independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MICHAEL JACKSON RIP (Part 7)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 55 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 07/08/09 5:00pm

Timmy84

suga10 said:

Klein is trying to say he's not the kids father, yet at the same time he's suggesting that he is related to them- by giving a photo of him and MJ and the children.

Another jerk trying to cash in on MJ's death. mad
[Edited 7/8/09 16:57pm]


I thought I was the only one who thought that. I do believe he may be their biological dad but he should be nowhere near the kids especially if he's forced to take a DNA test and it IS proven he is their father but he tells the media he's not. rolleyes That's disrespect to MJ and the kids.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 07/08/09 5:01pm

Timmy84

thesexofit said:


OK, the grammy pic with Collins and Lional I posted above is nice I think, but this is just bizarre. Dylan is posing bigtime whilst Willie Nelson looks pasted in. Bruce looks uncomfortable LOL



And Tina's like "can we get this over with? I gotta go to Mick Jagger's party. yawn "

lol
[Edited 7/8/09 17:01pm]
[Edited 7/8/09 17:02pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 07/08/09 5:06pm

missfee

avatar

Timmy84 said:

thesexofit said:


OK, the grammy pic with Collins and Lional I posted above is nice I think, but this is just bizarre. Dylan is posing bigtime whilst Willie Nelson looks pasted in. Bruce looks uncomfortable LOL



And Tina's like "can we get this over with? I gotta go to Mick Jagger's party. yawn "

lol
[Edited 7/8/09 17:01pm]
[Edited 7/8/09 17:02pm]

damn Tina's looking kind of rough on that cover.
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 07/08/09 5:07pm

thesexofit

avatar

Timmy84 said:

thesexofit said:


OK, the grammy pic with Collins and Lional I posted above is nice I think, but this is just bizarre. Dylan is posing bigtime whilst Willie Nelson looks pasted in. Bruce looks uncomfortable LOL



And Tina's like "can we get this over with? I gotta go to Mick Jagger's party. yawn "

lol
[Edited 7/8/09 17:01pm]
[Edited 7/8/09 17:02pm]


Yes, Iam not sure what Tina is doing LOL. Maybe she's just tired. Lional pulls if off though. Damn that Lional mad lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 07/08/09 5:07pm

Timmy84

thesexofit said:

Timmy84 said:



And Tina's like "can we get this over with? I gotta go to Mick Jagger's party. yawn "

lol
[Edited 7/8/09 17:01pm]
[Edited 7/8/09 17:02pm]


Yes, Iam not sure what Tina is doing LOL. Maybe she's just tired. Lional pulls if off though. Damn that Lional mad lol


Tina IS tired, look at her expression. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 07/08/09 5:10pm

thesexofit

avatar

Timmy84 said:

thesexofit said:



Yes, Iam not sure what Tina is doing LOL. Maybe she's just tired. Lional pulls if off though. Damn that Lional mad lol


Tina IS tired, look at her expression. lol



Yeah LOL. Is that Tina's hand on Bruce's shoulder? I cant imagine Dylan doing such a thing? Whoever's hand it is Bruce wants none of it lol Michael ain't even looking at the right camera LOL.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 07/08/09 5:13pm

Timmy84

thesexofit said:

Timmy84 said:



Tina IS tired, look at her expression. lol



Yeah LOL. Is that Tina's hand on Bruce's shoulder? I cant imagine Dylan doing such a thing? Whoever's hand it is Bruce wants none of it lol Michael ain't even looking at the right camera LOL.


Yeah but Bruce has that weird look, you know how they take photos, some just end up looking weird. lol
[Edited 7/8/09 17:14pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 07/08/09 5:15pm

Evvy

avatar

Timmy84 said:

suga10 said:

Klein is trying to say he's not the kids father, yet at the same time he's suggesting that he is related to them- by giving a photo of him and MJ and the children.

Another jerk trying to cash in on MJ's death. mad
[Edited 7/8/09 16:57pm]


I thought I was the only one who thought that. I do believe he may be their biological dad but he should be nowhere near the kids especially if he's forced to take a DNA test and it IS proven he is their father but he tells the media he's not. rolleyes That's disrespect to MJ and the kids.


Jerry: Klein you are NOT the father.

and he reminds me of that dude who was trying to sell the dino eggs in the original Jurassic Park movie
LOVE HARD.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 07/08/09 5:15pm

missfee

avatar

Timmy84 said:

thesexofit said:



Yes, Iam not sure what Tina is doing LOL. Maybe she's just tired. Lional pulls if off though. Damn that Lional mad lol


Tina IS tired, look at her expression. lol

Shit Michael probably had them up all night in that damn studio trying to get the song right. They was probably pissed at his ass..... lol Gotta love Mike but ya'll know he was a dire perfectionist. nod
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 07/08/09 5:16pm

dreamfactory31
3

It was Christmas 1988. I was 9 years old and this was my favorite present of all, given to me by grandmother. I must have read it cover to cover at least 100x. This was the first autobiography that I ever read on my own.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 07/08/09 5:17pm

missfee

avatar

dreamfactory313 said:

It was Christmas 1988. I was 9 years old and this was my favorite present of all, given to me by grandmother. I must have read it cover to cover at least 100x. This was the first autobiography that I ever read on my own.


aww shucks, I remember seeing this book cover, my mom has this book, I had forgotten all about it!
I will forever love and miss you...my sweet Prince.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 07/08/09 5:20pm

sunsetdriver19
99

Klein? The biological dad? LOL....please.

I don't like discussing the kids, biology, but I must rebut this bullshit.

If someone posted ANY white man, with Michael's kids, they'd agree that he "could" be the dad. Michael visited many people, not all are his kids "donors". The kids in no way, look 100 percent white. If people believe Michael wasn't the father, they should be looking toward someone of some type of color.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 07/08/09 5:20pm

kibbles

Timmy84 said:

suga10 said:

Klein is trying to say he's not the kids father, yet at the same time he's suggesting that he is related to them- by giving a photo of him and MJ and the children.

Another jerk trying to cash in on MJ's death. mad
[Edited 7/8/09 16:57pm]


I thought I was the only one who thought that. I do believe he may be their biological dad but he should be nowhere near the kids especially if he's forced to take a DNA test and it IS proven he is their father but he tells the media he's not. rolleyes That's disrespect to MJ and the kids.


there will be a dna test because debbie is going to try to get those kids. if they're not mj's blood, regardless of the fact that he's the only parent who's raised them, they're going to hers if she wants them. they must be the doctor's; otherwise, why is he being so evasive? why would he be even saying 'to the best of his knowledge' he's not the father? diane sawyer is a really shitty interviewer; the next question out of my mouth would have been 'what the hell is that supposed to mean'? you should know whether you're the father, a**hole.

even though people adopt everyday, and no one questions whether they are the parents to their adopted kids, and rich whites adopt across racial lines all the time, don't look for that to apply here. look for the double standard. if those kids are 100% white, and not at all related to mj, they're going to debbie. i suppose the jacksons could argue that if she gets them, then she can't make a claim on the estate; that she can't have it both ways.

that's my two cents.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 07/08/09 5:23pm

thesexofit

avatar

Timmy84 said:

thesexofit said:




Yeah LOL. Is that Tina's hand on Bruce's shoulder? I cant imagine Dylan doing such a thing? Whoever's hand it is Bruce wants none of it lol Michael ain't even looking at the right camera LOL.


Yeah but Bruce has that weird look, you know how they take photos, some just end up looking weird. lol
[Edited 7/8/09 17:14pm]


Don't get me started on bad photo's LOL. Iam the king of them. Theres one with me and some collegues posted at work and I look dreadful. If I pose it looks awful, if I cant be bothered to pose I look awful, if I pull a funny face I just look stupid aswell as awful. Lional is probably one of those guys you just cant take a bad pic of.

Michaels "moonwalk" autobiography LOL. Its nice and all, but you know its sugar coated as hell. Heck Mike was so busy around 1987/1988 theres no way he could of written every word even.

I still remember how he glosses over the "victory" tour, saying it was merely nice to performing with his brothers again. Whilst not fact, it seems quite well known that none of those brothers got on well on that tour. Jermaine mentions something nice about it on the linear notes of his "precious moments" album in 1986, so maybe Jermaine enjoyed it as it was his first time back in the group for nearly a decade, but Mike enjoying it? Not likely.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 07/08/09 5:23pm

sunsetdriver19
99

No way they are going to Debbie.

Some people simply believe white is right, and go toward it.

if Blanket's mom, came out of nowhere and said she'd like Blanket now, and the other two, would ANYONE think that was a good idea? NO.

Debbie Rowe, will back down, as she always backs down, because she KNOWS what will come out if she tries for custody.

There is absolutely no way, the children will be taken from the Jackson family, and it doesn't matter how many liars come forward claiming to be their father, or how much Debbie Rowe cries to the white media..or how much people try to use their hue to rip them from their family...

No way, no how. And anyone who thinks the Debbie, and a simply white man created those kids is deluded....there will be dozens of more stories, with people trying to cash in on this story...
[Edited 7/8/09 17:27pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 07/08/09 5:25pm

Evvy

avatar

kibbles said:

Timmy84 said:



I thought I was the only one who thought that. I do believe he may be their biological dad but he should be nowhere near the kids especially if he's forced to take a DNA test and it IS proven he is their father but he tells the media he's not. rolleyes That's disrespect to MJ and the kids.


there will be a dna test because debbie is going to try to get those kids. if they're not mj's blood, regardless of the fact that he's the only parent who's raised them, they're going to hers if she wants them. they must be the doctor's; otherwise, why is he being so evasive? why would he be even saying 'to the best of his knowledge' he's not the father? diane sawyer is a really shitty interviewer; the next question out of my mouth would have been 'what the hell is that supposed to mean'? you should know whether you're the father, a**hole.

even though people adopt everyday, and no one questions whether they are the parents to their adopted kids, and rich whites adopt across racial lines all the time, don't look for that to apply here. look for the double standard. if those kids are 100% white, and not at all related to mj, they're going to debbie. i suppose the jacksons could argue that if she gets them, then she can't make a claim on the estate; that she can't have it both ways.

that's my two cents.


he was just being an ass and hinting that he and Debbie were hittin it....
LOVE HARD.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 07/08/09 5:29pm

cdcgold




and


http://www.nydailynews.co...ldren.html

Michael Jackson's doctor Arnold Klein denies he fathered King of Pop's kids Paris and Prince Michael

BY Rich Schapiro
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Wednesday, July 8th 2009, 10:53 AM
ABC News

Dr. Arnold Klein, Michael Jackson's dermotologist, said that he is not the father of Jackson's two oldest kids, Paris and Prince Michael Jackson (below).
Terrill/AP
Take our Poll
King of Pop's kids

Who do you think should retain custody of Michael Jackson's kids?

Michael Jackson's mother. She's shown the most interest.

Their biological mother. They're her children.

None of the above.

I can't say.
Related News
Articles

* Michael Jackson mourned by family, stars
* Where is Jackson's body?
* King of Pop on top as 6 albums hit charts
* Molloy: The day the music cried
* Daly: King of Pop's little princess brave in spotlight
* Paris' tears saved memorial from becoming too much of a show
* 'I'll be there' - to remember Michael - was fans' mission
* Jackson doc denies he fathered 2 of King of Pop's kids

Michael Jackson's longtime dermatologist broke his silence Wednesday, offering a carefully worded denial that he fathered two of the pop icon's children.

"To the best of my knowledge, I am not the father of these children," Dr. Arnold Klein told ABC News' "Good Morning America" Wednesday.

"I can't answer it in any other way. I don't want to feed any of this insanity that is going around."

