independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Wal-Mart Sued Over Evanescence CD Lyrics
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/10/04 5:07pm

bananacologne

Wal-Mart Sued Over Evanescence CD Lyrics

...Wal-Mart Sued Over Evanescence CD Lyrics

2 hours, 7 minutes ago Top Stories - AP

By DAVID DISHNEAU, Associated Press Writer


HAGERSTOWN, Md. - Wal-Mart Stores Inc., which promotes itself as a seller of clean music, deceived customers by stocking compact discs by the rock group Evanescence that contain the f-word, a lawsuit claims.

The hit group's latest CD and DVD, "Anywhere But Home," don't carry parental advisory labels alerting potential buyers to the obscenity. If they did, Wal-Mart wouldn't carry them, according to the retailer's policy.

But the lawsuit claims Wal-Mart knew about the explicit lyrics in the song, "Thoughtless," because it censored the word in a free sample available on its Web site and in its stores. The complaint, filed Thursday in Washington County Circuit Court, seeks an order requiring Wal-Mart to either censor or remove the music from its Maryland stores. It also seeks damages of up to $74,500 for each of the thousands of people who bought the music at Wal-Marts in Maryland.

"I don't want any other families to get this, expecting it to be clean. It needs to be removed from the shelves to prevent other children from hearing it," said plaintiff Trevin Skeens of Brownsville.

Skeens said he and his wife, Melanie, let their daughter buy the music for her 13th birthday and were shocked when they played it in their car while driving home.

Wal-Mart, of Bentonville, Ark., has no immediate plans to pull the CDs from its shelves, spokesman Guy Whitcomb told The (Hagerstown) Herald-Mail. He said the company will investigate the allegations. No hearing dates have been set.

"While Wal-Mart sets high standards, it would not be possible to eliminate every image, word or topic that an individual might find objectionable," Whitcomb told the newspaper.

He told the Herald-Mail that the song sample online was censored by Walmart.com, a separate division of Wal-Mart.

Whitcomb didn't return telephone calls Friday from The Associated Press.

The lawsuit also names as defendants Wind-up Records LLC, the New York-based company that recorded the music and decided not to apply parental-advisory stickers; and distributor BMG Entertainment, a subsidiary of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, of New York.

Sony BMG declined to comment on the lawsuit. Wind-up didn't return calls from the AP.

The Skeens' lawyer, Jon D. Pels of Bethesda, said he aims to "take this case national, even if that means going state by state."

He dismissed Whitcomb's suggestion that Wal-Mart stores didn't know about the censored version of the song. "They are a multimillion-dollar corporation and they certainly can communicate among their various entities," he said.

Are u fucking kidding me? lol (out of disbelief) $74,500?!? EACH??? eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/10/04 5:28pm

CinisterCee

Don't teach your child the F word, but teach them to clog up the courts with baseless lawsuits demanding damage payments. Which is more corrupting?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/10/04 5:41pm

bananacologne

Exactly, talk about screwed-up. rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/10/04 5:56pm

VoicesCarry

Any retailer carrying an Evanescence CD should be fined harshly!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/10/04 6:05pm

CinisterCee

VoicesCarry said:

Any retailer carrying an Evanescence CD should be fined harshly!


lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/10/04 6:36pm

suzysue

avatar

I like the group. I think she has an amazing voice. It's silly that people would sue Wal-Mart over such a small thing. They should be sueing Brittney Spears and Christina Aguilera for the things they represent - everything gone wrong.
My kitty wants to play...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/10/04 6:53pm

EllisDee

avatar

let's see... i've bought "goats head soup" at wal-mart, and "fuck" is used on that album at least 20 times... "fuck" is on numerous jimmy buffett albums that i've purchased from wal-mart... "fuck" is on prince's "the hits 2" that i bought at wal-mart... confuse... maybe i should jump all over this lawsuit... biggrin
oral Mr. Ellis Dee-licious, the Official NPGigolo pimp2

Candy Dulfer is my boo... razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/10/04 7:13pm

CandaceS

avatar

rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes rolleyes

On the other hand, I don't mind seeing Wallyworld getting kicked in the shins, so for that reason alone I hope the plaintiffs win (not because they actually deserve any compensation!). Scary to think Walmart's one of the biggest music retailers in the country now. omfg
"I would say that Prince's top thirty percent is great. Of that thirty percent, I'll bet the public has heard twenty percent of it." - Susan Rogers, "Hunting for Prince's Vault", BBC, 2015
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/10/04 7:39pm

VinnyM27

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

Any retailer carrying an Evanescence CD should be fined harshly!


lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/10/04 7:40pm

VinnyM27

avatar

bananacologne said:



Are u fucking kidding me? lol (out of disbelief) $74,500?!? EACH??? eek



If people in Maryland were smart, they should buy the CD from there....just in case! Shit, I would take the gamble.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 12/10/04 7:42pm

VinnyM27

avatar

suzysue said:

I like the group. I think she has an amazing voice. It's silly that people would sue Wal-Mart over such a small thing. They should be sueing Brittney Spears and Christina Aguilera for the things they represent - everything gone wrong.


I don't know which lawsuit sounds more absurd. Since I own some Britney albums, does that mean I could get some money out of it? In that case, bring it on!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 12/10/04 7:50pm

VoicesCarry

VinnyM27 said:

suzysue said:

I like the group. I think she has an amazing voice. It's silly that people would sue Wal-Mart over such a small thing. They should be sueing Brittney Spears and Christina Aguilera for the things they represent - everything gone wrong.


I don't know which lawsuit sounds more absurd. Since I own some Britney albums, does that mean I could get some money out of it? In that case, bring it on!


No, you should be fined for owning Britney albums wink Credit through prince.org available. razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 12/10/04 9:50pm

Axchi696

avatar

They won't censor that, but they'll censor this...

"Watch out sister, watch out brother,
Watch our children while they kill each other
With a gun they bought at Wal-mart discount stores"



...Solution?



Don't buy CD's from WalMart ever!!!
I'm the first mammal to wear pants.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 12/11/04 12:56am

LadyQ

CinisterCee said:

Don't teach your child the F word, but teach them to clog up the courts with baseless lawsuits demanding damage payments. Which is more corrupting?



And I hope it backfire on these putzes. I'm tired of people looking for ways to get rich off these silly lawsuits. They're hoping Walmart will settle, but they will have to prove damages via trauma and I'm sure they're gonna look pretty stupid showing this 13 year old girl try to explain that she was tramautised by it in these days. I'm not lover of Walmart, but I really hope they decide to take it to trial, hopefully Walmart can hire Scott Peterson's defense team and they'll tie it up with a bunch of meaningless delays and cost these putzes a lot of money. That'll teach them a lesson.

LQ
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 12/11/04 2:42am

meow85

avatar

I swear, people are getting stupider every day.

That said, Wal-Mart is the devil. demon
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 12/11/04 4:04am

Tom

avatar

WalMart was stupid to begin with for censoring CDs. Now they are on the receiving end of some self-righteous bible thumping wrath...taste of their own medicine...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 12/11/04 4:17am

Christopher

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

Any retailer carrying an Evanescence CD should be fined harshly!


did you see them on the billboard awards? she sounded like a wounded dog on the side of the road! down girl!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 12/11/04 4:55am

smellmyfunk

avatar

Christopher said:

VoicesCarry said:

Any retailer carrying an Evanescence CD should be fined harshly!


did you see them on the billboard awards? she sounded like a wounded dog on the side of the road! down girl!


evillol falloff falloff
Official member of the Paw Power Posse paw

Pawer to the people!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 12/11/04 6:46am

suzysue

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

VinnyM27 said:



I don't know which lawsuit sounds more absurd. Since I own some Britney albums, does that mean I could get some money out of it? In that case, bring it on!


No, you should be fined for owning Britney albums wink Credit through prince.org available. razz




lol. wal-mart should be sued for carrying those two. blackeye
My kitty wants to play...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 12/11/04 8:08am

JonSnow

VoicesCarry said:

Any retailer carrying an Evanescence CD should be fined harshly!



well said biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/11/04 8:28am

vainandy

avatar

If Wal-Mart calls itself having such a damned "clean" image, then why do they carry VHS tapes and DVDs of R-Rated movies with brief nudity and obscene language?

Wal-Mart needs to get a damned life.
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 12/11/04 10:31am

DorothyParkerW
asCool

vainandy said:

If Wal-Mart calls itself having such a damned "clean" image, then why do they carry VHS tapes and DVDs of R-Rated movies with brief nudity and obscene language?

Wal-Mart needs to get a damned life.


Thank You. I have always found that so ignorant and hypocritical. Movies have more explicit forms violence, profanity and sexuality than ANY CD could ever hope to attain. However, this is rarely mentioned when people talk about Wal-Mart's wholesome image.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 12/11/04 11:50am

vainandy

avatar

DorothyParkerWasCool said:

vainandy said:

If Wal-Mart calls itself having such a damned "clean" image, then why do they carry VHS tapes and DVDs of R-Rated movies with brief nudity and obscene language?

Wal-Mart needs to get a damned life.


Thank You. I have always found that so ignorant and hypocritical. Movies have more explicit forms violence, profanity and sexuality than ANY CD could ever hope to attain. However, this is rarely mentioned when people talk about Wal-Mart's wholesome image.


AMEN!
Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 12/11/04 2:46pm

VinnyM27

avatar

meow85 said:

I swear, people are getting stupider every day.

That said, Wal-Mart is the devil. demon


I know....who to rot for? The connie housefraus that have to sue becuase their kind might hear the F-bomb or the evil empire of Wal-Mart!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 12/11/04 3:30pm

subhuman09

vainandy said:

If Wal-Mart calls itself having such a damned "clean" image, then why do they carry VHS tapes and DVDs of R-Rated movies with brief nudity and obscene language?

Wal-Mart needs to get a damned life.


Glad I'm not the only way who feels that way.

If you're going to go to that extreme, you've gotta go across the board.

confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 12/11/04 5:32pm

MrJoker

CinisterCee said:

Don't teach your child the F word, but teach them to clog up the courts with baseless lawsuits demanding damage payments. Which is more corrupting?

clapping
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 12/11/04 5:48pm

CalhounSq

avatar

This is getting rigoddamndiculous neutral
heart prince I never met you, but I LOVE you & I will forever!! Thank you for being YOU - my little Princey, the best to EVER do it prince heart
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 12/12/04 12:09am

meow85

avatar

VinnyM27 said:

meow85 said:

I swear, people are getting stupider every day.

That said, Wal-Mart is the devil. demon


I know....who to rot for? The connie housefraus that have to sue becuase their kind might hear the F-bomb or the evil empire of Wal-Mart!


With any luck they'll both self-destruct! biggrin
"A Watcher scoffs at gravity!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Wal-Mart Sued Over Evanescence CD Lyrics