Well, nothing compares to The Beatles 65-70. Just listen. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You get it or you don't. I don't "get" Dylan or Morrissey, but I know lots of people who claim they're legendary artists, and I've seen their influence in a lot of other artists who I actually DO like. So I don't slag 'em. I just don't happen to "get" what their whole appeal is.
I don't understand how some people can't "get" the Beatles, though god bless yez. They had so many varied sounds when they were together, from the mellow pop fluff of songs like "Michelle" and "If I Fell" to the edgier, thrustier stuff like "Helter Skelter" and lots of the stuff on "Let It Be", which, without the Spector strings, virtually sounds like dirty rooty blues rock. Their psychadelic-era music is colorful, fun, sometimes surreal and a bit scary...their early stuff is crowd-pleasing dumb pop music that, at the time, sounded fresh and rebellious...and their individual styles grew and fed the group's music as they matured. It's just always felt to me like there's so much STUFF in The Beatles' albums. I can see how some might consider them overrated, but I just can't see how anyone could dismiss their work wholesale. There were just too many styles and sounds and directions happening. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
just listen to "A Day In The Life" and tell me you don´t like it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
urbanfox3105 said: just listen to "A Day In The Life" and tell me you don´t like it.
I have and I don't. Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonbeam said: urbanfox3105 said: just listen to "A Day In The Life" and tell me you don´t like it.
I have and I don't. well, then clean out your ears and listen again | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
urbanfox3105 said: Moonbeam said: I have and I don't. well, then clean out your ears and listen again I'm unswerving in my hatred of The Beatles. Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonbeam said: urbanfox3105 said: well, then clean out your ears and listen again I'm unswerving in my hatred of The Beatles. too bad..for you! hahaha | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Speaking of the devil.
Available 4/11... ...4 disc set includes The Early Beatles, Beatles VI, Help! & Rubber Soul. Track List: 1 Love Me Do (Stereo) 2 Twist And Shout (Stereo) 3 Anna (Go To Him) (Stereo) 4 Chains (Stereo) 5 Boys (Stereo) 6 Ask Me Why (Stereo) 7 Please Please Me (Stereo) 8 P.S. I Love You (Stereo) 9 Baby It's You (Stereo) 10 A Taste Of Honey (Stereo) 11 Do You Want To Know A Secret (Stereo) 12 Love Me Do (Mono) 13 Twist And Shout (Mono) 14 Anna (Go To Him) (Mono) 15 Chains (Mono) 16 Boys (Mono) 17 Ask Me Why (Mono) 18 Please Please Me (Mono) 19 P.S. I Love You (Mono) 20 Baby It's You (Mono) 21 A Taste Of Honey (Mono) 22 Do You Want To Know A Secret (Mono) 23 Kansas City/Hey Hey Hey Hey (Stereo) 24 Eight Days A Week (Stereo) 25 You Like Me Too Much (Stereo) 26 Bad Boy (Stereo) 27 I Don't Want To Spoil The Party (Stereo) 28 Words Of Love (Stereo) 29 What You're Doing (Stereo) 30 Yes It Is (Stereo) 31 Dizzy Miss Lizzy (Stereo) 32 Tell Me What You See (Stereo) 33 Every Little Thing (Stereo) 34 Kansas City/Hey Hey Hey Hey (Mono) 35 Eight Days A Week (Mono) 36 You Like Me Too Much (Mono) 37 Bad Boy (Mono) 38 I Don't Want To Spoil The Party (Mono) 39 Words Of Love (Mono) 40 What You're Doing (Mono) 41 Yes It Is (Mono) 42 Dizzy Miss Lizzy (Mono) 43 Tell Me What You See (Mono) 44 Every Little Thing (Mono) 45 Help (Stereo) 46 The Night Before (Stereo) 47 From Me To You Fantasy (Instrumental) 48 (Stereo) 49 You've Got To Hide Your Love Away 50 (Stereo) 51 I Need You (Stereo) 52 In The Tyrol (Instrumental) (Stereo) 53 Another Girl (Stereo) 54 Another Hard Day's Night (Instrumental) 55 (Stereo) 56 Ticket To Ride (Stereo) 57 The Bitter End/You Can't Do That 58 (Instrumental) (Stereo) 59 You're Going To Lose That Girl (Stereo) 60 The Chase (Instrumental) (Stereo) 61 Help (Mono) 62 The Night Before (Mono) 63 From Me To You Fantasy (Instrumental) 64 (Mono) 65 You've Got To Hide Your Love Away 66 (Mono) 67 I Need You (Mono) 68 In The Tyrol (Instrumental) (Mono) 69 Another Girl (Mono) 70 Another Hard Day's Night (Instrumental) 71 (Mono) 72 Ticket To Ride (Mono) 73 The Bitter End/You Can't Do That (Mono) 74 (Instrumental) (Stereo) (Mono) 75 You're Going To Lose That Girl (Mono) 76 The Chase (Instrumental) (Mono) 77 I've Just Seen A Face (Stereo) 78 Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown) 79 (Stereo) 80 You Won't See Me (Stereo) 81 Think For Yourself (Stereo) 82 The Word (Stereo) 83 Michelle (Stereo) 84 It's Only Love (Stereo) 85 Girl (Stereo) 86 I'm Looking Through You (Stereo) 87 In My Life (Stereo) 88 Wait (Stereo) 89 Run For Your Life (Stereo) 90 I've Just Seen A Face (Mono) 91 Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown) 92 (Mono) 93 You Won't See Me (Mono) 94 Think For Yourself (Mono) 95 The Word (Mono) 96 Michelle (Mono) 97 It's Only Love (Mono) 98 Girl (Mono) 99 I'm Looking Through You (Mono) 100 In My Life (Mono) 101 Wait (Mono) 102 Run For Your Life (Mono) tA Tribal Disorder http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431 "Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
urbanfox3105 said: Moonbeam said: I'm unswerving in my hatred of The Beatles. too bad..for you! hahaha he does not like them in a box, he does not like them with a fox! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think The Beatles are over-rated myself, however I can't argue with the volume of songs they have written. John and Paul were profolic songwriters if nothing else. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yeah, the Beatles are shit.
For fuck's sake! As much as I love Prince, I can't think of another act that has such a consistently top notch body of work; whether you refer to their early stuff, or their more inventive AND innovative albums from "Revolver" onwards, they always sought to progress. James Brown is the man; but on a compositional level, he's nowhere near the Beatles. Of course, the Beatles aren't rock'n'roll...are you fucking mad? Check out "Helter Skelter", "Revolution", "I Saw Her Standing There"; I could go on ad nauseam; they are one of the few acts of our times that deserved to be as big as they were. To dismiss the Beatles per se reeks of ignorance; surely there must be one of their many musical phases that you find yourself drawn to? I will admit that they weren't exactly great vocalists - but hey, this purple guy that I know of doesn't exactly excel in that area either? [Edited 4/5/06 16:22pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bublebath said: I just dont get it.
Looking at your avatar, you never will. . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jjam said: Yeah, the Beatles are shit.
For fuck's sake! As much as I love Prince, I can't think of another act that has such a consistently top notch body of work; whether you refer to their early stuff, or their more inventive AND innovative albums from "Revolver" onwards, they always sought to progress. James Brown is the man; but on a compositional level, he's nowhere near the Beatles. Of course, the Beatles aren't rock'n'roll...are you fucking mad? Check out "Helter Skelter", "Revolution", "I Saw Her Standing There"; I could go on ad nauseam; they are one of the few acts of our times that deserved to be as big as they were. To dismiss the Beatles per se reeks of ignorance; surely there must be one of their many musical phases that you find yourself drawn to? I will admit that they weren't exactly great vocalists - but hey, this purple guy that I know of doesn't exactly excel in that area either? [Edited 4/5/06 16:22pm] It's almost impossible to even compare The Beatles & James Brown. They're so different. They're like Yin & Yang of popular music. Between them you pretty much have it all covered. Anywhere the Beatles are lacking--showmanship & funkiness, for example, James has that covered. Anywhere James is lacking--melody & lyrics, perhaps, the Beatles have that covered. But they're both so great & so influential & so different that who could say who's better (and be sure that they're right)? My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i think the beatles would have cited james brown as an influence, especially in their early days. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anx said: i think the beatles would have cited james brown as an influence, especially in their early days.
Sure, just like so many masters of R&B have sung Beatles songs over the years. My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
NDRU said: jjam said: Yeah, the Beatles are shit.
For fuck's sake! As much as I love Prince, I can't think of another act that has such a consistently top notch body of work; whether you refer to their early stuff, or their more inventive AND innovative albums from "Revolver" onwards, they always sought to progress. James Brown is the man; but on a compositional level, he's nowhere near the Beatles. Of course, the Beatles aren't rock'n'roll...are you fucking mad? Check out "Helter Skelter", "Revolution", "I Saw Her Standing There"; I could go on ad nauseam; they are one of the few acts of our times that deserved to be as big as they were. To dismiss the Beatles per se reeks of ignorance; surely there must be one of their many musical phases that you find yourself drawn to? I will admit that they weren't exactly great vocalists - but hey, this purple guy that I know of doesn't exactly excel in that area either? [Edited 4/5/06 16:22pm] It's almost impossible to even compare The Beatles & James Brown. They're so different. They're like Yin & Yang of popular music. Between them you pretty much have it all covered. Anywhere the Beatles are lacking--showmanship & funkiness, for example, James has that covered. Anywhere James is lacking--melody & lyrics, perhaps, the Beatles have that covered. But they're both so great & so influential & so different that who could say who's better (and be sure that they're right)? I'd say the Beatles, Duke Ellington and James Brown are the primary colors of popular music. Just about everybody is influenced by one of those three in some way or another | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You'll find the Beatles always say the early influences are...
John - Lonnie Donegan and various skiffle bands Paul - Bill Haley & Little Richard George - Carl Perkins & Chuck Berry Ringo - Lonnie Donegan . | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Because they wrote some of the greatest songs ever, and if you cannot hear that, then you need some musical growing up to do. Or you have no taste, whatsoever. All you others say Hell Yea!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonbeam said: I knew my name would be brought up here. While I detest their music, it would be really ignorant of me (or anyone) to deny their impact. The fact is that their influence is enormous. However, I hold firm to the notion that they are the most overrated band in the history of rock and roll. I don't care how much anyone adores them, when it is universally unquestioned that they are the greatest, or it is suggested that this should be the case, there is no way for them to be anything but overrated. No matter the artist in consideration for such a lofty (and non-existent) title, there should always be room for discussion. It seems with most Beatle fans, discussion of this matter is viewed as nothing short of heresy. Subsequently, they are overrated by the very notion of what overrated means, and it has little to do with their music. Agreed, if I understand what you're saying properly. If I follow your argument through, then nothing can ever be termed indisputably great. There will always exist a divergent opinion that is going to hold that Saul Bellow was a fucking hack novelist, that John Ford couldn't direct his way out of a paper bag. Fair enough, I think that’s a perfectly logical view to hold. I have not crawled so deep within my fandom that I cannot understand that the Beatles are not a panacea. Certainly, if you crave hard funk, you'll prefer James Brown, if you pine for white blues, you'll go for the Stones or the Pretty Things or whoever. I’m not out to deny anyone of their hatred of the Beatles or whoever. However, I will always respond whenever someone suggests that their legacy isn't deserving of the greatest respect. So if I take it too seriously, well that’s because I ENJOY taking it seriously. [Edited 4/5/06 18:30pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bublebath said: I just dont get it.
I'm not saying that you have to like their music nor exalt them to Godhead status. But to deny their impact and influence on Pop music is short sighted to say the least. tA Tribal Disorder http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431 "Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
damosuzuki said: Moonbeam said: I knew my name would be brought up here. While I detest their music, it would be really ignorant of me (or anyone) to deny their impact. The fact is that their influence is enormous. However, I hold firm to the notion that they are the most overrated band in the history of rock and roll. I don't care how much anyone adores them, when it is universally unquestioned that they are the greatest, or it is suggested that this should be the case, there is no way for them to be anything but overrated. No matter the artist in consideration for such a lofty (and non-existent) title, there should always be room for discussion. It seems with most Beatle fans, discussion of this matter is viewed as nothing short of heresy. Subsequently, they are overrated by the very notion of what overrated means, and it has little to do with their music. Agreed, if I understand what you're saying properly. If I follow your argument through, then nothing can ever be termed indisputably great. There will always exist a divergent opinion that is going to hold that Saul Bellow was a fucking hack novelist, that John Ford couldn't direct his way out of a paper bag. Fair enough, I think that’s a perfectly logical view to hold. I have not crawled so deep within my fandom that I cannot understand that the Beatles are not a panacea. Certainly, if you crave hard funk, you'll prefer James Brown, if you pine for white blues, you'll go for the Stones or the Pretty Things or whoever. I’m not out to deny anyone of their hatred of the Beatles or whoever. However, I will always respond whenever someone suggests that their legacy isn't deserving of the greatest respect. So if I take it too seriously, well that’s because I ENJOY taking it seriously. [Edited 4/5/06 18:30pm] It's not that I'm saying that nothing can assume greatness, but nothing should be universally lauded as the greatest, as there should always be room for discussion. Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonbeam said: It's not that I'm saying that nothing can assume greatness, but nothing should be universally lauded as the greatest, as there should always be room for discussion. OK - Lord knows I can be prone to the occasional bout of hyperbole. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I liked their first hit, "Take the Last Train to Clarksville".
Their tv show was pretty good, but they kinda jumped the shark with too many appearances on the Brady Bunch. They had a pretty good guitarist back in the day...I wonder what ever happened to him? Their documentary was pretty funny, but when Eric Idle left the band to become a snake charmer, it was career suicide. Their musical in the late seventies, "Dr. Pepper's Clubland" wasn't as good as their earlier work in Saturday Night Fever, but over time it ages well. Stigwood is much better than Martin. When Davey sang "Yesterday" on the set of Star Trek II, that was totally the bomb, but how did he get the slither thingy out of his ear? The Beetles has their very own kinda farfennoogenthingy. Great musicians in a great band. Some people tell me I've got great legs... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think anyone who can't understand The Beatles must have had an unfortunate upbringing or perhaps witnessed kittens being tortured.
It's like not understanding love... but then I guess it takes all kinds and there are those who don't "get" love either. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JPW said: I think anyone who can't understand The Beatles must have had an unfortunate upbringing or perhaps witnessed kittens being tortured.
It's like not understanding love... but then I guess it takes all kinds and there are those who don't "get" love either. Now that's just silly. Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jacktheimprovident said: here's my take on the Beatles' greatness.
The Beatles were more or less the first act in rock music (or arguably popular music as a whole) to A."grow" artistically and make it acceptable, even expected for a band to expand and progress rather than keep rehashing the same songs over and over again. B they were among the first bands to exclusively write their own material and not be beholden to outside songwriters, again making it expected for artists in popular music to write their own stuff. C. Were among the first groups to embrace all kinds of styles and influences. Revolver may not have been the first place where orchestral strings were used in rock music, or the first place a rock artist made forays into eastern music, or the first place a musician used tape loops in a collage/soundscape, but it was the first record where all those things were done in the same place. D. Made the biggest contribution towards making rock music, and "popular" music as a whole, respectable and held on the same level as "Serious" art, not just disposable fluff that wouldn't have any relevance beyond it's time of release. I bet you the term "classic rock" would have never existed if not for them E. They just wrote dozens and dozens of excellent songs, both lyrically and musically, in almost every style and pioneered in some direct or indirect way just about every "hyphen rock" genre that would come into existence in the next decades. and F. they were the first band to make the album format relevant. it was nothing but singles before the Beatles. a psychotic is someone who just figured out what's going on | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The same people who don't get the Beatles don't get Monty Python. They were like the Gods of a certain era and English culture that people either relate to or don't. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
what were rock bands like before the beatles? had there ever been a band before where every member played and instrument AND had a chance to write songs and sing lead? had there ever been a band before the beatles where every member had a distinct personality and "role" in the band? i mean, before ringo, had anyone ever heard a rock drummer talk before? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
U take the Beatles and I'll take:
Lil Ricahrd, James Brown, Jerry lee lewis, Johnny B Goode (u know who), Louie Jordan, Bessie Smith, Elvis (some of it), BB King,.....I could go on. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Alasseon said: I liked their first hit, "Take the Last Train to Clarksville".
Their tv show was pretty good, but they kinda jumped the shark with too many appearances on the Brady Bunch. They had a pretty good guitarist back in the day...I wonder what ever happened to him? Their documentary was pretty funny, but when Eric Idle left the band to become a snake charmer, it was career suicide. Their musical in the late seventies, "Dr. Pepper's Clubland" wasn't as good as their earlier work in Saturday Night Fever, but over time it ages well. Stigwood is much better than Martin. When Davey sang "Yesterday" on the set of Star Trek II, that was totally the bomb, but how did he get the slither thingy out of his ear? The Beetles has their very own kinda farfennoogenthingy. Great musicians in a great band. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |