MikeMatronik said:

That's fine with me.

Najee said:

I agree with that and also what you said about Michael having a color complex. He was a handsome brother who freaked out and destroyed his blackness. Pathetic. As a black man, I'm disgusted at what he did. Evevything Katt Williams said about him is gospel truth.

"Blanket" reminds me of The Grudge in that pic =\

uPtoWnNY said:

Who's Katt Williams?

Krytonite said:

You know, that coke-head D-grade comedian that got arrested for drugs.

EmbattledWarrior said:

ok, you said it was said during the custody trial? But when? I missed that? Did you see the documentsor was it just in the paper. I´d love to know....
BTW they´re cute!
Paris looks more and more like Debbie in face.
[Edited 2/4/07 2:57am]
[Edited 2/4/07 3:02am]

dag said:

It wasn't established in court at all. Some gossip sites said so, but no-one provided any documentation from court records or even verified quotes from anyone.

Ellie said:

thanks Ellie.

i really dont know what everyone is on about, i think they look quite similar to michael in a lot of ways, the eyes and the cheek bones and the hair, they dont have to be black just because michael is!

lilgish said:

lilgish said:

pathetic

eikonoklastes said:

see that's exactly why MJ did not let his kids out without masks on. And he had a point

I think prince looks like michael in the face...and paris too. Paris is so cute!!!

Now I understand why Michael wants to hide his kids from the public..

Prince's eyes resemble Michael's eyes a lot.

So it is Jacko Stunt Time again. Slowly trying to get your name back in the paper for 6 months now. Of Course no new music, just cheap quick hits for any press.

Oh yeah we all can see that Blankets's Mother was black. This nut loves to lie doesnt he. He didnt even wack off to make those kids. They dont have a drop of his dna.

ElectricBlue said:

WHAT THE HELL IS THIS? WHAT I'VE READ IN THIS THREAD IS DISGUSTING AND DISRESPECTFUL! IT'S COMPLETELY INNAPPROPRIATE TO BE TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE'S CHILDREN LIKE THIS! WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE?!

Jazim said:

eikonoklastes said:

PurpleCharm said:[quote]

lilgish said:

THAT SORT OF SHIT SHOULD NOT BE TOLERATED!

Michael Jackson has copped this shit for years and years. True, he brought on most of it himself, but he didn't bring on this! Give him crap about his plastic surgery, his alleged child molestation, his Neverland ranch, his cloths, his fair, whatever. But don't give his children crap. That's way out of line. They are kids. Just kids. Leave the poor children alone. Can't Michael and his family cut a break?

And to the clown who called this a Jacko PR stunt. WTF dude? He takes his children out, the paparazzi snap them and put them all over the net, and it's a PR stunt? Does he have to stay inside his house 24/7? What sort of life is that for the kids? They can't go out or it's a PR stunt? C'mon! He covers their faces up so the media can't snap them, and ya'll complain. He takes the masks off and the media has a chance to snap them, and they do, so ya'll complain. What is it you really want from Michael? It seems he can't do anything right with you people. I think it's about time everybody gave the man and his family a break. He's done things that would fuel nasty comments, but how long must that go on? How long will he pay for his mistakes?
[Edited 2/4/07 9:24am]

ohh...i feel a dosey of a thread tit for tat war coming along here...

FunkyBrotha said:

XxKristinaxX said:

If those children truly were Michael Jackson's biological children, wouldn't they have some of these features?



The children have facial feautures more common with MJ's surgically altered look, which wouldn't be passed down.
[Edited 2/4/07 8:43am]

DarlingDiana said:

Given that Mike has both been arrested and had drug problems, it's hardly fair to call out somebody else for it just because you don't like his humor.

RipHer2Shreds said:

Way to call the kettle black! Everybody round here "calls out" Michael because they don't like his music, or his physical appearance, or his lifestyle. It's nothing new. But I guess you guys don't notice what you are really doing until the tables are turned and I treat someone else they way you treat Michael Jackson.
[Edited 2/4/07 9:05am]
[Edited 2/4/07 9:05am]

DarlingDiana said:

What?

RipHer2Shreds said:

I just think it's double standards that people are allowed to say whatever they want about Michael Jackson, but I can't touch the all mighty Katt Williams.

Najee said:

Prince definately has MJ's eyes. But his blonde hair comes from Debbie. Paris's hair colour probably comes from Michael. I haven't seen enough (nor do I want to) of Blanket, so I can't say if he resembles either parent.

Even if Prince's eyes are a coincidence. They are Michael's kids, because that's what the court says. And if Michael doesn't want to let everyone know the true parentage of his children, is that a problem? Is it really anyones business? I think he doesn't feel anyone needs to know, so he says he is the father, because if he said the father is a sperm donor, he'd be giving the media and the public the pleasure of knowing information that they don't need to know, plus it'd raise more questions and just make life more difficult for MJ and his kids.
[Edited 2/4/07 9:14am]

Also, can the moderators see to it that the images of MJ's kids are removed from this thread? You don't have to (well atleast I don't think you have to, you'll have to check that up with MJ's lawyers). But I know MJ has repeatedly asked a lot of fansites, and media websites not to publish any photos of his children. He's successfully got photos and videos removed from media websites, and even televised news. So per MJ's personal wishes, you should remove the images. If anyone who has contact with him, or his legal team, sees this thread, you could be forced to remove them.

DarlingDiana said:

I don't see it myself. The hair texture and color and skin color (not to mention other features, such as the nose) are definitely Caucasian features; more importantly, there is no obvious elements of an mixed Caucasian/African ancestry in any of those children.

As for the boy's eyes (more particularly, the eye structure), if I remember my biology correctly aren't most young children's eyes wider and have that doe-look structure and then as people age the eyes tend to narrow? It's also been reported (but never confirmed) that among other numerous surgeries that MJ later in life had his eye structure altered to continue giving them that doe-like structure.

DarlingDiana said:

Again, I'm not discussing Michael Jackson's custodial rights. That's neither here or there.

DarlingDiana said:

So what would be the purpose of MJ lying and saying the children are biologically his, when it's obvious the children don't have any of his genetic (not cosmetically altered) commonalities? It just feeds into the very apparent deduction that MJ has a racial inferiority complex and reinforces the general opinion in that certain aspects of his life MJ has strained what little credibility he has (particularly when it comes to race-related topics involving him).
[Edited 2/8/07 19:39pm]

"make it stop mother...make it stop.."

Najee said:

I hate to brake it to you, but the mother of Prince and Paris is white. Is it not possible that most of their looks comes from her? It can go either way, and it just so happens than both children look more like their mother than their father. I have no physical resembelance to my father. So it can happen that a children gets most or all of their looks from their mother, and little or none from their father.
[Edited 2/4/07 9:40am]

DarlingDiana said:

It's a little more than "one child favoring one parent more than another." You're talking about two parents of different races and physical characteristics, and typically some characteristics (such as hair structure) in such interracial pairings are some combination of both parents.

Those children could resemble Michael Jackson if MJ was born with his cosmetically altered, Caucasian-inspired features. But that's the problem -- how MJ looks now is nothing close to how he looked as a child. Those children have entirely all physical characteristics of Caucasian ancestry.
[Edited 2/4/07 11:30am]