SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

I'm full of surprises.

Cloudbuster said:

I would believe you were a Christian over that

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

You're a dead man.

Sorry, I think those kids look like Michael.

Blanket is so cute; I just wanna pinch his lil' cheeks!

They are MJ's kids regardless....

Do I think the first two are MJ's bio kids, no not really, but I have little doubt that they are Jacksons. I think Michael used a younger member of his family, maybe Tito's kids..etc.. as a donor.... The first two kids would then be 1/4 black and Jacksons... They DO resemble Michael and his family... If they didn't people wouldn't still be wondering. The kids aren't "white" and don't look White...they look...1/4 black. What if MJ couldn't have his own children? Going to his own family would be natural really, and perhaps he chose the donor based on who he was closest to, who he thought the smartest, who could keep a secret best? Who knows... Michael owes no explanations, and its not all that difficult to come to a fairly possible conclusion...


Damn...beat me to it...
[Edited 10/10/08 16:28pm]

bboy87 said:

Yep he's raising them so they are his.

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Supa is what we like to call a "habitual line stepper"

I have no idea whether those are MJ's biological kids are not, and I don't much care. He's raising them, so they're his. Adopted, sperm donor, alien babies, whatever the case may be, he's looking after them so he's their dad.

That said, it's not impossible for a mixed-race couple to produce white looking children. Especially considering the Jacksons, like many black Americans and Canadians, are descendents of slaves and so likely have some white blood themselves. It's completely realistic that a white mother and a black father who likely has white ancestry could produce kids with light skin and straight hair.

These are indeed Mike's kids and its time this debate was put to rest.

Beautiful kids I must say and its lovely to see Mike being the best dad that he possibly can.

Fashion should not be something that these kids should be concerned about at this stage in their lives.

For years I've said that Michael's their Dad, but he's not their father. Dare I say it? I'm starting to think it's possible I was wrong. Not that it matters, of course.

But, I wish people would stop saying those kids look like him. It's just not true. However, like Rashida Jones doesn't look like Quincy, it doesn't mean Michael's not their father.

But, enough already with the "they look like him" crap. Showing me a picture of the littlest one looking down and saying "case closed"? Please. From that angle, I look like his father.

Anyway, Paris is pretty. And, I see they get their fashion sense from Michael.

sunsetdriver1999 said:

You've got to be kidding. I've seen a million white kids that look like them. There's nothing remotely "mixed" looking about them. Not to say that mixed kids can't look like that. I've seen quite a few mixed kids that look white. But those kids are white looking.

I don't believe they are biologically his, not even the youngest one. But I honestly don't see anything wrong with him having used a sperm donor either like most people do, even though I'd love for Michael to have someone to pass on his genes. He's got genes to die for, but I don't think he believes that.
[Edited 10/10/08 21:08pm]

Now accuse MJ fanatics of having wild fantasy. Why couldn´t MJ have kids? It´s unbelievable that once people start to see that those kids actually do look like Jacksons, they start making up stories that MJ must have used a family sperm donor because for them there is NO WAY that MJ could concieve his own. If you believe that they are Jacksons then why can´t they be Michael´s? Why is the most natural possibility automatically ruled out as the least possible? Why couldn´t MJ simply have sex with a woman and concieve a child? ( I know I am going to be damned for putting it this way because it´s just the lunatics who can see MJ doing anything "normal".)
[Edited 10/11/08 0:42am]

Why is it so important to MJ fans whether or not those are his biological kids or not? MJ wouldn't be the first rich person to buy kids, or the last.
If he's a good father, as many of you claim (although I don't know how being photographed at various bookstores makes you a good father), then that should be enough.

dag said:

I do believe the youngest one can be his but not the first two children. And the fact that their own mother is so ambigious about the whole thing doesn't help, either . Madonna daughter, Lourdes, looks more mixed than those kids and her father is Hispanic as opposed to someone who is more or less a full blooded African-American, well that's what Michael is naturally

lets be honest

Blanket looks like he is definitely Michael's biological child.
the resemblance is uncanny.

the pics pretty much prove this.

as for the other two, who knows.

dag said:

I'm the one with "wild fantasies", and your the one posting pics trying to prove the younger one is his child? Yes, the younger one looks a lot like Michael and imo is prob. his bio, but let's not try to pretend the older two look exactly like him based on the small one's pics... The small one looks a lot like Michael and Michael's brother's sons. The older two look like their cousins, but lighter. It's is not impossible for Michael to be unable to conceive, or to have been unable to do it at the time... The idea that Michael didn't use his "sperm cells" with his first two kids, and did with the last one shouldn't be a big deal. Many people have issues with this, and going to family isn't surprising....

You think the first two kid's are Michael's bio..fine.. I don't and many people don't and don't even believe their Jacksons, which I disagree with. But, let's not pretend that the little one and the older ones look exactly the same... They're Michael's kids, and it doesn't matter... and if they truly, truly "looked white" people wouldn't still be wondering...they do resemble Michael, and do resemble his family...

MJ fans though look like NUTS when they argue people down for saying the first two don't look like him....or try to convince people that they're his bio kids... After Blanket, who looks a lot like Michael, their points are even more ridiculous. MJ Fans want to believe Michael at all costs, even when it defies logic and common sense. They make themselves look ridiculous. People on both sides want to prove their points so hard, they don't look at the obvious. It doesn't matter though, its not that serious, and there's no reason trying to "prove" something like that...
[Edited 10/11/08 7:44am]

whatsgoingon said:

Well, Lourdes is dark, but so is Madonna (not dark as in mixed race, but she´s just got black hair etc. She is dark for a white person, I think she´s got bit of Italian blood and Italians are quite dark and so is her father.

But let´s not forget Debbie is naturally blond - very light.
And if Blanket is his, why the other could not be as well. They do look like Debbie so obviously her genes are very strong.

I think it is as important to the MJ fans as to the general public otherwise you, guys, would not spend that much time trying to convince the lunatics they´re no his.
And of course, being photograped at stores does not make anyone a good parent, but that´s not what we are basing our opinions on. I personally have heard from many people who have met them that his kids are well-behaved.

Damn, here are are again getting into that discussion. I´ll try not to continue anymore.
[Edited 10/11/08 7:19am]

SupaFunkyOrgangrinderSexy said:

Fool!

Graycap23 said:

Yeah, but have you seen that nucca's credit lately? I wouldn't take a check from Mike these days!

Well, Madonna's baby daddy is Puerto Rican, and most Puerto Ricans have some, if not a lot of, African in them along with Taino Indian and Spanish, so it makes perfect sense that Lourdes would look mixed, cuz she is.

As for MJ's kids, I don't get the whole they look white so they can't be his argument. Most black folks personally know black people where BOTH parents are black yet are as light and racially ambiguous as MJ's kids. So, it's not implausible that these are his kids.

dag said:

Because when it comes to MJ , all things are different...
Its sad that the majority of people are brainwashed by the media , plain and simple.
The similarities between MJ and blanket are obvious and anyone says otherwise is simply on crack , And frankly, I hate to get into conversations about MJ's personal life I would rather talk about his music , A personal life of anyone whether its MJ or not is not our business ,but sometimes you find yourself forced to respond to such ignorance mentality....

shygirl said:

It's not really MJ fans who are concerned about it

too bad those aren't his biological kids. I wish they would have looked like mike.

Those kids are getting older and starting to look even further from him. They don't even look like his kids.
Michael probably keeps himself distant from his family because his dad and maybe mom, probably think that michael should have had his own biological kids.

dag said:

I know people want to believe those are his biological kids.

but we are all humans and resemble each other. so that picture does not show resemblance.


and now they are older it shows how they really are not from his seed

SCNDLS said:

I'm going to be honest even if I sound ignorant. For me, it's always been their hair texture. Unless they have relaxers or a really good flat iron...I think their hair should be curlier than that. From Halle Berry to Mariah Carey to Alicia Keys to Nicole Richie. They all have curly hair--not wavy, curly. And yet these children...something is unusual.

I wouldn't put it past Michael to have their hair straigtened since I believe he has issues with African features including hair texture. Or maybe those kids are not black/white bi-racial? Who knows?

Again, all of this (whether those kids are his biologically) is not serious, just something to talk about.

SCNDLS said:

I know black parents can have kids alot lighter than them, but in the end you will still see the black features in them. I know mixed race kids with blonde hair & blue eyes, but just by looking at the texture of their hair you can still tell they are mixed-race, you can't see anything like that in MJ kids, especially the first two children. They have no African features what so ever. Jermaine has got bi-racial children too, and they are very pale but you can still see the african blood in them.

You must admit Michael is full of coincidences; this is a person who has eroded all his original features. Who gradually got lighter over the years and then after years of speculation said he has vitiligo-even though I have never seen a vitiligo patient get lighter in such a gradual, even manner! He then goes and marries a white woman, he obviously doesn't love and up pops two white children that don't have a trace of African blood in them, not one but two, who he claims are biologically his. I mean that's an awful lot of coincidence for just one person.

However, I do agree there is a similarity between Blanket & little Michael Jackson, maybe he actually used one of his family members sperm for him
[Edited 10/11/08 19:59pm]

y'all get on my nerves trying to call his kids white

oh god not this discussion again..

I really don't care whether those children are biologically his or fathered by an alien breed, all I care about is whether those kids won't yell contstantly from the top of their lungs and run around wantonly in public.

If they can pull of that, Michael has managed to raise his kids better than 50% of parents in the Western countries.

Did someone photoshop young MJ's face onto this pic? I'm seriously asking.