Break it down Huey! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Agreed.So far,this decade SUCKS! The previous decade sucked as well.The 90s is when I stopped listening to the radio altogether. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stax said: There is a ton of new music out there that sucks, BUT it is amazing how easy it is to get your music heard compared to past decades. I think the decentralization of music distribution that has occured in the last few years is a good thing. Hell, I have friends getting thier self produced music on iTunes. With podcasting, internet radio, website distribution, p2p, the opportunties are endless. Having said that, there has been a definite decline in overall musicianship. Programs like Grarageband allow anyone to cut and paste some electronic crap. In the end, I am not sure that the music is worse these days or if its just that, because there are so many more opportunties for people to get their "music" heard, that we are flooded with more and more crappy content.
You nailed it, but I would also add: the flood is making it harder to even find the good stuff. You gotta sort through so much more. I think the only way we'll really be able to judge the decade is a few years after it's over...I bet we'll see a lot of stuff surface that just got missed along the way. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Very true - mostly due to all the gangster rap shit, r&b crap like Ciara, Kellis, JLo. Pop crap such as Britney, The Simpson sisters, Gwens solo shit. I'm sure I've left out many things that would fall under the subject of "pure crap", but you get my drift. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Way false but if you are over 30 and out of touch with current music trends and have plenty of stuff you grew up on to listen to and keep you busy, it could be slightly true. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: I don't believe you can just look at calendar years and determine a decade, because many different trends can come within a decade and overlap others. I would break down music like this:
1954-1957 - The birth of rock 'n roll: This is the beginnings of Rock 'N Roll with Bill Haley, doo-wop, Elvis, Buddy Holly, Jerry Lee Louis, etc. Kids loved this music, but their parents either thought this was devil's music or a passing fad. 1958-1963 - The mainstreaming of early rock 'n roll: Once the mainstream realized Elvis and his ilk were not going away antime soon, the record companies started their own mainstream doo-wop groups, but it was watered down and more mellow (Pat Boone, Sam Cooke, The Marvelletes, Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons). 1964-1969 - The British Invasion, Motown and the rock explosion: When people talk about the 1960's, they refer to this era of the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, the classic Motown artists (The Temptations, The Four Tops, The Supremes, Marvin Gaye), the Beach Boys, Jimi Hendrix, etc. This is when rock 'n roll truly gean to grow and experiment, culminating with "Sgt. Pepper's" and Woodstock. 1970-1976 - Progressive rock and the birth of hard rock/metal: After the breakup of the Beatles and the deaths of Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison, rock 'n roll retreated for a bit, but then thundered out with a heavier and more progressive sound. Witness the rise of Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, and Jethro Tull. 1977-1983 - Disco, punk and new wave After the heavy sound of the prog rock era, most music fans either wanted something simpler or more fun. The Ramones, the Sex Pistols, and the Clash provided biting musical commentary in 2 to 3 minute bursts, yet most people wanted the fun aspects of disco and new wave. This ultimately culminated in Michael Jackson's "Thriller." 1984-1991 - The MTV era, electro-pop, hair metal and the dawn of hip-hop: This was the era where music videos began to upstage recorded sounds for recognition of artists, and looks became nearly as important for an artist's image as his vocal or musical abilities. Also, music became more electronically driven, with synthesizers and drum machines often replacing drummers and horn sections in bands. In addition, hair metal grew when pop songs were given a hard rock and metal edge. This was also when hip-hop first became prominent and threatened to upstage R&B. 1992-1996 - Grunge, gangsta rap and alternative music: This is the age of Nirvana, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, 2Pac, Dr. Dre, and Biggie Smalls. While there were some pop artists who managed to become huge during this period (Mariah Carey, Boyz II Men, Celine Dion), pop music definitely took a back seat to the harsher sounds of grunge and heavy beats of gangsta rap. As quickly as it exploded onto the public consciousness, it flamed out with the deaths of Kurt Cobain, Eazy-E, 2Pac and Biggie Smalls. 1997-2001: Boy bands, TRL, Napster and the re-emergence of pop: Just as the harsher alternative era was flaming out of the mainstream, the Spice Girls and Hanson emerged with happy upbeat songs for a new generation of music listeners. Then came a wave of music aimed at these younger fans, most of it by artists who were the same age. This was the era of the Backstreet Boys, 'Nsync, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Destiny's Child, and Alicia Keys. In addition, hip-hop became all about money, parties, club-hoppin' and bling bling, and it was personified by P. Diddy and Jay-Z. Eminem was around to shock people with harsh lyrics, but unlike his predecessors, it was either meant as a prank or turned introspective. Also, the new wave of punk bands (Blink 182, Sum 41, Simple Plan, Good Charlotte, Avril Lavigne) aimed more for the pop charts than rebelling at the world like their predecessors. The other major development of this period was the rise of P2P applications like Napster, which allowed people to download music they wanted to listen to at any time. This was especially big for artists who mainly released their music as singles, but bad for album artists. 2002-present: Crunk across America: One of the most persistent sounds present in music today is southern pop, R&B and hip-hop. Most of the big artists currently occupying the pop charts today come from Atlanta, where they have created their own distinct sound. Go 'head on, Huey*! Pound it out*! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: Agreed.So far,this decade SUCKS! The previous decade sucked as well.The 90s is when I stopped listening to the radio altogether.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: intha916 said: False
5 years doesn't make a decade Mathmatically speaking, you're right. But what about musically? ----- Great you guys can count. 5 years is half a decade and we have had a half a decade of awful music. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: missfee said: shit - true
Nothing beats the 80's it was shit!!!! Duran Duran (hungry like the wolf) U2 Keith Sweat (how deep is your love, i want her, there you go telling me no again) Guy Pebbles New Edition The Police (message in a bottle, don't stand so close to me) Metallica Guns-N-Roses Van Halen (Jump) Marvin Gaye Jeffrey Osbourne Luther Vandross (Give me the Reason, Never Too Much) Patty Labelle (If you ask me to, Somebody Loves you baby, On my own) Stevie Wonder (Part-time Lover, Skeletons) Gladys Knight (Love overboard) The Whispers (Rock Steady, And the beat goes on) The System (Don't Disturb this groove ) The S.O.S. band (no one's gonna love you the way i do) Lisa Lisa & Cult Jam Alexander O'Neil (you're a fake, all true man) Sade (your love is king, smooth operator, war of the hearts) Jeffrey Osbourne (don't you get so mad about it, The woo woo woo song; you should be mine) Rick James Madonna (Lucky Star, Celebrate, Dress you up in my love) Cyndi Lauper Teena Marie M.C. Lyte Salt n Pepa Heavy D. and the Boys Eric B. and Rakim EPMD Public Enemy KRS One Big Daddy Kane You can't beat this decade!!!!! [Edited 7/16/05 18:34pm] ...without question!!! [Edited 7/16/05 20:19pm] ----- Co-Sign. The last decade when artist sold Millions of CD's on a routine basis. Because the music was good | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said:
(Original) melody died with gangsta rap's rise, I think. Exactly! Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: Agreed.So far,this decade SUCKS! The previous decade sucked as well.The 90s is when I stopped listening to the radio altogether. Same here. I took radio stations that play current music off my dial in the mid 1990s and have no desire whatsoever to ever tune in to them again unless a major change is made musically. One of our local radio stations that plays nothing but hip hop, is the same station that has been around since back in the day. They really need to change their name because they are destroying the memory of what used to be a damn good radio station. I can't blame the current decade for being so awful though. Hell, look what they had to influence them in the previous decade, the 1990s.....THE most DEAD music in the modern day era. Hell, that's all today's artist know....pure shit. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
728huey said: I don't believe you can just look at calendar years and determine a decade, because many different trends can come within a decade and overlap others. I would break down music like this:
1954-1957 - The birth of rock 'n roll: This is the beginnings of Rock 'N Roll with Bill Haley, doo-wop, Elvis, Buddy Holly, Jerry Lee Louis, etc. Kids loved this music, but their parents either thought this was devil's music or a passing fad. 1958-1963 - The mainstreaming of early rock 'n roll: Once the mainstream realized Elvis and his ilk were not going away antime soon, the record companies started their own mainstream doo-wop groups, but it was watered down and more mellow (Pat Boone, Sam Cooke, The Marvelletes, Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons). 1964-1969 - The British Invasion, Motown and the rock explosion: When people talk about the 1960's, they refer to this era of the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, the classic Motown artists (The Temptations, The Four Tops, The Supremes, Marvin Gaye), the Beach Boys, Jimi Hendrix, etc. This is when rock 'n roll truly gean to grow and experiment, culminating with "Sgt. Pepper's" and Woodstock. 1970-1976 - Progressive rock and the birth of hard rock/metal: After the breakup of the Beatles and the deaths of Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison, rock 'n roll retreated for a bit, but then thundered out with a heavier and more progressive sound. Witness the rise of Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, and Jethro Tull. 1977-1983 - Disco, punk and new wave After the heavy sound of the prog rock era, most music fans either wanted something simpler or more fun. The Ramones, the Sex Pistols, and the Clash provided biting musical commentary in 2 to 3 minute bursts, yet most people wanted the fun aspects of disco and new wave. This ultimately culminated in Michael Jackson's "Thriller." 1984-1991 - The MTV era, electro-pop, hair metal and the dawn of hip-hop: This was the era where music videos began to upstage recorded sounds for recognition of artists, and looks became nearly as important for an artist's image as his vocal or musical abilities. Also, music became more electronically driven, with synthesizers and drum machines often replacing drummers and horn sections in bands. In addition, hair metal grew when pop songs were given a hard rock and metal edge. This was also when hip-hop first became prominent and threatened to upstage R&B. 1992-1996 - Grunge, gangsta rap and alternative music: This is the age of Nirvana, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, 2Pac, Dr. Dre, and Biggie Smalls. While there were some pop artists who managed to become huge during this period (Mariah Carey, Boyz II Men, Celine Dion), pop music definitely took a back seat to the harsher sounds of grunge and heavy beats of gangsta rap. As quickly as it exploded onto the public consciousness, it flamed out with the deaths of Kurt Cobain, Eazy-E, 2Pac and Biggie Smalls. 1997-2001: Boy bands, TRL, Napster and the re-emergence of pop: Just as the harsher alternative era was flaming out of the mainstream, the Spice Girls and Hanson emerged with happy upbeat songs for a new generation of music listeners. Then came a wave of music aimed at these younger fans, most of it by artists who were the same age. This was the era of the Backstreet Boys, 'Nsync, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Destiny's Child, and Alicia Keys. In addition, hip-hop became all about money, parties, club-hoppin' and bling bling, and it was personified by P. Diddy and Jay-Z. Eminem was around to shock people with harsh lyrics, but unlike his predecessors, it was either meant as a prank or turned introspective. Also, the new wave of punk bands (Blink 182, Sum 41, Simple Plan, Good Charlotte, Avril Lavigne) aimed more for the pop charts than rebelling at the world like their predecessors. The other major development of this period was the rise of P2P applications like Napster, which allowed people to download music they wanted to listen to at any time. This was especially big for artists who mainly released their music as singles, but bad for album artists. 2002-present: Crunk across America: One of the most persistent sounds present in music today is southern pop, R&B and hip-hop. Most of the big artists currently occupying the pop charts today come from Atlanta, where they have created their own distinct sound. The rise of the "gangsta style" of rap began in 1988 (not 1992). But other than that, very good job on the listing! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kisscamille said: Very true - mostly due to all the gangster rap shit, r&b crap like Ciara, Kellis, JLo. Pop crap such as Britney, The Simpson sisters, Gwens solo shit. I'm sure I've left out many things that would fall under the subject of "pure crap", but you get my drift.
Yes I do: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This is the decade that brought us "Vespertine" by Bjork, one the best solo albums by any female/singer song writer of any era. so for that reason the noughties is saved!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
it's really foolish to say "ANY" era of music sucks, especially as we are still living it, aot you sound like old folk from the seventies who were saying "They just don't make music like Sinatra any more" and that Hendrix's, the beatles, Janis Joplin were all talentless and made alot of noise.
open your minds and be open to new music. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: theAudience said: You're one of the group who I believe has their ear to the ground currently. So let me ask you this. Has there been any current music created that has done what Louis Armstrong did for instrumental soloists, or Duke Ellington did for big band composition, or Miles Davis did numerous times for interpreting Jazz, or Jimi Hendrix did for rock guitar, or The Beatles did for pop music? I could go on but I think you know what i'm getting at. I'm talking innovative improvements here. Sincerely, i'd like to know. tA Tribal Disorder http://www.soundclick.com...rmusic.htm Right on. I often wonder though if there is no where left to go with musical innovation?? Or could the boundaries could be pushed further but there is no-one in the music industry with the creativity to?? I'll leave graffiti where you've never been kissed | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: I can't blame the current decade for being so awful though. Hell, look what they had to influence them in the previous decade, the 1990s.....THE most DEAD music in the modern day era. Hell, that's all today's artist know....pure shit.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twink69 said: it's really foolish to say "ANY" era of music sucks, especially as we are still living it, aot you sound like old folk from the seventies who were saying "They just don't make music like Sinatra any more" and that Hendrix's, the beatles, Janis Joplin were all talentless and made alot of noise.
open your minds and be open to new music. My mind is open unfortunately my brain's built-in Shit Detector allows little modern music past the front gates. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
True...this entire thread sounds like my mom. She was complaining to me about rap during the Run DMC/Beastie Boys era. So what if she grew up on the Beatles. They didn't mean anything to me. Prince probably won't mean anything to kids growing up now. That doesn't mean music these days sucks. And for the record, sucky boy bands have always been around. So has music that sucks. The fact that more of it is around is because ther are more people in general around and more ways for you to hear the crappy music. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pkidwell said: True...this entire thread sounds like my mom. She was complaining to me about rap during the Run DMC/Beastie Boys era. So what if she grew up on the Beatles. They didn't mean anything to me. Prince probably won't mean anything to kids growing up now. That doesn't mean music these days sucks. And for the record, sucky boy bands have always been around. So has music that sucks. The fact that more of it is around is because ther are more people in general around and more ways for you to hear the crappy music.
so you're satisfied with the state of music in 2005? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twink69 said: it's really foolish to say "ANY" era of music sucks, especially as we are still living it, aot you sound like old folk from the seventies who were saying "They just don't make music like Sinatra any more" and that Hendrix's, the beatles, Janis Joplin were all talentless and made alot of noise.
open your minds and be open to new music. That's a completely different comparison. Those people were raising hell about that music because they saw it as "evil", "hip thrusting", "devil" music. They had grown up on a much slower tempo of music. I could care less about the profanity and vulgarness in today's music. That's not an issue with me. Hell, I'm a Prince fan, so the nastier the better. My problem is with the tempo of today's music.....it's TOO DAMN SLOW. There's plenty of the "evil" and "devil" music still around but there sure as hell ain't none of the "hip thrusting" music any more that they complained about. Today's music is so slow that if you took away the profanity, the people in the rest homes would probably like it. Hell, music is going backwards instead of forwards and that little "you guys sound like the older generations" arguement don't hold water, it's just a lame excuse to try to defend today's dead ass music. I first started bitching about current music the summer after I graduated high school in 1985 and I was only 17 back then. [Edited 7/19/05 7:20am] Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pkidwell said:
That doesn't mean music these days sucks. And for the record, sucky boy bands have always been around. So has music that sucks. The fact that more of it is around is because ther are more people in general around and more ways for you to hear the crappy music. Yes, there has always been music by some artists that suck but there has always been great music also. My mother hated some of the music of my day, but for the most part, she loved most of it. Hell, she was the one that was old enough to get into clubs, not me. If there was no music for her back then, there wouldn't have been any clubs for her either and the clubs she was in was playing current music of the 1980s. That is not the case today. It's ALL music that sucks and there is NO great music anymore. I'm the age now that my mother was in the 1980s and I hate ALL the current music of today. And I be damned if I go underground to find it because I didn't have to go underground back in the day. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twink69 said: This is the decade that brought us "Vespertine" by Bjork, one the best solo albums by any female/singer song writer of any era. so for that reason the noughties is saved!
Agreed. Absolutely stunning. Possibly the most gorgeous thing I've ever heard. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twink69 said: it's really foolish to say "ANY" era of music sucks, especially as we are still living it, aot you sound like old folk from the seventies who were saying "They just don't make music like Sinatra any more" and that Hendrix's, the beatles, Janis Joplin were all talentless and made alot of noise.
open your minds and be open to new music. ::::Whenever I get the will and stamina to do so, I'll state my case in a separate thread::: | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would easily say true, but I am beginning to see a change in a lot of the music. It's starting to sound better to me. A lot of my old heroes have come back to rescue it and a lot new (especially Alternative Rock) acts are starting to sound good. But then again, most of that stuff isn't even mainstream. Mainstream, or the majority of it, is crap these days.
I don't know about this one. NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
True | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: I first started bitching about current music the summer after I graduated high school in 1985 and I was only 17 back then.
Same here! It was in 1985 when music started to go downhill imo.I always say that 1984 was truly the last brilliant year for pop music.There was some great music after that,but not as much. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TonyVanDam said: intha916 said: False
5 years doesn't make a decade Mathmatically speaking, you're right. But what about musically? I'm not willing to write off the 2000s yet. 2005 has been one of the best years in recent memory (Mint, Mariah, Lina, etc) I'd say the 2000s are only slightly behind the 90s at this point. While the 90s started strong and then went down hill, I think the 2000s are going to prove to be the other way around Bringing Together Five Decades of R&B/Funk/Soul/Dance
http://reunionradio.blogspot.com/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nothing can beat the 50's for crappy music.
It may have been the decade that rock n' roll was birthed but most of the music sucked. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I hear 5020 - 5030AD is going to suck. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |