:

Question...Are you listening to the symphonic version? If so, yes it's a bit outside the box. I was never crazy about his symphonic covers. His music covered by piano quartets is pretty amazing..I enjoy his music more that way..very dynamic and almost "heavy metal" in a weird sense.


Well, yeah - it's a symphony, so that's how I'm listening to it.

I mean...I love No. 5. That adagio... faint No. 9 is pretty good, too.

But 3 is just waaaaayyyyyy out there. Six movements?! With those strident vocals and bells in the fifth movement? It's just...odd.

We don’t mourn artists because we knew them. We mourn them because they helped us know ourselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 06/13/16 2:33pm

SPYZFAN1

lol..I think many of the composers back then wanted to out do each other. The more crazier, the better.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 06/13/16 3:20pm

KoolEaze

avatar

Genesia said:

...is a 98-minute hot mess. It does not "jam" - on the box or otherwise.

I bought that record just because of Prince.

Went home.

Put the vinyl on the record player....turned up the volume....couldn´t get into it.

Haven´t listened to it since.

wink

It definitely did not "jam" on my box ....at all.

Maybe I should give it another listen, it´s been almost three decades.

" I´d rather be a stank ass hoe because I´m not stupid. Oh my goodness! I got more drugs! I´m always funny dude...I´m hilarious! Are we gonna smoke?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 06/13/16 7:28pm

steakfinger

Genesia said:

...is a 98-minute hot mess. It does not "jam" - on the box or otherwise.

I agree. 5 is good, though.

[Edited 6/13/16 19:29pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 06/13/16 10:26pm

langebleu

avatar

moderator

SPYZFAN1 said:

His music covered by piano quartets is pretty amazing.


He only wrote one piano quartet at the beginning of his career, and that was unfinished.
ALT+PLS+RTN: Pure as a pane of ice. It's a gift.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 06/14/16 3:59am

NikkiH

Genesia said:

SPYZFAN1 said:

Question...Are you listening to the symphonic version? If so, yes it's a bit outside the box. I was never crazy about his symphonic covers. His music covered by piano quartets is pretty amazing..I enjoy his music more that way..very dynamic and almost "heavy metal" in a weird sense.


Well, yeah - it's a symphony, so that's how I'm listening to it.

I mean...I love No. 5. That adagio... faint No. 9 is pretty good, too.

But 3 is just waaaaayyyyyy out there. Six movements?! With those strident vocals and bells in the fifth movement? It's just...odd.

I'm not the biggest fan of the 3rd either, it's SO LONG. But I love the vocal parts, I also love Mahler's lieder though. When I was still doing the opera thing, I performed the Ruckert Lieder in my junior recital and the Kindertotenlieder in my senior recital.

But man that 5th Adagietto!!!!!! One of my favorite pieces of all time. I love a composer/conductor though biggrin

Bernstein loved him some Mahler and I love them both.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 06/14/16 8:05am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

You know that was Prince's favorite composer?

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 06/14/16 10:53am

langebleu

avatar

moderator

NikkiH said:

I also love Mahler's lieder though. When I was still doing the opera thing, I performed the Ruckert Lieder in my junior recital and the Kindertotenlieder in my senior recital.


I agree, I think the Lieder are very interesting.

ALT+PLS+RTN: Pure as a pane of ice. It's a gift.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 06/14/16 12:59pm

duccichucka

I haven't really sat down to purposefully listen to Mahler's work to have an intelligent
opinion on his compositional skills, but I am so happy to see a classical music thread!

Mozart...sigh...so beautiful. I have Beethoven's Pathetique Sonata and am learning
to play the second movement. I think its main theme is the loveliest I've ever heard.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 06/14/16 9:03pm

NikkiH

2freaky4church1 said:

You know that was Prince's favorite composer?

He loved Debussy too. And so do I. I feel like everyone likes impressionism though...it's sort of the "safe" classical for modern musicians I think. As odd as that sounds.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 06/15/16 4:04am

duccichucka

NikkiH said:

2freaky4church1 said:

You know that was Prince's favorite composer?

He loved Debussy too. And so do I. I feel like everyone likes impressionism though...it's sort of the "safe" classical for modern musicians I think. As odd as that sounds.


It's not odd at all. 21st century ears are more accustomed to the chromaticism of Debussy,
Ravel, Dukas, et. al., than they are with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, et. al. who weren't so
concerned with atonality.

The former starts with Wagner's "Tristan chord" yet Debussy did not consider himself to be an
impressionist.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 06/15/16 10:19am

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Debussy has a Prince like hum.

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 06/15/16 10:59am

thetimefan

avatar

Interestingly Frank Zappa was heavily influenced by Edgar Varese and Frank was very much the Prince of his time, he was continually writing and recording, pioneer in terms of technology, had protege acts, created alter egos (Reuben and the Jets for example), did songs and albums which didn't fit just one genre and was a great guitarist. Speaking of which I've read Frank liked Prince but did P ever speak about Frank Zappa and was he an influence on him?.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 06/15/16 9:51pm

NikkiH

duccichucka said:

NikkiH said:

He loved Debussy too. And so do I. I feel like everyone likes impressionism though...it's sort of the "safe" classical for modern musicians I think. As odd as that sounds.


It's not odd at all. 21st century ears are more accustomed to the chromaticism of Debussy,
Ravel, Dukas, et. al., than they are with Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, et. al. who weren't so
concerned with atonality.

The former starts with Wagner's "Tristan chord" yet Debussy did not consider himself to be an
impressionist.

Yeah, Ravel didn't consider himself one either but it's way easier to say "impressionist" than "late Romantic/Early 20th century composers from France that used global influences in their own distinct Western Art Music sound." lol I'll never be a Wagner woman, but of course I have to appreciate him for pushing art music forward so that the composers that came after weren't too afraid to push the envelope. I'll never be a fan of Schoenberg/2nd Viennese school either (sprechstimme is so grating)but I will always respect their art. Someone else I feel is left out of the "tonality" convo too often is Ives. He was pushing boundaries way earlier than most. I love Ives.



[Edited 6/16/16 11:20am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 06/15/16 11:52pm

Germanegro

avatar

It was Prince's mention in the song "Good Love" of that symphony that brought my attention to Mahler the composer. I'll have to listen to this again soon--my first impression hearing was that it seemed quite dynamic but I never really revisited it much to gain any deeper impressions from the music.

LOL on the OP's take and I can sympathize--sometimes it takes more than a few listens to understand what's happening with a sound beyond some technical aspect, but there is likely a story at hand!

I never learned of the kind of classical music Prince had gotten into, that not really being his focus in performance, but inspiration can strike from many a direction and I'm sure there were some classical works that caught his attention, being such a musical one.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 06/16/16 10:11am

duccichucka

NikkiH said:

Someone else I feel is left out of the "tonality" convo too often is Ives. He was pushing boundaries way earlier than most. I love Ives.



HEYO!

Me too! American composers are pretty damn good.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 06/16/16 6:33pm

Jon1967

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Gustav Mahler No. 3...