| Author | Message |
Will Madonna Be A Bigger Historical Figure Than Elvis? When she's gone.
Thoughts??? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I honestly don't know. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Take a guess Tim. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't think she'll replace Elvis, but will she be remembered on a wide scale? Yeah. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well, Madonna will always be the standard to compare female pop artists to...
So I guess...
~Time Spent Learning is a Time Never Wasted~
~They say the skies the limit And to me that's really true But my friend you have seen nothing Just wait till I get through~ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
She's a pretty big figure, maybe a bigger worldwide celebrity, but did she create a sensation like he did? She did not sell as many records or make as many movies.
I am also trying to rememeber any single moment of hers that us burned into my brain as part of eternal pop culture, and I can't really think of any. I have a lot of memories of her, but none of them are particularly classic, defining moments. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Exactly plus the times Elvis came on the scene and Madonna's were quite different. Elvis came at a time when America was basically apple pies and bright white teeth. Elvis had a lot of things against him in the media when he first came out.
Madonna could never be seen in the same way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I doubt it. Female performers in general aren't given the same kind of recognition as male acts and are not taken as seriously. But that is how it goes in society, not just entertainment. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
the way mj, elvis and beatles are the biggest historical figures in the music industry, madonna will be that on the female side | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yeah you could argue that Madonna pushed things in a certain direction culturally, especially for women, but the model for pop star had already been set years before.
That is actually what is so amazing about Michael Jackson's popularity, he was able to be such a sensation after it had already been done by Elvis & the Beatles, and without being shocking or particularly controversial (not in 1983 at least)
But I'm biased. I like M okay, but to me she lacks that special whatever that makes a MJ, Beatles, or Elvis [read "crazy amount of talent & charisma" My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
But he didn't sell out as many stadiums around the world the way she did either. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That don't matter. Plus it was two different climates. Madonna emerged at a time when rock stars like the Rolling Stones were filling out stadiums so it was actually a current phenomenon. In HIS heyday, he was the biggest star there was. We're talking about a totally DIFFERENT time. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He also has 23 studio albums, 11 compilations, 7 live albums, and 19 soundtracks compared to her 11 studio albums, 6 compilations, 3 live albums, and 3 live albums. The ratio is a little lopsided.
Plus she hasn't benefited from a death. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The touring market was not the same in Elvis day. It was small, and most acts appeared on package tours and sang 2 or 3 songs, whatever their popular hits were. Tours as a big thing didn't really happen until the 1970's. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
true, but a lot of people have sold out stadiums and not been big historical figures. I don't see Justin Bieber being a big historical figure or even Justin Timberlake. Oasis might have played more stadiums than the Beatles at this point.
But she is a long lasting international popular star. Maybe what you're saying is right, and she is more well known around the world. Time will tell. I don't think so personally, but it's possible My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Not necessarily, but she's already the most famous female act of all time, only Ella and Aretha are as famous as her (nearly...)
I think, anyway, that she's in in the group of most famous popular artists of all time
Elvis, Beatles, MJ, Madonna, Stones, Nirvana, U2, Eagles, Stevie Wonder, Sinatra, Bowie, James Brown, Zeppelin, or even Prince lol ...
[Edited 12/6/10 17:59pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He didn't either, but yeah I know what you're saying and I agree. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Like I said think back to HIS time and HER time.
In HIS time, albums were put out every year, so were compilations. It was to continue the brand. And the brand continued after his death. His estate kept re-releasing albums and the label kept ordering shipments to bring interest.
With Madonna, she had "event albums" where almost every album had three or four or five hit singles off it. Most of Elvis' hits weren't featured on his studio albums. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think Aretha will become (or has already become) the most important female music act of all time. Madonna will be there mainly as an all-around entertainer (same with Diana Ross). [Edited 12/6/10 17:55pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
When I think of a historical figure I think they need to have done something that stands the test of time
Marilyn Monroe is still gorgeous despite her bad hair Elvis is insanely handsome & was a great performer and to many (maybe unfairly) represents the birth of rock & roll Beatles have an amazing group of songs MJ danced in a way that seemed nearly impossible
What has Madonna actually done? My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My dad thinks Diana is the biggest female artist of all time. We always argue about it. He grew up during the era so that's probably his chief reason. I say Madonna but he seriously thinks Diana is unrivaled. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
First female superstar...
also, she pretty much defined the decade: if you ask a random guy: what do you remember about 80s music? "ehh, Michael and Madonna?"
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
In a way he could be right. Her role in the Supremes is almost enough to assure that she was someone made a huge impact. No other black group before the Supremes dominated the charts like they did. Then Diana as a solo act did some amazing things in her career. She was indeed the biggest all-around female act (after Barbra Streisand) until Madonna came into the picture. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
She'll probably be remembered most for her music videos I think. Her material (similar to Michael Jackson) is tied to the video era of the 80s, 90s, etc unlike the Beatles & Elvis. They were before the revolution. You know it's not just 'Like A Prayer' the song. It's the song AND the video. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's interesting you said this, rather than she's remembered for her movies and acting. That's basically what the general public thinks about her. She's an image to be sold. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree--for those of us that were there. I just wonder if Borderline or Vogue are getting new fans today like Heartbreak Hotel or Can't Help Falling In Love (or like Purple Rain, for that matter--certainly Madonna eclipsed Prince's popularity, but his music will be re-discovered IMO)
Are her actual creations timeless?
The most lasting thing that she has done seems to me to be some of her photographs, the way she incorporated S&M or really naughty things with the sexy Marilyn style.
But her singing, dancing, and acting seem to be decent, but not timeless & worthy of historical preservation. [Edited 12/6/10 18:09pm] My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yes totally, and I think that to a lesser degree about Elvis. I also think that that could be true for Madonna (more than for her music).
The question is, is her image as iconic as Elvis or Marilyn? My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Marilyn hated to be referred as a sex symbol and spent like seven years trying to fight off that image that was portrayed on "The Seven-Year Itch" and "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes" films. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Like I said, different times. But it's kinda like Michael, they would be compared to them and Michael may be the only one to hold up against Elvis and the Beatles but I don't know if they'll make that connection with Madonna. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |