ViintageJunkiie said:

SOME of y'all are too old to be trying to belittle a 13 year old girl and accuse her family of "whoring" her around. Then bringing up the child's racial background. The kid went to a Chris Brown concert and had a good time...Move on

THANK YOU!!!! I was beginning to think everybody on this thread was crazy!!! Lord.......

Timmy84 said:

Don't worry paris has nothing to worry about anyway

[img:$uid]http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r67/babybugz10457/Whatyoutryingtotelluschris.jpg[/img:$uid]

I don't think he's interested

NewPowerSista said:

ViintageJunkiie said:

SOME of y'all are too old to be trying to belittle a 13 year old girl and accuse her family of "whoring" her around. Then bringing up the child's racial background. The kid went to a Chris Brown concert and had a good time...Move on

THANK YOU!!!! I was beginning to think everybody on this thread was crazy!!! Lord.......

......And that surprises you?!? THIS is prince.org! Some orgers going total apeshit is the norm on this site.

Terrib3Towel said:

Timmy84 said:

People acting like fools in here over some kid that ain't theirs.

It's sad, really. No telling what the nutjob fans over at the MJ forums are saying about this. They're probably ready to perform some sort of resurrection of MJ, I can only imagine lol.

They're saying the same thing most are saying in this thread

NewPowerSista said:

ViintageJunkiie said:

SOME of y'all are too old to be trying to belittle a 13 year old girl and accuse her family of "whoring" her around. Then bringing up the child's racial background. The kid went to a Chris Brown concert and had a good time...Move on

THANK YOU!!!! I was beginning to think everybody on this thread was crazy!!! Lord.......

well......

If Michael was alive, I don't think he would have liked his kids being publicized the way its happening now. He did so much to protect them from the papz.

But obviously- its life and you have to accept it.

lowkey said:

kibbles said:

you always COMPLETELY IGNORE information that has spoon fed to you about the jacksons' avarice and dirty dealing vis a vis these kids, even in so-called "innocent" situations like the oprah interview, so i don't even know why you bother to state that. the jacksons could literally parade them around naked in the street and you would find an excuse to defend their actions.

also, even you admit that when mj was alive, they weren't all up in the cameras like they are now. why is that? did the internet and social network just get invented on june 25, 2009? i don't see madonna's daughter followed around the way paris is. madonna is just as famous as mj; how is it she's been able to clamp down on all this shit? yes, there are a few shots of lola every now and again, but it is nowhere near the level of what's going on with paris. and don't say it's b/c mj is dead and there's greater interest. the papparazi could have all the interest they want; the jacksons don't have to acquiesce.

i dont ignore no dirty dealing i just dont see it going on like some of you claim. so paris going to a concert is bad because? and when mj was alive they wasnt all over because NOBODY CARED, they were still looked at as some kinda lil freaks with masks when he was alive and you know it. why would you bring up madonna's kid when the girl has her own business, she writes her own blog. mj's fans want his kids to be locked away in a magic castle surrounded by their daddy's pictures and videos and basically sit up on this pedastal that they didnt ask to be on, they are not michael and never will be, the fans are not responsible for them.

1. of course you don't see dirty dealing because as i said, you choose to ignore it.

2. if you read my post, i never said paris going to a concert was bad. in fact, i brought up the fact that mj of all people would have understood teenage girls and their teen idol crushes. i stated that the masks would have been off by now, but that they would still have their private lives. mj wouldn't selling up tidbits about them to the press. his oxford university speech said it all.

3. give me a break. people were always curious about mj's kids, but mj did little to sate their purient interest. i have read the comments of several posters at other sites when there is a topic about the kids. the overwhelming majority of these posters always cite the masks as proof of mj's desire to protect of his kids; i've never seen them referred to as "lil freaks". extreme situations often call for extreme measures. i only see praise from these posters, as they know the masks were only mj's attempt to do whatever he could to protect his kids. why don't you understand that? moreover, you are in the minority in believing that what his family is now doing with these kids. most people are saddened by what they're seeing.

4. lola may have her own blog related to her business, but her activities vis a vis that business do not extend to her interacting with lowlifes on twitter who are able to tweet her inappropriate pictures of her mother or being able to get near enough to her to say or do anything of that nature. this isn't about locking mj's kids away. it's about the sadness of seeing them exposed in a way that would make any parent, mj or not, be concerned.

5. like a stopped clock that's right twice a day, you actually make cogent point. the kids aren't mj. they did not ask to be mj's kids or live in his shadow or be put on a pedastal. so the why the fuck is his family parading them around dressed like mj, asking them to front dodgy concerts and even dodgier "business opportunities" in their father's name? why are paris and prince out signing autographs as if they've done anything to earn that level of notoriety? they have their own lives to live, so why is the family trying to push them into mj's shoes? that's a rhetorical question, see #1.

I think its cute- she had a good time with her girlfriends- they had their hair and nails done- super cute. Good for her!!!

Use MJ sticky, thanks.