independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Little Richard - I Don't Know What You Got (But It's Got Me)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/17/12 9:44pm

Timmy84

Little Richard - I Don't Know What You Got (But It's Got Me)

Jimi's on this (guitar) as is Don Covay (background vocalist) and Billy Preston (organ). Released on Vee-Jay Records. Dig Richard preaching in the middle of this.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/17/12 9:57pm

Gunsnhalen

Pure blues amazingness cool

Pistols sounded like "Fuck off," wheras The Clash sounded like "Fuck Off, but here's why.."- Thedigitialgardener

All music is shit music and no music is real- gunsnhalen

Datdonkeydick- Asherfierce

Gary Hunts Album Isn't That Good- Soulalive
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/18/12 1:08pm

rialb

avatar

This should have been a big hit, at least on the "black" chart. This song is proof that he was perfectly capable of recording contemporary R & B music and that he wasn't just an "oldies" act.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/18/12 1:23pm

Timmy84

rialb said:

This should have been a big hit, at least on the "black" chart. This song is proof that he was perfectly capable of recording contemporary R & B music and that he wasn't just an "oldies" act.

It peaked at No. 12 on the R&B charts. I think the biggest problem is he released it on a label that was about to go bankrupt (Vee-Jay).

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/18/12 1:31pm

Graycap23

Nice.......never heard that one.

Thanks.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/19/12 2:04am

rialb

avatar

Timmy84 said:

rialb said:

This should have been a big hit, at least on the "black" chart. This song is proof that he was perfectly capable of recording contemporary R & B music and that he wasn't just an "oldies" act.

It peaked at No. 12 on the R&B charts. I think the biggest problem is he released it on a label that was about to go bankrupt (Vee-Jay).

I was not aware of that. lol I guess that it was a fairly sizable hit but like everything he recorded after the fifties it is overshadowed by his early material.

I think that he had trouble finding good/great songs to record in the sixties/seventies but when he was given a good song he could still deliver a great performance. It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if he recorded for Stax. He may have been a little too raw for Motown but maybe that partnership could have worked.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/19/12 8:15am

Milty

avatar

whoa. this is AWESOME.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/19/12 9:50am

Timmy84

rialb said:

Timmy84 said:

It peaked at No. 12 on the R&B charts. I think the biggest problem is he released it on a label that was about to go bankrupt (Vee-Jay).

I was not aware of that. lol I guess that it was a fairly sizable hit but like everything he recorded after the fifties it is overshadowed by his early material.

I think that he had trouble finding good/great songs to record in the sixties/seventies but when he was given a good song he could still deliver a great performance. It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if he recorded for Stax. He may have been a little too raw for Motown but maybe that partnership could have worked.

I think it was because producers didn't know what to do with him. They weren't the genius type producers that Robert "Bumps" Blackwell had been for Richard. It also had to do with changing times. It's a miracle a rock and roll song like "Bama Lama Bama Loo", for instance, made it to 82 on the pop chart (the R&B chart was taken out briefly when it charted but Billboard has put the song at 82 on its historic archives). Like I said, if this song had gotten better promotion (like if he had released it on Stax or Atlantic), then he would've had a great comeback as a bluesy soul artist. Another issue is people were trying to make Richard someone else. He complained once that Vee-Jay had tried to get him to do the same type of modern R&B productions as his fellow Georgia rocker James Brown. Richard reportedly asked them, "don't you know who I am?" Not in an arrogant, braggadocious matter, but in a sad, almost melancholy way because he felt Vee-Jay had totally forgot who he really was. The only guy who truly understood him musically was his old Specialty label mate Larry Williams and they began working together shortly after this song came out. It was because of Larry that Richard at least got some mainstream popularity again as a flamboyant live performer.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/19/12 9:51am

Timmy84

^ Forgot to add: and his flamboyance during this period - including blond wigs - didn't help matters either. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/19/12 10:11am

iaminparties

avatar

Timmy84 said:

^ Forgot to add: and his flamboyance during this period - including blond wigs - didn't help matters either. lol

His weirdnes scared off some black folks.

2014-Year of the Parties
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Little Richard - I Don't Know What You Got (But It's Got Me)