independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Lauren Hill or D'Angelo which one disappointed you the most?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 08/08/08 8:09am

Cinnie

CalhounSq said:

SCNDLS said:

According to Wendy Williams today, Lauryn's featured in this week's People magazine with Brad and Angelina on the cover. She said that she had a FIFTH child for Rohan and the baby still doesn't have a name after 7 months. All this since he got her cousin pregnant. So I guess Lauryn is still nutso sigh
[Edited 8/7/08 21:01pm]

What in THE hell???? eek


So my guess is Postpartum depression.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 08/08/08 8:14am

Jboogiee

avatar

For me it's D'Angelo,Jboogiee says Boo to D'Angelo-2 thumbs down!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 08/08/08 9:34am

SCNDLS

avatar

Cinnie said:

CalhounSq said:


What in THE hell???? eek


So my guess is Postpartum depression.

Yeah, for the last 10 damn years. disbelief They say that legally the babies name is Baby Marley. disbelief This heffa is too crazy.
[Edited 8/8/08 9:35am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 08/08/08 10:25am

Cinnie

SCNDLS said:

Cinnie said:



So my guess is Postpartum depression.

Yeah, for the last 10 damn years. disbelief They say that legally the babies name is Baby Marley. disbelief This heffa is too crazy.



Lauryn Hill demonstrates Procrastination at its finest. Soon it will be Toddler Marley.
[Edited 8/8/08 10:25am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 08/08/08 10:53am

MuthaFunka

avatar

SoulAlive said:

MuthaFunka said:



Drew asked her herself. L said she wanted her next film role to be of significance so she turned her down. Now, how much more significant can it get by playing in a 70s icon sitcom and being the first Black angel eek ? L-Boogie wigged-out. Lucy Liu was picked instead.


Yeah,I knew about this.Drew Barrymore personally asked Lauryn to co-star in the 'Charlie's Angels' movie.In 1999,everybody wanted to work with Lauryn Hill.She was RED-HOT.Even Sheryl Crow said that she wants Lauryn to produce her next album.As for the movie...Lauryn was crazy for turning that role down! It would have been a historic,groundbreaking role for her.

In pop music,you don't get a second chance.You have to strike while you can.Lauryn messed up big time.These opportunities won't come her way again.


nod And her fan base just would've gotten bigger than it already was.
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 08/08/08 10:54am

MuthaFunka

avatar

SCNDLS said:

SoulAlive said:



Yeah,I knew about this.Drew Barrymore personally asked Lauryn to co-star in the 'Charlie's Angels' movie.In 1999,everybody wanted to work with Lauryn Hill.She was RED-HOT.Even Sheryl Crow said that she wants Lauryn to produce her next album.As for the movie...Lauryn was crazy for turning that role down! It would have been a historic,groundbreaking role for her.

In pop music,you don't get a second chance.You have to strike while you can.Lauryn messed up big time.These opportunities won't come her way again.

She also turned down a role in Bourne Identity and something else.


Weird broad.
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 08/08/08 11:37am

Harlepolis

Neither.

Cowardly record labels are the ones who truly disappointed me because they refused to take a chance on them when they(L & D) took another direction instead of catering to the old marketing method of their previous albums.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 08/08/08 11:52am

CosmicDancer

Neither. pt 2
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 08/08/08 12:39pm

Jamzone333

avatar

ChristopherTracy319 said:

With all the speculation about D'Angelo's new album (maybe) and Lauren Hill possibly getting back in the game, I have to ask. Which one of these great artists were you most disappointed in when they broke down and flamed out? Both were on the road to musical greatness, but instead they now live in the dreaded, "where are they now" land of disappointments. But its not like we are talking about Devo or Milli Vanilli. We are talking about musical genius.

For me I think it was D'Angelo that disappointed me the most. I kept anticipating a new album then all of a sudden...BAM! He's got a mugshot and a drug habit! Talk about crazy. Which one effected you the most?



Lauren. Lauren had more potential than D'Angelo because she had already "crossed over" where the world knew who Lauren Hill was/is. But, she slipped back from her dream and gave into pressure. I think she should have kept on moving. But, I also feel the same way about Maxwell and Erykah Badu. They (Maxwell and Badu) was on the verge of doing something big but, they also pulled a "Lauren Hill" and just didn't "press in" to get to the next level. Look at our boy, Prince. Prince has been in favor and out of favor with people (fans, public opinion and music insiders), however, he doesn't care, by hook or by crook, he is going to get his music out there. Ole boy just keeps going no matter what and that is why I'm so into him. It has been over thirty years since "For You" and the name Prince is not a "by word". Prince has and continues to fulfill his dream by creating music his way and is a living legend. No doubt... cool
[Edited 8/8/08 12:43pm]
"A united state of mind will never be divided
The real definition of unity is 1
People can slam their door, disagree and fight it
But how U gonna love the Father but not love the Son?
United States of Division"
gigglebowfroguitar
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 08/08/08 12:56pm

Graycap23

Jamzone333 said:




Lauren. Lauren had more potential than D'Angelo because she had already "crossed over" where the world knew who Lauren Hill was/is. But, she slipped back from her dream and gave into pressure. I think she should have kept on moving. But, I also feel the same way about Maxwell and Erykah Badu. They (Maxwell and Badu) was on the verge of doing something big but, they also pulled a "Lauren Hill" and just didn't "press in" to get to the next level. Look at our boy, Prince. Prince has been in favor and out of favor with people (fans, public opinion and music insiders), however, he doesn't care, by hook or by crook, he is going to get his music out there. Ole boy just keeps going no matter what and that is why I'm so into him. It has been over thirty years since "For You" and the name Prince is not a "by word". Prince has and continues to fulfill his dream by creating music his way and is a living legend. No doubt... cool
[Edited 8/8/08 12:43pm]

How does someone who can't play a lick a music have more potential than a MUSICIAN? U lost me on that one.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 08/09/08 8:20am

steelyd

MuthaFunka said:

SCNDLS said:


She also turned down a role in Bourne Identity and something else.


Weird broad.





Lauryn has her issues, but what is weird or crazy about turning down a piece of fluff like Charlie's Angels? or Bourne Identity shrug So she wanted to keep her image consistent at the height of her career and she turned down those roles...I couldn't see her in those movies. If she had stayed in the industry and "played nice" she probably would have received more interesting movie offers. Alicia Keys wasn't savvy about her first movie role, she played a lesbian hit-woman in a movie...it didn't make her career any more or less better.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 08/09/08 8:24am

MuthaFunka

avatar

steelyd said:

MuthaFunka said:



Weird broad.





Lauryn has her issues, but what is weird or crazy about turning down a piece of fluff like Charlie's Angels? or Bourne Identity shrug So she wanted to keep her image consistent at the height of her career and she turned down those roles...I couldn't see her in those movies. If she had stayed in the industry and "played nice" she probably would have received more interesting movie offers. Alicia Keys wasn't savvy about her first movie role, she played a lesbian hit-woman in a movie...it didn't make her career any more or less better.


I never said it was weird for her to turn down those rules. I saw it as dumb actually - but not weird. I call her ass weird because she don' lost her damn mind over some dick.

And who cares if Alicia's movie role helped/not helped her career? That wasn't the point. The way I see it, she was getting her feet wet so she can play other roles. It was a career move. Happens all the time.
nWo: bboy87 - Timmy84 - LittleBlueCorvette - MuthaFunka - phunkdaddy - Christopher

MuthaFunka - Black...by popular demand
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 08/18/08 8:08pm

Jamzone333

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Jamzone333 said:




Lauren. Lauren had more potential than D'Angelo because she had already "crossed over" where the world knew who Lauren Hill was/is. But, she slipped back from her dream and gave into pressure. I think she should have kept on moving. But, I also feel the same way about Maxwell and Erykah Badu. They (Maxwell and Badu) was on the verge of doing something big but, they also pulled a "Lauren Hill" and just didn't "press in" to get to the next level. Look at our boy, Prince. Prince has been in favor and out of favor with people (fans, public opinion and music insiders), however, he doesn't care, by hook or by crook, he is going to get his music out there. Ole boy just keeps going no matter what and that is why I'm so into him. It has been over thirty years since "For You" and the name Prince is not a "by word". Prince has and continues to fulfill his dream by creating music his way and is a living legend. No doubt... cool
[Edited 8/8/08 12:43pm]

How does someone who can't play a lick a music have more potential than a MUSICIAN? U lost me on that one.



Sorry I'm so late, trying to make them "duckets" Anyhoo, Lauren is a musician. She and Badu can play guitar. lol lol
"A united state of mind will never be divided
The real definition of unity is 1
People can slam their door, disagree and fight it
But how U gonna love the Father but not love the Son?
United States of Division"
gigglebowfroguitar
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 08/18/08 8:52pm

robinesque

ChristopherTracy319 said:

With all the speculation about D'Angelo's new album (maybe) and Lauren Hill possibly getting back in the game, I have to ask. Which one of these great artists were you most disappointed in when they broke down and flamed out? Both were on the road to musical greatness, but instead they now live in the dreaded, "where are they now" land of disappointments. But its not like we are talking about Devo or Milli Vanilli. We are talking about musical genius.

For me I think it was D'Angelo that disappointed me the most. I kept anticipating a new album then all of a sudden...BAM! He's got a mugshot and a drug habit! Talk about crazy. Which one effected you the most?


hey!
these guys were just in melbourne touring... pretty harsh sticking them with Milli Vanilli ... sheesh neutral
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 08/18/08 9:07pm

mellow1

avatar

cool Lauren Hill disappointed me more. I can't even listen to any of her music without thinking about how she let her mind go. What a waste. D'Angelo i kinda knew he was going to take a long break when he never put out anything else after his last album. They both are truly talented. I do think D'Angelo will eventually release another cd. Lauren is soo far out of it that if she does actually decides to make another album....who knows if she will ever release it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 08/18/08 10:11pm

lowkey

i think lauryn made a mistake by taking all the credit for creating her album, she was placed on this huge pedastal and people were calling her some kinda genius, i even heard her compared to stevie wonder. when she was exposed for not giving proper credit to the people that helped her (most likely did most of the work) with that classic album i think she knew it was no way she could come close to miseducation. she let herself go and became a sperm depository for a married man,lauryn is very talented but i think there was a lil bit of fraud when it came to just how talented.i was never a big dangelo fan, i liked a couple of his songs from his 1st album,i never thought he was that big of a deal in the first place.he had a strong prince vibe thats why i think he's hyped up so much on this board.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 08/19/08 1:32am

BigDaddyHQ

avatar

Lauryn Hill was the bigger dis-appointment IMO.

From the Fugees on she displayed a remarkable voice.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 08/19/08 5:30am

SoulAlive

steelyd said:

Lauryn has her issues, but what is weird or crazy about turning down a piece of fluff like Charlie's Angels? or Bourne Identity shrug So she wanted to keep her image consistent at the height of her career and she turned down those roles...I couldn't see her in those movies. If she had stayed in the industry and "played nice" she probably would have received more interesting movie offers. Alicia Keys wasn't savvy about her first movie role, she played a lesbian hit-woman in a movie...it didn't make her career any more or less better.


A person in their right mind is NOT gonna turn down major movie roles like 'Charlie's Angels' and 'Bourne Identity'.Both of those films were major hits and I really think that Lauryn could have been a dazzling,dynamic actress.Sadly,she won't get these opportunities again.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 08/19/08 7:47am

Empress

This is an interesting question!

For me, it's probably Lauryn. She had the world by the balls and gave it up for a man and some religious guru who was controlling her thoughts and life. She's since been a baby making machine for Rohan who already has children from other women (so I've read) and has never married her either. If she didn't have money, she and her kids would be in trouble.

It's very unfortunate that she's allowed this to happen to her. D'Angelo on the other hand.....is very talented and I loved Voodoo, but he doesn't have the same talent has Lauryn IMO.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Lauren Hill or D'Angelo which one disappointed you the most?