Klein spoke almost a week after a report surfaced alleging that the celebrity skin doc sired Jackson's son Prince Michael, 12, and daughter, Paris Michael, 11.

Us Weekly, quoting anonymous sources, said Klein - not Jackson - acted as the sperm donor for surrogate mom Debbie Rowe, who was an assistant to the LA-based doctor at the time.

In the days since Jackson's stunning death on June 25, Klein's name also surfaced in more ominous reports naming him as one of the doctors being investigated for prescribing the pop legend powerful sedatives.

Investigators discovered Diprivan, a dangerous drug administered by hospital anesthesiologists, inside Jackson's home.

Klein vehemently denied prescribing the drug.

"How am I going to prescribe Diprivan when I don't know how to use it?" Klein said, adding that he treated Jackson with only mild doses of drugs.

Just three days before he died, Jackson visited Klein in his office. The 50-year-old pop sensation showed no indication he was in failing health, Klein said.

"He danced in my office," Klein said. "He danced for my patients."

A cavalcade of celebrities and Jackson's loved ones paid tribute to the "Thriller" star on Tuesday at a moving memorial inside Los Angeles' Staples Center.

Near its conclusion, Paris spoke out publicly for the first, calling her "daddy" the "best father you could ever imagine" - a heartbreaking moment that reduced almost everyone in the 20,000-seat arena to tears.

Meanwhile, authorities released his death certificate, which did not list a cause of death. The official ruling will likely take weeks until toxicology results are completed.

Assistant Chief Coroner Ed Winter said Jackson's brain, or at least part of it, was still being held by investigators and would be returned to the family for burial once neuropathology tests were completed.

The site of Jackson's final resting place remained shrouded in mystery Wednesday.

A private memorial was held at a cemetery in the Hollywood Hills that contains the bodies of dozens of stars, but it does not appear Jackson will be buried among them.

Permission is needed to bury him at his former home, Neverland Ranch - a location some of Jackson relatives favor for his final resting place.

http://www.nydailynews.co...KiYzmQOO&D
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 07/08/09 5:30pm

Chic35

avatar

thesexofit said:

Janet could raise the kids I guess, but considering she still has a career, maybe, as a said, someone like Jermaine or Marlon could look after them. Katherine and even Diana are too old really. Particually Katherine. Its not fair on the kids if she dies....

Nice of Marlon to mention Brandon. That was touching. Not that I know any of them, but he seems like the nicest of the lot.



Janet can't raise them either she get's high on the regular...
That is like sending the kids from the skillet to the fire.
Janet does not have children for a reason...

Her career is number #1 plain and simple.
The message you are about to hear are not meant for transmission. Should ONLY be accessed in the privacy of your mind. Words are so intense so if you dare to listen.Take off your clothes and meet me between the lines. wildsign
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 07/08/09 5:48pm

kibbles

sunsetdriver1999 said:

No way they are going to Debbie.

Some people simply believe white is right, and go toward it.

if Blanket's mom, came out of nowhere and said she'd like Blanket now, and the other two, would ANYONE think that was a good idea? NO.

Debbie Rowe, will back down, as she always backs down, because she KNOWS what will come out if she tries for custody.

There is absolutely no way, the children will be taken from the Jackson family, and it doesn't matter how many liars come forward claiming to be their father, or how much Debbie Rowe cries to the white media..or how much people try to use their hue to rip them from their family...

No way, no how. And anyone who thinks the Debbie, and a simply white man created those kids is deluded....there will be dozens of more stories, with people trying to cash in on this story...
[Edited 7/8/09 17:27pm]


i hope you're right. i think they probably are his kids. i have half white people in my family who were very light in their younger years and who got a little darker as time went on. it's clear that mj was dying prince's hair when he was little; yet another attempt at disguising him from the public ( lol ), so maybe that's why everyone thinks the kids are 'whiter' than they are.

on the other hand, i think about that judge who unilaterally decided to restore rowe's parental rights after she renounced them and walked away. i don't think that a black woman who abandoned her kids like that would have been given such a benefit of the doubt. i really don't. i suppose he did it b/c of the accusations against mj, but if he was so concerned about that he could have tried to take them away, right? but there was no compelling evidence to do that so he did the next best thing.

i'm very skeptical about the fairness of the family court system, or the american 'justice' system in general.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 07/08/09 5:49pm

Anxiety

Chic35 said:



Her career is number #1 plain and simple.


as can be proven by her relentless touring schedule and the agressive promotional campaigns she's mounted for her past few albums. redface
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 07/08/09 5:50pm

ladygirl99

I thought Janet currently lives in Altanta as she no longer lives out in Malibu and that would be a huge adjustment to the kids of relocating with her down south. And plus I always come across from Janet that she prefers to be the role as an auntie or a baby-sitter not a mother, and I doubt that she is willing to take responsible for three kids or she would have been step up after Michael had died. Despite the nannies, still being responsible to three kids abruptly isn't no joke. Not every woman is meant to be a mother and if she doe not end up getting the kids then of course the least she could is to keep them for awhile but so can her other brothers and sisters and she already she currently taking care of Jermaine's kids financially and plus she got her own life to run too. Give the woman a break there are other siblings who aren't doing too much and they should be consider to step in to help out until at least they turn 18.

I think the kids should to the ones who currently lives in Hayenhurst compound other than Katherine. Or better yet there Michael's niece and nephews who are now in their thirties to consider too.
[Edited 7/8/09 17:55pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 07/08/09 5:58pm

midiscover

ladygirl99 said:

I thought Janet currently lives in Altanta as she no longer lives out in Malibu and that would be a huge adjustment to the kids of relocating with her down south. And plus I always come across from Janet that she prefers to be the role as an auntie or a baby-sitter not a mother, and I doubt that she is willing to take responsible for three kids or she would have been step up after Michael had died. Despite the nannies, still being responsible to three kids abruptly isn't no joke. Not every woman is meant to be a mother and if she doe not end up getting the kids then of course the least she could is to keep them for awhile but so can her other brothers and sisters and she already she currently taking care of Jermaine's kids financially and plus she got her own life to run too. Give the woman a break there are other siblings who aren't doing too much and they should be consider to step in to help out until at least they turn 18.

I think the kids should to the ones who currently lives in Hayenhurst compound other than Katherine. Or better yet there Michael's niece and nephews who are now in their thirties to consider too.
[Edited 7/8/09 17:55pm]


Janet lives in LA boo!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 07/08/09 6:05pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

thesexofit said:

Arguably 3 of the biggest stars of the 80's in one shot. I love this pic:-



Arguably, there are 4!!! Lionel Richie, Michael Jackson, Quincy Jones and Phil Collins. So who are you leaving out...Lionel or Quincy? falloff
I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 07/08/09 6:06pm

noimageatall

avatar

sunsetdriver1999 said:

Klein? The biological dad? LOL....please.

I don't like discussing the kids, biology, but I must rebut this bullshit.

If someone posted ANY white man, with Michael's kids, they'd agree that he "could" be the dad. Michael visited many people, not all are his kids "donors". The kids in no way, look 100 percent white. If people believe Michael wasn't the father, they should be looking toward someone of some type of color.

That's what I was thinking. The kids are not white and Debbie is blond and Klein is white. No way is Klein the father.
"Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 07/08/09 6:07pm

noimageatall

avatar

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

thesexofit said:

Arguably 3 of the biggest stars of the 80's in one shot. I love this pic:-



Arguably, there are 4!!! Lionel Richie, Michael Jackson, Quincy Jones and Phil Collins. So who are you leaving out...Lionel or Quincy? falloff

I was about to say! cool
"Let love be your perfect weapon..." ~~Andy Biersack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 07/08/09 6:21pm

Evvy

avatar

Klein is on Larry King- he says that vitiligo is an autoimmune disorder like lupus and that mike was diagnosed with both. that mike's vitiligo was so bad that his skin was speckled. so it would have looked ridiculous to wear enough makeup to cover it-so he prescribed a cream to even out his skin tone. he said michael is black and was proud to be a black man
LOVE HARD.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 07/08/09 6:26pm

cdcgold

Timmy84 said:

suga10 said:

Klein is trying to say he's not the kids father, yet at the same time he's suggesting that he is related to them- by giving a photo of him and MJ and the children.

Another jerk trying to cash in on MJ's death. mad
[Edited 7/8/09 16:57pm]


I thought I was the only one who thought that. I do believe he may be their biological dad but he should be nowhere near the kids especially if he's forced to take a DNA test and it IS proven he is their father but he tells the media he's not. rolleyes That's disrespect to MJ and the kids.



he is not those kids father he already denied it and besides those kids look NOTHING like arnold klein get real. it boggles my mind that people actually insist that a man as ugly as klein and a woman as ugly as debbie rowe world create those beautiful kids, just to keep from admitting mj is their bio father. thats is so pathetic. those kids are not white and don't look white either. Even i was shocked to see how paris was almost as dark as janet and latoya when they were on stage.
[Edited 7/8/09 18:32pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 07/08/09 6:28pm

Evvy

avatar

cdcgold said:

Timmy84 said:



I thought I was the only one who thought that. I do believe he may be their biological dad but he should be nowhere near the kids especially if he's forced to take a DNA test and it IS proven he is their father but he tells the media he's not. rolleyes That's disrespect to MJ and the kids.



he is not those kids father he already denied it and besides those kids look NOTHING like arnold klein get real.


Timmy i'm shocked and ashamed- you musta fell and bumped your head
LOVE HARD.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 07/08/09 6:28pm

kibbles

Evvy said:

Klein is on Larry King- he says that vitiligo is an autoimmune disorder like lupus and that mike was diagnosed with both. that mike's vitiligo was so bad that his skin was speckled. so it would have looked ridiculous to wear enough makeup to cover it-so he prescribed a cream to even out his skin tone. he said michael is black and was proud to be a black man


are you listening q? wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 07/08/09 6:29pm

seeingvoices12

avatar



Bill O'Reilly: Michael Jackson is no black icon
July 8, 2009, 7:15 PM EST
MSN Entertainment

FOX News host Bill O'Reilly continued his streak of controversial statements during his show on Tuesday in reaction to Michael Jackson's memorial service which was held earlier in the day.

O'Reilly criticized Jackson for "incredible selfishness -- spending hundreds of million dollars on himself while singing 'We Are the World,'" and said that it "should make any clear-thinking American nauseous."

Speaking to guest analyst Marc Lamont Hill, a black FOX commentator, O'Reilly also addressed race as an issue at the memorial service: "Why are Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton making this a racial deal? Jackson bleached his own skin. And then chose white men to provide existence for his in vitro children. Give me a break with all this."

Hill responded: "You have me baffled in your analysis here, to say this isn't a racial issue, when this man's entire career has been marked by the tropes of race... Yes, the black community has embraced him, yes the black community has wrapped its arms around him more in death, but that's because the media has assaulted him in ways they don't do with white people of his stature."

Hill continued: "Now he has passed away. A year or two ago, when Jerry Falwell died, you and I debated this very point. You said, 'Give him three days to a week and let the people mourn him before you start talking about his racist politics.' So why are we giving Jerry Falwell something that we won't give Michael Jackson?"

The two debated for quite some time on whether Jackson had helped in uniting black and White Americans. The debate, however, turned into a shouting match with O'Reilly proclaiming: "If he's such a black American icon, why did he have his kids with white men!?"

Hill responded: "That's a personal matter. That doesn't make him less black -- there's no blackness meter here. You don't become less black if you have a white kid."


I did have a heart attack when i read this, Is this person a fucking retarded or what? Disgsuting filthy bastard rolleyes
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 55 <123456789>Last »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MICHAEL JACKSON RIP (Part 7)