TheRealFiness said: amit1234 said: And why is that? Oh I forgot. Because some ...blankity blank said so. touchy touchy... at least i support real musicians like sly and macartney "cough" SNOB "cough" [Edited 7/31/05 16:01pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jacktheimprovident said: VoicesCarry said: Sorry, amit, the guy is an absolutely incredible musician (ie. instrumentalist), while MJ is not. This is what finess means by "real musician". [Edited 7/30/05 14:06pm] , Sly, along with Paulie and Stevie, was among the first to use overdubbing to enable him to play all or most of the instruments on his songs himself. He rates very high on my ratings for skill, taste and style on guitar, keyboards (particularly organ and piano), bass, drums and harmonica, and considering one of his majors at vallejo junior college was trumpet, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the horn tracks on the Riot-Fresh era were sly as well (there's also speculation as to who exactly played that dixieland clarinet on Dance To The Music ). Plus Sly's a much better songwriter and producer than MJ, and practically every R&B artist of the 70s INCLUDING MJ and Jacksons were either copping or at least building on his sound. Sly is so underrated, very sad... [Edited 8/1/05 11:12am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
krayzie said: jacktheimprovident said: , Sly, along with Paulie and Stevie, was among the first to use overdubbing to enable him to play all or most of the instruments on his songs himself. He rates very high on my ratings for skill, taste and style on guitar, keyboards (particularly organ and piano), bass, drums and harmonica, and considering one of his majors at vallejo junior college was trumpet, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the horn tracks on the Riot-Fresh era were sly as well (there's also speculation as to who exactly played that dixieland clarinet on Dance To The Music ). Plus Sly's a much better songwriter and producer than MJ, and practically every R&B artist of the 70s INCLUDING MJ and Jacksons were either copping or at least building on his sound. Sly is so overrated, very sad... so is that man in ur av. [Edited 7/31/05 16:02pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't think it's possible to overrate Stevie | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
FunkyBrotha said: Its a silly compilation album, which i must stress, MJ KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT! These things will crop up all the time from now on, its not a Michael Jackson album, its a Sony Music compilation CD.
Also can i stress, that its already the most successful Essential album ever. Its sold well in Europe. MJ is not over, he is a global icon and has been successful for 35 years, had hits in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90, 00s, he is the biggest back catalogue seller in the world. Number Ones sold 7million worldwide, 2.1million in the UK alone. Put that in2 perspective with 2005 where the biggest selling album of the year has sold 5million and the 2nd biggest (Mariah) is currently at 4.5million. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
sermwanderer said: dag said: Let´s wait for an album with NEW songs to see how Mike will do. Those compilations are ridicilous. People already have all those songs.
it'll flop, he's finished I thought you were done with MJ threads. Here's reminding you not to post when the next album flops. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have no clue why people attach any significance to the notion that this was a Sony release that MJ didn't have anything to do with. So what? That has absolutely nothing to do with the dismal sales.
When Sony released a very similar "essential Bruce Springsteen" collection in 2003 with a similar amount of promotion, it debuted at #14 on the charts. Bruce had also previously released a greatest hits set. Sounds to me like people are trying to make excuses as to why the new collection tanked so bad. Let's face facts: if Madonna, or any other huge music star, released an "essential collection" it would have sold 5 times the copies that this did, with similar promotion. And as far as "Michael didn't have anything to do with it, so that's why it tanked." Show me the logic. Ya think MJ actively promoting this would have helped sales???? um, no. Let's see, the last time MJ actively promoted an album - Ones, and before that Invincible, and before that, Blood on the Dance Floor - - - all did poorly. None met expectations. And now 8k copies??? 8k?? That is astonishingly pathetic. MJ is done in the US. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: if Madonna, or any other huge music star, released an "essential collection" it would have sold 5 times the copies that this did, with similar promotion.
So why did Invincible sell more than American Life. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: JonSnow said: if Madonna, or any other huge music star, released an "essential collection" it would have sold 5 times the copies that this did, with similar promotion.
So why did Invincible sell more than American Life. If Madonna released a 2-CD "essential collection" tomorrow - even though she already has 3 previous compilations - would it, or would it not, sell more than 8 thousand copies? Simple question. We all know the answer. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I thought I read it was selling well on another thread... was that for the UK? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: lilgish said: So why did Invincible sell more than American Life. If Madonna released a 2-CD "essential collection" tomorrow - even though she already has 3 previous compilations - would it, or would it not, sell more than 8 thousand copies? Simple question. We all know the answer. ok, so why did Invincible sell more than American Life? Is Madonna done in the U.S to? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: I thought I read it was selling well on another thread... was that for the UK?
check amits posts for all sales figures. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: JonSnow said: If Madonna released a 2-CD "essential collection" tomorrow - even though she already has 3 previous compilations - would it, or would it not, sell more than 8 thousand copies? Simple question. We all know the answer. ok, so why did Invincible sell more than American Life? Is Madonna done in the U.S to? Invincible was a huge disappointment, and so was American Life. We are talking about a PATTERN of failures and disappointments for MJ, topped off by the spectacularly poor showing of his new collection. Madonna has had one sub-par sales performace. If she ever releases a compliation that sells 8,000 copies then, yes, she may be finished. Of course, I don't think anybody here believes that would ever happen. The last time an MJ album sold up to expectations in the US was "Dangerous", and even that is arguable. But even at the time of "invincible", MJ - while no longer the force he once was - was still a major player on the charts. Well, kinda... But now - 8,000!?!?!?!?!?! - he is done in the US. Oh... and can you please answer this question: If Madonna released a 2-CD "essential collection" tomorrow - even though she already has 3 previous compilations - would it, or would it not, sell more than 8 thousand copies? [Edited 7/31/05 18:00pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm not the biggest MJ fan, but I don't really see the big deal about this.
What's it really prove, that ppl don't wanna buy another collection with Thriller and Beat It on it again? So what? That's just cause they have all those songs a million times over. The world is a comedy for those who think and a tragedy for those who feel.
"You still wanna take me to prison...just because I won't trade humanity for patriotism." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: Oh... and can you please answer this question: If Madonna released a 2-CD "essential collection" tomorrow - even though she already has 3 previous compilations - would it, or would it not, sell more than 8 thousand copies? It would, but I never disputed that. You say MJ is done and compare his sales with Madonna. MJ sales twice to three times the units Madge moves each week. American life sold less than Invincible. Point. Madonna is not selling more or much more than MJ right now. This disc also cost 30.00 dollars, so it's not like madge was gonna move 200 - 300,000 on this. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: JonSnow said: Oh... and can you please answer this question: If Madonna released a 2-CD "essential collection" tomorrow - even though she already has 3 previous compilations - would it, or would it not, sell more than 8 thousand copies? It would, but I never disputed that. You say MJ is done and compare his sales with Madonna. MJ sales twice to three times the units Madge moves each week. American life sold less than Invincible. Point. Madonna is not selling more or much more than MJ right now. This disc also cost 30.00 dollars, so it's not like madge was gonna move 200 - 300,000 on this. Invincible vs. American Life is not relevant to MJ selling 8k copies right now. Again, Bruce Springsteen's similar compilation, with similar packaging, debuted at #14. MJ? #128. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JonSnow said: lilgish said: It would, but I never disputed that. You say MJ is done and compare his sales with Madonna. MJ sales twice to three times the units Madge moves each week. American life sold less than Invincible. Point. Madonna is not selling more or much more than MJ right now. This disc also cost 30.00 dollars, so it's not like madge was gonna move 200 - 300,000 on this. Invincible vs. American Life is not relevant to MJ selling 8k copies right now. Again, Bruce Springsteen's similar compilation, with similar packaging, debuted at #14. MJ? #128. way to gloss over the weekly numbers. How many units is Bruce moving each week? I could care less about the sales, I own almost all his stuff and didn't buy this. These numbers prove little, he could be done, but this third straight 30.00 collection is certainly not proof. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish will you PLEASE come play on yahoo? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: lilgish will you PLEASE come play on yahoo?
play what exactly????? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: I could care less about the sales
why do I have the feeling that this phrase is going to be repeated quite a bit by MJ fans in the future.....? Just a prediction. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: CinisterCee said: lilgish will you PLEASE come play on yahoo?
play what exactly????? catcher. I have a file for you | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CinisterCee said: lilgish said: play what exactly????? catcher. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lilgish said: CinisterCee said: catcher. "What's the problem?" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
how can someone be king of anything just sellin 8,000 albums
that too only cause they had sale at bestbuy for $15 for 2cds next week it will be like 3k albums | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: Michael's current fans are mostly from Europe & Asia. He should do a Kylie and just focus on those areas outside of America.
he always has | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Back to the idea of MJ's "Essentail" being the most sucessful, Barbara Sterisand's debuted at 15 (and I also recall it having good internatonal numbers). That being said, when people are in the mood for a good compilation, they'll buy it (Donna Summer, the queen of comps, recently charted with a single disc set with some new songs and a bonus disc of 12 inch mixes....good idea and good timing). This one had bad timing and a worse tracklisting. Sterisand's had commericals, as I recall. I think it also had a pretty good tracklisting (she' probably had at least some say in what was on there).
As for Madonna, no comparison is fair. She's never released a comp like this. Nor as MJ released a proper hits Cd like Madonna did twice ("The Immaculate Collection" and "GVH2", both of which sold exteremly well and in the case of IC, still sells). I'm willing to beat, whoever, if there was a Madonna essentail collection, her fans would come out in big numbers and support it just because she isn't the type to rerelease material that often. I'm not saying MJ's numbers are terrible...a few of these complitions come with some promotion and in fact do better (in America at least). However, MJ's certainly has done better than most. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jn2 said: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I have yet to see promotion on this record. PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever ----- Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleBLUECorvette said: I have yet to see promotion on this record.
what the fuck you think this is!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |