New topic
Printabledag said: oh why do all the Mj threads turn into that "he needs a therapy" or "he looks terribly " crap? It´s tiring. To all of you guys who think he´s ugly why do you bother clicking on a topic which clearly is only about MJ pictures and than bother us with your insulting comments?
 Because it's a public message board & people can comment on whatever they want. If you want endless fawning & "oh, he's so hot!!" I suggest you go to a site dedicated to him where you'll be surrounded by fellow deluded fanatics.
Enough about that... let's discuss the fineness that is Prince & his perfectly gorgeous, lickable round ass 
   I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
MrSoulpower said: dag said: Someone who´s worked since 5 years old has sure been working way to hardly. I think by now MJ has already done more work than any of us will ever do. If he retired today completely - than he would deserve it. There is a difference between your own determination/ambition and being driven to work by an overambitious father. Joe Jackson has ruined it for Michael. Besides, the "hardest working man in showbusiness" is someone else. Someone, who has at his heyday performed on 320 days a year/up to six (!) shows a day and who has released more than 200 singles and more than 100 albums. u know michael could've EASILY stopped singing and being in the biz once he turned 18. he was an adult the day he hit 18 and could've stopped and went to college or watever. but he didnt, to me that OBVIOUSLY shows his dedication and determination to continue doing music. he may not have released as many records as jb he may not be a musician, and he may not tour 24/7 but that doesnt take away from his legacy. that does not take away from what he's achieved Yesterday is dead...tomorrow hasnt arrived yet....i have just ONE day...
...And i'm gonna be groovy in it! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: kdj997 said: Worse than ever? As an unbias person in regards to MJ, I say he looks better than he looked in years based on those picture. I see some damage control there, I don't know how much more he could do but he definitely reversed the path he was going. Umm, PLEASE tell me how he's reversed his previous path??? When I say his nose looks worse than ever I mean that it's very, VERY sharp/pointy/fake in this photo - maybe the worst I've seen it. Outside of that the muthafucka looks the same as he has the past few years - fucked up face, too much makeup, FUCKED up wig  Somebody get his punk ass on Extreme Makeover  Do you think he has interchangeable tips?  Cuz you're right, it looks even skinnier than ever, if that was even possible.Don't Kiss The Beast.....Be Superior at least.
It's Me Supa, ran out of replies again  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SpookyElectricSmackdown said: CalhounSq said: Umm, PLEASE tell me how he's reversed his previous path??? When I say his nose looks worse than ever I mean that it's very, VERY sharp/pointy/fake in this photo - maybe the worst I've seen it. Outside of that the muthafucka looks the same as he has the past few years - fucked up face, too much makeup, FUCKED up wig Somebody get his punk ass on Extreme Makeover Do you think he has interchangeable tips? Cuz you're right, it looks even skinnier than ever, if that was even possible.Yea. There's a super closeup pic of him where you can see the tip just laying on his nose. It's an actual piece. LORD  I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Moonwalkbjrain said: MrSoulpower said: There is a difference between your own determination/ambition and being driven to work by an overambitious father. Joe Jackson has ruined it for Michael. Besides, the "hardest working man in showbusiness" is someone else. Someone, who has at his heyday performed on 320 days a year/up to six (!) shows a day and who has released more than 200 singles and more than 100 albums. u know michael could've EASILY stopped singing and being in the biz once he turned 18. he was an adult the day he hit 18 and could've stopped and went to college or watever. but he didnt, to me that OBVIOUSLY shows his dedication and determination to continue doing music. he may not have released as many records as jb he may not be a musician, and he may not tour 24/7 but that doesnt take away from his legacy. that does not take away from what he's achieved No, but it pretty much terminates dag's claim that MJ works harder than anybody else.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: Yea. There's a super closeup pic of him where you can see the tip just laying on his nose. It's an actual piece. LORD
And where would this picture be? You do understand if you for instant google up "Michael Jackson" in Google image search at least 30% of the results are caricatures or image manipulations. And usually quite clumsy. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I had to look at the pictures before I deemed them ugly or whatever...right.
and then after looking at the pictures, I commented. you sound as if you never seen him.
No, but it pretty much terminates dag's claim that MJ works harder than anybody else.
ok, guys. 11 solo albums in a space of 33 years doesn`t really stand for a hard working artist.. more for an artist who records when the previous album has been milked.
yeah, but we don´t know how much went into making of these albums. And from what I´ve heard a lot. he allegedly records 100 of songs before he realeases those 10 per album. And I do believe that during his childhood - the J5 era, it must have been pretty tough for a child. I think that it´s only now when he has kids that he allowed himself to have some time off, before it was all about work. And I think he deserves his time off.That´s all. That´s why I don´t consider him lazy now when he doesn´t seem to be workin - but hey who knows. Maybe he is. That would be great. "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
These are nice pics.
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: SpookyElectricSmackdown said: Do you think he has interchangeable tips? Cuz you're right, it looks even skinnier than ever, if that was even possible.Yea. There's a super closeup pic of him where you can see the tip just laying on his nose. It's an actual piece. LORD 
This thread is hilarious.  "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyBrotha said: I think the whole Michael Jackson issue and in particular the treatment he gets in America today, summarises the extent of the social mess that country is still in.
The Americans treat michael jackson as a product, which they consumed and spat back out again, its quite disgusting really. And, in the end, everything that is said in the media and indeed in public in that country points to a society that basically doesnt give a shit for human life, has no morals, is full of fundamentalists, is xenophobic and lacking in respect. Its not just the media who convey these messages, its actually the people too. I think most Europeans find it totally bizarre. If u look at all the Jackson haters on this website, or all the people that comment on him as if they are ashamed, they are 99% American. MJ comes to London and hundreds of fans follow him round the city, the media r everywhere, the public cheer in the street, and he gets an applause/clapping as he sits in the theatre in the West End. This simply does not happen in the US anymore..... lol, i just felt like ranting on about the UK support and in particular French/German support for MJ which is massive. Okay...I have to weigh in on this...First I have to say that calling MJ's voice decent (as someone on the org did in a previous reply) is a bit delusional...When the man was at his peak, his voice was insane; I'm talking among the greats... BUT!!!!!...This business about the US public treating MJ like a product and showing the man total contempt, is bullshit...The man has gone through one of the most disfiguring and horrific self-induced physical evolutions of any public figure in the history of pop culture; here's a man that, while found innocent, has serious mental issues with his unhealthy obsession for children that has twice gone in direction of child molestation charges (even if it's not true, you have to admit that he needs some help...); here's a man that once stood as the most beloved and popular entertainer of all time but has been reduced to playing catch up with whatever flavor of the month singer, dancer is topping the charts at the moment... Here is a man that ran away from his R&B roots, giving himself the fleeting and egomanical moniker "The KING Of POP," a title that basically insinuates that MJ's success should be judged strictly on the record sales and not actual musical quality (You wonder why the man is looked at as a product; Just point to the KING Of Pop title)...There are plenty of reasons why the American public has turned on the man...But to say that the UK have shown a more positive view of MJ is a bit misleading...Where do you think the term "Wacko Jacko" came from? Listen, as people may already know, I'm an Prince fan who happens to be an oldchool Mike J. admirer....I went to the Triumph tour; I remember watching Motown 25...I watched in amazement of the man's groundbreaking videos...The man was as great as advertized...And I believe that a song like "Stranger In Moscow" is a gem worth discovering by those who long gave up on MJ...But to say that his problems come from a lack of support from the American public is silly and a bit naive..By his own doing, MJ has become tabloid fodder...He's in the headlines worldwide for all the wrong reasons...And that's tragic indeed... [Edited 10/11/05 14:09pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Um, abandoning his rnb roots? Take a listen to his last album "Invincible" and explain how that reflects an abandonment of RnB?
And he clearly is still loved in the UK, he's sold more records here in the last 5 yrs than he has in America, with 1/6 of the population. He's sold 8million records in the UK alone since 2001. Also, the Living with Michael Jackson documentary went down well here, most ppl could identify that Bashir was a toad, so much so that in the week following the airing MJ's sales went up by 1000%. Also, the Wacko Jacko thing came from the worst tabloid in the UK and is the most derogatory thing said about him over here, the Americans call him far worse than "wacko". Also, claimin that he has been reduced to a shadow of his former self is ridiculous, he is nearly 50 what do u expect?? He's had a 40 year career, in the limelight every single day of his life longer than he can probably remember. Every day will be work for him, he isnt free. I applaud the man for surviving possibly the most evil, vile, inhumane treatment any human being can get, it amazes me to see him smile in those photos! Finally, The King of Pop title is simply an indicator of the truth, he is the greatest pop star ever, he deserves it. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Warning...this is long as hell....Here we go...
FunkyBrotha said: Um, abandoning his rnb roots? Take a listen to his last album "Invincible" and explain how that reflects an abandonment of RnB? Murph says: Invincible was merely an attempt to come back in the new age R&B world of Usher and Beyonce after the "pop" era was driven in the ground by the likes of Britney Spears, NYN Sync and ect...If it was "in" and commercially viable to make polka songs, I'm afraid MJ would be doing the exact thing.....I'll say it again...the man moved far away from his true soul base (Bad, was a bit formulaic, but that's another story...) because he wanted to crush Thriller..This also may explain why he only released two albums in a decade...To put it bluntly, a great, all-world talent like MJ did not capitalize on his prime years..instead, he coasted on his immense, record breaking success...Hell, even Madonna released more albums during that decade... FunkyBrotha: And he clearly is still loved in the UK, he's sold more records here in the last 5 yrs than he has in America, with 1/6 of the population. He's sold 8million records in the UK alone since 2001. --- Murph: Let's be real...I love my UK brothers and sisters, but I don't think MJ is spending $15 to $30 million on the recording of one album (invincible) just to sell albums to the British public and abroad..We all know MJ wants to sell records in the States...The fact that people are saying that the man has to make a comeback is absurd...We should be speaking about this man's great legacy as a brilliant singer/performer...Instead, he has to make a "comeback" to salvage his legacy...what's wrong with this picture??? Funky: Also, the Wacko Jacko thing came from the worst tabloid in the UK and is the most derogatory thing said about him over here, the Americans call him far worse than "wacko". -- Murph: Come on...I ride for MJ like the next man...I respect the man's rich legacy as arguably the greatest performer of his generation...but I don't need to read UK tabloids to know my boyhood hero is clearly not right... Funky: Also, claimin that he has been reduced to a shadow of his former self is ridiculous, he is nearly 50 what do u expect?? He's had a 40 year career, in the limelight every single day of his life longer than he can probably remember. Every day will be work for him, he isnt free. I applaud the man for surviving possibly the most evil, vile, inhumane treatment any human being can get, it amazes me to see him smile in those photos! -- Murph: Listen...I don't know how old you are, but there was a time when MJ was more than just a chart-topping artist...or some hit machine; MJ was a force of nature; a genuis of the stage...However, the reason I will continue to say the man is a former shell of himself is that he's allowed the absurdity and tragic implications of his private and very public life (there's too much to recount...) to effect his great musical legacy...Yeah, there are some outside forces out to get him...But MJ's been the 'cause for most of his downward spiral , not the media...I don't expect the man to be doing the moonwalk with the same vigor and brilliance of his early '80s years...nor do i expect him to rival the prime year concerts that became a part of his legend...What i expect is for him to grow up and act like a reasonable human being (meaning, stop with the Peter Pan obsessions...)What I expect him to age gracefully like his '80s peers (Bruce Springsteen, Prince, Madonna, U2 ect...) Is that too much to ask? Funky: Finally, The King of Pop title is simply an indicator of the truth, he is the greatest pop star ever, he deserves it. --- Murph: With all due respect, I think MJ's KING Of POP proclamation is the biggest indication of how MJ has tarnished his career...Yes, his personal fuck ups have had a great deal to do with his status a the ultimate tabloid freakshow (it hurts me to say this...seriously)...But by calling himself the KING Of Pop he basically has given critics and the public at large a bullseye for ridicule...Think about it...the term "pop" over the last 20 years has been more connected with performers who mere products; whose self worth should only be judged on commercial sales and not artistic prowess...There's a reason why the man alligned himself with Britney Spears and boy bands in past award shows..Such statements are beneath the MJ; To me his appearance with James Brown on the BET Awards indicates the type of company he should be keeping...not disposable "pop" artists... Yet, MJ insist on calling himself the King Of Pop because he sold a billion records...There's a reason why you don't hear the likes of the Beatles and Stevie Wonder being labeled KINGs of Pop...When you connect your legacy with record sales, and nothing more, such success is fleeting...Hell, Garth Brooks was breaking records in the '90s...What does that really mean? I would rather love MJ's legacy for the greatness of his talent than how many records he's sold...As I've said on a MJboard.com site, Michael Jackson is one of the only artists of the '80s that can move 8 million copies worldwide or sell 3 million in the US and be deemed a bust...There's a reason for that...The man refuses to move on from Thriller; he still thinks it's the '80s...And calling himself the "King Of Pop" will never help his case...To me he was always bigger than record sales... [Edited 10/11/05 23:29pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: CalhounSq said: Yea. There's a super closeup pic of him where you can see the tip just laying on his nose. It's an actual piece. LORD
And where would this picture be? You do understand if you for instant google up "Michael Jackson" in Google image search at least 30% of the results are caricatures or image manipulations. And usually quite clumsy. 
All of these are pretty disturbing. He must put some kind of flesh-like putty around it b/c it's more obvious/sharp @ times. On the closeup w/ his nose taped you can see the piece peeking through the tape... 
DAMN... after looking @ all these ghastly photos it just makes me sad. I'm sorry but the pic below is a totally fuckable dude who had an insanely warped image of himself & morphed into a fucking monster. 
He's so fucking stupid...  I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: his face looks very african american in this pic, besides the nose of course [Edited 10/12/05 1:47am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hellomoto said: CalhounSq said: his face looks very african american in this pic, besides the nose of course [Edited 10/12/05 1:47am] WTF is that supposed to mean??  Besides the nose he doesn't even HAVE a face  I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hellomoto said: CalhounSq said: his face looks very african american in this pic, besides the nose of course [Edited 10/12/05 1:47am] OMG.....bahahahahahhaaa
"VERY AFRICAN AMERICAN" (white skin, lipstick and an awful wig)
I love the org...ya'll some say crazy ass shit....lol. [Edited 10/12/05 8:16am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said:
Tito, bring me a tissue! And again - obvious wig. Dig the lace in the front. There was a point during all his stages of surgery where it didn't look unbecoming on him. Thriller era Mike was still cute. Bad he started to look like a black Barbie doll with a bad curl...but still kinda sorta cute at first. From there on, it just makes me sad. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said:
All of these are pretty disturbing. He must put some kind of flesh-like putty around it b/c it's more obvious/sharp @ times. On the closeup w/ his nose taped you can see the piece peeking through the tape... 
His nose looks like that in that picture because he according to his own words had recently just had "a minor surgery" on his nose and that's just a post-surgery plaster covered in make-up. It's not a permanent part of his nose, for crying out loud. He insisted on wearing his mask inside the courthouse that day but the judge ordered it to be removed. And as for the varying pointiness - well it's there, but it has to do with the camera angles and the facial expressions he makes. If you watched the Bashir documentary for instance you saw how different it looked from different camera angles. Basically, the nose is just too small and also too tight for his middle-aged African-American male's facial structure. I'm not saying it looks good on a regular day either, though.  [Edited 10/12/05 7:59am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh! Is it 1987?
I could've sworn it was 2005. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cloudbuster said: Oh! Is it 1987?
I could've sworn it was 2005. Can you post a close-up photo of your nose please? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
He also apparently starred in the movie Devil Doll
 "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
Gotta admit, MJ threads always inspire great comedy. Been gone for a minute, now I'm back with the jump off | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: He also apparently starred in the movie Devil Doll
Naughty girl! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RipHer2Shreds said: minneapolisgenius said: He also apparently starred in the movie Devil Doll
Naughty girl!"I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hellomoto said: CalhounSq said: his face looks very african american in this pic, besides the nose of course [Edited 10/12/05 1:47am] LMAO WTF? No it doesn't. His face here looks like someone took a dead corpse and tried to dress it up to look alive. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Novabreaker said: CalhounSq said:
All of these are pretty disturbing. He must put some kind of flesh-like putty around it b/c it's more obvious/sharp @ times. On the closeup w/ his nose taped you can see the piece peeking through the tape...
His nose looks like that in that picture because he according to his own words had recently just had "a minor surgery" on his nose and that's just a post-surgery plaster covered in make-up. It's not a permanent part of his nose, for crying out loud. He insisted on wearing his mask inside the courthouse that day but the judge ordered it to be removed. And as for the varying pointiness - well it's there, but it has to do with the camera angles and the facial expressions he makes. If you watched the Bashir documentary for instance you saw how different it looked from different camera angles. Basically, the nose is just too small and also too tight for his middle-aged African-American male's facial structure. I'm not saying it looks good on a regular day either, though.
[Edited 10/12/05 7:59am] Sooooo what am I looking @ in this photo?
And I don't think his nose looks different each time due to lighting & angles - the shit is different b/c he's putting different shit on it to make it look like he still has a nose. The shit collapsed ages ago... at least that's what I believe, but whatever man I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: hellomoto said: his face looks very african american in this pic, besides the nose of course [Edited 10/12/05 1:47am] WTF is that supposed to mean?? Besides the nose he doesn't even HAVE a face i meant the facial structure. like the part above his lips and below the nose, the way it sticks out, and the cheek area. maybe i shouldn't of said african american, but more 'like he used to' [Edited 10/13/05 5:37am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
his lips look as big as ever here, doesnt look like hes had any reducing surgery done to them oh and i think this is a great pic of michael, i think he looks very good, very normal and very GREAT, i have to say it again, i love this look (remeber im comparing this look to the rest of the invincible look, not saying he looks better here then any other time, just then any look hes had recently). i can defiently see thriller and young michael in this photo. its strange, he can look one way one day and completely different the next day, for instance i thought he looked really good at this court thing in 2002 but a couple of weeks later there were pics of him and he looked terrible. i really think it depends on what kind of wig he wears and the make up [Edited 10/13/05 5:36am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CalhounSq said: The shit collapsed ages ago... at least that's what I believe, but whatever man
 oh God stop Calhoun, you're killing me over here!  "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |