independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > THE BEATLES!.....THEY WERE f**KING BRILLIANT, WERENT THEY
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 10/14/05 7:05am

Dewrede

avatar

smile
Hé , een landgenoot wave smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 10/14/05 7:54am

WildheartXXX

avatar

If U rated nursery rhyme pop is you sort of thing i guess they were brilliant. Me id rather listen to some Led Zeppelin.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 10/14/05 8:05am

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

WildheartXXX said:

If U rated nursery rhyme pop is you sort of thing i guess they were brilliant. Me id rather listen to some Led Zeppelin.

There's room for both. nod
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 10/14/05 9:54am

GangstaFam

minneapolisgenius said:

RipHer2Shreds said:


lol In the same way that you can't mention Prince without somebody else mentioning MJ, somebody is always going to instantly compare the inferior Stones to The Beatles. razz

I'll never get that comparison. Never. confuse

Well, they came up at the same time. They had a similar evolution during the 60's. They were eachother's direct competition. Years after their peak, they're still the 2 biggest bands in the world. I mean, thev've definitely got their differences, but they go hand in hand.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 10/14/05 10:04am

chuckaducci

IstenSzek said:

CinisterCee said:

I don't spin any Beatles albums recorded before Rubber Soul.


nod


And Anxiety's 100%, imho.
[Edited 10/14/05 10:05am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 10/14/05 10:31am

andyman91

avatar

CinisterCee said:

andyman91 said:



I hear ya (I prefer them as hippies), but A Hard Days Night is about as classic as it gets. Also, it's the closest thing you get to a John Lennon solo record until 1970.

With the Beatles is great, too, and Help has some songs that surpass many of the songs on their later records.




Well then... with those descriptions I might have to dig into those couple albums.

For that era of stuff I am only aware of the tracks that appeared on the Red album:




What do you think of Beatles For Sale, andyman91?



A Hard Days Night is a much better collection of original Beatles music.

The songwriting on Beatles for sale is great, beginning to move away from puppy love and towards more personal stuff, slightly darker than before. No Reply & I'm a Loser show more of Lennon's real nature.

But the album is kind of a step backward as a whole. They wrote all the songs on the predecessor A Hard Days Night, and I think 7 of these songs are rock & roll standards, like their first two albums.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 10/14/05 10:38am

Moonbeam

avatar

Tessa said:

Moonbeam said:



And you like the Backstreet Boys. giggle



But I also like the Beatles wink


And that says what?
Feel free to join in the Prince Album Poll 2018! Let'a celebrate his legacy by counting down the most beloved Prince albums, as decided by you!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 10/14/05 11:20am

funkyslsistah

avatar

I didn't grow up on The Beatles, but discovered and embraced their music on my own around 1995 with the help of oldies stations, and the much hyped Anthologies. I bought alot of their music, and taped a radio program which played basically their entire catalogue from A-Z in a day. Just hearing their stories and knowing who've influenced them makes their music even more worth listening. Unfortunately I haven't listened in a long time cuz 80% of their music are on tapes. I would love to transfer it to cd then to my Dell DJ so I can listen to it more.
"Funkyslsistah… you ain't funky at all, you just a little ol' prude"!
"It's just my imagination, once again running away with me."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 10/14/05 11:23am

RipHer2Shreds

andyman91 said:

CinisterCee said:





Well then... with those descriptions I might have to dig into those couple albums.

For that era of stuff I am only aware of the tracks that appeared on the Red album:




What do you think of Beatles For Sale, andyman91?



A Hard Days Night is a much better collection of original Beatles music.

The songwriting on Beatles for sale is great, beginning to move away from puppy love and towards more personal stuff, slightly darker than before. No Reply & I'm a Loser show more of Lennon's real nature.

But the album is kind of a step backward as a whole. They wrote all the songs on the predecessor A Hard Days Night, and I think 7 of these songs are rock & roll standards, like their first two albums.

I was talking about this last night with my boyfriend. This is exactly what I don't like about it. I guess I don't necessarily object to the remakes per se, but they weren't exactly exciting remakes. A Hard Day's Night is a satisfying listen from start to finish. There are big lapses in Beatles for Sale.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 10/14/05 11:28am

BinaryJustin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 10/14/05 11:31am

andyman91

avatar

RipHer2Shreds said:

andyman91 said:




A Hard Days Night is a much better collection of original Beatles music.

The songwriting on Beatles for sale is great, beginning to move away from puppy love and towards more personal stuff, slightly darker than before. No Reply & I'm a Loser show more of Lennon's real nature.

But the album is kind of a step backward as a whole. They wrote all the songs on the predecessor A Hard Days Night, and I think 7 of these songs are rock & roll standards, like their first two albums.

I was talking about this last night with my boyfriend. This is exactly what I don't like about it. I guess I don't necessarily object to the remakes per se, but they weren't exactly exciting remakes. A Hard Day's Night is a satisfying listen from start to finish. There are big lapses in Beatles for Sale.



Definitely. They were on an incredible pace of two records per year, and they'd just "conquered America" and filmed their first movie, toured since 1960 nonstop, it seems. How could they keep it up? Still the originals are pretty good. But Hard Days Night is probably their greatest early album.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 10/14/05 11:33am

RipHer2Shreds

andyman91 said:

RipHer2Shreds said:


I was talking about this last night with my boyfriend. This is exactly what I don't like about it. I guess I don't necessarily object to the remakes per se, but they weren't exactly exciting remakes. A Hard Day's Night is a satisfying listen from start to finish. There are big lapses in Beatles for Sale.



Definitely. They were on an incredible pace of two records per year, and they'd just "conquered America" and filmed their first movie, toured since 1960 nonstop, it seems. How could they keep it up? Still the originals are pretty good. But Hard Days Night is probably their greatest early album.

I agree 100%! And the greatest opening chord for an album ever! biggrin Instantly identifiable.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 10/14/05 11:34am

theAudience

avatar

funkyslsistah said:

I didn't grow up on The Beatles, but discovered and embraced their music on my own around 1995 with the help of oldies stations, and the much hyped Anthologies. I bought alot of their music, and taped a radio program which played basically their entire catalogue from A-Z in a day. Just hearing their stories and knowing who've influenced them makes their music even more worth listening. Unfortunately I haven't listened in a long time cuz 80% of their music are on tapes. I would love to transfer it to cd then to my Dell DJ so I can listen to it more.

That sounds similar to a show that is broadcast here in L.A. on 97.1 KLSX:
Breakfast With The Beatles (every Sunday 8am-10am)
Supposedly it's the longest running Beatles show in the states (over 20 years).

http://www.klsx.com/shows/beatles.shtml


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 10/14/05 11:42am

andyman91

avatar

theAudience said:

funkyslsistah said:

I didn't grow up on The Beatles, but discovered and embraced their music on my own around 1995 with the help of oldies stations, and the much hyped Anthologies. I bought alot of their music, and taped a radio program which played basically their entire catalogue from A-Z in a day. Just hearing their stories and knowing who've influenced them makes their music even more worth listening. Unfortunately I haven't listened in a long time cuz 80% of their music are on tapes. I would love to transfer it to cd then to my Dell DJ so I can listen to it more.

That sounds similar to a show that is broadcast here in L.A. on 97.1 KLSX:
Breakfast With The Beatles (every Sunday 8am-10am)
Supposedly it's the longest running Beatles show in the states (over 20 years).

http://www.klsx.com/shows/beatles.shtml


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431


Ah, I miss Breakfast With the Beatles!. Pretty sure KLSX did the Beatles A-Z show.

Also up here in Frisco, KFOG has done it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 10/14/05 12:02pm

sextonseven

avatar

Moonbeam said:

sextonseven said:



This thread is only for people that think the Beatles are cooler. smile

And take Moonbeam with you when you leave, please.


shocked cry


I'm just playing around. This thread wouldn't be very interesting if everybody here loved the Beatles.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 10/14/05 1:10pm

ufoclub

avatar

you're right about live, but in the studio, the beatles were way more cool.

GangstaFam said:

RipHer2Shreds said:

lol In the same way that you can't mention Prince without somebody else mentioning MJ, somebody is always going to instantly compare the inferior Stones to The Beatles. razz

The Beatles might be superior songwriters, but the Stones are just so much cooler!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 10/14/05 1:25pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

GangstaFam said:

minneapolisgenius said:


I'll never get that comparison. Never. confuse

Well, they came up at the same time. They had a similar evolution during the 60's. They were eachother's direct competition. Years after their peak, they're still the 2 biggest bands in the world. I mean, thev've definitely got their differences, but they go hand in hand.

But they sound nothing alike. neutral
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 10/14/05 1:30pm

funkyslsistah

avatar

andyman91 said:

theAudience said:


That sounds similar to a show that is broadcast here in L.A. on 97.1 KLSX:
Breakfast With The Beatles (every Sunday 8am-10am)
Supposedly it's the longest running Beatles show in the states (over 20 years).

http://www.klsx.com/shows/beatles.shtml


tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...dID=182431


Ah, I miss Breakfast With the Beatles!. Pretty sure KLSX did the Beatles A-Z show.

Also up here in Frisco, KFOG has done it.


nod KFOG is station I taped it from. It took four tapes, 8-10 hours. Usually they air it on New Years Day or sometime during a holiday weekend.
"Funkyslsistah… you ain't funky at all, you just a little ol' prude"!
"It's just my imagination, once again running away with me."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 10/14/05 1:36pm

andyman91

avatar

minneapolisgenius said:

GangstaFam said:


Well, they came up at the same time. They had a similar evolution during the 60's. They were eachother's direct competition. Years after their peak, they're still the 2 biggest bands in the world. I mean, thev've definitely got their differences, but they go hand in hand.

But they sound nothing alike. neutral


Even they weren't competing. They were friends! They're different enough that I allow the Stones' title "Worlds Greatest Rock & Roll Band" even though I'm more of a Beatles fan.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 10/14/05 1:48pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

andyman91 said:

minneapolisgenius said:


But they sound nothing alike. neutral


Even they weren't competing. They were friends! They're different enough that I allow the Stones' title "Worlds Greatest Rock & Roll Band" even though I'm more of a Beatles fan.

I'm a fan of both. Although I would never give the Stones that title personally. biggrin
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 10/14/05 1:51pm

zaara

I recently went to Liverpool and it was really cool seeing all the beatles stuff and having a beer at The Cavern Bar and The Cavern Club - although not the original place you still feel the vibe. Great atmosphere!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 10/14/05 2:17pm

Cloudbuster

avatar

DavidEye said:

btw,The Rolling Stones are great,but their music doesn't compare to the Beatles at all.Very few bands (or artists) can top The Beatles' amazing body of work.


boff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 10/14/05 2:20pm

ABeautifulOne

avatar

Washed up...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 10/14/05 2:25pm

RipHer2Shreds

ABeautifulOne said:

Washed up...

We're not talking about B's wigs (though they could use a good washin'). Get the fuck outta here.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 10/14/05 2:44pm

ABeautifulOne

avatar

RipHer2Shreds said:

ABeautifulOne said:

Washed up...

We're not talking about B's wigs (though they could use a good washin'). Get the fuck outta here.



Bitch find something new to talk about...Beyoncé is so last year.Unlike most of you idiots slobbing over a damn group that's been dead for ages, I have a life that I don't have to sit on my ass all day to mop over a bunch of dead beats.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 10/14/05 2:47pm

RipHer2Shreds

ABeautifulOne said:

RipHer2Shreds said:


We're not talking about B's wigs (though they could use a good washin'). Get the fuck outta here.



Bitch find something new to talk about...Beyoncé is so last year.Unlike most of you idiots slobbing over a damn group that's been dead for ages, I have a life that I don't have to sit on my ass all day to mop over a bunch of dead beats.

shrug Are you sure you've got better things to do than to "mop over a bunch of dead beats?" Cuz you took some time to post about them. If you knew what you were talking about, it'd be a different story. How can a group that broke up 35 years ago be washed up?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 10/14/05 2:48pm

minneapolisgen
ius

avatar

ABeautifulOne said:

RipHer2Shreds said:


We're not talking about B's wigs (though they could use a good washin'). Get the fuck outta here.



Bitch find something new to talk about...Beyoncé is so last year.Unlike most of you idiots slobbing over a damn group that's been dead for ages, I have a life that I don't have to sit on my ass all day to mop over a bunch of dead beats.

lol But you're taking the time to post about how they're a bunch of deadbeats. You should go back to that life you were just talking about. nod
"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 10/14/05 3:23pm

ABeautifulOne

avatar

RipHer2Shreds said:

ABeautifulOne said:




Bitch find something new to talk about...Beyoncé is so last year.Unlike most of you idiots slobbing over a damn group that's been dead for ages, I have a life that I don't have to sit on my ass all day to mop over a bunch of dead beats.

shrug Are you sure you've got better things to do than to "mop over a bunch of dead beats?" Cuz you took some time to post about them. If you knew what you were talking about, it'd be a different story. How can a group that broke up 35 years ago be washed up?



I know I have way better things to do than to sit on my ass all day like most of you and speculate over a bunch of crap...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 10/14/05 3:31pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

Jon Brion:

"The Beatles are just impossibly great. Most people who hear it can appreciate that it's just well-spirited at the very least, the rest of us just shake our heads and go,'Those fucking assholes!' It's almost a drag as an artist because we're all living under the shadow of the Beatles."

worship
VOTE....EARLY
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 10/14/05 3:34pm

DiminutiveRock
er

avatar

DavidEye said:

btw,The Rolling Stones are great,but their music doesn't compare to the Beatles at all.Very few bands (or artists) can top The Beatles' amazing body of work.


And they were innovators in the studio - writers - performers - producers. They set the standard for nearly all who followed as creative recording artists.
VOTE....EARLY
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > THE BEATLES!.....THEY WERE f**KING BRILLIANT, WERENT THEY