New topic
Printableprodigalfan said: lowkey said: are you a woman? there is no such thing as to far along to miscarry a child. my brothers girlfriend was about 2 weeks away from delivery, had the shower and everything and she miscarried her child. yes, I am a woman, and in the medical field. At that age, the baby is then stillborn... not misscarried. And therefore has to have a disposal of human remains... not necessarily a funeral.. but there has to be some sort of burial or cremation. I don't consider that a miscarriage.. but a stillborn. To me, stillborn is a bit more dramatic then a miscarriage... there has to be a death certificate which means there has to be a name for the deceased. This would seem harder to hide than a miscarriage that happens in your doctor's office... and since Janet was too far along for a "miscarriage" I personally don't beleive she had a stillborn and someone didn't spill the beans. but how do you know how far along she was, are you going by the amount of weight she gained? janet has a fat girl gene, look how she blows up when she's not working, so imagine her being pregnant.i remember back then very well and i agree she was pregnant, but im not gonna speculate how far along she was or if she had a child because i dont know. james debarge said himself that janet got pregnant and he took her to have an abortion, i dont believe that, i think she lost the kid due to his abuse and the stress a relationship like that has to have had on a 18,19 year old girl. | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
errant said: JackieBlue said:  Now, Timmy I didn’t say anything about them not being healthy but clearly she is not young for a first-time mom.but she's not a first time mom! isn't Rebbie raising the first one?  Yes, that is correct. RIP, mom. I will forever miss and love you. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lowkey said: prodigalfan said: yes, I am a woman, and in the medical field. At that age, the baby is then stillborn... not misscarried. And therefore has to have a disposal of human remains... not necessarily a funeral.. but there has to be some sort of burial or cremation. I don't consider that a miscarriage.. but a stillborn. To me, stillborn is a bit more dramatic then a miscarriage... there has to be a death certificate which means there has to be a name for the deceased. This would seem harder to hide than a miscarriage that happens in your doctor's office... and since Janet was too far along for a "miscarriage" I personally don't beleive she had a stillborn and someone didn't spill the beans. but how do you know how far along she was, are you going by the amount of weight she gained? janet has a fat girl gene, look how she blows up when she's not working, so imagine her being pregnant.i remember back then very well and i agree she was pregnant, but im not gonna speculate how far along she was or if she had a child because i dont know. james debarge said himself that janet got pregnant and he took her to have an abortion, i dont believe that, i think she lost the kid due to his abuse and the stress a relationship like that has to have had on a 18,19 year old girl. Well, that is true, I don't know. And yes I am going by how big she got. Maybe she was in the 2nd trimester. She just looked so much bigger than a 4 month pg woman. But you are right, Janet is very short, petite... it doesn't take much weight gain on her to look very bloated and overweight. Likewise, she can drop 20 - 30 pounds and look like she had gastric bypass surgery. So maybe she was in 1st, 2nd trimester and had a miscarriage. I don't have any proof, just a gut feeling that Janet had secret baby with James. She is very good at keeping secrets. "Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jermaine Dupri: Girlfriend Janet Jackson "Is Not Pregnant"
Friday December 19, 2008 Janet Jackson is not pregnant! Jackson's longtime beau, Jermaine Dupri, took to his blog to blast rumors started by Life & Style, which recently featured a cover with her photo and the headline: "Yes, I'm Pregnant." Dupri wrote: "To all the Janet fans, As you all know Janet is a very private person. The only reason you see her, as much as you do on my YouTube vlog, is because of me lol. But I hear ya'll and your questions. So hear [sic] you have it... No she is not pregnant and yes we're still together." "It baffles me how ya'll let these blog and magazines control your lifes [sic]. That's why I created global14.com so when ever hear s--- about me you...can come right here and get the truth," he added. But that doesn't mean Jackson, 42, and Dupri, 36, aren't excited to start a family in the future. "I'd love to have children," the singer told Us earlier. "It's just up to Jermaine, what he wants to do." Jackson also spoke about motherhood in an interview with Sister 2 Sister magazine. "Everyone tells me that there will never be a good time, that I will always be busy," she revealed, "but I just think: when the stars are aligned, it will happen." http://www.usmagazine.com...t-pregnant MJ L.O.V.E: https://www.facebook.com/...689&type=2 / YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/us...nderSilent | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just wait and see! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: LiquidGold said: Could have been one of her many nieces That's what I believe. Look at her last appearance on Fame, she wasn't really big They keep saying that Rebbie raised this child, but Rebbie only had 3 kids and her daughters were around the same age as Janet 
Jackie's daughter was born in 1982. They also say that Jermaine's daughter Autumn is the mystery child BUT Autumn was born in 1980 or 1981 Good point bboy! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |