independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > NON-PRINCE Albums you desperately want remastered
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 12/06/04 7:06pm

JonSnow

The Pretenders CDS!!!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 12/06/04 7:52pm

Sdldawn

The Beatles-White Album

Paul McCartney- McCartney

The Beatles- Revolver

The Beatles- Magical Mystery Tour
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 12/06/04 11:40pm

ehuffnsd

avatar

since the music scene today either sucks or is made up of samples why not just remaster everything before 90 and stop releasing new music... til we find people who make good new music
You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 12/07/04 12:48am

superspaceboy

avatar

GooeyTheHamster said:







nod and add Heaven or Las Vegas to that one...

Christian Zombie Vampires

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 12/07/04 12:52am

superspaceboy

avatar

bananacologne said:



don't hold your breath.

Christian Zombie Vampires

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 12/07/04 12:54am

superspaceboy

avatar

GangstaFam said:

Anxiety said:

i got my mom a copy of the white album remaster a few christmasses back...and it was packaged with all the goodies inside.

I didn't think any of their albums were remastered. confuse


So...does anyone know if any of these have been remastered? I don't think so, or we'd all heard by now. I think the White Lbum musta been a special ed or something.

Christian Zombie Vampires

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 12/07/04 2:02pm

Anxiety

superspaceboy said:

GangstaFam said:


I didn't think any of their albums were remastered. confuse


So...does anyone know if any of these have been remastered? I don't think so, or we'd all heard by now. I think the White Lbum musta been a special ed or something.


yah, it was limited edition...i believe they were all numbered and stamped, if memory serves...i think it came out winter of 1999?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 12/07/04 2:21pm

NWF

avatar

Pylon, anyone????.....hmm
NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 12/07/04 2:22pm

NWF

avatar

Talking Heads? Who's Talking Heads? That's a funny name. They probably suck.




















































giggle
NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 12/07/04 2:32pm

RanMarJam

I'd like PJ Harvey's Dry remastered.

George Michael's Faith and Listen Without Prejudice Vol.1 also need remastering.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 12/07/04 3:15pm

Anxiety

NWF said:

Talking Heads? Who's Talking Heads? That's a funny name. They probably suck.


































brick
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 12/07/04 3:21pm

SupaFunkyOrgan
grinderSexy

avatar

RanMarJam said:

I'd like PJ Harvey's Dry remastered.

George Michael's Faith and Listen Without Prejudice Vol.1 also need remastering.


Dry needs it the worst out of any of her albums nod
2010: Healing the Wounds of the Past.... http://prince.org/msg/8/325740
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 12/07/04 8:41pm

GangstaFam

Anxiety said:

superspaceboy said:



So...does anyone know if any of these have been remastered? I don't think so, or we'd all heard by now. I think the White Lbum musta been a special ed or something.


yah, it was limited edition...i believe they were all numbered and stamped, if memory serves...i think it came out winter of 1999?

Shit. I had no idea.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 12/07/04 8:56pm

Anxiety

GangstaFam said:

Anxiety said:



yah, it was limited edition...i believe they were all numbered and stamped, if memory serves...i think it came out winter of 1999?

Shit. I had no idea.


i haven't seen it since i bought it as a gift a few years back...it was nice. it came in packaging that was a miniature version of the original album release...gatefold sleeve with inserts and posters and photographs, and it all slid into a sturdy clear plastic sleeve. it was really spiffy. nod
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 12/07/04 8:59pm

mrdespues

remastering is mostly bullshit on CD.

nothing sounds as good as the original vinyl.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 12/07/04 9:13pm

GangstaFam

mrdespues said:

remastering is mostly bullshit on CD.

nothing sounds as good as the original vinyl.

I disagree.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 12/07/04 9:44pm

JANFAN4L

Janet - The Velvet Rope (1997)
Janet - janet. (1993)
Janet - Control (1986)
Janet - Janet Jackson's Rhythm Nation 1814 (1989)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 12/07/04 11:19pm

GrayKing

avatar

mrdespues said:

remastering is mostly bullshit on CD.

nothing sounds as good as the original vinyl.



vinyl has its own limitations.
"Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 12/07/04 11:29pm

mrdespues

GrayKing said:

mrdespues said:

remastering is mostly bullshit on CD.

nothing sounds as good as the original vinyl.



vinyl has its own limitations.


such as?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 12/07/04 11:31pm

GrayKing

avatar

mrdespues said:

GrayKing said:




vinyl has its own limitations.


such as?



scratches, pops, crackles, hum, fragility, and impracticality for today's music listening.
"Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 12/07/04 11:34pm

GrayKing

avatar

GrayKing said:

mrdespues said:



such as?



scratches, pops, crackles, hum, fragility, and impracticality for today's music listening.



not to mention phase shift, limited frequency response, noise, distortion, etc
"Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 12/08/04 12:38am

mrdespues

GrayKing said:

GrayKing said:




scratches, pops, crackles, hum, fragility, and impracticality for today's music listening.



not to mention phase shift, limited frequency response, noise, distortion, etc


hey man, if that's the issue with your record player, too bad. as for me, analog is always preferable because human beings are analog creatures. digital will never compare. i can handle a few crackles every now and then if it means i get a much richer sound.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 12/08/04 12:47am

GrayKing

avatar

mrdespues said:

GrayKing said:




not to mention phase shift, limited frequency response, noise, distortion, etc


hey man, if that's the issue with your record player, too bad. as for me, analog is always preferable because human beings are analog creatures. digital will never compare. i can handle a few crackles every now and then if it means i get a much richer sound.



i'm sure you drive around with a turn table strapped to the dashboard of your car, don't you? eekl:

shrug so be it. i just think it's funny that people insist that vinyl is suprior to CD. that may have been the case until the mid-90's, but considering most music is now recorded digitally, people who insist on vinyl are just not being logical.

vinyl is the the CD of its' day: a convenient, cheap piece of shit to mass produce record music on, with many limitations.
"Awards are like hemorrhoids. Sooner or later, every asshole gets one."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 12/08/04 6:37am

CinisterCee

GrayKing said:

GrayKing said:




scratches, pops, crackles, hum, fragility, and impracticality for today's music listening.



not to mention phase shift, limited frequency response, noise, distortion, etc


love
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 12/08/04 2:47pm

mrdespues

GrayKing said:

mrdespues said:



hey man, if that's the issue with your record player, too bad. as for me, analog is always preferable because human beings are analog creatures. digital will never compare. i can handle a few crackles every now and then if it means i get a much richer sound.



i'm sure you drive around with a turn table strapped to the dashboard of your car, don't you? eekl:

shrug so be it. i just think it's funny that people insist that vinyl is suprior to CD. that may have been the case until the mid-90's, but considering most music is now recorded digitally, people who insist on vinyl are just not being logical.

vinyl is the the CD of its' day: a convenient, cheap piece of shit to mass produce record music on, with many limitations.


dude, i have way more cds than i do vinyl, and of course cds are more portable. but when it comes down to the best reproduction of music, most so-called audiophiles will tell you time and again that vinyl still cannot be beat. there is more dynamic range, for starters. cd sounds tinny in comparison. i mean, i don't totally hate cd though, because i threw out ALL of my tapes a while ago...but i will never throw out my vinyl cause i KNOW they sound better and will last longer than my cds.

c ya.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 12/08/04 2:50pm

VoicesCarry

mrdespues said:

GrayKing said:




i'm sure you drive around with a turn table strapped to the dashboard of your car, don't you? eekl:

shrug so be it. i just think it's funny that people insist that vinyl is suprior to CD. that may have been the case until the mid-90's, but considering most music is now recorded digitally, people who insist on vinyl are just not being logical.

vinyl is the the CD of its' day: a convenient, cheap piece of shit to mass produce record music on, with many limitations.


dude, i have way more cds than i do vinyl, and of course cds are more portable. but when it comes down to the best reproduction of music, most so-called audiophiles will tell you time and again that vinyl still cannot be beat. there is more dynamic range, for starters. cd sounds tinny in comparison. i mean, i don't totally hate cd though, because i threw out ALL of my tapes a while ago...but i will never throw out my vinyl cause i KNOW they sound better and will last longer than my cds.

c ya.


I think the aphorism, "We are most comfortable with what we're used to" applies. People who grew up on vinyl are more likely to like vinyl than people who grew up on CDs. Most fastidious audiophiles I know certainly did. Personally, I would take a remastered CD over vinyl any day (and believe me, I've compared quite a few). Vinyl has a certain warmth and organic quality to it, but if the mastering is done properly, there is just no comparing a CD source with a vinyl source, IMHO.
[Edited 12/8/04 14:51pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 12/08/04 3:05pm

theAudience

avatar

VoicesCarry said:


I think the aphorism, "We are most comfortable with what we're used to" applies. People who grew up on vinyl are more likely to like vinyl than people who grew up on CDs. Most fastidious audiophiles I know certainly did. Personally, I would take a remastered CD over vinyl any day (and believe me, I've compared quite a few). Vinyl has a certain warmth and organic quality to it, but if the mastering is done properly, there is just no comparing a CD source with a vinyl source, IMHO.



Wait until you can get a portable and affordable SACD or DVD-Audio player. evillol

I deal with quite a few staunch analog audiophile types that, until the availability of SACD/DVD-A titles and hardware,
wouldn't go ditigal if their lives depended on it. These higher resolution disc formats are starting to change that.

tA

peace Tribal Disorder

http://www.soundclick.com...rmusic.htm
"Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 12/08/04 3:13pm

mrdespues

VoicesCarry said:

mrdespues said:



dude, i have way more cds than i do vinyl, and of course cds are more portable. but when it comes down to the best reproduction of music, most so-called audiophiles will tell you time and again that vinyl still cannot be beat. there is more dynamic range, for starters. cd sounds tinny in comparison. i mean, i don't totally hate cd though, because i threw out ALL of my tapes a while ago...but i will never throw out my vinyl cause i KNOW they sound better and will last longer than my cds.

c ya.


I think the aphorism, "We are most comfortable with what we're used to" applies. People who grew up on vinyl are more likely to like vinyl than people who grew up on CDs. Most fastidious audiophiles I know certainly did. Personally, I would take a remastered CD over vinyl any day (and believe me, I've compared quite a few). Vinyl has a certain warmth and organic quality to it, but if the mastering is done properly, there is just no comparing a CD source with a vinyl source, IMHO.
[Edited 12/8/04 14:51pm]


i grew up with tapes and cds. i started buying vinyl about 2 years ago and i maintain that it is louder, brighter (though not tinny bright like cd) and at the same time warmer. it is a FACT that it has a wider dynamic range, as does tape. the only medium i find preferable is DVD audio. yes, i can tell the difference. smile

.
[Edited 12/8/04 15:14pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 12/08/04 3:20pm

NWF

avatar

Anxiety said:

NWF said:

Talking Heads? Who's Talking Heads? That's a funny name. They probably suck.









brick




falloff
























confuse Oww, that hurt. sad
NEW WAVE FOREVER: SLAVE TO THE WAVE FROM THE CRADLE TO THE GRAVE.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 12/08/04 3:45pm

JANFAN4L

mrdespues said:

GrayKing said:




not to mention phase shift, limited frequency response, noise, distortion, etc


hey man, if that's the issue with your record player, too bad. as for me, analog is always preferable because human beings are analog creatures. digital will never compare. i can handle a few crackles every now and then if it means i get a much richer sound.


I love the sound of certain records when I listen to them on vinyl.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > NON-PRINCE Albums you desperately want remastered