JonSnow said: Yeah... there are alot of great songs, definitely, but... the production just grates on my nerves. I would love it if DM went back and re-recorded some of those great old tracks.
That could be interesting. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: GangstaFam said: I see a lot of folks saying that. But I think "Some Great Reward" and "Black Celebration" are aging quite well. There are a TON of great songs from that period. And I have a really special place in my heart for "Speak & Spell". Yeah... there are alot of great songs, definitely, but... the production just grates on my nerves. I would love it if DM went back and re-recorded some of those great old tracks. Aren't there some new mixes on the Singles compilations? VOTE....EARLY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm here to disagree. U2 and Depeche Mode are up there in my list of favorite bands (#s 1 and 3 respectively), but I think that U2 works much better as a band than DM. With U2, you have four musicians coming together to release something that is better as the sum of their parts. It's hard to consider DM a band as such. Gore has so much more power than the rest of his bandmates that it seems like an unfair balance.
As much as I like Dave Gahan as a singer, I still can't allow myself to believe him when he sings as much as I believe Bono. This is all for the simple reason that up until the new album, Gahan never sang his songs on a DM album. It is really difficult to pit two of my favorite bands against each other, and it's even more difficult to quantify why I like one over the other. I'd just say that U2 gets a more emotional response out of me than Depeche and be done with it. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'll still say that the early 90's would have been a really great time for the two bands to get together and do something. They could've gotten Corbijn and Flood involved. It might've sounded something like a cross between "I Feel You" and "Zoo Station", which to me sound like they could've come from the same band. I'm the first mammal to wear pants. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axchi696 said: I'll still say that the early 90's would have been a really great time for the two bands to get together and do something. They could've gotten Corbijn and Flood involved. It might've sounded something like a cross between "I Feel You" and "Zoo Station", which to me sound like they could've come from the same band.
I could get with that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
. [Edited 10/3/05 16:25pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Completly different, but C'mon some of Depeche Modes early shit is now unlistenable and dated as all hell. Go listen to New Dress nowadays.
I can put on Boy and War on and it still sounds fresh. U2 is too much for me to take right now though, they shouldn't be the biggest band in the world, yet they are. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: U2 is too much for me to take right now though, they shouldn't be the biggest band in the world, yet they are.
Why not? I think their last couple albums are really solid. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TRON said: lilgish said: U2 is too much for me to take right now though, they shouldn't be the biggest band in the world, yet they are.
Why not? I think their last couple albums are really solid. All that you can leave behind was, but How to dismantle..... pretty good, better than coldpaly x&y, but barely. Thnk about it . The Beatles, Zep, Vh/GNR, Nirvana. U2 has been the biggest band in the world for almost a decade. U2 are the biggest cause they are survivors. They haven't made an earth shattering album imo. Joshua is sell out AOR shit to me. There should be a huge rock band out there right now taking over the world. U2 and Springsteen are the only two who can even do staduims in this country. Lame | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: TRON said: Why not? I think their last couple albums are really solid. All that you can leave behind was, but How to dismantle..... pretty good, better than coldpaly x&y, but barely. Thnk about it . The Beatles, Zep, Vh/GNR, Nirvana. U2 has been the biggest band in the world for almost a decade. U2 are the biggest cause they are survivors. They haven't made an earth shattering album imo. Joshua is sell out AOR shit to me. There should be a huge rock band out there right now taking over the world. U2 and Springsteen are the only two who can even do staduims in this country. Lame I gotta disagree with that.... U2 has made two earthshattering albums, in my mind: Achtung Baby certainly, and The Joshua Tree probably. I really don't see the Joshua Tree as sell-out. I mean, what else on the pop charts sounded like "With or Without You"? It was a very unconventional song... extremely passionate and with great feeling. Nothing on that album screams "commercial", yet is was an amazing success because the material was so strong. I thought "All that You Can't Leave Behind" was excellent, and "Atomic Bomb" was great as well.. I just get a little tired of U2's bombast from time to time.. but they deserve to be regarded as the best band in the world, in my opinion. they just blow the doors off when they play live. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: lilgish said: All that you can leave behind was, but How to dismantle..... pretty good, better than coldpaly x&y, but barely. Thnk about it . The Beatles, Zep, Vh/GNR, Nirvana. U2 has been the biggest band in the world for almost a decade. U2 are the biggest cause they are survivors. They haven't made an earth shattering album imo. Joshua is sell out AOR shit to me. There should be a huge rock band out there right now taking over the world. U2 and Springsteen are the only two who can even do staduims in this country. Lame I gotta disagree with that.... U2 has made two earthshattering albums, in my mind: Achtung Baby certainly, and The Joshua Tree probably. I really don't see the Joshua Tree as sell-out. I mean, what else on the pop charts sounded like "With or Without You"? It was a very unconventional song... extremely passionate and with great feeling. Nothing on that album screams "commercial", yet is was an amazing success because the material was so strong. I thought "All that You Can't Leave Behind" was excellent, and "Atomic Bomb" was great as well.. I just get a little tired of U2's bombast from time to time.. but they deserve to be regarded as the best band in the world, in my opinion. they just blow the doors off when they play live. I'll say Acthung would be the most earth shattering, I like what Eno did better on that one, but c'mon that album (JT) was way more radio friendly than anything they had done. That era wasn't all hair either, INXS did pretty well, probably thanx to U2. But the ZOO Tv era was their first high so Acthung did shake the world, but just look at the stuff and the bands that were kicking ass at that time. U2 being the best or biggest band is an indictment on the rock scene, their shows atrract way too many yuppies and average music fans as well. [Edited 10/3/05 17:52pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GangstaFam said: starbuck said: Depeche Mode however seems to be more intense and thus strikes me more as a band and musically. And I love Songs of Faith and Devotion and Exciter was a supurb album too!!
No way! U2 runs circles around DM in terms of band dynamics. I'm not saying that Depeche Mode sucks as a band, but there is no way that the 4 of them (well, 3 nowadays) could step on stage without any backing tapes, triggers, or outside musicians and recreate the music they make in the studio. U2 however, and just the 4 guys in U2 with no outside help or pre-recorded music, can step out onto the stage and knock that shit out just like the record. So, as a band, I guess U2 takes it. Depeche Mode is more of a studio act, which isn't a bad thing, it's just different. [Edited 10/3/05 20:39pm] It's a jungle out there. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
this thread title is too funny! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JACKAL said: I'm not saying that Depeche Mode sucks as a band, but there is no way that the 4 of them (well, 3 nowadays) could step on stage without any backing tapes, triggers, or outside musicians and recreate the music they make in the studio. U2 however, and just the 4 guys in U2 with no outside help or pre-recorded music, can step out onto the stage and knock that shit out just like the record. So, as a band, I guess U2 takes it. Depeche Mode is more of a studio act, which isn't a bad thing, it's just different. And U2 can and have easily done what Depeche Mode do on albums like Zooropa, Passengers and Pop. Depeche Mode could never make a song like "Where the Streets Have No Name" or "One". Think about it. Plus, as much as I love DM, they really only have 2 kinds of songs anymore - the dark depressing, generally faster Dave stuff and the pretty, quiet Martin sung ballads. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
no both of them are overated in my opinion..depeche mode in the whole synth pop genre..and the fact that he's making the nu-metal kids shake thier hips isn't a turn either..as for U2 oh lord..so overated..sorry if i want alt rock from the 80's i pick..the smiths as for synth pop i'll stick with gary numan...ta-ta. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
GangstaFam said: I wonder who Anton Corbijn likes more.
LoL He hangs with Bono and the Edge alot, I hear. Corbijn junkie. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
weepingwall said: no both of them are overated in my opinion..depeche mode in the whole synth pop genre..and the fact that he's making the nu-metal kids shake thier hips isn't a turn either..as for U2 oh lord..so overated..sorry if i want alt rock from the 80's i pick..the smiths as for synth pop i'll stick with gary numan...ta-ta.
Are you sure you're not thinking of Robert Smith? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: U2 is far far far better than DM in my opinion... that said, i'm sick of U2 right now and ready for the new DM album
I love DM but their early stuff sounds so dated its unlistenable to me. At this point, I really only listen to Music for the Masses and onward. Violator is my favorite DM album... But honestly I think U2 is in a different stratosphere than Depeche Mode. Funny, I know that Music for the Masses is generally everyone's favorite, but it's the one DM album that I just can't really listen to anymore. (well at least right now) I played that album OUT back in high school and now can only pull it out once in a while. It also reminds me of some crazy acid trips as well. Although, I never feel feel the need to put U2 on that much though. Maybe once a year or so. They leave me feeling REALLY cold. And not in a good way. I don't know why. It's also strange how these two bands are pitted against each other in this thread because I got into DM RIGHT after getting into U2 as a kid. But mostly this thread is making me want to listen to something harder. Like Jane's Addiction or something. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If it comes down to albums, it is Joshua Tree against Violator and I must admit I play Violator way more than I ever play Joshua Tree.
So DM resonates deeper within me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm actually listening to U2 right now. I do love Boy. "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: I'm actually listening to U2 right now.
I do love Boy. Ah, me old U2 too | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Anything is better than U2. U2 sucks Martin is my name, Music is my game!
Never be afraid to tell the truth. But remember not all of your truth is other people’s business. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: But mostly this thread is making me want to listen to something harder. Like Jane's Addiction or something.
LOL VOTE....EARLY | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
time 2 make 2 elevate the level of this thread with yer daily Tori and Kate Bush spam!
![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MikeMatronik said: time 2 make 2 elevate the level of this thread with yer daily Tori and Kate Bush spam!
No problem by me! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
minneapolisgenius said: But mostly this thread is making me want to listen to something harder. Like Jane's Addiction or something.
Three days was the morning My focus three days old My head, it landed To the sounds of cricket bows I am proud man anyway Covered now by three days Three ways was the morning Three lovers, in three ways We knew when she landed Three days she'd stay I am a proud man anyway Covered now by three days | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RipHer2Shreds said: minneapolisgenius said: But mostly this thread is making me want to listen to something harder. Like Jane's Addiction or something.
Three days was the morning My focus three days old My head, it landed To the sounds of cricket bows I am proud man anyway Covered now by three days Three ways was the morning Three lovers, in three ways We knew when she landed Three days she'd stay I am a proud man anyway Covered now by three days LOVE that song. at this moment....you should be with us....feeling like we do....like you love to...but never will again.... "I saw a woman with major Hammer pants on the subway a few weeks ago and totally thought of you." - sextonseven | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am a fan of both bands but my vote goes with Depeche Mode. I found the lyrics to their new single Precious.....
Precious and fragile things Need special handling My God what have we done to you We always tried to share The tenderest of care Now look what we have put you through Things get damaged Things get broken I thought we'd manage But words left unspoken Left us so brittle There was so little left to give Angels with silver wings Shouldn't know suffering I wish I could take the pain for you If God has a master plan That only He understands I hope it's your eyes He's seeing through Things get damaged Things get broken I thought we'd manage But words left unspoken Left us so brittle There was so little left to give I pray you learn to trust Have faith in both of us And keep room in your hearts for two Things get damaged Things get broken I thought we'd manage But words left unspoken Left us so brittle There was so little left to give | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Did you all know that Martin Gore's biological father is an Afro American? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RipHer2Shreds said: minneapolisgenius said: But mostly this thread is making me want to listen to something harder. Like Jane's Addiction or something.
Three days was the morning My focus three days old My head, it landed To the sounds of cricket bows I am proud man anyway Covered now by three days Three ways was the morning Three lovers, in three ways We knew when she landed Three days she'd stay I am a proud man anyway Covered now by three days Dan, is this what inspired your Jane's fest today? speaking of, I'm gonna put on Jane's right now... somewhat on topic...this thread made me wanna hear Some Great Reward and then I realized: the only DM I have on CD is the single for "Everything Counts" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |