New topic
Printablequestionofu said: What I don't understand is that the judge said in his writings that she was not consistent or accurate with her testimony, less than candid with her testimony, and a less than impressive witness. That sounds like lying to me, so why was she awarded as much as she was? I suppose it is because there was no pre-nup?
Relative 2 Paul's worth she got very little. | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: DAMN... perhaps I should consider marrying a wealthy geezer
 No. Please. Money don't matter when it comes to 
and if it's money don't matter  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Graycap23 said: questionofu said: What I don't understand is that the judge said in his writings that she was not consistent or accurate with her testimony, less than candid with her testimony, and a less than impressive witness. That sounds like lying to me, so why was she awarded as much as she was? I suppose it is because there was no pre-nup?
Relative 2 Paul's worth she got very little. Regardless of his worth, if the judge felt she was lying, why award her with 48 million? Sure, award support for the daughter, or give the parenting right to Paul, but 48 mil is way more than she ever started out with. But of course, I do not know all the details, I am only basing this off of the judge's written comments on the case. The only LOVE there is, IS the LOVE WE MAKE ~ Prince | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
questionofu said: Graycap23 said: Relative 2 Paul's worth she got very little. Regardless of his worth, if the judge felt she was lying, why award her with 48 million? Sure, award support for the daughter, or give the parenting right to Paul, but 48 mil is way more than she ever started out with. But of course, I do not know all the details, I am only basing this off of the judge's written comments on the case. She would have received a lot more if not 4 the lies. She got the bare minimum. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think Paul is probably quietly pleased, she wanted a whole lot more than what she got. [Edited 3/19/08 15:13pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mynameisnotsusan said: I think Paul is probably quietly pleased, she wanted a whole lot more than what she got.
[Edited 3/19/08 15:13pm] i was passing the high court the last day with my girlfriend and the paps were out in force. i think she should have got nothing as she clearly only used paul for his money. i feel sorry for the guy cause he has to share a child with her and its the child that will suffer long term being used as a weapon. i have seen this time and time again when relationships breakdown. its always the children that end up being the victim  [Edited 3/19/08 16:39pm] croke park here i come | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Heather did not get the 1/4 of Paul's fortune, she originally wanted ($250 million) therefore, he is very happy with the outcome. She's getting $33 mil in cash and $15.6 in property, which she already has in her posession. On top of that Paul has to pay Beatrice's schooling and $70,000 a year for a nanny. Damn, if I could tolerate whining kids, I would be a nanny for that kind of paycheck.
STELLA MCCARTNEY was right to be pissed when she complained before Paul and Heather were married (and refused to go to the wedding) that gold digger Heather was marrying her father for his money. She sinced it and was right on the money. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |