Is this just the P.I.M.P. or whut?

lip-sync

lovemachine said:

Yeah - I thought it was a shit performance personally.

i've only seen little bits and pieces of it at berlin on P night, but it's more of that crap with him in an NPG jersey and a fedora, isn't it? HATE that look.

bananacologne said:

It was a performance over the backing track of a live performance (that NY single that came out through New Funk back then)...I had a friend who was there at the Chris Rock show, he said it sounded cool....said it was super loud.


Nero

neronava said:

Oh. ok - and that makes it not shit how?

BlaqueKnight said:

I liked the performance!

bananacologne said:

I think its a good performance on the presentation aspect of the song, musically he's playing with a backing track-so whatever....thats no good. But someone said it was "lip synching".
It wasn't. Thats a fact..I don't think it was shit. I'm not into backing tracks, its cheating. But It was entertaining...not shit. douchebag...

Nero

neronava said:

That's why, at several times, he's out of sync with the audio huh ?

If that ain't a lip sync, I'm the pope !


.

freakyfeet said:

Um...Your holiness- I'm not defending lip-sycning, or claiming he wasn't using a backtrack on some parts. I'm just telling you about a close friend who was the Chris Rock show, and he was bummed that they did the song over a backing track (the NYC live version). He said it sounded awkward & loud because they were playing over a track. I'm just telling u what I heard.

Enjoy Rome

Nero

neronava said:

Sad u gotta resort 2 name-calling 2 get your point across - I just merely wanted u 2 address your point succintly.

Pathetic.

lovemachine said:

So, the f*ck, what?? It was an awesome performance. The guy has lip-synched live, what 3 times at the most in career, and most of the time its to make way for the performance..dancing and what-not. I understand why Janet has to do it, ever hear Bobby Brown dance AND sing at the same time?? It sounds like shit.